Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

77

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

77 results for “Vegetation modeling”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Data for fitting a statistical global burned area model for seamless integration into Dynamic Global Vegetation Models

<p>The dataset is a large R data.table object saved in RDS format. It contains global, monthly data spanning the period from 2002 to 2018, with a 0.5 degrees spatial resolution. The dataset is utilized to develop and validate statistical models for predicting global burnt areas resulting from wildfires.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

A comparison among three ways to assemble wall-to-wall land-cover maps from distribution models of vegetation types

<p>Dataset accompanying manuscript <em>&quot;A comparison among three ways to assemble wall-to-wall land-cover maps from distribution models of vegetation types&quot;. </em>Datasets contain a wall-to-wall map of vegetation types covering the study area of terrestrial Norway, produced using three methods for assembling individual predictions from Distribution models (<em>probability-based method</em>, <em>performance-based method</em> and <em>prevalence-based method</em>).&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

VICGlobal: soil and vegetation parameters for the Variable Infiltration Capacity hydrological model

<p>## VICGlobal: soil, vegetation, and elevation band input files for the VIC hydrological model</p> <p>Date updated: June 28, 2021</p> <p>Authors and affiliations: Jacob Schaperow (1), Dongyue Li (1,2)<br> 1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UCLA<br> 2. Department of Geography, UCLA<br> Author contact info: jschap@g.ucla.edu</p> <p>The current version, v1.6d improves upon v1.6c by splitting the image parameters by continent, reducing file sizes.</p> <p>v1.6c is the same as v1.6, except that the image mode parameters have been updated to reflect the changes made to the classic mode parameters (e.g. r0 and rmin are different, and albedo, fcanopy, and LAI are calculated based on snow-free values).</p> <p>## Overview</p> <p>VICGlobal is a dataset that can be used to run the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrological model over regional to continental scales. The dataset is at 1/16 degree resolution and has latitudinal coverage from -60 to 85 degrees. All files are referenced to the WGS84 ellipsoid and datum (EPSG code 4326).</p> <p>The vegetation parameter file uses the IGBP classification and use partial land use types. The vegetation parameter rooting depths and root fractions are based on the method of Zeng (2001). The vegetation library file is largely the same as that of Livneh et al. (2013; 2015); however, the monthly average LAI, canopy fraction, and albedo values for each land cover type are calculated based on MODIS observations from 2017, using the method of Bohn and Vivoni (2019).</p> <p>There are two vegetation libraries: one for the northern hemisphere, and one for the southern hemisphere, in order to account for the seasonality of LAI, canopy fraction, and albedo.</p> <p>WARNING: although it appears small in compressed form, the image driver parameter input file, VICGlobal_params.nc, is about 140 GB when unzipped. Users are encouraged to use the image mode parameters that are already split by continent. For example, the parameter file for Africa is about 19 GB.</p> <p>A data descriptor is in preparation for submission to Nature Scientific Data (https://www.nature.com/sdata/).</p> <p>Other VIC input datasets (coverage limited to North America):<br> * Bohn and Vivoni MOD-LSP dataset: https://zenodo.org/record/2559631</p> <p>## List of contents</p> <p>Inputs for VIC-4 or the VIC-5 Classic Driver<br> * Soil parameter file<br> * Vegetation parameter file<br> * Elevation band file<br> * Vegetation library files (one each for the northern and southern hemispheres)</p> <p>Inputs for the VIC-5 Image Driver<br> * Parameter file (global)<br> * Domain file (global)<br> * Parameter files for each continent<br> &nbsp; * Africa<br> &nbsp; * Australia<br> &nbsp; * Eurasia (except Kamchatka)<br> &nbsp; * Kamchatka<br> &nbsp; * North America<br> &nbsp; * Oceania (New Zealand and nearby islands)<br> &nbsp; * South America<br> * Domain files for each continent<br> * GeoTiffs with continent masks</p> <p>Matlab codes for subsetting the VICGlobal parameters to a region of interest are also provided.</p> <p>## References</p> <p>* Bohn and Vivoni (2019). MOD-LSP, MODIS-based parameters for hydrologic modeling of North American land cover change. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-019-0150-2</p> <p>* Livneh et al. (2015). A spatially comprehensive, hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the U.S., and Southern Canada 1950&ndash;2013. https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201542</p> <p>* Livneh, B., Rosenberg, E. A., Lin, C., Nijssen, B., Mishra, V., Andreadis, K. M., Maurer, E. P. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: Update and extensions, J. Clim., 26(23), 9384&ndash;9392, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00508.1, 2013.</p> <p>* Zeng (2001). Global Vegetation Root Distribution for Land Modeling. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002&lt;0525:GVRDFL&gt;2.0.CO;2</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →
dryad40/100

