Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

32

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

32 results for “Wetland Monitoring”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi44/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Survey - Tidal Volumetric Flow Rate

These data describe annual estimates of tidal volumetric flow rate collected as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program designed to evaluate compliance of the restoration project with conditions of the SONGS permit. Monitoring began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands in San Diego County, CA. The tidal volumetric flow rate into the wetland between low and high tide was sampled 24 times annually along a cross section transect of the main channel located 0.9 km from the inlet.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi44/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Survey - Plant Reproductive Success

These data describe annual estimates of seed set for seven common salt marsh plant species at the San Dieguito Wetland collected as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program designed to evaluate compliance of the restoration project with conditions of the SONGS permit. Monitoring began in 2012.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi44/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Process Study - Irrigation, Decompaction, Amendment, Planting and Seeding Experiment Vegetation Cover

These data describe estimates of the percent cover of marsh plants in experimental plots designed to evaluate the effectiveness of various soil treatments on increasing vegetation cover at the San Dieguito Wetlands (Del Mar, California). Plots established between 1.61 – 2.1 m MLLW were manipulated to test the effects of irrigation, decompaction, soil amendments, and planting versus seeding, whereas plots between 1.6 – 1.7 m MLLW tested the effects of planting versus seeding alone. Data collection was conducted from 2020 to 2022. During each survey, species of marsh plants were identified and recorded under 98 uniformly spaced points within 4.5 m2 quadrats in each plot.

openCC (other)Jun 2023View details →
edi44/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Process Study - Irrigation, Decompaction, Amendment, Planting and Seeding Experiment Plant Size

These data describe estimates of the condition and size of three species of salt marsh plants (Arthrocnemum subterminale, Frankenia salina, and Salicornia virginica) planted in experimental plots designed to evaluate the effectiveness of various soil treatments on increasing vegetation cover at the San Dieguito Wetlands (Del Mar, California). Plots established between 1.61 – 2.1 m MLLW were manipulated to test the effects of irrigation, decompaction, soil amendments, and planting versus seeding, whereas plots between 1.6 – 1.7 m MLLW tested the effects of planting versus seeding alone. Data collection was conducted from 2020 to 2022. During each survey, the length of the longest axis and maximum perpendicular width of each planted individual was measured.

openCC (other)Jun 2023View details →
edi44/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Process Study – Soil Properties

These data describe physical and chemical properties of soil samples collected as part of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Mitigation Monitoring Program. Data collection began in 2019 at the San Dieguito Wetland in San Diego County, CA. Additional locations at Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh is Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA were added in 2021. Sampling occurred sporadically at various locations in each wetland. All soil samples were characterized for organic matter content and particle size. Additional properties were characterized for select soil samples.

openCC (other)Jun 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Rinker's Treatment Wetland Water Quality monitoring data (2017 - 2019), South Daytona, Florida

<p><span>Water quality was monitored at a constructed treatment wetland in South Daytona, Florida through </span>a<span> </span><span>two-year</span><span> </span><span>project</span><span> </span><span>(Oct</span><span> </span><span>2017-</span><span> </span>Sept<span> </span><span>2019). </span></p> <p><strong><span>The 2017-2018 INDIAN<span> </span><span>RIVER</span><span> </span><span>LAGOON</span><span> </span><span>NATIONAL</span><span> </span><span>ESTUARY</span><span> </span><span>PROGRAM funded Project</span></span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Submitted to the IRL Council</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Oct 8<sup>th</sup>, 2018</span></strong></p> <p><span>&nbsp;</span></p> <p><strong><span>Project<span> </span>Title</span></strong><span>: <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Reed<span> </span><span>Canal</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Basin <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Stormwater <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Improvement <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>through <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Treatment <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span>Wetland</span><span> </span><span>Construction<span> </span>in<span> </span>South<span> </span>Daytona,<span> </span>FL</span></p> <p><strong><span>Project<span> </span>Applicant:<span> </span></span></strong><span>Bethune-Cookman</span><span> </span><span>University</span><span> </span><span>(B-CU)</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span>Amount</span></strong><strong><span> </span></strong><strong><span>of</span></strong><strong><span> <span>Request</span></span></strong><span>:</span><span> </span><span>$181,148</span></p> <h3><span>Other</span><span> </span><span>Funding</span> <span>Sources</span><span> </span><span>and</span> <span>Amount</span><span> </span><span>of</span> <span>Total</span><span> </span><span>Match</span><span>:</span><span> </span><span>$183,095</span></h3> <p><span><span>B-C</span></span>U <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>($74,631);</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>EPA</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>319</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>($11,250);</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>Local</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>wetland/tree/shoreline</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>restoration</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>funds</span> <span><span>&nbsp;</span></span><span>(pending</span></p> <p><span>$60,000); AE-Group ($5,000); </span><span>Volunteers</span><span> </span><span>($2,214);</span><span> </span><span>Project </span>H2O<span> </span><span>Academy</span><span> </span><span>and</span><span> </span><span>partners</span><span> </span><span>($30,000)</span></p> <p><span>The project goals were </span><span>to</span><span> </span><span>design,</span><span> </span><span>construct,</span><span> </span><span>and</span><span> </span><span>assess</span><span> </span>a<span> </span><span>treatment</span><span> </span><span>wetland,</span><span> </span><span>retrofit</span><span> </span><span>Rinker&rsquo;s</span><span> </span><span>pond</span><span> </span><span>within<span> </span><span>the</span><span> </span><span>city</span></span><span>-owned</span> <span>plat, monitor water quality,</span><span>&nbsp;and</span><span> </span><span>conduct plant</span><span> </span><span>surveys</span><span> </span><span>to</span> test<span> the</span> <span>effectiveness</span><span> </span><span>of </span><span>treatment wetlands</span><span> </span>in<span> stormwater</span> <span>management </span><span>and</span><span> habMayitat quality improvement.</span><span> </span><span>This</span><span> </span><span>project</span><span> </span><span>will</span><span> </span><span>engage</span><span> </span><span>the</span><span> </span><span>residents</span><span> </span><span>into</span><span> </span><span>public</span><span> </span><span>education</span><span> </span><span>programs</span><span> </span>in<span> </span><span>order</span><span> </span><span>to</span><span> </span><span>help</span><span> </span><span>them</span><span> </span><span>enhance</span><span> </span><span>their</span><span> </span><span>awareness</span><span> </span><span>of</span> <span>issues</span><span> </span>of <span>and</span><span> solutions</span><span> </span><span>to</span> <span>stormwater</span><span> </span><span>associated</span> <span>problems.</span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Monitoring vertebrate biodiversity of a protected coastal wetland using eDNA metabarcoding

