Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
173
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
173 results for “South Carolina”
Figure 2 in Molecular and morphological characterization of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from Corn (Zea mays) in South Carolina
Figure 2: Photomicrographs of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. males and females. A–B: Anterior end with arrows pointing toward the excretory pore; C: Excretory pore; D: Areolated lateral field; E: Entire female body; F: Female basal bulb; G: Female gonad; H–I: female posterior end with arrow pointing the anal area (H); J: Female vulva region with arrow pointing toward the spermatheca; K: Male spicule.
Figure 5 in Molecular and morphological characterization of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from Corn (Zea mays) in South Carolina
Figure 5: Phylogenetic relationships of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. with other select Tylenchidae, as inferred from an 822 bp alignment of 28S rRNA sequences, according to the GTR + I + G model of nucleotide substitution and incorporated into MrBayes (MB) as described. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was generated with posterior probabilities (PP) shown on appropriate branches, with Bursaphelenchus mucrOnatus as the outgroup. New sequences are indicated in bold.
Figure 1 in Molecular and morphological characterization of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. (Nematoda: Tylenchida) from Corn (Zea mays) in South Carolina
Figure 1: Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images of Tylenchus zeae n. sp. A: Female specimen, anterior end, arrow pointing toward the excretory pore; B: Female specimen, head; C: Female specimen, face view; D: Lateral field (midbody); E: Female specimen, anal opening; F: Female specimen, vulval opening; G: Male specimen, spicule; H: Female specimen, arrow showing the anal opening; I: Female specimen, tail; J: Male specimen, posterior end.
Fig. 5 in Multispecies leatherback turtle assemblage from the Oligocene Chandler Bridge and Ashley formations of South Carolina, USA
Fig. 5. Ossicles of leatherback turtle cf. Psephophorus sp. from Oligocene of South Carolina, USA. CCNHM 5460 (A) and CCNHM 5543 (B), in dorsal A1, B1), visceral (A2, B2), and sutural (A3, B3) views.
Fig. 3 in Multispecies leatherback turtle assemblage from the Oligocene Chandler Bridge and Ashley formations of South Carolina, USA
Fig. 3. Ossicles of leatherback turtle Natemys sp. 2 from Oligocene of South Carolina, USA. CCNHM 4287.1 (A), CCNHM 4287.2 (B), and CCNHM 4910 (C), in dorsal (A1–C1), visceral (A2–C2), and sutural (A3–C3) views. Arrows indicate the fissure on the visceral and sutural surfaces of CCNHM 4287.2, and note the stratified internal structure of CCNHM 4287.1.
Fig. 4 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 4. LC50 values (± 95% confidence interval) for 7 AIs screened against a known-susceptible lab colony and 3 field-collected populations of Tetranychus urticae. When present, the dashed line indicates the amount of AI in the maximum labelled field rate. This value also is indicated in each graph by "FR=". The resistance ratio of each AI × population is written above each data point.
Fig. 1 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 1. Mean (± SE) spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) counts per tomato leaflet in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant. The dotted line represents the action threshold for spider mites in tomato (2 per leaflet).
Fig. 2 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) cumulative mite d of Tetranychus urticae in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant.
Fig. 2 in Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology
Fig. 2. Right canine tusk of odobenid walrus Ontocetus emmonsi (CCNHM 1144) from the Lower Pleistocene?Waccamaw Formation, Austin Sand Pit, South Carolina, in lingual (A), proximal (B), anterior (C), and labial (D) views.
Fig. 1. A in Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology
Fig. 1. A. Map showing the location of South Carolina and Austin Sand Pit near Ridgeville in Dorchester County (asterisked). B. Generalized stratigraphic column of the Austin Sand Pit with biostratigraphically significant vertebrate fossils from the?Waccamaw Formation (C, D). Colors approximate sediments exposed in the Austin Sand Pit.
Fig. 3 in Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology
Fig. 3. Scatterplot of ratio of proximal transverse width/anteroposterior length versus radius of the arc of curvature for tusks of Odobenus and Ontocetus, including CCNHM 1144. Original plot modified from Kohno and Ray (2008: fig. 27).