Data and model code for: Habitat use patterns suggest that climate-driven vegetation changes will negatively impact mammal communities in the Amazon (ACV)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2023View details →
edi40/100

Community Land Model version 4.5 (CLM4.5) simulations of water, energy, and carbon fluxes for Saddle vegetation communities, 2008 - 2013

Single point simulations of CLM4.5 that include (1) forcing data that were input to the model and subsequent (2) model output for simulations that approximate conditions in fellfield, dry meadow, moist meadow, wet meadow, and snowbed vegetation communities. Forcing data were generated with observed atmospheric conditions from Tvan, Saddle precipitation, and incoming shortwave radiation measured from the AmeriFlux tower site (US-NR1) from 2008-2013. Wintertime precipitation inputs were modified to approximate average snow depth for each vegetation community observed across the Saddle grid. Land models, like CLM, provide a cohesive framework to investigate biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of environmental change on ecosystem processes. We used CLM4.5 to investigate if a global-scale model can represent local-scale patterns of water, energy, and carbon fluxes in a heterogeneous mountain environment. Specifically, we were interested in generating testable projections of potential ecosystem responses to climate change. Model output includes half-hourly data on fluxes of energy, water, and carbon, as well as vegetation carbon stocks and edaphic conditions. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to look at ecosystem responses to modifications intended to extend growing season length by decreasing snow albedo and warming air temperatures (black sand and M-A warm, respectively). Information on the variables, units, and data are included as attributed in the network Common Data Form (NetCDF) files for this dataset. For users unfamiliar with using NetCDF files, we have included R scripts that write (forcing data) and read (model output) .nc files include in this data archive. More information about NetCDF files is available at http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/index.html.

openCC (other)Jan 2019View details →
edi40/100

Saddle catchment vegetation cover for Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM), 2 meter, 2019

The Saddle Catchment of the Niwot Ridge LTER is subject to observed and modeled hydrologic connectivity and nuances that is influenced by the variable vegetation across the area. This file was specifically intended to update the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM) input file used to simulate vegetation within the Saddle Catchment, as an ongoing method for evaluating modeled hydrologic connectivity. Thus, high resolution vegetation information was used from existing National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) datasets. NEON has developed a suite of vegetation datasets including a 1m spatial resolution Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) Total Biomass data product. This product is an orthorectified (UTM projection) raster product derived from NEON AOP Imaging Spectrometer (NIS) reflectance data (DP3.30016.001). This vegetation layer was chosen because it visually reflected the differences in vegetation across the Saddle Catchment at a much higher resolution than previous DHSVM vegetation files. Using this gridded biomass product, different vegetation types were manually assigned and translated into to DHSVM vegetation types/codes. The assigning and translating of vegetation types was done by consulting NWT LTER individuals who specialize in the vegetative and soil properties within the Saddle Catchment and using available point-vegetation data from the Saddle Catchment sensor node network. The final product was upscaled to a 2m resolution using R (to match all other DHSVM input files).

openCC (other)Apr 2021View details →
zenodo36/100

Model outputs: Vegetation biomass change in China in the 20th century: An assessment based on a combination of multi-model simulations and field observations

