Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
74
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
74 results for “Software tools”
Artifact: VISON: An Ontology-Based Approach for Software Visualization Tool Discoverability
<p>VISON an ontology that captures the semantics of software visualizations through concepts and relationships. The artifact has been submitted to VISSOFT'19 to support the results reported on our full paper "VISON: An Ontology-Based Approach for Software Visualization Tool Discoverability".</p>
Supplementary Material to SBIE 2024:Achieving Project Management Educational Web-Tool Evolution Using Service-based Software
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
How are software repositories mined? A systematic literature review of workflows, methodologies, reproducibility, and tools
<p>This is the excel spreadsheet dataset containing our analysis of papers performing mining software repositories research from the conferences ICSE, ESEC/FSE, and MSR from the years 2018 - 2020. The data is broken into columns and can be explained at a high-level as follows:</p> <p>Column Content</p> <p>1 The paper being analyzed</p> <p>2 Does the paper state the data they analyzed is available</p> <p>3 Does the paper perform some sort of data analysis or sampling using data others have compiled in the past</p> <p>4 Does the paper state a timestamp for when they begin their work</p> <p>5 Does the paper state the use of systems pre-built to help with MSR work</p> <p>6 - 18 Forms of sampling researchers may have employed to select their data</p> <p>19 What datasets (if any) were used in the analysis</p> <p>20 What tools (if any) were used in the analysis</p> <p>21 How they performed their data sampling workflow</p> <p>22 How they performed their data filtering workflow</p> <p>23 How they performed their data retrieval workflow</p> <p>24 Did they create any scripts in each of these workflows</p> <p>25 - 33 Did they publish a replication package and what is contained within</p> <p>34 Is the paper describing a tool for research or not</p> <p>35 Short description of the paper read</p> <p>36 A high-level category of the work performed in each paper</p>
1. Files containing data from each sample studied and ready to be open in Thellier Tool 4.0 software (Leonardt et al., 2004) for evaluation and determination of archaeointensity and archaeoinclination.
<p>Files containing data from each sample studied and ready to be open in Thellier Tool 4.0 software (Leonardt et al., 2004) for evaluation and determination of archaeointensity and archaeoinclination.</p> <p>Data supporting manuscript entitled “Archaeomagnetic studies of bricks from ancient buildings sampled in SE Poland (Central Europe)” by J. Nawrocki, K. Standzikowski, M. Chadima, T. Werner, M. Łanczont, J. Gancarski, Z. Gil submitted to Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports (JASREP-D-23-00078).</p>
Developers eXperience (DX) in ALM software tools: an investigation on virtual kanban boards
<p>Video de backup da apresentação do artigo "Developers eXperience (DX) in ALM software tools: an investigation on virtual kanban boards" no SBES 2020 - Trilha de Ideias Inovadoras e Resultados Emergentes. </p>
Data from: Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritisation software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools
1. Well-designed marine protected area (MPA) networks can deliver a range of ecological, economic and social benefits, and so a great deal of research has focused on developing spatial conservation prioritization tools to help identify important areas. 2. However, whilst these software tools are designed to identify MPA networks that both represent biodiversity and minimize impacts on stakeholders, they do not consider complex ecological processes. Thus, it is difficult to determine the impacts that proposed MPAs could have on marine ecosystem health, fisheries and fisheries sustainability. 3. Using the eastern English Channel as a case study, this paper explores an approach to address these issues by identifying a series of MPA networks using the Marxan and Marxan with Zones conservation planning software and linking them with a spatially explicit ecosystem model developed in Ecopath with Ecosim. We then use these to investigate potential trade-offs associated with adopting different MPA management strategies. 4. Limited-take MPAs, which restrict the use of some fishing gears, could have positive benefits for conservation and fisheries in the eastern English Channel, even though they generally receive far less attention in research on MPA network design. 5. Our findings, however, also clearly indicate that no-take MPAs should form an integral component of proposed MPA networks in the eastern English Channel, as they not only result in substantial increases in ecosystem biomass, fisheries catches and the biomass of commercially valuable target species, but are fundamental to maintaining the sustainability of the fisheries. 6. Synthesis and applications. Using the existing software tools Marxan with Zones and Ecopath with Ecosim in combination provides a powerful policy-screening approach. This could help inform marine spatial planning by identifying potential conflicts and by designing new regulations that better balance conservation objectives and stakeholder interests. In addition, it highlights that appropriate combinations of no-take and limited-take marine protected areas might be the most effective when making trade-offs between long-term ecological benefits and short-term political acceptability.
