Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,209
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
2,209 results for “Systematic Review”
MiRoR15-P1-Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
<p>Database, data extraction form, R codes and protocol related to: Superchi C, González JA, Solà I, Cobo E, Hren D, Boutron I. <em>Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review</em>. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(48):1–14. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x</a></p> <p> </p>
Dataset related to the manuscript: "An open-source integrated framework for the automation of citation collection and screening in systematic reviews"
<p>Dataset related to the manuscript: “An open-source integrated framework for the automation of citation collection and screening in systematic reviews”, to be used together with the code stored at https://github.com/AD-Papers-Material/BART_SystReviewClassifier to reproduce the results.</p> <p>There are three datasets:<br> - The Record data collected from the online scientific databases;<br> - The session journal which describes the search session, i.e., how many records were collected and from which source, for each query/session pairs.<br> - The session data which is the outcome of the classification and review tasks;</p>
MiRoR2 - P1 - Shortcomings in the evaluation of biomarkers in ovarian cancer: a systematic review
<p>Data set for the study “Shortcomings in the evaluation of biomarkers in ovarian cancer: a systematic review”, including search strategy, extraction form, extracted data with summary of results, and protocol</p>
Supplementary data for the article: Future environmental impacts of metals: a systematic review of impact trends, modelling approaches, and challenges
<p>This repository provides the supplementary data to the paper titled <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107572" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>"Future environmental impacts of metals: a systematic review of impact trends, modelling approaches, and challenges"</em></a>, published 2024 in <em>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</em>.</p> <h4><strong>Contents</strong></h4> <p>The repository is split in 3 parts and comprises the following files (more details are provided in the <em>README.md</em>):</p> <p><strong>A_Database of reviewed studies:</strong></p> <ul> <li>contains the detailed review data, meant for readers to use as an overview file to gather studies relevant to them. It also includes an overview of all data sources that the reviewed studies used.</li> </ul> <p><strong>B_Scientific supplement to paper:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Contains all data relevant to the related publication Harpprecht et al. (2024), such as studies screened , FAIR data analysis, or analyzed impact trends.</li> </ul> <p><strong>C_Data for figures in paper:</strong></p> <ul> <li>This file contains all the data for Figures 3, 4 and 5 in tabular form, representing impact trends, scenario variables, scenario modelling approaches and data sources used.</li> </ul> <h4><strong>Summary</strong></h4> <p>These files allow to reproduce the results of our study. In this work, we systematically reviewed studies which assessed future environmental impacts of metal supply chains. Our review yielded 40 publications covering 15 metals: copper, iron, aluminium, nickel, zinc, lead, cobalt, lithium, gold, manganese, neodymium, dysprosium, praseodymium, terbium, and titanium. We evaluated their results regarding future impact trends, and their methods, i.e., modelling approaches, scenario variables, and data sources of scenario variables. We identified 15 scenario variables. The most common variables are background electricity mix, ore grade, recycling shares, demand, and energy efficiency. We identified 229 unique data sources for the reviewed scenario variables.</p> <h4><strong>Related publication</strong></h4> <p>More details on the data and its interpretation as well as the scientific context are provided in the publication itself:</p> <p><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107572" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Harpprecht, C., Miranda Xicotencatl, B., van Nielen, S., van der Meide, M., Li, C. , Li, Z., Tukker, A., Steubing, B. (2024). <em>Future environmental impacts of metals: a systematic review of impact trends, modelling approaches, and challenges.</em> Resources, Conservation and Recycling.</a></p> <h4><strong>Funding </strong></h4> <p>Carina Harpprecht received funding from the Energy Program of the German Aerospace Center in 2022. Zhijie Li received funding from the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) under the project Valomag (Project No. 14049).</p> <h4><strong>License</strong></h4> <p>CC-BY 4.0 license for DLR (German Aerospace Center)</p>