<p>This dataset contains six model outputs of&nbsp;vegetation biomass on plant functional type level and total vegetation biomass on grid cell with and without bias-correction in different sensitivity experiments, as described in Readme.txt.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Supporting data for "A convolution method to assess subgrid-scale interactions between flow and patchy vegetation in biogeomorphic models"

<p>Dataset necessary to reproduce the results and analyses presented in the paper:</p> <p>Gourgue, O., van Belzen, J., Schwarz, C., Bouma, T.J., van de Koppel, J. &amp; Temmerman, S. (2020) A convolution method to assess subgrid-scale interactions between flow and patchy vegetation in biogeomorphic models, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, submitted.</p> <p>The dataset contains:</p> <ul> <li>Process-based model simulations, including their input files and the Python scripts to generate them (pre-processing), as well as the output files and Python scripts to post-process them.</li> <li>Flume experiment data processed for the model calibration.</li> <li>Python scripts to generate the figures and tables of the manuscript.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

VTFT_Demography: global ageclass simulation data from the LPJ-wsl v2.0 Dynamic Global Vegetation Model

<p>Forest ecosystem processes follow classic responses with age, peaking production around canopy closure and declining thereafter. Although age dynamics might be more dominant in certain regions over others, demographic effects on net primary production (NPP) and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) are bound to exist. Yet, explicit representation of ecosystem demography is notably absent in most global ecosystem models. This is concerning because the global community relies on these models to regularly update our collective understanding of the global carbon cycle. This paper aims to fill this gap in understanding by presenting the technical developments of a computationally-efficient approach for representing age-class dynamics within a global ecosystem model, the LPJ-wsl v2.0 Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. The modeled age-classes are initially created by fire feedbacks, wood harvesting, and abandonment of managed land, otherwise aging naturally until a stand-clearing disturbance is simulated or prescribed. In this paper, we show that the age-module can capture classic demographic patterns in stem density and tree height compared to inventory data, and that patterns of ecosystem function follow classic responses with age. We also present a few scientific applications of the model to assess the modeled age-class distribution over time and to determine the demographic effect on ecosystem fluxes relative to climate. Simulations show that, between 1860 and 2016, zonal age distribution on Earth was driven predominately by fire, causing a ~45-year difference in ages between boreal (50N-90N) and tropical (23S-23N) latitudes. Land use change and land management was responsible for an additional decrease in zonal age by -6 years in boreal and by -21 years in temperate (23N-50N) and tropical latitudes, with the anthropogenic effect on zonal age distribution increasing over time. A statistical model helped reduced LPJ-wsl complexity by predicting per-grid-cell annual NPP and Rh fluxes by three terms: precipitation, temperature and age-class; at global scales, R<sup>2</sup> was between 0.95 and 0.98. As determined by the statistical model, the demographic effect on ecosystem function was often less than 0.10 kg C m<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> but as high as 0.60 kg C m<sup>-2</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> where the effect was greatest. In eastern forests of North America, the demographic effect was of similar magnitude, or greater than, the effects of climate; demographic effects were similarly important in large regions of every vegetated continent. Spatial datasets are provided for global ecosystem ages and the estimated coefficients for effects of precipitation, temperature and demography on ecosystem function. The discussion focuses on our finding of an increasing role of demography in the global carbon cycle, the effect of demography on relaxation times (resilience) following a disturbance event and its implications at global scales, and a finding of a 40-Pg C increase in turnover from age dynamics at global scales. Whereas time is the only mechanism that increases ecosystem age, any additional disturbance not explicitly modeled will decrease age. This LPJ-based age-module therefore simulates the upper limit of age-class distributions on Earth and represents another step forward towards understanding the role of demography in global ecosystems.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2020View details →
dryad36/100

Improving the representation of high-latitude vegetation distribution in dynamic global vegetation models