Exploring Generative AI Tools for Software Quality: Insights from a Rapid Multivocal Literature Review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Replication package for "Blended Modeling in Commercial and Open-source Model-Driven Software Engineering Tools: A Systematic Study"
<p>Replication package for the paper <em>Blended Modeling in Commercial and Open-source Model-Driven Software Engineering Tools: A Systematic Study</em>.</p> <p>Protocol</p> <ul> <li><code>/01-protocol/protocol.pdf</code></li> </ul> <p>Data & analysis scripts</p> <p>This replication package is structured as follows:</p> <ul> <li><code>/02-search</code> - Detailed data on the <code>/academic</code> and <code>/grey literature</code> search.</li> <li><code>/03-tools</code> - Identified tools and inclusion/exclusion decisions.</li> <li><code>/04-classification_schema</code> - Classification framework and the corresponding data extraction form.</li> <li><code>/05-data</code> - Clean data in a processable form.</li> <li><code>/06-analysis</code> - Analysis scripts and results.</li> </ul>
SECO-RCR: A Tool to Manage Requirements Change in Software Ecosystems
<p>Video de apresentação para a ferramenta SECO-RCR submetido ao SBES Tools 2024.</p>
Software artifacts corresponding to the paper "Pragmatic Random Sampling of the Linux Kernel: Enhancing the Randomness and Correctness of the conf Tool"
<div><strong>Software artifacts corresponding to the paper "Pragmatic Random Sampling of the Linux Kernel: Enhancing the Randomness and Correctness of the conf Tool"</strong></div> <div> </div> <div> <div> <div>This repository is organized in two main folders:</div> <br> <div>1. <strong>randconfig+</strong> includes the source code of our tool randconfig+, which improves the randomness and correctness of the conf tool (a built-in Linux kernel tool for generating random samples of kernel configurations). It has two subfolders:</div> - <strong>source</strong>: includes the source code of randconfig+. <div> - <strong>bin</strong>: includes the compiled version of randconfig+.</div> <br> <div>2. <strong>experimental_validation</strong> includes the experimental validation of randconfig+ reported in the paper.</div> - <strong>systems</strong>: includes the 10 Linux Kernel versions analyzed in the paper. <div> - <strong>scripts_for_sample_generation</strong>: Bash shell scripts to generate the data.</div> <div> - <strong>data</strong>: includes the following data generated by the experimental validation:</div> <div> + Generated samples (subfolder configuration_samples). The samples are available in two formats: CSV and <a href="https://r4ds.hadley.nz/arrow">Apache Arrow</a>.</div> <div> + Entropies and number of distinct values per configuration option.</div> <div> + Data regarding the correctness of the samples and the time spent to generate them (subfolder correctness_and_runtime).</div> <div> - <strong>statistical_analysis</strong>: R scripts to perform the statistical analysis of the data (subfolder statistical_analysis).</div> <div> - <strong>plots</strong>: graphs produced from the data statistical analysis.</div> </div> </div>
Reducing the Allocation of Software Testing Demand: A Study on the Pros and Cons using STELA Tool
<p><strong>Qualitative Research</strong></p> <p>1. How long have you been on the testing team?<br><br>2. How long have you been assigning requests?<br><br>3. Do you encounter difficulties in the manual assignment process?<br><br>4. If yes, which ones?<br><br>5. Do you use automated acceptance with STELA support?<br>6. If not, why?<br><br>7. What main differences do you see between the acceptance and distribution of requests using automated acceptance with STELA support and the manual process?<br><br>8. What advantages do you see in automated acceptance with the support of STELA?<br><br>9. What disadvantages do you see in automated acceptance with STELA support?<br><br>10. How do you feel about using automated acceptance within the STELA tool?<br><br>11. What are the differences between STELA and the system used previously?</p>
The Impact of Generative AI-Powered Code Generation Tools on Software Engineer Hiring: Recruiters' Experiences, Perceptions, and Strategies
<p>This is the dataset for the paper: The Impact of Generative AI-Powered Code Generation Tools on Software Engineer Hiring: Recruiters' Experiences, Perceptions, and Strategies</p> <p> This paper was accepted for publication at the 58th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) - Software Technology Track</p>
Software tools used in ROMI: a quick look into some of the tools used to develop ROMI
<p><strong>The following video describes ROMI's principles and methods for designing with free and open source software and hardware. Funded by EU Grant 773875.</strong></p> <p><em>Videos are available in:</em></p> <ul> <li>Hi-res (1080p Apple ProRes)</li> <li>Mid-res (1080p H265)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Video script:</strong></p> <p>(BARBERAN) ROMI develops open tools for farming communities. But I prefer not to say open tools I prefer to say ‘free’ tools. Free not as in ‘Gratis’, not as in it doesn't have a cost, but as in ‘freedom’ you know because it's not the same. And and I think we all in ROMI project agree that we are more in the side of ‘free’ as in ‘freedom’ than in ‘open’ as in you can see what I do. It's more that I can do this, and you can use it for whatever you want and modify it as you want.<br> <br> Hi, I'm Victor, I'm an industrial designer here at the Fab LaN in Barcelona, and I work mostly work developing hardware and software. So the idea is that using free tools gives you control of what you do, so we try to do all the chain, all the the flow with with open source tools, with free tools. So we use Linux that's a free operative system, that anyone can download and use on their own computers. It's installable in any type of computer in any type of TV, in most watches. Super computers use Linux all over the world on top of Linux we use different tools to do the different tasks. We use ‘Blender’ for example for modelling Blender is a tool that can do a lot of tough animation 3D modelling, 3D sculpting Etc. And here we use it like for a strange thing like designing robots, but it's a really nice tool for even design stuff like this, the cabling then all the mechanical parts etc.