Fig. 8. Stingrays from Summerville, upper Chattian. A in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 8. Stingrays from Summerville, upper Chattian. A. Dasyatis cavernosa (Probst,1877), BCGM 9097, occlusal (A1) and labial (A2) view. B. D. cf. cavernosa, BCGM 9103, male tooth, occlusal (B1) and labial (B2) view. C. D. rugosa (Probst, 1877), BCGM 9099, occlusal (C1) and labial (C2) view. D. Dasyatidae gen. et. sp. indet., BCGM 9101, occlusal (D1), labial (D2), and lateral (D3) view. E. BCGM 9106, Dasyatis sp. denticle, lateral−oblique view.
Fig. 7. Skates from Summerville, upper Chattian. A, B in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 7. Skates from Summerville, upper Chattian. A, B, Raja sp. A. BCGM 9088, male anterior tooth, occlusal (A1), lateral (A2), and lingual (A3) view. B. BCGM 9089, female lateral tooth, labial (B1) and lateral (B2) view. C, D, Raja mccollumi sp. nov. C. BCGM 9093 (holotype), male anterior tooth, occlusal (C1), lateral (C2), labial (C3), and lingual (C4) view. D. BCGM 9199 (paratype), male lateral tooth, basal (D1), lateral (D2), lingual (D3) view. E. BCGM 9095, Raja sp. denticle, lateral−oblique view. F–H, R. mccollumi sp. nov. F. BCGM 9200 (paratype), female anterior tooth, occlusal (F1), labial (F2), and lingual (F3) view. G. BCGM 9201 (paratype), female lateral tooth, labial (G1) and lingual (G2) view. H. BCGM 9202 (paratype), female posterior tooth, occlusal (H1), labial (H2), lingual (H3) view.
Fig. 3. Shark remains from Summerville, upper Chattian. A in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 3. Shark remains from Summerville, upper Chattian. A. Squatina cf. S. angeloides van Beneden, 1873, BCGM 9043, antero−lateral tooth, labial view. B. Nebrius cf. N. serra (Leidy, 1877), SC2009.18.1, antero−lateral tooth, labial view. C. Rhincodon cf. R. typus (Smith, 1828), BCGM 9045, anterior tooth, labial (C1), lateral (C2), and basal (C3) view. D.?Cetorhinus parvus (Leriche, 1908), BCGM 9050, dermal scale, dorsal view, anterior at bottom.
Fig. 2 in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 2. Stratigraphy of the Chandler Bridge Formation showing facies designations of Katuna et al. (1997) and their correlative units (Beds 1–3) as discussed by Sanders and Weems (1986). Marine/marginal marine facies constitute a coarsening upward sequence from poorly sorted, sandy to silty clay to moderately sorted silty, very fine sand, whereas the bay/estuarine facies is poorly sorted silty to clayey fine quartz sand with occasional phosphate pebbles, and fluvial/estuarine facies consists of poorly sorted, clayey, fine sand with abundant phosphate pebbles.
Fig. 5. Carcharhiniform sharks from Summerville, upper Chattian. A–D in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 5. Carcharhiniform sharks from Summerville, upper Chattian. A–D. Carharhinus gibbesi (Woodward, 1889). A. BCGM 9059, juvenile upper anterior tooth, labial view. B. BCGM 9060, adult upper anterior tooth, labial view. C. BCGM 9061, juvenile upper lateral tooth, labial view. D. BCGM 9058, adult lower anterior tooth, labial view. E, F. Physogaleus aduncus (Agassiz, 1835). E. BCGM 9064, upper lateral tooth, labial view. F. BCGM 9066, lower anterior tooth, labial view. G. Physogaleus sp., BCGM 9068, antero−lateral tooth, labial view. H. Rhizoprionodon sp., BCGM 9070, labial view. I, J. Hemipristis serra (Agassiz, 1835). I. BCGM 9073, adult upper lateral tooth, labial view. J. BCGM 9072, juvenile upper lateral tooth, labial view. K. Sphyrna cf. S. media Springer, 1940, BCGM 9077, lateral tooth, labial view. L. Sphyrna zygaena (Linneaus, 1758), BCGM 9079, lateral tooth, lingual view. M. Bythaelurus sp., BCGM 9074, labial view. N–P. Galeorhinus sp. N. BCGM 9081, parasymphyseal tooth, labial view. O. BCGM 9082, antero−lateral tooth, labial view. P. BCGM 9083, lateral tooth, labial view.