<p></p><p>Vegetation is an important component in global ecosystems, affecting the physical, hydrological and biogeochemical properties of the land surface. Accordingly, the way vegetation is parameterised strongly influences predictions of future climate by Earth system models. To capture future spatial and temporal changes in vegetation cover and its feedbacks to the climate system, dynamic global vegetation models (DGVM) are included as important components of land surface models. Variation in the predicted vegetation cover from DGVMs therefore has large impacts on modelled radiative and non-radiative properties, especially over high-latitude regions. DGVMs are mostly evaluated by remotely sensed products, but rarely by other vegetation products or by in-situ field observations. In this study, we evaluate the performance of three methods for spatial representation of vegetation cover with respect to prediction of plant functional type (PFT) profiles – one based upon distribution models (DM), one that uses a remote sensing (RS) dataset and a DGVM (CLM4.5BGCDV). PFT profiles obtained from an independently collected vegetation data set from Norway were used for the evaluation. We found that RS-based PFT profiles matched the reference dataset best, closely followed by DM, whereas predictions from DGVM often deviated strongly from the reference. DGVM predictions overestimated the area covered by boreal needleleaf evergreen trees and bare ground at the expense of boreal broadleaf deciduous trees and shrubs. Based on environmental predictors identified by DM as important, we suggest implementation of three novel PFT-specific thresholds for establishment in the DGVM. We performed a series of sensitivity experiments to demonstrate that these thresholds improve the performance of the DGVM. The results highlight the potential of using PFT-specific thresholds obtained by DM in development and benchmarking of DGVMs for broader regions. Also, we emphasize the potential of establishing DM as a reliable method for providing PFT distributions for evaluation of DGVMs alongside RS. </p><p></p>

opencc-zeroOct 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Data for manuscript: An ecogeomorphic framework coupling sediment modeling with invasive riparian vegetation dynamics

<p>Datasets (aside from the publicly available GIS datasets) used in the analyses presented in the manuscript &quot;An ecogeomorphic framework coupling sediment modeling with invasive riparian vegetation dynamics.&quot;&nbsp;</p>

opencc-byDec 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Global Physically-Constrained Deep Learning Water Cycle Model with Vegetation: Model Simulations

<p>Welcome to our repository, which features simulations from the Hybrid Hydrological Model with Vegetation (H2MV). This collection includes 11 NetCDF files, representing temporal model simulations on a monthly scale and the static output of maximum soil moisture capacity (also known as plant rooting water storage) derived from a 10-fold cross-validation (CV) setup:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Temporal Simulations</strong>: The files named "fold1.nc" through "fold10.nc" contain the temporal model simulations, aggregated to a monthly scale, from 10 fold cross-validation (CV) setup.</li> <li><strong>Static Output</strong>: The "sm_max.nc" file presents the H2MV's estimation of the maximum soil moisture capacity</li> </ul> <h3>Contents of the Temporal Simulation Files</h3> <p>Each of the "fold" files ("fold1.nc" to "fold10.nc") contains the following variables:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Snow Dynamics</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>snow_acc</code></span>: Snow accumulation (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>snow_melt</code></span>: Snow melt (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>swe</code></span>: Snow water equivalent (mm)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Evapotranspiration and its components</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>Ei</code></span>: Interception evaporation (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>Es</code></span>: Soil evaporation (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>T</code></span>: Transpiration (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>ET</code></span>: Evapotranspiration (mm/day)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Recharge</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>r_soil</code></span>: Soil recharge (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>r_gw</code></span>: Groundwater recharge (mm/day)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Runoff</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>runoff_surface</code></span>: Surface runoff (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>baseflow</code></span>: Baseflow (mm/day)</li> <li><span><code>runoff_total</code></span>: Total runoff (mm/day)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Water Storages&nbsp;</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>GW</code></span>: Groundwater (mm)</li> <li><span><code>SM</code></span>: Soil moisture (mm)</li> <li><span><code>tws</code></span>: Terrestrial water storage (mm)</li> <li><span><code>tws_anomaly</code></span>: Anomalies of terrestrial water storage (mm)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Vegetation</strong> <ul> <li><span><code>fapar</code></span>: Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (-)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h3>Contents of the&nbsp;Static Output File</h3> <p>The "sm_max.nc" file contains 10 variables corresponding to the 10 folds of CV, with each variable (e.g., "fold1") referring to the respective fold.</p> <h3>Additional Information</h3> <p>It's important to note that the original model simulations were conducted with a daily temporal resolution, but the data shared here have been aggregated to a monthly scale. We are open to sharing the original daily simulations and additional variables not included in this repository upon request. Please feel free to reach out to us for more information or data requests.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Evaluation of Predictive Capabilities of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Density and Viscosity Measurements of Different Biodiesel-Diesel-Vegetable Oil Ternary Blends

