Find research datasets worth reusing

openCC (other)Dec 2022View details →

LAGOS-NE v.1.054.1 - Lake water quality time series and geophysical data from a 17-state region of the United States

Time series of mean summer total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), stoichiometry (TN:TP) and chlorophyll values from 2913 unique lakes in the Midwest and Northeast United States. Epilimnetic nutrient and chlorophyll observations were derived from the Lake Multi-Scaled Geospatial and Temporal Database LAGOS-NELIMNO version 1.054.1, and come from 54 disparate data sources. These data were used to assess long-term monotonic changes in water quality from 1990-2013, and the potential drivers of those trends (Oliver et al., submitted). Summer was used to approximate the stratified period, which was defined as June 15 to September 15. The median number of observations per summer for a given lake was 2, but ranged from 1 to 83. The rules for inclusion in the database were that, for a given water quality parameter, a lake must have an observation in each period of 1990-2000 and 2001-2011. Additionally, observations must span at least 5 years. Each unique lake with nutrient or chlorophyll data also has supporting geophysical data, including climate, atmospheric deposition, land use, hydrology, and topography derived at the lake watershed (variable prefix “iws”) and HUC 4 (variable prefix “hu4”) scale. Lake-specific characteristics, such as depth and area, are also reported. The geospatial data came from LAGOS-NEGEO version 1.03. For more specific information on how LAGOS-NE was created, see Soranno et al. 2015. Soranno P.A., Bissell E.G., Cheruvelil K.S., Christel S.T., Collins S.M., Fergus C.E., Filstrup C.T., Lapierre J.-F., Lottig N.R., Oliver S.K., Scott C.E., Smith N.J., Stopyak S., Yuan S., Bremigan M.T., Downing J.A., Gries C., Henry E.N., Skaff N.K., Stanley E.H., Stow C.A., Tan P.-N., Wagner T., and Webster K.E. 2015. Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: fostering open science and data reuse. Gigascience 4: 28. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0067-4.

openCC (other)Oct 2025View details →

SBC LTER: Reef: Annual time series of biomass for kelp forest species, ongoing since 2000

These data are annual estimates of biomass of approximately 225 taxa of reef algae, invertebrates and fish in permanent transects at 11 kelp forest sites in the Santa Barbara Channel (2-8 transects per site). Abundance is measured annually (as percent cover or density, by size) and converted to biomass (i.e., wet mass, dry mass, decalcified dry mass, ash free dry mass) using published taxon-specific algorithms. Data collection began in summer 2000 and continues annually in summer to provide information on community structure, population dynamics and species change. The time period of data collection varied among the 11 kelp forest sites. Sampling at BULL, CARP, and NAPL began in 2000, sampling at the other 6 mainland sites (AHND, AQUE, IVEE, GOLB, ABUR, MOHK) began in 2001 (transects 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 at IVEE were added in 2011). Data collection at the two Santa Cruz Island sites (SCTW and SCDI) began in 2004. See Methods for more information.

openCC (other)Jul 2025View details →

SBC LTER: Ocean: Time-series: nearshore calibrated pH and temperature outside of reefs, ongoing since 2011

Calibrated pH (Total scale, SeaFET sensor) data was collected from 10 reefs in the Santa Barbara Channel along with in situ temperature. Most pH sensors are deployed together with SBC long-term mooring instruments. Data collection intervals and SeaFET sensor depths vary based on the site location.

openCC (other)Jan 2026View details →

SBC LTER: Time series of quarterly NetCDF files of kelp biomass in the canopy from Landsat 5, 7 and 8, since 1984 (ongoing)

This data file represents a time series of canopy area of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, and bull kelp, Nereocystis luetkeana, and canopy biomass of giant kelp derived from Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI), and Landsat 9 Operational Land Imager 2 satellite imagery, along with relevant metadata. The kelp canopy is composed of the portions of fronds and stipes floating on the surface of the water. Canopy area (m) data are given for individual 30 x 30 meter pixels for all coastal areas of Baja California, Mexico, California, Oregon, and the outer coast of Washington (including offshore islands). Biomass data (wet weight, kg) are given for individual 30 x 30 meter pixels in the coastal areas extending from near Ano Nuevo, CA through the southern range limit in Baja California (including offshore islands), representing the range where giant kelp is the dominant canopy forming species. Data were derived from the three Landsat sensors listed above. Observations are made on a 16 day repeat cycle, for each instrument, but the temporal coverage is irregular because of cloud cover, instrument failure, and the mission length of each sensor (TM: 1984 – 2011, ETM+: 1999 – present, OLI: 2013 – present). Estimates of canopy area are derived from the fractional cover of kelp canopy determined from satellite surface reflectance. Estimates of kelp canopy biomass are derived from the relationship between giant kelp fractional cover determined from satellite surface reflectance and empirical measurements of giant kelp canopy biomass in long-term SBC LTER study plots obtained using SCUBA. The different Landsat sensors were calibrated to each other using simulated Landsat data derived from hyperspectral imagery. Missing data due to the ETM+ scan line corrector error were filled using a synchrony-based gap filling method. Data are organized into a single NetCDF file and contain the quarterly area and