<p>Monitoring plans using environmental DNA have the potential to offer a standardized and cost-efficient method to survey biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems. Among these ecosystems, coastal wetlands are key elements that serve as transition zones between marine and freshwater ecosystems and are today the target of many conservation and restoration efforts. In this sense, eDNA monitoring could provide a rapid and efficient tool for studying and generating baseline biodiversity information to guide coastal wetland management programs. Here we test an eDNA metabarcoding assay as a tool to characterize vertebrate biodiversity in one of the largest coastal wetlands of Chile, the Rio Cruces Wetland, a Ramsar designated site since 1981. We sampled surface water from 49 sites along the entire wetland. Our eDNA approach detected 91 genera of vertebrates including amphibians, fishes, mammals, and birds, as well as identified several cryptic, exotic, and endangered species. Our results also indicated that the spatial distribution of eDNA from different species is spatially structured despite the complex hydrodynamics inherent in this wetland due to the influence of daily tidal regimes. For amphibians and fishes, the number of taxa detected with eDNA was higher in the periphery of the wetland, and increased with proximity to the ocean, a pattern consistent with small-scale spatial sensitivity for some species and eDNA accumulation downstream for others. Birds and mammals showed somewhat more idiosyncratic distributions. Taken together our results add to the growing body of evidence showing eDNA can serve as a rapid cost-effective tool to characterize vertebrate communities in protected coastal wetlands, where visual surveys are difficult and animal collections are often prohibited. The use of multiple primer sets is also recommended as it facilitates the detection of ephemeral terrestrial organisms and resident aquatic organisms that make use of these wetlands.</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
dryad36/100

Monitoring vertebrate biodiversity of a protected coastal wetland using eDNA metabarcoding

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2021View details →
edi36/100

UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Process Study - Elevations of Spartina in Tidal Creek and Mudflat Habitats in Restored and Natural Wetlands in Southern California

These data describe the elevations of vegetated and unvegetated areas within tidal creek and mudflat habitats at the restored San Dieguito Wetlands (Del Mar, CA), the restored San Elijo Lagoon (Solana Beach, CA), and the natural Tijuana River Estuary (San Diego, CA). Data were collected in November 2022. Transects were established in these habitats at each wetland; the elevation and vegetation type were documented for at least seven points along at least five transects per habitat type.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Using citizen science monitoring data in species distribution models to inform isotopic assignment of migratory connectivity in wetland birds

Stable isotopes have been used to estimate migratory connectivity in many species. Estimates are often greatly improved when coupled with species distribution models (SDMs), which temper estimates in relation to occurrence. SDMs can be constructed using from point locality data from a variety of sources including extensive monitoring data typically collected by citizen scientists. However, one potential issue with SDM is that these data oven have sampling bias. To avoid this potential bias, an approach using SDMs based on marsh bird monitoring program data collected by citizen scientists and other participants following protocols specifically designed to maximize detections of species of interest at locations representative of the species range. We then used the SDMs to refine isotopic assignments of breeding areas of autumn-migrating and wintering Sora (Porzana carolina), Virginia Rails (Rallus limicola), and Yellow Rails (Coturnicops noveboracensis) based on feathers collected from individuals caught at various locations in the United States from Minnesota south to Louisiana and South Carolina. Sora were assigned to an area that included much of the western U.S. and prairie Canada, covering parts of the Pacific, Central, and Mississippi Flyways. Yellow Rails were assigned to a broad area along Hudson and James Bay in northern Manitoba and Ontario, as well as smaller parts of Quebec, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan, including parts of the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways. Virginia Rails were from several discrete areas, including parts of Colorado, New Mexico, the central valley of California, and southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba in the Pacific and Central Flyways. Our study demonstrates extensive data from organized citizen science monitoring programs are especially useful for improving isotopic assignments of migratory connectivity in birds, which can ultimately lead to better informed management decisions and conservation actions.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

Code and Training Data for "Cascaded Machine Learning of Soil Moisture and Salinity Prediction in Estuarine Wetlands based on In-situ Internet of Things Monitoring"

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Using citizen science monitoring data in species distribution models to inform isotopic assignment of migratory connectivity in wetland birds

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.