<p>In this section, it was given that Annex Figures and Annex Tables related to the article &quot;Evaluation of Predictive Capabilities of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Density and Viscosity Measurements of Different Biodiesel-Diesel-Vegetable Oil Ternary Blends&quot; published in &quot;Environmental and Climate Technologies&quot; journal.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →
zenodo36/100

Model simulated potential natural vegetation state in the western US under preindustrial, historic, and future (RCP8.5) atmospheric conditions using multiple parameterizations of the dynamic vegetation model TRIFFID.

<p>DATA DESCRIPTION<br> Author contact information:<br> Linnia R. Hawkins<br> Oregon State University<br> lhawkins@oregonstate.edu; linnia.hawkins@gmail.com<br> Data supporting 2019 Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems publication</p> <p>Simulations of the equilibrium vegetation distribution in the western US performed with the climate model HadAM3p-HadRM3p-MOSES2-TRIFFID</p> <p>step1: Identify Influential Parameters<br> All files labeled step1.<br> EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION: Data used in step 1: identify influential parameters&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br> sensitivity experiment adjusting one parameter at a time 38 individual parameters were adjusted to 7 values, equally spaced<br> over a defined plausible range. For reference nine simulations with the default model parameterization are included, initiated with unique initial potential temperature perturbations.&nbsp;</p> <p>The data contains the vegetation state variables at the end of four-year simulations (January 2004 to December 2007) during which two equilibrium time steps with the dynamic vegetation model TRIFFID (Cox et al., 2001). The results are averaged over three simulations initiated with unique atmospheric potential temperature perturbations.</p> <p>FILE DESCRIPTION:<br> NETCDF: Each netcdf file contains the fractional coverage (field1391), leaf area index (field1392), and the canopy height (field1393) for 5 plant functional types (PFTs: broadleaf, needleleaf, c3 grass, c4 grass, shrub) simulated for November 29, 2007.&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;File labeling scheme: &nbsp;&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;step1_parameter_settingindex_3ICave.nc</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;parameter: the name of the only model parameter adjusted<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;setting index: the index of the parameter setting (1-7)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;index of 1 references the lowest plausible parameter setting<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;index of 7 references the highest plausible parameter setting<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;index of 4 references the parameter setting half way between the lowest and highest plausible parameter settings.&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;3ICave: references that the results have been averaged over 3 initial conditions.</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Variables:<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;</p> <p>step2: ParameterSensitivity<br> all files labeled step2<br> EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION:<br> Data used in step 2: parameter sensitivity&nbsp;<br> Perturbed Parameter Experiment (PPE) simultaneously adjusting 18 parameters.<br> Latin hypercube sampling was employed to generate 250 unique parameterizations references with a SETID (ranging from 1-359)<br> The data provided contains the simulated vegetation state after 4 year simulations (December1903-November1907) with two TRIFFID equilibrium rounds.&nbsp;<br> Data is averaged over 5 initial atmospheric conditions.</p> <p>FILE DESCRIPTION:<br> NETCDF: files contain either the fractional coverage (field1391) or the above ground biomass (field1512) for 5 plant functional types (PFTs) simulated for November 1907.</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;File labeling scheme: &nbsp;&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;step2_variable_parametersetindex_5ICave.nc</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;variable: the name of the variable contained in the file<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;setting index: the index of the parameter setting corresponding to the parameter set text files<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;5ICave: references that the results have been averaged over 5 initial atmospheric conditions.</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Variables:<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1512 &ndash; above ground biomass of PFT &ndash; units: kgC/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]</p> <p>TXT: files contain a list of the model parameterizations (for each PFT and variable) and the corresponding to the parameter set index.&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Parameters are labeled in row 1<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Parameter set indices are shown in column 1</p> <p>RESTART: restart_region_TPPE_c374_1903-12-01.nc<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;The restart file contains the model state variables after spinup. This file was used to initiate all model simulations in step2.</p> <p>step3: ParameterSetSelection<br> All files labeled step3<br> EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION:<br> Data used in step 3: parameter set selection<br> PPE simultaneously adjusting 10 parameters.