Dataset for: A systematic literature review on user factors to support the sense of presence
<p>This dataset was created for a publication of Wiepke, Axel and Heinemann, Birte called "A systematic literature review on user factors to support the sense of presence". In this paper we used the PRISMA-method to collect Papers via Google Scholar on the third of April 2023 with the search term:<br>(framework OR model OR frameworks OR models OR processes OR ontologies) AND ((“personality traits” OR “personality variables” OR “personality factors”) AND “spatial presence”) AND (“virtual reality”) AND (learn OR edu\*)</p> <p>The results were pictured in "agreed" findings, where more than 50% of found studies supported a category of results and in "controversial", where there were significant findings, but less than 50% of the studies reported significance.</p> <p>This dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>raw data for our literature review in .bib</li> <li>our main findings with categories in .csv</li> <li>a short Jupyter notebook script for one graphic in ipynb</li> <li>other graphics as .png</li> </ul>
Systematic Literature Review on Tourism Marketing in the Metaverse
<p>The aim of this research is to investigate tourist marketing within the embryonic context of the metaverse in order to comprehend the building blocks and the primary technologies employed in the sector. For this purpose, a systematic literature review is conducted. The references are extracted in January 2023. The data in this document correspond to the articles finally included in the systematic literature review after the article screening phase.</p> <p>Keywords: tourism marketing, metaverse, technologies, building blocks, SLR (Systematic Literature Review), PRISMA</p> <p> </p>
New Challenges in Point Cloud Visual Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review (Dataset)
<p>This dataset is a collection of annotated information on the scientific papers screened and analyzed for the systematic review of the literature in Point Cloud Visual Quality Assessment. </p> <p>The data is structured as follows:</p> <ul> <li>General information <ul> <li>Document title</li> <li>Authors</li> <li>Year of publication</li> <li>Venue (Conference or Journal title)</li> <li>Citations (number)</li> <li>URL/DOI</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>About the content <br> <ul> <li>Content Type: Point clouds (PC), Colored Point clouds (CPC), Meshes, Dynamic Point Clouds (DPC)</li> <li>Content source: Source of the content used in a subjective QA test or the evaluation of one or more QA metrics</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>About metric benchmarks <ul> <li>Subjective Ground-truth Data: Dataset(s) Source of the subjective scores used as ground-truth in a QA metric benchmark</li> <li>Assessed Metrics: Types of metrics assessed in a benchmark (JPEG standards, IQM, NR, State-of-the-art, others)</li> <li>Performance Measures: PLCC, SROCC, KRCC, RMSE, OR, others</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>About Objective QA metrics <ul> <li>Metric: Name given to the metric introduced in this paper</li> <li>Base: 3D-based or Projection-based</li> <li>Categories: Categories that characterize the approach of the proposed metric (Feature-based, Learning-Based, Perceptual-based, IQM, others) </li> <li>Reference: Full-Reference (FR), Reduced-Reference (RR) or No-Reference (NR)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>About Subjective QA experiments <ul> <li>Display: Type of display (2D, 3D, AR, MR, VR) and interaction approach (passive, interactive, 3DoF, 6DoF) used in the described experiment.</li> <li>Rendering: Type of rendering used to display the stimuli (Points, Squares, Cubes, Surface)</li> <li>Lab/Remote: The experiment was run in one or more lab environments, or remotely (Lab, Cross-Lab, Remote)</li> <li>Rating: Subjective rating methodology used in the experiment (ACR, DSIS, PWC, others)</li> <li>Dataset: Name of the new subjective dataset if the experiment's results were published.</li> <li>Observers: Number of observers </li> <li>Distortion type: Types of distortions applied to the stimuli and assessed in the experiment</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Automated Literature Screening for Systematic Reviews: Dataset for Evaluation Against Human Title and Abstract and Full-Text Screening Decisions