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2021View details →

Time-series of shoreline change along the Pacific Rim

This repository contains 40 years of tidally-corrected shoreline change time-series for most sandy coastlines around the Pacific Rim derived from Landsat imagery. The time-series were last updated in May 2025. For the latest data always refer to <a href="http://coastsat.space/">http://coastsat.space/</a>. The dataset was used to investigate the impact of ENSO on beach erosion and accretion in: - Vos, K., Harley, M.D., Turner, I.L. et al. Pacific shoreline erosion and accretion patterns controlled by El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 140–146 (2023). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01117-8">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01117-8</a>   CoastSat was used to map shoreline changes on Landsat 5, Landsat 7 and Landsat 8 imagery between 1984 and 2025. The Coastsat toolbox is publicly available at https://github.com/kvos/CoastSat and described in Vos et al. 2019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104528">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104528</a>. The time-series of shoreline change were tidally-corrected along cross-shore transects using tide levels from a global tide model (FES2022) and a satellite-derived estimate of the beach slope (as described in Vos et al. 2020, "Beach slopes from satellite-derived shorelines", <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088365">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088365</a>). This dataset covers wave-dominated sandy coasts in the Pacific basin where Landsat imagery was available, including a total of 3,000 beaches and more than 100,000 cross-shore transects (100-m alongshore spaced). This includes coastlines in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Chile , Peru, Mexico and USA (California and Hawaii only). The data is structured as follows: <ul> <li>There is a folder for each country (e.g. Australia)</li> <li> In the country folder, there is a folder for each site (e.g. aus0001, aus0002 etc)</li> <li>In the site folder, there are 4 CSV files: <ul> <li>time_series_tidally_corrected.csv: this file contains the tidally-corrected time-series of shoreline change along each transect belonging to the site (e.g. aus0001-0001, aus0001-0002 etc). This is the final product used for coastal change analyses.</li> <li>time_series_raw.csv: this file contains the raw time-series of shoreline change, which have not be tidally-corrected. Note that each image is taken at a different stage of the tide.</li> <li>tide_levels_fes2022: this file contains the tide levels at the time of image acquisition extracted from FES2022 (global tide model publicly available on AVISO+).</li> <li>transect_coordinates_and_beach_slopes.csv: this file contains the coordinates (in WGS84 lat/lon coordinates) as well as the estimated beach slope for each transect, including confidence intervals.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>   In addition, there are four geospatial layers (.GEOJSON) which contain important spatial information: <ul> <li> polygons.geojson: this layer contains the polygons that were used to run CoastSat for each beach.</li> <li>shorelines.geojson: this layer contains the sandy shorelines that were used to generate the cross-shore transects (also used as reference shorelines in CoastSat). Each beach has the following attributes: beach length, median orientation, median slope, and mean springs tidal range.</li> <li>transects.geojson: this layer contains the cross-shore transects, which are spaced 100 m along each beach. Each transect has the following attributes: orientation, beach slope, linear trend (in m/year), alongshore distance relative to the northern end of the beach (absolute and normalised).</li> <li>transects_edit.geojson: this layer is the same as transects.geojson but the transects that are not suitable for shoreline mapping were manually deleted (rocky shores, submerged reef, coastal lagoons and inlets, coastal defences etc...).</li> <li>transects_ENSO.geojson: this layer (similar to transects.geojson) contains the transects that were used to analyse ENSO effects on shoreline changes in the Pacific (a total of 83,000).</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

UAV time series and tree crowns

This dataset contains:-A UAV time series of mosaicked images of a woodland in Northeast UK. Complete detaisl are given in: "Elias Fernando Berra, Rachel Gaulton, Stuart Barr, Assessing spring phenology of a temperate woodland: A multiscale comparison of ground, unmanned aerial vehicle and Landsat satellite observations, Remote Sensing of Environment, Volume 223, 2019, Pages 229-242, ISSN 0034-4257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.010." -Manual (reference) and automatic delinetaed tree crowns for the area covered by the UAV time series data. Complete details in: Elias F. Berra. Individual tree crown detection and delineation across a woodland using leaf-on and leaf-off imagery from a UAV consumer-grade camera. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 034501 (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.14.034501

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Ground temperature time series in European mountain permafrost

