Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,209
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
2,209 results for “Systematic Review”
Minimal dataset for "Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus"
<p>This text file contains the minimal dataset necessary to reproduce the results and analyses in the paper: Cardon E et al., "Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus". Plos One;2020.</p>
Materials for "Poor nutritional condition promotes high-risk behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis"
<p>This contains a permanent record of dataset and analysis code for the study:</p> <p>Moran, N. P., Sánchez‐Tójar, A., Schielzeth, H., & Reinhold, K. (2021). Poor nutritional condition promotes high‐risk behaviours: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. <em>Biological Reviews</em>, <em>96</em>(1), 269-288.</p> <p>Full data analysis records are available on https://osf.io/3tphj/</p> <p>This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 836937. Also, this research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the SFB TRR 212 (NC³) – Project numbers 316099922 and 396782608.</p>
Identification of biomarkers for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>We sought to identify the best biomarkers for the early diagnosis of LC, using a systematic review of seven databases. We identified 79 articles that focused on the identification and assessment of diagnostic biomarkers and then performed a meta-analysis. This work has been submitted for publication.</p>
Dataset for Machine Learning Assisted Citation Screening for Systematic Reviews
<p>The work "Machine Learning Assisted Citation Screening for Systematic Reviews" explored the problem of citation screening automation using machine-learning (ML) with an aim to accelerate the process of generating <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review#:~:text=Systematic%20reviews%20are%20a%20type,synthesize%20findings%20qualitatively%20or%20quantitatively." rel="nofollow">systematic reviews</a>. Manual process of citation screening involve two reviewers manually screening the searched studies using a predefined inclusion criteria. If the study passes the "inclusion" criteria, it is included for further analysis or is excluded. As apparant through manual screening process, the work considered citation screening as a binary classification problem whereby any ML classifier could be trained to separate the searched studies into these two classes (include and exclude).</p> <p> </p> <p>A physiotherapy citation screening dataset was used to test automation approaches and the dataset includes the studies identified for citation screening in an update to the systematic review by Hilfiker <em>et al.</em> The dataset included titles and abstracts (citations) from 31,279 (deduplicated: 25,540) studies identified during the search phase of this SR. These studies were already manually assessed for relevance and labelled by two reviewers into two mutually exclusive labels. The uploaded file consists of 25,540 data samples, with each data sample separated by a new line. It is a tab separated file and the data in it is structured as shown below. This dataset was manually labelled into include and exclude by Hilfiker <em>et al.</em></p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Title</strong></td> <td><strong>PMID</strong></td> <td><strong>Abstract </strong></td> <td><strong>Class</strong></td> <td><strong>MeSH terms (separated by a pipe)</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Structured exercise improves physical functioning in women with stages I and II breast cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. </td> <td>11157015</td> <td>Abstract PURPOSE: Self-directed and supervised exercise were compared with usual care in a clinical trial designed to evaluate the effect of structured exercise on physical functioning and other dimensions of health-related quality of life in women with stages I and II breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three women with stages I and II breast cancer completed baseline evaluations of generic and disease- and site-specific health-related quality of life, aerobic capacity, and body weight. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three intervention groups: usual care (control group), self-directed exercise, or supervised exercise. Quality of life, aerobic capacity, and body weight measures were repeated at 26 weeks...</td> <td>include or exclude</td> <td>Clinical Trial | Comparative Study | Randomized Controlled Trial | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | Breast Neoplasms | Breast Neoplasms | Breast Neoplasms | Chemotherapy, Adjuvant | Exercise | Female | Humans | Middle Aged | Neoplasm Staging | Quality of Life | Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p>If you use this dataset in your research, please cite our papers.</p>
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness-Based (Baduanjin) Exercise for the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
<p><span>A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness-Based (Baduanjin) Exercise for the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients</span></p>