<p>This Zenodo entry contains the supplementary material associated with the manuscript titled <em>Automated Literature Screening for Systematic Reviews: A 5-Tier Prompting Approach Meeting Cochrane’s Sensitivity Requirement of Greater Than 0.99.</em> The paper will be presented at <a href="https://dbis.rwth-aachen.de/LLMs4MI2024/">LLMsMI 2024</a> in November 2024.</p> <p>A script is provided for replicating the executed experiments, along with a comprehensive evaluation file that reports all the experiment results. Provided data files represent an extension to the original datasets as provided by [1]. For associated systematic review manuscripts and eligibility criteria, please refer to [1] as well. </p> <p>[1] Guo, Eddie; Gupta, Mehul; Deng, Jiawen; Park, Ye-Jean; Paget, Mike; Naugler, Christopher (2023). "Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models." <em>Mendeley Data</em>, V1, doi: 10.17632/np79tmhkh5.1. Accessed from: <a href="https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/np79tmhkh5/1" target="_new" rel="noopener">https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/np79tmhkh5/1</a>.</p>
Cancer screening attendance rates in transgender and gender-diverse patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>Supplementary Data to support the findings of a systematic review investigating cancer screening rates in transgender and gender-diverse individuals.</p>
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous vs. sublingual immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>Allergic rhinitis significantly impacts patients' quality of life, and allergen immunotherapy (AIT) offers an alternative to conventional treatments. This study compares the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov identified nine randomized controlled trials involving 780 patients (427 SCIT, 353 SLIT). The primary outcome was symptom score; secondary outcomes included medication score, symptom medication score, and local and systemic reactions. Results showed SCIT significantly reduced symptom scores compared to SLIT (Pooled SMD: -0.52, 95% CI: -0.60, -0.03, I2 =83%, P<0.05). However, SCIT patients experienced more severe systemic reactions (grade 3&4) than SLIT patients (Pooled SMD: 6.27, 95% CI: 1.47, 26.73, I2 =0%, P=0.01). Other outcomes were comparable between both groups. In conclusion, SCIT is slightly more effective than SLIT but is associated with a higher frequency of severe systemic reactions, guiding clinicians to tailor treatments to individual patient needs.</p>
Is there a non-invasive biomarker for the early detection of ovarian torsion? A systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis and identified multiple biomarkers that warrant further study as part of a broader diagnostic panel for ovarian torsion. These include SCUBE1, s-DD, IL-6, IMA and TNF-a. </p>
Dataset for paper: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Ontology-based Support of Digital Forensics
<p>PLEASE, READ THE README.TXT FILE</p> <p>This document describes how to interpret the data and metadata files, and it is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-AS (https://creativecommons.org/licenses).</p> <p>The file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv" is a CSV file format and contains the raw data extracted from our systematic literature review primary studies. Such data were extracted based on the research questions defined for our study.<br> The file "primary_studies_final_set-METADATA.csv" is a CSV file format and contains the following:<br> - the first row contains two pieces of information: the data type, which might be original or reused;<br> - the second row contains the reused data URL/DOI, which should inform the URL or DOI from which the data was reused, or n/a if the data is original;<br> - the third row contains the date of data generation in the format mm/dd/yyyy;<br> - the fourth row contains 11 elements describing each of the fields of the file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv": the study ID, title, objective, six research questions, and an observation field; and<br> - the fifth row describes the data type of each field of the file "primary_studies_final_set-DATA.csv".<br> The .bib files contain the bibtex entry for the final set of studies.<br> The license.txt file describes the Creative Commons license for this material.</p> <p>We hope you have an excellent read!!</p> <p>Cheers!<br> Thiago, Edson, and Avelino</p>