RELATED PUBLICATION This dataset is related to the following publication: Noetzli J., Isaksen, K., Barnett, J., Chrisitiansen, H.H., Delaloye, R., Etzelmueller, B., Farinotti, D., Gallemann, T., Guglielmin, M., Hauck, C., Hilbich, C., Hoelzle, M., Lambiel, C., Magnin, F., Oliva, M., Paro, L, Pogliotti, P., Riedl, C., Schoeneich, P., M., Valt, M., Vieli A., Philliips, M. (2024). Enhanced permafrost warming in European mountains in the 21st century. Nature Communications, 15, 10508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54831-9">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54831-9</a>. ==> For information on the measurements, selection criteria, processing information and data providers please refer to the methods, data availability and acknowledgements sections of the related publication !    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTENT The dataset includes monthly and annual time series of ground temperatures measured in 64 boreholes in European mountain permafrost areas and corresponding metadata. Temporal coverage: at least 10 years until 2022 Spatial coverage: European mountain regions (Svalbard, Scandinavia, Iceland, European Alps, Sierra Nevada) Depth of measurements: at least 10 m; for all boreholes data of the sensors closest to 5, 10 and 20 m depth are included Monthly means are calculated from daily values and annual values are derived from monthly mean values.   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATA COMPILATION The data were compiled to derive 10-year and 20-year warming rates in European mountain permafrost in the study by Noetzli et al. (in review, see above). Data were collected from national permafrost observation networks as well as from individual institutions (e.g, universities, environmental agencies). The aquisition of long time series over decades requires long-term committment from the responsible institutions to maintain instruments and to collect and curate the data. Details on the data source for each time series can be found in the metadata file as well as in the related publication. The main data sources by country are given in the list below. <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Country</td> <td>Data source (institution or national network)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Austria</td> <td>GeoSphere Austria</td> </tr> <tr> <td>France</td> <td>Réseau français d'observation du permafrost (PermaFrance, <a href="https://wslch365-my.sharepoint.com/personal/jeannette_noetzli_slf_ch/Documents/PermafrostEurope/permafrance.osug.fr">permafrance.osug.fr</a>)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Germany</td> <td>Bavarian Environment Agency</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Iceland</td> <td>University of Oslo</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Italy</td> <td>ARPA Piemonte, ARPA Valle d'Aosta, ARPA Veneto, University of Insubria</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Norway</td> <td>Norwegian Permafrost Monitoring Network (<a href="https://cryo.met.no/">cryo.met.no</a> and <a href="http://sios-svalbard.org/">sios-svalbard.org</a>)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Spain</td> <td>Universitat de Barcelona</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Svalbard</td> <td>Norwegian Permafrost Monitoring Network (<a href="https://cryo.met.no/">cryo.met.no</a> and <a href="http://sios-svalbard.org/">sios-svalbard.org</a>)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Sweden</td> <td>University of Stockholm</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Switzerland</td> <td>Swiss Permafrost Monitoring Network PERMOS (<a href="http://www.permos.ch">http://www.permos.ch</a>)</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FILES AND FORMAT This data set includes three csv-files: 1) metadata with information on the measurement location and data provider 2) monthly ground temperature time series and 3) annual ground temperature time series.  The variables in the three files are described below. Data files are in long data format. File 1 – borehole_overview.csv Key information on the boreholes, responsible institutions and contact persons. <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Variable</td> <td>Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Name</td> <td>Name of the borehole (as used in the related study)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Country</td> <td>Alpha-2 code</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Region</td> <td>Larger region</td> </tr> <tr> <td>First_year</td> <td>First year of data</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Elevation [m asl.]</td> <td>Elevation of the borehole</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lat [° N]</td> <td>Latitude</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lon [° E]</td> <td>Longitude</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Depth [m]</td> <td>Total depth of the borehole</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DZAA [m]</td> <td>Depth of the Zero Annual Amplitude (uppermost sensor with annual amplitude ≤0.1)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Phase lag</td> <td>Phase lag at 10 m depth compared to surface in months</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Morphology</td> <td>Main morphology of the site</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Surface_cover</td> <td>Main surface cover at the site</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lithology</td> <td>Main lithology of the site</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Ice_content</td> <td>Basic classification by ground ice content at the site (no ice, ice-poor, ice-bearing, ice-rich), see publication for details</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Institution</td> <td>Responsible institution (in the year 2024)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Contact_person</td> <td>Contact person (in the year 2024)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Special_remarks</td> <td>Remarks on location, e.g. horizontal borehole</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>   File 2 – permafrost_temperatures_european_mountains_monthly_2022.csv Time series of monthly mean ground temperatures at ca. 5, 10 and 20 m depth for 64 boreholes in European mountain permafrost until 2022. <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Variable</td> <td>Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bh</td> <td>Name of the borehole</td> </tr> <tr> <td>time [YYYY-MM-DD]</td> <td>Date</td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth [m]</td> <td>Depth of measurement</td> </tr> <tr> <td>temp [°C]</td> <td>Monthly mean ground temperature (aggregated from daily values)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t_min [°C]</td> <td>Minimum daily ground temperature of the year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t_max [°C]</td> <td>Maximum daily ground temperature of the year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>count</td> <td>Number of daily values available to calculate monthly mean values</td> </tr> <tr> <td>dclass [5, 10 or 20 m]</td> <td>Depth class defined for analyses in related study</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>   File 3 – permafrost_temperatures_european_mountains_annual_2022.csv Time series of annual mean ground temperatures at ca. 5, 10 and 20 m depth for 64 boreholes in European mountain permafrost until 2022. <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Variable</td> <td>Description</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bh</td> <td>Name of the borehole</td> </tr> <tr> <td>time [YYYY]</td> <td>Year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth [m]</td> <td>Depth of measurement</td> </tr> <tr> <td>temp [°C]</td> <td>Annual mean ground temperature (aggregated from monthly values)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t_min [°C]</td> <td>Minimum monthly ground temperature of the year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>t_max [°C]</td> <td>Maximum monthlyground temperature of the year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>count</td> <td>Number of monthly values available to calculate annual mean values</td> </tr> <tr> <td>dclass [5, 10 or 20 m]</td> <td>Depth class defined for analyses in related study</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTACT For question related to this dataset please contact the corresponding author: jeannette.noetzli@slf.ch.  For questions related to a specific time series, see metadata for contact information.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Catalog of NE Italy earthquakes Mw with related velocimetric time series