&nbsp;<br> Latin hypercube sampling was employed to generate 140 unique model parameterizations, referenced with a SETID (ranging from 3-276).<br> The data provided contains the simulated vegetation state after 4 year simulations (December1903-November1907) with two TRIFFID equilibrium rounds.&nbsp;<br> Data is averaged over 5 initial atmospheric conditions.</p> <p><br> FILE DESCRIPTION:<br> NETCDF: files contain either the biomass (field1512) fractional coverage (field1391) canopy height (field1393) for 5 plant functional types (PFTs) simulated for November 1907 or the net primary productivity (NPP; item3262_monthly_mean) for December 1903 through November 1907.&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;File labeling scheme: &nbsp;&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;step3_variable_parametersetindex_5ICave.nc</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;variable: the name of the variable(s) contained in the file<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;setting index: the index of the parameter setting corresponding to the parameter set text files<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;5ICave: references that the results have been averaged over 5 initial atmospheric conditions.</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Variables:<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1512 &ndash; above ground biomass of PFT &ndash; units: kgC/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;item3262_monthly_mean &ndash; Net primary productivity &ndash; units: (kgC/m2/sec) &ndash; all PFTs</p> <p>TXT: files contain a list of the model parameterizations (for each PFT) and the corresponding to the parameter set index.&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Parameters are labeled in row 1<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Parameter set indices are shown in column 1</p> <p><br> production_runs<br> files labeled PI, historical, and future<br> EXPERIMENT DESCRIPTION:<br> Data simulated in the production runs. Model spinup was performed under preindustrial conditions with 10 unique model parameterizations (pset0-pset9). The resulting vegetation distribution for each parameterization after spinup are included and labeled PIrestarts. These restarts were used to initiate (or restart) the simulations under historic and future (RCP8.5) climate conditions. Files labeled historic contains the simulated vegetation state after 5 year simulations (2004-09-01 to 2009-08-30) with one TRIFFID equilibrium round occurring at the end. Files labeled future contain the simulated vegetation state after 5 year simulations (2054-09-01 to 2059-08-30) with one TRIFFID equilibrium round occurring at the end.&nbsp;</p> <p>FILE DESCRIPTION:<br> NETCDF: files contain the fractional coverage (field1391), leaf area index (field1392), canopy height (field1393), and biomass(field1512) for 5 plant functional types (in the order broadleaf, needleleaf, C3 grass, C4 grass, shrub).</p> <p><br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;File labeling scheme:<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;pset* where * refers to the model parameterization 0-9<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;files were simulated with the model parameterization *, initiated with a unique initial condition (perturbation to the potential temperature field).&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Variables (PIrestart)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [broadleaf]&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391_1 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [needleleaf]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391_2 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [c3grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391_3 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [c4grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391_4 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392_1 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [needleleaf]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392_2 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [c3grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392_3 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [c4grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392_4 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [broadleaf]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393_1 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [needleleaf]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393_2 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [c3grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393_3 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [c4grass]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393_4 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Variables (historic/future)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1391 &ndash; fractional coverage of PFT &ndash; units: fraction &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1392 &ndash; leaf area index of PFT &ndash; units: m2/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1393 &ndash; canopy height of PFT &ndash; units: meters &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;field1512 &ndash; above ground biomass of PFT &ndash; units: kgC/m2 &ndash; [broadleaf; needleleaf; c3grass; c4grass; shrub]<br> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →
zenodo36/100