Not So Weak-PICO: Leveraging weak supervision for Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes recognition for systematic review automation
<p>EBM-PICO is a widely used dataset with PICO annotations at two levels: span-level or coarse-grained and entity-level or fine-grained. Span-level annotations encompass the full information about each class. Entity-level annotations cover the more fine-grained information at the entity level, with PICO classes further divided into fine-grained subclasses. For example, the coarse-grained Participant span is further divided into participant age, gender, condition and sample size in the randomised controlled trial. This dataset comes pre-divided into a training set (n=4,933) annotated through crowd-sourcing and an expert annotated gold test set (n=191) for evaluation.</p> <p>The <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6174533/bin/NIHMS988059-supplement-Appendix.pdf">EBM-PICO annotation guidelines</a> caution about variable annotation quality. <a href="http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2429/paper1.pdf">Abaho et al.</a> developed a framework to post-hoc correct EBM-PICO outcomes annotation inconsistencies. <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.09557.pdf">Lee et al.</a> studied annotation span disagreements suggesting variability across the annotators. Low annotation quality in the training dataset is excusable, but the errors in the test set can lead to faulty evaluation of the downstream ML methods. We evaluate 1% of the EBM-PICO training set tokens to gauge the possible reasons for the fine-grained labelling errors and use this exercise to conduct an error-focused PICO re-annotation for the EBM-PICO gold test set. The file 'test_ebm_correctedlabels.tsv' has error corrected EBM-PICO gold test set.</p> <p> </p> <p>The upload also contains two zip files containing labelling sources mentioned in the Distant-PICO paper. </p> <ol> <li>ds_cto_dict.zip: contains the four distant supervision dictionaries (P: participant.txt, I = intervention.txt, intervetion_syn.txt, O: outcome.txt) generated from clinicaltrials.gov using the methodology described in Distant-CTO. </li> <li>handcrafted_dictionaries.zip: contains three files <ul> <li>gender_sexuality.txt: contains a list of possible genders and sexual orientations found across the web. The list is not comprehensive.</li> <li>endpoints_dict.txt: contains outcome names and the names of questionnaires used to measure outcomes assembled from PROM questionnaires and PROMs.</li> <li>comparator_dict: contains a list of idiosyncratic comparator terms like a sham, saline, placebo, etc., compiled from the literature search. The list is not comprehensive.</li> </ul> </li> </ol>
Bibliographic Data from the Digital Twin Anomaly Detection Decision-Making for Bridge Management Systematic Review
<p>This database contains all the bibliographic information about the 8673 records found after applying the Search Strategy used for the Digital Twin Anomaly Detection Decision-Making for Bridge Management Systematic Review. Such strategy consisted on using seven initial keywords and similar terms of interest (namely: bridge and bridges, etc.): </p> <ul> <li>Bridge.</li> <li>Digital twin.</li> <li>Bridge information modelling.</li> <li>Finite elements.</li> <li>Bridge health monitoring.</li> <li>Anomaly detection algorithm.</li> <li>Cultural heritage.</li> </ul> <p>Six initial queries were done combining the first keyword with the rest of them:</p> <ul> <li>bridge* AND "digital twin*"</li> <li>bridge* AND (BrIM OR "bridge information model*")</li> <li>bridge* AND (FEM OR FEA OR "finite element method*" OR "finite element analy*")</li> <li>bridge* AND ("bridge health monitoring" OR "structural health monitoring")</li> <li>bridge* AND (ADA OR "anomaly detection algorithm*")</li> <li>bridge* AND ("cultural heritage" OR "monument* bridge*" OR "old bridge*" OR "ancient bridge*" OR "historic* bridge*")</li> </ul> <p>As a first screening step, the combination of these 6 initial searches was done to obtain relevant works containing at least three of the main keywords of interest:</p> <ul> <li>#1 AND #2</li> <li>#1 AND #3</li> <li>#1 AND #4</li> <li>#1 AND #5</li> <li>#1 AND #6</li> <li>#2 AND #3</li> <li>#2 AND #4</li> <li>#2 AND #5</li> <li>#2 AND #6</li> <li>#3 AND #4</li> <li>#3 AND #5</li> <li>#3 AND #6</li> <li>#4 AND #5</li> <li>#4 AND #6</li> <li>#5 AND #6</li> </ul> <p>All records found in Scopus where downloaded both in .ris and .csv format and are included in this database. The search was conducted on 10/12/2022.</p> <p>Note: Searches 10, 14, 17 and 21 did not return any records.</p>
