Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
514
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
514 results for “Zambia”
Infrastructure Climate Resilience Assessment Data Starter Kit for Zambia
<p> This starter data kit collects extracts from global, open datasets relating to climate hazards and infrastructure systems. </p> <p> These extracts are derived from global datasets which have been clipped to the national scale (or subnational, in cases where national boundaries have been split, generally to separate outlying islands or non-contiguous regions), using Natural Earth (2023) boundaries, and is not meant to express an opinion about borders, territory or sovereignty. </p> <p> Human-induced climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of climate and weather extremes. This is causing widespread, adverse impacts to societies, economies and infrastructures. Climate risk analysis is essential to inform policy decisions aimed at reducing risk. Yet, access to data is often a barrier, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Data are often scattered, hard to find, in formats that are difficult to use or requiring considerable technical expertise. Nevertheless, there are global, open datasets which provide some information about climate hazards, society, infrastructure and the economy. This "data starter kit" aims to kickstart the process and act as a starting point for further model development and scenario analysis. </p> <p>Hazards:</p> <ul> <li>coastal and river flooding (Ward et al, 2020; Baugh et al, 2024)</li> <li>extreme heat and drought (Russell et al 2023, derived from Lange et al, 2020)</li> <li>tropical cyclone wind speeds (Russell 2022, derived from Bloemendaal et al 2020 and Bloemendaal et al 2022)</li> </ul> <p>Exposure:</p> <ul> <li>population (Schiavina et al, 2023)</li> <li>built-up area (Pesaresi et al, 2023)</li> <li>roads (OpenStreetMap, 2023)</li> <li>railways (OpenStreetMap, 2023)</li> <li>power plants (Global Energy Observatory et al, 2018)</li> <li>power transmission lines (Arderne et al, 2020)</li> </ul> <p>Contextual information:</p> <ul> <li>elevation (European Union and ESA, 2021)</li> <li>land-use and land cover (Copernicus Climate Change Service and Climate Data Store, 2019)</li> <li>administrative boundaries from geoBoundaries (Runfola et al., 2020)</li> </ul> <p> The spatial intersection of hazard and exposure datasets is a first step to analyse vulnerability and risk to infrastructure and people. </p> <p> To learn more about related concepts, there is a free short course available through the Open University on <a href="https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/course/view.php?id=12278">Infrastructure and Climate Resilience</a>. This <a href="https://opsis.eci.ox.ac.uk/courses/2-infra-for-resil/">overview of the course</a> has more details. </p> <p> These Python libraries may be a useful place to start analysis of the data in the packages produced by this workflow: </p> <ul> <li> <a href="https://github.com/tomalrussell/snkit"><code>snkit</code></a> helps clean network data </li> <li> <a href="https://github.com/nismod/snail"><code>nismod-snail</code></a> is designed to help implement infrastructure exposure, damage and risk calculations </li> </ul> <p> The <a href="https://github.com/nismod/open-gira"><code>open-gira</code></a> repository contains a larger workflow for global-scale open-data infrastructure risk and resilience analysis. </p> <p> For a more developed example, some of these datasets were key inputs to a regional climate risk assessment of current and future flooding risks to transport networks in East Africa, which has a related online visualisation tool at <a href="https://east-africa.infrastructureresilience.org/">https://east-africa.infrastructureresilience.org/</a> and is described in detail in Hickford et al (2023). </p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <ul> <li> Arderne, Christopher, Nicolas, Claire, Zorn, Conrad, & Koks, Elco E. (2020). Data from: Predictive mapping of the global power system using open data [Dataset]. In Nature Scientific Data (1.1.1, Vol. 7, Number Article 19). Zenodo. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3628142">10.5281/zenodo.3628142</a> </li> <li> Baugh, Calum; Colonese, Juan; D'Angelo, Claudia; Dottori, Francesco; Neal, Jeffrey; Prudhomme, Christel; Salamon, Peter (2024): Global river flood hazard maps. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) [Dataset] PID: <a href="http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-floods-floodmapgl_rp50y-tif">data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-floods-floodmapgl_rp50y-tif</a> </li> <li> Bloemendaal, Nadia; de Moel, H. (Hans); Muis, S; Haigh, I.D. (Ivan); Aerts, J.C.J.H. (Jeroen) (2020): STORM tropical cyclone wind speed return periods. 4TU.ResearchData. [Dataset]. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.4121/12705164.v3">10.4121/12705164.v3</a> </li> <li> Bloemendaal, Nadia; de Moel, Hans; Dullaart, Job; Haarsma, R.J. (Reindert); Haigh, I.D. (Ivan); Martinez, Andrew B.; et al. (2022): STORM climate change tropical cyclone wind speed return periods. 4TU.ResearchData. [Dataset]. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.4121/14510817.v3">10.4121/14510817.v3</a> </li> <li> Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store, (2019): Land cover classification gridded maps from 1992 to present derived from satellite observation. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.006f2c9a">10.24381/cds.006f2c9a</a> (Accessed on 09-AUG-2024) </li> <li> Copernicus DEM - Global Digital Elevation Model (2021) DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65">10.5270/ESA-c5d3d65</a> (produced using Copernicus WorldDEM™-90 © DLR e.V. 2010-2014 and © Airbus Defence and Space GmbH 2014-2018 provided under COPERNICUS by the European Union and ESA; all rights reserved) </li> <li> Global Energy Observatory, Google, KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Enipedia, World Resources Institute. (2018) Global Power Plant Database. Published on Resource Watch and Google Earth Engine; <a href="http://resourcewatch.org/">resourcewatch.org/</a> </li> <li> Hickford et al (2023) Decision support systems for resilient strategic transport networks in low-income countries – Final Report. Available online: <a href="https://transport-links.com/hvt-publications/final-report-decision-support-systems-for-resilient-strategic-transport-networks-in-low-income-countries">https://transport-links.com/hvt-publications/final-report-decision-support-systems-for-resilient-strategic-transport-networks-in-low-income-countries</a> </li> <li> Lange, S., Volkholz, J., Geiger, T., Zhao, F., Vega, I., Veldkamp, T., et al. (2020). Projecting exposure to extreme climate impact events across six event categories and three spatial scales. Earth's Future, 8, e2020EF001616. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001616">10.1029/2020EF001616</a> </li> <li> Natural Earth (2023) Admin 0 Map Units, v5.1.1. [Dataset] Available online: <a href="https://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors/10m-admin-0-details/">www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-cultural-vectors/10m-admin-0-details</a> </li> <li> OpenStreetMap contributors, Russell T., Thomas F., nismod/datapkg contributors (2023) Road and Rail networks derived from OpenStreetMap. [Dataset] Available at <a href="https://global.infrastructureresilience.org">global.infrastructureresilience.org</a> </li> <li> Pesaresi M., Politis P. (2023): GHS-BUILT-S R2023A - GHS built-up surface grid, derived from Sentinel2 composite and Landsat, multitemporal (1975-2030) European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) PID: <a href="http://data.europa.eu/89h/9f06f36f-4b11-47ec-abb0-4f8b7b1d72ea">data.europa.eu/89h/9f06f36f-4b11-47ec-abb0-4f8b7b1d72ea</a>, doi:10.2905/9F06F36F-4B11-47EC-ABB0-4F8B7B1D72EA </li> <li> Runfola D, Anderson A, Baier H, Crittenden M, Dowker E, Fuhrig S, et al. (2020) geoBoundaries: A global database of political administrative boundaries. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231866. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231866">10.1371/journal.pone.0231866</a>. </li> <li> Russell, T., Nicholas, C., & Bernhofen, M. (2023). Annual probability of extreme heat and drought events, derived from Lange et al 2020 (Version 2) [Dataset]. Zenodo. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8147088">10.5281/zenodo.8147088</a> </li> <li> Schiavina M., Freire S., Carioli A., MacManus K. (2023): GHS-POP R2023A - GHS population grid multitemporal (1975-2030). European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) PID: <a href="http://data.europa.eu/89h/2ff68a52-5b5b-4a22-8f40-c41da8332cfe">data.europa.eu/89h/2ff68a52-5b5b-4a22-8f40-c41da8332cfe</a>, doi:10.2905/2FF68A52-5B5B-4A22-8F40-C41DA8332CFE </li> <li> Ward, P.J., H.C. Winsemius, S. Kuzma, M.F.P. Bierkens, A. Bouwman, H. de Moel, A. Díaz Loaiza, et al. (2020) Aqueduct Floods Methodology. Technical Note. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute. Available online at: <a href="https://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-floods-methodology">www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-floods-methodology</a>. </li> </ul>
National Checklists: Zambia Species List
Data from: GBIF.org (23 January 2025) GBIF Occurrence Download <a href="https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.vd2ajk</a>
Aedes albopictus in Zambia
<p>Identifying the current geographic range of disease vectors is a critical first step towards determining effective mechanisms for controlling and potentially eradicating them. This is particularly true given that historical vector ranges may expand due to changing climates and human activity. The <em>Aedes </em>subgenus <em>Stegomyia</em> contains over 100 species, and among them, <em>Ae.</em> <em>aegypti</em> and <em>Ae. albopictus</em> mosquitoes represent the largest concern for public health, spreading dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. While <em>Ae. aegypti</em> has been observed in the country of Zambia for decades, <em>Ae. albopictus</em> has not. In 2015 we sampled four urban and three rural areas in Zambia for <em>Aedes</em> species. Using DNA barcoding, we confirmed the presence of immature and adult <em>Ae. albopictus</em> at two sites: Siavonga and Livingstone. These genotypes seem most closely related to specimens previously collected in Mozambique based on CO1 sequence from mtDNA. We resampled Siavonga and Livingstone sites in 2019, again observing immature and adult <em>Ae. albopictus</em> at both sites. Relative <em>Ae. albopictus</em> frequencies were similar between sites, with the exception of immature life stages, which were higher in Siavonga than in Livingstone in 2019. While <em>Ae. albopictus</em> frequencies did not vary through time in Livingstone, both immature and adult frequencies increased through time in Siavonga. This report serves to document the presence of <em>Ae. albopictus</em> in Zambia, which will contribute to the process of determining the potential public health implications of this disease vector in Central Africa.</p>