Illustrations for 'Disturbances in the evergreen boreal forest and their impact on 21st century vegetation and climate dynamics - A stochastic modeling approach' (Doctoral thesis)

<p>This repository contains all the original illustrations I created for my doctoral thesis at the Technical University of Munich. This work is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license, which means that you are free to use and adapt this work under the same license for commercial and non-commercial applications as long as you credit the original work. To credit, please cite this repository as well as my doctoral thesis.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-sa-4.0Sep 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Data analysis & code: Quantifying the impact of climate change and forest management on Swedish forest ecosystems using the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS

<p><span>This file contains code to optimize the allometric parameters, to plot the figures, and details of the underlying data analysis in "Quantifying the impact of climate change and forest management on Swedish forest ecosystems using the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS" (Bergkvist et al.).&nbsp;<br></span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Dynamic Vegetation Model Dynamic Organic Soil Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (DVM-DOS-TEM) simulations focused on Eight Mile Lake, Alaska and Imnavait Creek, Alaska [2000-2015]

<p>This set of files store model simulations using the biosphere model Dynamic Vegetation Model Dynamic Organic Soil Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (DVM-DOS-TEM), developed to simulate biophysical and biogeochemical interactions between the soil, vegetation and atmosphere.&nbsp;To improve predictions of net carbon releases from thawing permafrost, we tested the sensitivity of a suite of model parameters.&nbsp;We analyzed the responses of ecosystem carbon balances to permafrost thaw by running site-level simulations at two long-term tundra ecological monitoring sites in Alaska: Eight Mile Lake (EML) and Imnavait Creek watershed (IMN).&nbsp;These sites are characterized by similar tussock tundra vegetation but differing soil drainage conditions and climate, IMN consists of well-drained soils, and EML has historically well-drained soils, however permafrost thaw has altered drainage conditions to wetter soils. Simulations were conducted at a 1km resolution, over a 1,000 km2 area (10x10 km square) centered on two long term ecological research sites in Alaska: Eight Mile Lake located in Interior Alaska (63.8900&deg; N, 149.2535&deg; W), and Imnavait creek watershed&nbsp;located on the northern foothills of the Brooks range (68&deg;37&prime; N, 149&deg;18&prime; W).</p> <p>Historical simulations are spanning the 2000 to 2015, and forced using climate simulations from the Climate Research Unit, time series 4.0. We ran 1,000 site level simulations for each model variable.&nbsp;The variables that are produced are gross primary productivity (GPP, in gC.m-2.m-1), net ecosystem exchange (NEE, gC.m-2.m-1), ecosystem respiration (RECO,&nbsp;gC/m2/m-1),&nbsp;active layer thickness (ALT, m), soil temperature (TLAYER,&deg;C) at 5, 10, 40 cm depths, soil moisture (LWCLAYER, m-3/m-3) at 5, 10 cm depths, and snow depth (SNOWDEPTH, m), evapotransipiration(EET, mm/m2/time), potential evapotransipiration (PET, mm/m2/time), leaf area index (LAI, m2/m2), organic layer thickness (OLT, m). The data are stored as compiled csv files, with time as the index, and each model sample output stored in the columns. In addition, there is a postprocessing python script to demonstrate the step and workflow used to generate the individual csv files post processed from the raw model outputs stored as netcdfs.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Improving the representation of high-latitude vegetation distribution in dynamic global vegetation models

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2020View details →
dryad36/100

VTFT_Demography: global ageclass simulation data from the LPJ-wsl v2.0 Dynamic Global Vegetation Model

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Simulations from the CABLE-POP land surface model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison

<p>Outputs from the CABLE-POP land surface model&nbsp;are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v7 climate data for the period 1901-2015 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Landcover was fixed at 1700 values throughout the simulations. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for each individual turnover-causing process in the model were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record