Bots in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review [Data Set]
<p>This repository contains al the artifacts of the research: Bots in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review </p>
Protocol for a systematic review: association between airborne pollen, intermittent allergic rhinitis and blood pressure
<p>Previous epidemiological studies have found an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality following days with heightened pollen exposure and suggested that intermittent allergic rhinitis might be associated with blood pressure. Pollen sensitization and subsequent pollen exposure cause local inflammation and cytokine release in individuals with intermittent allergic rhinitis (pollen allergy). Inflammatory mediators can travel throughout the body, hence providing the physiologic basis by which pollen allergy may lead to systemic inflammation, which is known to be a risk factor for cardiovascular events. However, the findings regarding the potential association between intermittent allergic rhinitis, pollen exposure, and cardiovascular health are not fully conclusive. To date, no systematic review has been published on this topic.</p> <p>This systematic review seeks to answer: Are exposure to airborne pollen and intermittent allergic rhinitis associated with blood pressure? Secondary questions include: (1) Are there personal characteristics (sex, age) which modify a potential association between intermittent allergic rhinitis or pollen exposure with blood pressure and/or hypertension? (2) What research gaps exist in our understanding of how intermittent allergic rhinitis, pollen exposure, and cardiovascular health are interrelated?</p> <p>Published herein are:</p> <ul> <li>Protocol for the systematic review, including the search strategy</li> <li>Supplement 1: PROSPERO registration</li> <li>Supplement 2: Data extraction table</li> <li>Supplement 3: Risk of bias assessment strategy</li> <li>Supplement 4: Risk of bias assessment tool</li> </ul>
Bibliographic Data from the SoTL in Civil and Structural Engineering Systematic Review
<p>This database contains all the bibliographic information found after applying the Search Strategy used for the SoTL in Civil and Structural Engineering Systematic Review. The following electronic databases were searched:</p> <ul> <li>Scopus.</li> <li>Web of Science.</li> <li>OsloMet Library.</li> <li>Google Scholar (no bibliographic information is presented since this database does not allow to download such data).</li> </ul> <p>A total of 84 records were found in Scopus, 43 in Web of Science, and 55 in OsloMet Library. The search was conducted on September 1, 2023.</p> <p>The information is presented in .ris, .bib, and .csv format.</p>
MiRoR7-P1- Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
<p>dataset referring to </p> <p><strong>Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design</strong></p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>Lorenzo Bertizzolo<sup>1</sup>, Patrick M Bossuyt<sup>2</sup>, Ignacio Atal<sup>1, 5</sup>, Philippe Ravaud<sup>1, 3-6</sup>, Agnès Dechartres<sup>7</sup></p> <p> </p> <p><sup>1</sup> INSERM, U1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), Methods of therapeutic evaluation of chronic diseases Team (METHODS), Paris, F-75004 France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.</p> <p><sup>2</sup> Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.</p> <p><sup>3</sup> Centre d’Épidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, AP-HP (Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris, France.</p> <p><sup>4</sup> Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.</p> <p><sup>5</sup> Cochrane France, Paris, France</p> <p><sup>6</sup> Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, New York, USA</p> <p><sup>7</sup> Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis de Santé Publique, Département Biostatistique, Santé Publique et Information Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière – Charles Foix, Paris, France</p>
Data for "What have biological records ever done for us? A systematic scoping review"
<p>These files contain data used in "What have biological records ever done for us? A systematic scoping review" (Gaul et al. 2020). </p>
Review of the evidence for Oceans and Human Health relationships in Europe: A systematic map.
<p>This database details the results of a systematic mapping exercise linking marine exposures to measured human health outcomes for the Seas, Oceans and Public Health in Europe Project.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.