Mw catalog (xlsx format) of earthquakes occurred in Norheastern Italy from 2016 to 2023; the catalog reports estimations for: <ul> <li>ML (Bragato and Tento, 2005);</li> <li>Mw calculated from SA (Moratto et al., 2017);</li> <li>Mw calculated from MT (Moment Tensor; Saraò et al., 2021);</li> <li>The tgz file with the corrected velocimetric waveforms (SAC fomat with P and S arrival times used for the locations and units in m/s); tgz file can be found in Waveforms.tgz. EVDP SAC header is expressed in meters.</li> </ul> Continuous raw time series can be dowloaded from Oasis website (Priolo et al., 2015).

opencc-by-sa-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Long-term MODIS LST day-time and night-time temperatures, sd and differences at 1 km based on the 2000–2020 time series

Layers include: Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly median value 2000–2017, Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly sd value 2000–2017, Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly day-night difference 2000–2017. Derived using the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/tree/master/input_layers/MOD11A2">data.table package and quantile function in R</a>. We derived four standard statistics: (1) lower 2.5% probability (l.025), median (m), upper 97.5% probability (u.975) and standard deviation (sd). Updated long-term values for 2000–2022+ are pending. Includes also long-term trends (trend.logit.ols) which was produced by fitting regression models to de-seasonalized time-series as explained in this <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/blob/master/input_layers/MOD13Q1/03-data-access.ipynb">python tutorial</a>. Basically models are fitted for each pixel and the model parameters are saved as images. For more info about the MODIS LST product see: <a href="https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod11a2v006/">https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod11a2v006/</a>. Antarctica is not included. To access and visualize maps use:  <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a> If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels: <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention: <ul> <li>clm = theme: climate,</li> <li>lst = variable: land surface temperature,</li> <li>mod11a2.oct.day = determination method: MOD11A2 product, day time values for October,</li> <li>d = median value / sd = standard deviation / u.975 = aggregation/statistics method: 97.5% probability upper quantile,</li> <li>1km = spatial resolution / block support: 1 km,</li> <li>s0..0cm = vertical reference: land surface,</li> <li>2000..2017 = time reference: from 2000 to 2017,</li> <li>v1.0 = version number: 1.0,</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0May 2022View details →

Capacity factor time series for solar and wind power on a 50 km^2 grid in Europe

This spatio-temporal dataset contains capacity factors timeseries for locations on a grid with 50km edge length in Europe. The data is resolved in one hour timesteps and comprises the years 2000--2016. It has been generated using <a href="https://www.renewables.ninja">Renewables.ninja</a> and is based on MERRA-2 reanalysis data. For each of the ~2700 onshore location, it contains one time series for onshore wind turbines and five time series for PV installations with different orientations and tilts. PV time series exist for (1) installations on open fields, (2) installations on all possible rooftops, (3) south-facing and flat rooftops, (4) east- and west-facing rooftops, (5) north-facing rooftops. For each of the ~2800 offshore location there is one timeseries for offshore wind turbines. Two GeoTIFF files contain spatial information of onshore and offshore locations. For each of the three technologies -- onshore wind, offshore wind, and PV -- there is one NetCDF file determining the temporal dimension and containing the data. The GeoTIFF and NetCDF files are linked through unique IDs for all locations. This data serves as input data to euro-calliope, a model of the European electricity system. The following parameters have been used to generate the timeseries: <pre><code>resolution-grid: 50 # [km^2] corresponding to MERRA resolution pv-performance-ratio: 0.9 hub-height: onshore: 105 # m, median hub height of V90/2000 in Europe between 2010 and 2018 offshore: 87 # m, median hub height of SWT-3.6-107 in Europe between 2010 and 2018 turbine: onshore: "vestas v90 2000" # most built between 2010 and 2018 in Europe offshore: "siemens swt 3.6 107" # most built between 2010 and 2018 in Europe</code></pre> CHANGELOG: Version 3 (2022-05-18) * Update spatial scope to include Iceland and its offshore EEZ. * Update temporal scope to include 2017 and 2018. Effect of increasing spatial scope is a slight change in the spatial position of the data points. Version 2 (2020-06-18) * Add time series for rooftop PV with different orientations.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Labeled Time Series Data of Force/Torque for Monitoring Assembly Processes with a Delta Robot