Potential Natural Vegetation of Eastern Africa (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia): raster and vector GIS files for each country
<p>The map of potential natural vegetation of eastern Africa (V4A) gives the distribution of potential natural vegetation in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Malawi and Zambia.</p> <p>The map is based on national and local vegetation maps constructed from botanical field surveys - mainly carried out in the two decades after 1950 - in combination with input from national botanical experts. Potential natural vegetation (PNV) is defined as “vegetation that would persist under the current conditions without human interventions”. As such, it can be considered a baseline or null model to assess the vegetation that could be present in a landscape under the current climate and edaphic conditions and used as an input to model vegetation distribution under changing climate.</p> <p>Vegetation types are defined by their tree species composition, and the documentation of the maps thus includes the potential distribution for more than a thousand tree and shrub species, see the documentation (<a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvegetationmap4africa.org%2Fspecies.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7Ca3280e568f104b9a26b308dc4e62f67b%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638471434157657534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=aeHdnF4n19CbTTznMdObr91vfZys%2FY1PrK1OxI%2BHif0%3D&reserved=0">https://vegetationmap4africa.org/species.html</a>)</p> <p>The map distinguishes 48 vegetation types, divided in four main vegetation groups: 16 forest types, 15 woodland and wooded grassland types, 5 bushland and thicket types and 12 other types. The map is available in various formats. The online version (<a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvegetationmap4africa.org%2Fvegetation_map.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7Ca3280e568f104b9a26b308dc4e62f67b%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638471434157657534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VKVkjZ8lTKMyoU9luZLAYFDwY5sbwDrGXceVEQAeGIQ%3D&reserved=0">https://vegetationmap4africa.org/vegetation_map.html</a>) and for PDF versions of the map, see the documentation (<a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvegetationmap4africa.org%2Fdocumentation.html&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7Ca3280e568f104b9a26b308dc4e62f67b%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638471434157657534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FIsoem3dYG4%2FIQFMPlM8B2Vf9Doqf2CS7p2fevpAwx0%3D&reserved=0">https://vegetationmap4africa.org/documentation.html</a>). Version 2.0 of the potential natural vegetation map and the woody species selection tool was published in 2015 (<a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvegetationmap4africa.org%2Fdocs%2Fversionhistory%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7Ca3280e568f104b9a26b308dc4e62f67b%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638471434157657534%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=J1aJt1D0dUhDd2fF9uEo8k1uu%2F7josYZCnQG%2FXWj5Ks%3D&reserved=0">https://vegetationmap4africa.org/docs/versionhistory/</a>). The original data layers include country-specific vegetation types to maintain the maximum level of information available. This map might be most suitable when carrying out analysis at the national or sub-national level.</p> <p>When using V4A in your work, cite the publication: Lillesø, J-P.B., van Breugel, P., Kindt, R., Bingham, M., Demissew, S., Dudley, C., Friis, I., Gachathi, F., Kalema, J., Mbago, F., Minani, V., Moshi, H., Mulumba, J., Namaganda, M., Ndangalasi, H., Ruffo, C., Jamnadass, R. & Graudal, L. 2011, Potential Natural Vegetation of Eastern Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia). Volume 1: The Atlas. 61 ed. Forest & Landscape, University of Copenhagen. 155 p. (Forest & Landscape Working Papers; 61 - as well as this repository using the DOI <<span><a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.11125645&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7C82eb48688be64612c08108dc70c1b2e9%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638509224465318531%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BtOVb3lPqZXp45K%2BWKUaLQEK3CTn0uMg8ysuQh5aVpo%3D&reserved=0">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11125645</a></span>>.