Fig. 6. Batoids from Summerville, upper Chattian. A in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 6. Batoids from Summerville, upper Chattian. A. Rhynchobatus pristinus (Probst, 1877), BCGM 9085, occlusal view. B, C. Myliobatinae gen. indet. B. BCGM 9117, lateral tooth, occlusal view. C. BCGM 9116, partial medial tooth, occlusal (C1) and lingual (C2) view. D. Paramobula fragilis (Cappetta, 1970), BCGM 9113, anterolateral tooth, occlusal (D1), labial (D2), and lateral (D3) view. E, F. Plinthicus stenodon Cope, 1869. E. BCGM 9120, partial anterior tooth, lateral (E1) and lingual (E2) view. F. BCGM 9121, lateral tooth, lateral (F1) and labial (F2) view. G. Rhinoptera cf. R. studeri (Agassiz, 1843), BCGM 9123, occlusal (G1) and lingual (G2) view. H. Gymnura sp., BCGM 9107, lateral (H1) and labial (H2) view.
Fig. 4. Lamniform sharks from Summerville, upper Chattian. A, B in Late Oligocene sharks and rays from the Chandler Bridge Formation, Dorchester County, South Carolina, USA
Fig. 4. Lamniform sharks from Summerville, upper Chattian. A, B. Alopias cf. A. vulpinus (Bonnaterre, 1788). A. BCGM 9047, anterior tooth, labial view. B. BCGM 9048, lateral tooth, labial view. C. Carcharias sp., BCGM 9054, labial view. D. Carcharias cuspidatus (Agassiz, 1843), BCGM 9052, lower lateral tooth, labial view. E. Carcharocles sp., BCGM 9055, labial view.
Figure 11 in Early Oligocene (Rupelian) fishes (Chondrichthyes, Osteichthyes) from the Ashley Formation (Cooper Group) of South Carolina, USA
Figure 11. Teleost teeth from the Givhans Ferry Member, Ashley Formation (Rupelian), Dorchester County, South Carolina. A, B.?Sciaenops sp. tooth, SC2007.36.200.1 in profile (A) and basal (B) views. C, D.?Sciaenops sp. tooth, SC2007.36.200.2 in profile (C) and basal (D) views. E–G.?Pogonias sp. tooth, SC2007.36.196 in occlusal (E), profile (F), and basal (G) views. H–J.?Calamus sp. tooth, SC2007.36.198 in occlusal (H), profile (I), and basal (J) views. K–M. Archosargus sp. molariform tooth, SC2007.36.197 in occlusal (K), profile (L), and basal (M) views. N–Q. Archosargus sp. incisiform tooth, SC2007.36.200 in profile (N), lingual (O), labial (P), and basal (Q) views. R–U. Archosargus sp. incisiform tooth, SC2015.29.219 in profile (R), lingual (S), labial (T), and basal (U) views. V, W. Archosargus sp. pharyngeal tooth, SC2007.36.192 in profile (V) and anterior (W) views. X, Y. Archosargus sp. pharyngeal tooth, SC2007.36.193 in profile (X) and anterior (Y) views. Z, AA. Diplodus sp. tooth, SC2015.29.222 in lingual (Z) and posterior (AA) views. BB‒CC. Diplodus sp. tooth, SC2015.29.224 in lingual (BB) and posterior (CC) views. Scale bar=0.5 mm in V, W; 1 mm in A–U, X–CC.
Figure 8 in Early Oligocene (Rupelian) fishes (Chondrichthyes, Osteichthyes) from the Ashley Formation (Cooper Group) of South Carolina, USA
Figure 8. Batoid teeth from the Givhans Ferry Member, Ashley Formation (Rupelian), Dorchester County, South Carolina. A, B. "Rhinoptera" sp. tooth, SC2015.29.30 in occlusal (A) and lingual (B) views. C, D. "Mobula" sp. male tooth, SC2007.36.40 in apical (C) and occlusal (D) views. E, F. "Mobula" sp. male tooth, SC2007.36.42 in apical (E) and occlusal (F) views. G, H. "Mobula" sp. female tooth, SC2007.36.43 in occlusal (G) and labial (H) views. I–K. Plinthicus sp. tooth, SC2007.36.48 in occlusal (I), lingual (J), and profile (K) views. Scale bar=1 mm in C–H; 5 mm in A, B, I–K.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.