<br> <br> Then for doing the in fact the electronic boards we use a ‘kiCAD’ that's a really nice software to design electronic boards we do all the electronic design here and we produce the boards later. We try to keep it in a way that boards can be produced locally but not always easy depending on the type of task that you want to do.<br> <br> We're using ‘Inscape’ like a normal open source and free drawing program that anyone can use. And we replace tools that cost a lot of money, and that you cannot customise to do whatever you want. For a coding we try to also keep using only three tools. So it depends on on it's a personal choice, I use ‘VIM’. We use all the the libraries developed by the Arduino project, that's a free really important free software project. We use platform IO, another set of tools to organise libraries to set up stuff to compile, to upload code to different processors.<br> <br> We use a lot of libraries developed by a lot of people all over the world with different interests. Libraries to control motors, libraries to read sensors, libraries to do whatever kind of things people have faced in their own tasks. The people write the library and share it so we got it, and if we see some problems we improve it, or we change it, and we re-share it again. So people can reuse whatever we are doing you know at the end this kind of projects are public money, and there's one model that's being promoted that is; ‘public money, public code’. You know, so it's a more or less the idea that we try to push.<br> <br> Everything I just showed to you in my computer, you can install it in yours because it's free and you can download all the models and all the code and modify it by yourself to build your own robots, and customise them to your own use. All the process that we do it's important, because at the end there's a lot of knowledge being generated we tested a lot of different motors with a lot of different open source and free controllers, and we document all the process so people can get advantage of that work. Here for example so we we use a remote controller and we try different remote controllers and we test the stability Etc and we document all the tests that we do and how we solve the problem in terms of code in terms of electronics in terms of algorithms etc. In since we are adapting for example we are adapting a mouse sensor to measure the position on top of the cable, then we do a lot of experimentation and if we document that experiment people can get advantage of it. Not of the final product but of the process that we did. Because people learn how to use that Mouse sensors to do different stuff.</p>
Impact of Training on the Use of Software and Digital Monitoring Tools During General Anesthesia for Intermediate/Major-risk Surgery on Morbidity and Mortality at 28 Days
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06111248. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Data from: Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritisation software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis
<p>The dataset contains files used as input for running functional tools, and it also contains the output files generated by them. These output files were then used for data analysis to comparing them.</p>
A Petri net tool for software performance estimation based on upper throughput bounds
<p>Functional and non-functional properties analysis (i.e., dependability, security, or performance) ensures that requirements are fulfilled during the design phase of software systems. However, the Unified Modelling Language (UML), standard <em>de facto</em> in industry for software systems modelling, is unsuitable for any kind of analysis but can be tailored for specific analysis purposes through profiling. For instance, the MARTE profile enables to annotate performance data within UML models that can be later transformed to formal models (e.g., Petri nets or timed automatas) for performance evaluation. A performance (or throughput) estimation in such models normally relies on a whole exploration of the state space, which becomes unfeasible for large systems. To overcome this issue upper throughput bounds are computed, which provide an approximation to the real system throughput with a good complexity-accuracy trade-off. This paper introduces a tool, namedPeabraiN, that estimates the performance of software systems via their UML models. To do so, UML models are transformed to Petri nets where performance is estimated based on upper throughput bounds computation. PeabraiN also allows to compute other features on Petri nets, such as the computation of upper and lower marking place bounds, and to simulate using an approximate (continuous) method. We show the applicability of PeabraiN by evaluating the performance of a building closed circuit TV system.</p>
Supplemental package of a study on the implications of AI-based tools for the human aspects of software engineering
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material 1 from: Magesh S, Jonsson V, Bengtsson-Palme J (2019) Mumame: a software tool for quantifying gene-specific point-mutations in shotgun metagenomic data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 3: e36236. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.36236
Table S1
Supplementary material 2 from: Magesh S, Jonsson V, Bengtsson-Palme J (2019) Mumame: a software tool for quantifying gene-specific point-mutations in shotgun metagenomic data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 3: e36236. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.36236
Figure S1
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.