This dataset comprises 524 recordings of 6-dimensional time series data, capturing forces in three directions and torques in three directions during the assembly of small car model wheels. The data was collected using an equidistant sampling method with a sampling period of 0.004 seconds. Each time series represents the process of assembling one wheel, specifically the placement of a tire onto a rim, and includes a label indicating whether the assembly was successful (OK). The wheels were assembled in batches of four, and the recordings were obtained over six different days. The labels of recordings from two (days 3 and 4) of the six days are invalid as described in [1].  The labels presented in this data set are only binary (they do not describe the reason of the failure). The labels of recordings from days 5 and 6 are created by human while the other labels came from a convolutional neural network based computer vision classifier and can be inaccurate as described in section 5.4 of [1].    <h4>Dataset Structure:</h4> <ul> <li>File: <code>ForceTorqueTimeSeries.csv</code> <ul> <li>Columns: <ul> <li><code>idx (1-524)</code>: Index of the recording corresponding to the assembly of one wheel.</li> <li><code>label (true/false)</code>: Indicates whether the assembly was successful (TRUE = product is OK).</li> <li><code>meas_id (1-6)</code>: Identifier for the day on which the recording was made (refer to Table 2.1 in [1]).</li> <li><code>force_x</code>: X-component of the force measured by the sensor mounted on the delta robot's end effector.</li> <li><code>force_y</code>: Y-component of the force.</li> <li><code>force_z</code>: Z-component of the force.</li> <li><code>torque_x</code>: X-component of the torque.</li> <li><code>torque_y</code>: Y-component of the torque.</li> <li><code>torque_z</code>: Z-component of the torque.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h4>Additional Files:</h4> <ul> <li><code>IMG_3351.MOV</code>: A video demonstrating the assembly process for one batch of four wheels.</li> <li><code>F3-BP-2024-Trna-Ales-Ales Trna - 2024 - Anomaly detection in robotic assembly process using force and torque sensors.pdf</code>: Bachelor thesis [1] detailing the dataset and preliminary experiments on fault detection.</li> <li><code>F3-BP-2024-Hanzlik-Vojtech-Anomaly_Detection_Bachelors_Thesis.pdf</code>: Bachelor thesis [2] describing the data acquisition process.</li> </ul> <h3>References:</h3> <ol> <li>Trna, A. (2024). Anomaly detection in robotic assembly process using force and torque sensors [Bachelor’s thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague].</li> <li>Hanzlik, V. (2024). Edge AI integration for anomaly detection in assembly using Delta robot [Bachelor’s thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague].</li> </ol>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →

Annual time series of global VIIRS nighttime lights for 2000-2024 at 500-m spatial resolution extrapolated using logistic regression

The <a href="https://eogdata.mines.edu/products/vnl/">Annual Visible Night Light (VNL) V2</a> (VIIRS) images at 500-m spatial resolution for the period 2012 to 2024 (Elvidge et al., 2021) have been used to extrapolate the values backwards for years 2000–2011. This was done by fitting a logistic regression (per pixel) and then predicting the values for the previous years (see nightlights_stack_500m.R). After consistent time-series have been produced, I also derived the difference between year 2024 and year 2000 (nightlights.difference_viirs.v21_m_500m_s_2000_2024_go_epsg4326_v20230318.tif): this shows average rate of change for the 25 years period. Use with caution: extrapolation of values can lead to artifacts. For most of the land surface, however, it appears that the growth of night lights follows exponential growth function and hence nights in the past can be represented accurately by fitting decay / logistic regression function. Original values from the Annual VNL V2 product have been converted from 0–200 to 0–2000 scale and are available as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs. Principal components (PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4) were derived using SAGA GIS (sums-of-squares-and-cross-products matrix) method. The first PC1 usually matches the long-term mean value, PC2 matches the 1st derivation in values. File "nightlights_dmsp.v10_m_1km_s_19920101_20241231_go_epsg4326_v20251006.tif" contains 33 years 1992 to 2024, but at 1 km resolution. To cite the Annual VNL V2, please use: <ul> <li>Elvidge, C. D., Zhizhin, M., Ghosh, T., Hsu, F. C., & Taneja, J. (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050922">Annual time series of global VIIRS nighttime lights derived from monthly averages: 2012 to 2019</a>. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050922</li> </ul> Historic night light images (1 km resolution) are also available from <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9828827.v10">Figshare</a>: <ul> <li>Li, X., Zhou, Y., Zhao, M., & Zhao, X. (2020). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0510-y">A harmonized global nighttime light dataset 1992–2018</a>. Scientific data, 7(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0510-y</li> </ul>

Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km): Yearly time-series (2000-2011)

This data is part of the Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km) dataset. Check the related identifiers section on the Zenodo side panel to access other parts of the dataset.General DescriptionThe monthly aggregated water vapor dataset is derived from <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/MCD19A2"><abbr title="MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua daily product">MCD19A2 v061</abbr></a>. The Water Vapor data measures the column above ground retrieved from MODIS near-IR bands at 0.94μm. The dataset time spans from 2000 to 2022 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like water cycle modeling, vegetation mapping, and soil mapping. This dataset includes:<ul><li>Monthly time-series: Derived from MCD19A2 v061, this data provides a monthly aggregated mean and standard deviation of daily water vapor time-series data from 2000 to 2022. Only positive non-cloudy pixels were considered valid observations to derive the mean and the standard deviation. The remaining no-data values were filled using the <abbr title="Moving Window Median">TMWM</abbr> algorithm. This dataset also includes smoothed mean and standard deviation values using the Whittaker method. The quality assessment layers and the number of valid observations for each month can provide an indication of the reliability of the monthly mean and standard deviation values.</li><li>Yearly time-series: Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides a yearly time-series aggregated statistics of the monthly time-series data.</li><li>Long-term data (2000-2022): Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides long-term aggregated statistics for the whole series of monthly observations.</li></ul>Data Details<ul><li>Time period: 2000–2011</li><li>Type of data: Water vapor column above the ground (0.001cm)</li><li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from MCD19A2 v061 using <a href="https://earthengine.google.com">Google Earth Engine</a>. Cloudy pixels were removed and only positive values of water vapor were considered to compute the statistics. The time-series gap-filling and time-series smoothing were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li><li>Statistical methods used: Four statistics were derived: standard deviation, percentiles 25, 50, and 75.</li><li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li><li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li><li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.00081, 179.99994, 87.37000)</li><li>Spatial resolution: 1/120 d.d. = 0.008333333 (1km)</li><li>Image size: 43,200 x 17,924</li><li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li></ul>SupportIf you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:<ul><li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">GitLab Issues</a></li><li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis">LandGIS Forum</a></li></ul>Name conventionTo ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:<ol><li>generic variable name: wv = Water vapor</li><li>variable procedure combination: mcd19a2v061.seasconv = MCD19A2 v061 with gap-filling algorithm</li><li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: m = mean | sd = standard deviation | n = number of observations | qa = quality assessment</li><li>Spatial support: 1km</li><li>Depth reference: s = surface</li><li>Time reference begin time: 20000101 = 2000-01-01</li><li>Time reference end time: 20111231 = 2011-12-31</li><li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li><li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li><li>Version code: v20230619 = 2023-06-19 (creation date)</li></ol>

Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km): Monthly time-series (2012-2014)

This data is part of the Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km) dataset. Check the related identifiers section on the Zenodo side panel to access other parts of the dataset.General DescriptionThe monthly aggregated water vapor dataset is derived from <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/MCD19A2"><abbr title="MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua daily product">MCD19A2 v061</abbr></a>. The Water Vapor data measures the column above ground retrieved from MODIS near-IR bands at 0.94μm. The dataset time spans from 2000 to 2022 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like water cycle modeling, vegetation mapping, and soil mapping. This dataset includes:<ul><li>Monthly time-series: Derived from MCD19A2 v061, this data provides a monthly aggregated mean and standard deviation of daily water vapor time-series data from 2000 to 2022. Only positive non-cloudy pixels were considered valid observations to derive the mean and the standard deviation. The remaining no-data values were filled using the <abbr title="Moving Window Median">TMWM</abbr> algorithm. This dataset also includes smoothed mean and standard deviation values using the Whittaker method. The quality assessment layers and the number of valid observations for each month can provide an indication of the reliability of the monthly mean and standard deviation values.</li><li>Yearly time-series: Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides a yearly time-series aggregated statistics of the monthly time-series data.</li><li>Long-term data (2000-2022): Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides long-term aggregated statistics for the whole series of monthly observations.</li></ul>Data Details<ul><li>Time period: 2012–2014</li><li>Type of data: Water vapor column above the ground (0.001cm)</li><li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from MCD19A2 v061 using <a href="https://earthengine.google.com">Google Earth Engine</a>. Cloudy pixels were removed and only positive values of water vapor were considered to compute the statistics. The time-series gap-filling and time-series smoothing were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li><li>Statistical methods used: Four statistics were derived: mean, standard deviation, smoothed mean, smoothed standard deviation.</li><li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li><li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li><li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.00081, 179.99994, 87.37000)</li><li>Spatial resolution: 1/120 d.d. = 0.008333333 (1km)</li><li>Image size: 43,200 x 17,924</li><li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li></ul>SupportIf you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:<ul><li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">GitLab Issues</a></li><li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis">LandGIS Forum</a></li></ul>Name conventionTo ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:<ol><li>generic variable name: wv = Water vapor</li><li>variable procedure combination: mcd19a2v061.seasconv = MCD19A2 v061 with gap-filling algorithm</li><li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: m = mean | sd = standard deviation | n = number of observations | qa = quality assessment</li><li>Spatial support: 1km</li><li>Depth reference: s = surface</li><li>Time reference begin time: 20120101 = 2012-01-01</li><li>Time reference end time: 20141231 = 2014-12-31</li><li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li><li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li><li>Version code: v20230619 = 2023-06-19 (creation date)</li></ol>

Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km): Yearly time-series (2012-2022)

This data is part of the Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km) dataset. Check the related identifiers section on the Zenodo side panel to access other parts of the dataset.General DescriptionThe monthly aggregated water vapor dataset is derived from <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/MCD19A2"><abbr title="MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua daily product">MCD19A2 v061</abbr></a>. The Water Vapor data measures the column above ground retrieved from MODIS near-IR bands at 0.94μm. The dataset time spans from 2000 to 2022 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like water cycle modeling, vegetation mapping, and soil mapping. This dataset includes:<ul><li>Monthly time-series: Derived from MCD19A2 v061, this data provides a monthly aggregated mean and standard deviation of daily water vapor time-series data from 2000 to 2022. Only positive non-cloudy pixels were considered valid observations to derive the mean and the standard deviation. The remaining no-data values were filled using the <abbr title="Moving Window Median">TMWM</abbr> algorithm. This dataset also includes smoothed mean and standard deviation values using the Whittaker method. The quality assessment layers and the number of valid observations for each month can provide an indication of the reliability of the monthly mean and standard deviation values.</li><li>Yearly time-series: Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides a yearly time-series aggregated statistics of the monthly time-series data.</li><li>Long-term data (2000-2022): Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides long-term aggregated statistics for the whole series of monthly observations.</li></ul>Data Details<ul><li>Time period: 2012–2022</li><li>Type of data: Water vapor column above the ground (0.001cm)</li><li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from MCD19A2 v061 using <a href="https://earthengine.google.com">Google Earth Engine</a>. Cloudy pixels were removed and only positive values of water vapor were considered to compute the statistics. The time-series gap-filling and time-series smoothing were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li><li>Statistical methods used: Four statistics were derived: standard deviation, percentiles 25, 50, and 75.</li><li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li><li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li><li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.00081, 179.99994, 87.37000)</li><li>Spatial resolution: 1/120 d.d. = 0.008333333 (1km)</li><li>Image size: 43,200 x 17,924</li><li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li></ul>SupportIf you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:<ul><li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">GitLab Issues</a></li><li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis">LandGIS Forum</a></li></ul>Name conventionTo ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:<ol><li>generic variable name: wv = Water vapor</li><li>variable procedure combination: mcd19a2v061.seasconv = MCD19A2 v061 with gap-filling algorithm</li><li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: m = mean | sd = standard deviation | n = number of observations | qa = quality assessment</li><li>Spatial support: 1km</li><li>Depth reference: s = surface</li><li>Time reference begin time: 20120101 = 2012-01-01</li><li>Time reference end time: 20221231 = 2022-12-31</li><li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li><li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li><li>Version code: v20230619 = 2023-06-19 (creation date)</li></ol>

Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km): Monthly time-series (2018-2020)

This data is part of the Monthly aggregated Water Vapor MODIS MCD19A2 (1 km) dataset. Check the related identifiers section on the Zenodo side panel to access other parts of the dataset.General DescriptionThe monthly aggregated water vapor dataset is derived from <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/MCD19A2"><abbr title="MCD19A2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua daily product">MCD19A2 v061</abbr></a>. The Water Vapor data measures the column above ground retrieved from MODIS near-IR bands at 0.94μm. The dataset time spans from 2000 to 2022 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like water cycle modeling, vegetation mapping, and soil mapping. This dataset includes:<ul><li>Monthly time-series: Derived from MCD19A2 v061, this data provides a monthly aggregated mean and standard deviation of daily water vapor time-series data from 2000 to 2022. Only positive non-cloudy pixels were considered valid observations to derive the mean and the standard deviation. The remaining no-data values were filled using the <abbr title="Moving Window Median">TMWM</abbr> algorithm. This dataset also includes smoothed mean and standard deviation values using the Whittaker method. The quality assessment layers and the number of valid observations for each month can provide an indication of the reliability of the monthly mean and standard deviation values.</li><li>Yearly time-series: Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides a yearly time-series aggregated statistics of the monthly time-series data.</li><li>Long-term data (2000-2022): Derived from monthly time-series, this data provides long-term aggregated statistics for the whole series of monthly observations.</li></ul>Data Details<ul><li>Time period: 2018–2020</li><li>Type of data: Water vapor column above the ground (0.001cm)</li><li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from MCD19A2 v061 using <a href="https://earthengine.google.com">Google Earth Engine</a>. Cloudy pixels were removed and only positive values of water vapor were considered to compute the statistics. The time-series gap-filling and time-series smoothing were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li><li>Statistical methods used: Four statistics were derived: mean, standard deviation, smoothed mean, smoothed standard deviation.</li><li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li><li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li><li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.00081, 179.99994, 87.37000)</li><li>Spatial resolution: 1/120 d.d. = 0.008333333 (1km)</li><li>Image size: 43,200 x 17,924</li><li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li></ul>SupportIf you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:<ul><li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">GitLab Issues</a></li><li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis">LandGIS Forum</a></li></ul>Name conventionTo ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:<ol><li>generic variable name: wv = Water vapor</li><li>variable procedure combination: mcd19a2v061.seasconv = MCD19A2 v061 with gap-filling algorithm</li><li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: m = mean | sd = standard deviation | n = number of observations | qa = quality assessment</li><li>Spatial support: 1km</li><li>Depth reference: s = surface</li><li>Time reference begin time: 20180101 = 2018-01-01</li><li>Time reference end time: 20201231 = 2020-12-31</li><li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li><li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li><li>Version code: v20230619 = 2023-06-19 (creation date)</li></ol>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Sep 2023View details →