Data inputs and results from AI-supported title and abstract screening "Lack of evidence regarding markers identifying acute heart failure in patients with COPD: an AI-supported systematic review"
<p>These comma-separated data files were used to conduct the AI supported screening of [Lack of Evidence Regarding Markers Identifying Acute Heart Failure in Patients with COPD: An AI-supported Systematic Review (working title)], following the methodology described in the publication (URL/doi to be uploaded).</p> <p>These files provide insight into the AI-supported screening process and the choices made by the human reviewer.</p>
Bibliographic Dataset for the Systematic Literature Review on Industry 5.0 Concepts and Enabling Technologies, Towards an Enhanced Conservation Practice
<p>This database contains all the bibliographic information found after applying the Search Strategy used for the Industry 5.0 Concepts and Enabling Technologies, Towards an Enhanced Conservation Practice: Systematic Literature Review. The following electronic databases were searched:</p> <ul> <li>Scopus.</li> </ul> <p>A total of 907 records were found. The search was conducted on 16/02/2024.</p> <p>The information is presented in .ris, .bib, and .csv format.</p>
Clinical evidence for high-risk CE-marked medical devices for glucose management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
<p><strong><span>Aims: </span></strong><span>High-risk medical devices are increasingly used in diabetes management, but<span><span> there are no specific European recommendations on how they should be evaluated. Within</span></span> the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices (CORE-MD) project, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating CE-marked high-risk devices for glucose management. </span></p> <p><strong><span>Materials and Methods: </span></strong><span>We<span> identified interventional and observational studies evaluating the </span>efficacy and safety of 8 automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, 2 implantable insulin pumps, and 3 implantable continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices.<span> </span></span><span>We meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID systems with other treatments.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Results:</span></strong><span> 99 studies published from 2009–2022 were included, comprising 83 on AID systems, 6 on insulin pumps, and 10 on CGM; 43% reported industry funding;30% were pre-market; 45% had a comparator group. 33% were RCTs, 25% non-randomized trials, and 41% observational studies. Median sample size was 52 (interquartile range 25–111), age 37.8 years (17–45.5), and study duration 13 weeks (4.5–26). AID systems lowered HbA1c by 0.3 percentage points (absolute mean difference [MD]=-0.3; 9 RCTs; I<sup>2</sup>=85%) and increased time in target range for sensor glucose level by 10.5 percentage points (MD=10.5; 14 RCTs; I<sup>2</sup>=89%). 69% of studies reported on at least one safety outcome.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Conclusions:</span></strong><span> High-risk devices for glucose monitoring or insulin dosing, in particular AID systems, improve glucose control safely but evidence on diabetes-related end organ damage is lacking due to short study durations. Methodological heterogeneity highlights the need for d<span><span>eveloping standards for future pre- and post-market investigations of diabetes-specific high-risk medical devices.</span></span></span></p>
Systematic review data on the role of urban planning in the context of sustainability transformations and human-nature connections
<p>This data publication belongs to the following research paper:<br>Harms, P., Hofer, M. & Artmann, M. Planning cities with nature for sustainability transformations — a systematic review. Urban Transform 6, 9 (2024). <br>https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-024-00066-2 </p> <p>We conducted a systematic literature review according to the PRISMA Statement 2020 (Page et al. 2021). The list shows the steps performed and the names of the corresponding datasets available here:</p> <p>Step A - Identification of Records<br>A_01_PRISMA-protocoll.pdf<br>A_02_searchstring.txt<br>A_03_recordsidentified.ris</p> <p>Step B - Screening of Records<br>B_01_recordsscreened-title-keywords.ris<br>B_02_recordsscreened-abstract.ris<br>B_03_recordsscreened-fulltext.ris<br>B_04_studiesincluded.ris<br>B_05_screeningdecisions-overview.xlsx</p> <p>Step C - Qualitative Analysis<br>C_01_codingscheme.xlsx</p> <p> </p>
Reproduction package for paper "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review"
<p>Checklist and data extracted from publications analyzed for "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review" paper, together with processing scripts and calculations of Cohen's Kappa.</p> <p>Paper that describes details of the data is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106783</p>
Mixed methods systematic review and metasummary about barriers and facilitators for the implementation of cotrimoxazole and isoniazid - preventive therapies for people living with HIV.
