Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →

Figures 4–7 in A contribution to the centipede (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha, Scolopendromorpha) fauna of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan

Figures 4–7. Bothriogaster signata (Kessler, 1874) (ZMB 3592): 4 – microscopic slide from Karl Verhoeff's collection; 5 – rear body fragment, ventral view; 6 – intermediate body fragment, ventral view; 7 – front body fragment, ventral view. Scale: 1 mm.

Figure 5 in First record of Hemiclepsis marginata (O.F.Müller, 1773) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) from the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan

Figure 5. Minimum spanning network of COI haplotypes of Hemiclepsis marginata, including the newly generated unique sequence from Uzbekistan (5). Bars on branches represent mutation steps. Haplotype numbers correspond to those in Table 1.

Figure 3 in First record of Hemiclepsis marginata (O.F.Müller, 1773) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) from the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan

Figure 3. Natural habitats of Hemiclepsis marginata marginata: A, Balikkul spring; B, Kaynarbulak spring; D, Uchtepa spring; D, leeches on a stone (photo by Kh. Solijonov).

Figure 2 in First record of Hemiclepsis marginata (O.F.Müller, 1773) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) from the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan

Figure 2. Hemiclepsis marginata marginata: A, dorsal view; B, ventral view; C, eyes; D, posterior sucker; E, juvenile leech (photo by Kh. Solijonov), F, fixed sample (photo by A. Utevsky).

Figure 1 in First record of Hemiclepsis marginata (O.F.Müller, 1773) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) from the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan

Figure 1. Geographic distribution of Hemiclepsis marginata in the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan (based on a 10x10 km UTM grid).

Figure 4 in First record of Hemiclepsis marginata (O.F.Müller, 1773) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) from the Ferghana Valley, Uzbekistan

Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationships of Hemiclepsis marginata from the Ferghana Valley (Uzbekistan) inferred using the maximum likelihood optimality criterion. The analysis is based on a dataset consisting of the newly generated COI sequence of the Uzbekistan leech and previous GenBank sequences. Both ultrafast bootstrapping and SH-like approximate likelihood-ratio test (SHaLRT) values are provided for branches. The newly generated sequence is highlighted in bold, while the entire clade of H. marginata (H. marginata marginata) is highlighted in blue.

Fig. 1 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 1. Anterior view of right distal humerus of extant Echinosorex gymnurus Raffles, 1822 to illustrate humeral features discussed in the text (modified from Salton and Sargis 2008).

Fig. 6 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 6. Right distal humerus of eutherian group 1 (URBAC 06−062, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 10 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 10. Right distal humerus of zhelestid group 1 (URBAC 03−187, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 8 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 8. Right distal humerus of zhelestid group 1 (URBAC 06−057, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 7 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 7. Right distal humerus of zalambdalestid (ZIN C 85309, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 13 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 13. Right distal humerus of zhelestid group 3 (URBAC 06−072, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 12 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 12. Left distal humerus of zhelestid group 2 (URBAC 03−099, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 4 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 4. Right distal humerus of metatherian group 2 (URBAC 06−103, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 2 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 2. Left distal humerus of multituberculate (URBAC 03−076, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 14 in Mammalian distal humeri from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 14. Left distal humerus of zhelestid group 4 (URBAC 03−126, Bissekty Formation, Upper Cretaceous: Turonian, Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan), in anterior (A), distal (B), and posterior (C) views.

Fig. 3 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 3. Stereophotographs of the petrosal of Kulbeckia kulbecke (URBAC 00−16) in cerebellar (A),squamosal (B),and tympanic views. Scale bar 1 mm. Anterior towards the top in all views.

Fig. 4. Soft tissue reconstructions. A in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 4. Soft tissue reconstructions. A. Tympanic view of "Zhelestidae". B. Squamosal view of "Zhelestidae". C. Tympanic view of Prokennalestes (modified from Wible et al. 2001). D. Squamosal view of Prokennalestes (modified from Wible et al. 2001). E. Tympanic view of Didelphis virginiana (modified from Wible 1990). F. Squamosal view of Didelphis virginiana (modified from Wible 1990). G. Tympanic view of Kulbeckia kulbecke. H. Squamosal view of Kulbeckia kulbecke. Anterior towards the top in A, C, E, and G. Anterior towards the right in B, D, F, and H.

Fig. 2 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 2. Stereophotographs of the petrosal of "Zhelestidae". A. Cerebellar view of URBAC 99−41. B. Squamosal view of URBAC 99−41. C. Tympanic view of URBAC 99−41. D. Tympanic view of ZIN C. 85514 with internal structures exposed. E. Lambdoidal view of URBAC 99−73. Scale bar 1 mm. Anterior towards the top in A–D; tympanic towards top in E.

Fig. 1. Promontorium area versus lower m3 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 1. Promontorium area versus lower m3 area for taxa with associated petrosal and dental remains. Open circle, Daulestes kulbeckensis; closed circle, Kennalestes gobiensis; open square, Prokennalestes trofimovi; closed square, Asioryctes nemegetensis; open diamond, Barunlestes butleri; closed diamond, Deltatheridium pretrituberculare.