MODIS MCD12Q1 Land Cover and Land Use Time Series Global Mosaics 2001-2022 (500 m)

General Description The yearly land use and land cover dataset is derived from <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/MCD12Q1"><abbr title="MCD12Q1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 500m">MCD12Q1 v061</abbr></a>. This data provides an yearly mosaics of land use and land cover data from 2001 to 2022 in cloud optimized Geotiff (COG) format. This dataset includes layers of land cover type 1 (t1), 2 (t2), and 5 (t5), land cover property 1 (p1) and 2 (p2), land cover property assessment 1 (p1a) and 2 (p2a), and land cover quality control (qc). Data Details <ul> <li>Time period: 2001–2022</li> <li>Type of data: Land cover and land use</li> <li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from MCD12Q1 v061 using <a href="https://earthengine.google.com">Google Earth Engine</a>.</li> <li>Statistical methods used: None</li> <li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li> <li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.00081, 179.99994, 87.37000)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 1/120 d.d. = 0.008333333 (1km)</li> <li>Image size: 86,400 x 35,849</li> <li>File format: Cloud optimized Geotiff.</li> </ul> Support If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels: <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">GitLab Issues</a></li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis">LandGIS Forum</a></li> </ul> Name convention To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are: <ol> <li>generic variable name: lc = Land cover</li> <li>variable procedure combination: mcd12q1v061.t1 = MCD12Q1 v061 LC Type1 band</li> <li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: c = class | p = probability</li> <li>Spatial support: 500m</li> <li>Depth reference: s = surface</li> <li>Time reference begin time: 20010101 = 2001-01-01</li> <li>Time reference end time: 20011231 = 2001-12-31</li> <li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li>Version code: v20230818 = creation date</li> </ol>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Monthly aggregated GLASS FAPAR V6 (250 m): 95th percentile monthly time-series (2021)

List of Subdatasets: <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> General Description The monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes: <ul> <li>Long-term:</li> </ul> Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R2 (p95.r2_m). <ul> <li>Monthly time-series:</li> </ul> Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month. Data Details <ul> <li>Time period: March 2000 – December 2021</li> <li>Type of data: Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC. The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li> <li>Statistical methods used: for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li> <li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li>Image size: 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> Support If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a> Reference Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a> Name convention To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are: <ol> <li>generic variable name: fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li>variable procedure combination: essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi–LSTM)</li> <li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li>Spatial support: 250m</li> <li>Depth reference: s = surface</li> <li>Time reference begin time: 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li>Time reference end time: 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li>Version code: v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Monthly aggregated GLASS FAPAR V6 (250 m): 50th percentile monthly time-series (2021)

FAPAR monthly time-series (250 m): Long-term trend (2000-2021)

List of Subdatasets: <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> General Description The monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes: <ul> <li>Long-term:</li> </ul> Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R2 (p95.r2_m). <ul> <li>Monthly time-series:</li> </ul> Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month. Data Details <ul> <li>Time period: March 2000–December 2021</li> <li>Type of data: Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li>How the data was collected or derived: Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC.The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li> <li>Statistical methods used: for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li>Limitations or exclusions in the data: The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li>Coordinate reference system: EPSG:4326</li> <li>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax): (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li>Spatial resolution: 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li>Image size: 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li>File format: Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> Support If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a> Reference Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a> Name convention To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are: <ol> <li>generic variable name: fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li>variable procedure combination: essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi–LSTM)</li> <li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li>Spatial support: 250m</li> <li>Depth reference: s = surface</li> <li>Time reference begin time: 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li>Time reference end time: 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li>Version code: v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>