<p>This is the minimal data set underlying the findings of our systematic review and metasummary:</p> <p>We uploaded the following data extracted from the studies included in our review:</p> <p>- Systematic Review protocol, also published in PROSPERO (CRD42019137778).</p> <p>- detailed description of studies included in our review.</p> <p>- barriers identified in the review (metasummary).</p> <p>- facilitators identified in the review.</p>
Data used to create figures and tables in the ACP manuscript "Two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of impacts of aerosol feedbacks on meteorology and air quality" by Gao et al. (2022)
<p>This dataset contains the original data that extracted from all collected papers refering applications of two-way coupled models in Asia. It is supplied to the review paper, which titled as "Review on two-way coupled meteorology and air quality models in Asia: impacts of aerosol feedbacks on meteorology and air quality". The dataset includes three excel files (in the format of xlsx) as follows:</p> <p>1. Basic information of literatures (Table S1.xlsx)</p> <p>2. Model performance metrics (Table S2.xlsx)</p> <p>3. Quantitative results of aerosol effects on meteorological and air quality variables (Table S3.xlsx)</p> <p>4. Basic information of model setup for two-way coupled model applications in Asia (Table S4.xlsx)</p> <p>5. Summary of aerosol-induced variations of simulated shortwave and longwave radiative forcing at the bottom and top of atmosphere and in the atmosphere in Asia (Table S5.xlsx)</p> <p>.</p>
Supplemental Material for a Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches
<p>Bug benchmarks are used in development and evaluation of debugging approaches. Quantitative performance comparison of different debugging approaches is only possible when they have been evaluated on the same dataset or benchmark. However, benchmarks are often specialized towards usage for certain debugging approaches in their contained data, metrics, and artifacts. Such benchmarks can not be easily used on debugging approaches outside their scope as such approach may rely on specific data such as bug reports or code metrics not included in the dataset. Furthermore, benchmarks vary in their size w.r.t. the number of subject programs and the size of the individual subject programs. For these reasons, we have performed a systematic literature review where we have identified 73 benchmarks that can be used to evaluate debugging approaches.</p> <p>We compare the different benchmarks with respect to their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics. Furthermore, we have investigated how well the benchmarks realize the <a href="https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/">FAIR guiding principles</a>. This comparison is intended to help researchers to quickly identify all suitable benchmarks for evaluating their specific debugging approaches. More information can be found in the publication:</p> <blockquote> <p>Thomas Hirsch and Birgit Hofer: "A Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches", Journal of Systems and Software, in press, 2022.</p> </blockquote>
Variation in Detected Adverse Events using Trigger Tools: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
<p>Raw data sets for the meta-analysis.</p> <p>Data collection file with all the information extracted from the included studies.</p> <p>QAT file with the information from the quality assessment tool (QAT) for all included studies.</p> <p>ReadMe with information on data sets and updates.</p> <p>Codebooks for both data sets.</p>
A Systematic Review on Techniques and Approaches to Estimate Mobile Software Energy Consumption (SUSCOM Dataset)
<p>Dataset and replication data for the systematic review entitled "A Systematic Review on Techniques and Approaches \\to Estimate Mobile Software Energy Consumption".</p>
GERDAT011 Literature search for publication - Geriatric assessment in the management of older patients with cancer – a systematic review (update).xlsx
<p>Search data belonging to the publication Geriatric assessment in the management of older patients with cancer – a systematic review (update)</p>
University dropout: A systematic review of the main determinant factors
<p><strong><span>Introduction:</span></strong><span> This research is a systematic review aimed at synthesizing scientific evidence on the causes of university dropout, focusing on the subcategories of vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects between 2020 and June 2024. <strong>Methods:</strong> Only articles addressing university dropout were considered, analyzing dimensions such as vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects. Articles published in indexed scientific journals with double-blind, double-blind peer, or open reviews between 2020 and June 2024 were included. The main databases used were Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. To assess the risk of bias in qualitative studies, the criteria from the article "Validity criteria for qualitative research: three epistemological strands for the same purpose" were used. For quantitative studies, the criteria from the article "Evaluating survey research in articles published in Library Science journals" were followed. For mixed-method studies, both sets of criteria were combined. <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 23 studies were included: 15 quantitative (65.22%), 3 qualitative (13.04%), and 5 mixed-method (21.74%). All studies (100%) addressed the subcategories of socioeconomic status and institutional aspects. Regarding the academic performance subcategory, 86% of the studies addressed it, while the vocational guidance subcategory was covered by 73.91% of the studies. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Vocational guidance, academic performance, socioeconomic status, and institutional aspects are crucial for reducing university dropout. Providing adequate professional guidance, academic support, financial assistance, and strong institutional support is fundamental to improving student retention and academic success.</span></p>
Data archive for Pepper, Bateson and Nettle, 'Telomeres as integrative markers of exposure to stress and adversity: A systematic review and meta-analysis'
<p>Data archive for the paper 'Telomeres as integrative markers of exposure to stress and adversity: A systematic review and meta-analysis' by Gillian Pepper, Melissa Bateson and Daniel Nettle. This version was uploaded in July 2018 after peer-review in the journal Royal Society Open Science. Compared to earlier version, it incorporates some minor error correction to the dataset, and reflects the revised analyses we performed after peer review. </p> <p>Our protocol and recording guide, which were preregistered on the Open Science Framework in 2016, are also included here, as is our PRISMA diagram.</p> <p>The data file 'unprocessed data' contains the data as extracted from the literature, with associations shown both as provided in the original papers, and converted to correlation coefficients. The algorithms for converting all the different associations to correlation coefficients are described in the flowchart and implemented in the R script 'effect conversion algorithms.r'.</p> <p>The data file 'processed data.csv' is the dataset analysed in the paper. Compared to 'unprocessed data.csv', it excludes: associations from studies of non-human animals; duplicate associations; a small number of associations from studies of medical treatments; and associations considered subparts or subscales of other associations. These exclusions are outlined in Methods section of the paper. In addition, in the processed data file, all correlations are aligned in direction so as to make them comparable (variable 'ValencedEffect'); and all associations are assigned to broad and fine categories.The script 'unprocessed to processed.r' makes the processed data file from the unprocessed one, or you can simply work from the processed one directly. </p> <p>The R script 'telomere metanalysis script RSOS REVISED.r' reproduces the analyses found in the paper.</p> <p>This version of the archive (July 17 2018) contains one small correction in the data files compared to all earlier versions. </p>
Unpacking the concept of "educators' data literacy in Higher Education" - Systematic Review of the literature and Keyword Map
<p>As algorithmic decision-making and data collection become pervasive within higher education, how can educators make sense of the systems that shape life and learning in the 21st century? Through a systematic review of the literature, the paper investigates the gaps in the literature, which prevent the formulation of potential pathways and principles on which educators’ data literacy can - and should - be developed and fostered. The analysis of 137 papers through the methods of classification under relevant categories, and key words mapping, showed that there is little attention on HE teachers, and most approaches to educators’ data literacy address management and technical abilities for data processing, with less concern on critical, ethical and personal approaches to datafication in education.</p> <p>The present dataset shows the full list of articles analysed.</p> <p>The dataset, and ods file, is composed by the following sheets:</p> <ol> <li>Codebook</li> <li>List of articles extracted from SCOPUS</li> <li>List of articles extracted from WOS</li> <li>List of articles extracted from ERIC</li> <li>List of articles extracted from DOAJ</li> <li>Interrater Agreement</li> <li>PRISMA workflow</li> <li>Analysis - First Level (classification of 137 articles selected)</li> <li>Analysis - Second Level (List of articles relating faculty development)</li> <li>Supplementary tables (counting articles in relation to the categories of analysis).</li> </ol> <p>As for the Keywords' Map, a second file .csv displays the text over which basis was performed the keyword maps analysis. A .txt file shows notes relating the analysis procedures using the software VOS-Viewer <a href="http://www.vosviewer.com/">http://www.vosviewer.com/</a></p> <p> </p>
[Dataset] Software Process Line as an Approach to Support Software Process Reuse: a Systematic Literature Review
<p>Dataset of a Systematic Literature Review on Software Process Line as an Approach to Support Software Process Reuse</p> <p>Please, read README.txt file before go through dataset.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.