</p> <p>The development of V4A was mainly funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and supported by University of Copenhagen</p> <p>If you want to use the potential natural vegetation map of eastern Africa for your analysis, you can download the spatial data layers in raster format as well as in vector format from this repository <<span><a href="https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.11125645&data=05%7C02%7Cjpbl%40ign.ku.dk%7C82eb48688be64612c08108dc70c1b2e9%7Ca3927f91cda14696af898c9f1ceffa91%7C0%7C0%7C638509224465318531%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BtOVb3lPqZXp45K%2BWKUaLQEK3CTn0uMg8ysuQh5aVpo%3D&reserved=0">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11125645</a></span>></p> <p>A simplified version of the map can be found on <u>Figshare <https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1306936.v1>. </u>That version aggregates country specific vegetation types into regional types. This might be the better option when doing regional-level assessments.</p> <p> </p>
Land Use and Land Cover Mapping of Katanino Forest Reserve, Zambia (2019–2023)
<h1><strong>Overview</strong></h1> <p>The land use and land cover maps encompass the Katanino Forest Reserve in the Copperbelt province, Zambia. These maps categorize the area into two classes: forest and non-forest. They were derived from NICFI, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1 mosaics, resulting in a spatial resolution of 4.77 meters, covering the period from 2019 to 2023. </p> <h1><strong>Maps Accuracy</strong></h1> <p>The overall accuracy of the final annual maps (2019–2023) ranged from 0.90 to 0.94. The user’s and producer’s accuracies are detailed in Table 1.</p> <p>Table 1: Land use and land cover maps validation, including overall, producer (PA) and user (UA) accuracies values for each class.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>2019</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>2020</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>2021</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>2022</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>2023</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong><span> </span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>PA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>UA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>PA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>UA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>PA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>UA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>PA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>UA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>PA</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>UA</span></strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><span>Forest</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.87</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.83</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.88</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.91</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.88</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>1</span></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><span>Non Forest</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.86</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.82</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.99</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.89</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>1</span></p> </td> <td> <p><span>0.87</span></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong><span>Overall Accuracy</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>0.92</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><span> </span></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>0.90</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><span> </span></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>0.93</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><span> </span></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>0.94</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><span> </span></p> </td> <td> <p><strong><span>0.93</span></strong></p> </td> <td> <p><span> </span></p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h1><strong>Files descripion</strong></h1> <ul> <li>KAT_2019.tif: 2019 land use and land cover map</li> <li>KAT_2020.tif: 2020 land use and land cover map</li> <li>KAT_2021.tif: 2021 land use and land cover map</li> <li>KAT_2022.tif: 2022 land use and land cover map</li> <li>KAT_2023.tif: 2023 land use and land cover map</li> <li>qgis_style.qml: QGIS style file</li> <li>KAT_training_samples(.shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj): training samples with class labels</li> <li>KAT_validation_samples(.shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj): validation samples with class labels</li> </ul> <p> </p>
Figs. 1-2 in A new species of the genus Anthrenus (s. str.) from Zambia (Coleoptera: Dermestidae: Megatomini).
Figs. 1-2.- Habitus of male: 1.- Anthrenus (s. str.) klichai sp. nov. (Holotypus). 2.- Anthrenus (s. str.) kantneri Háva, 2003.
Figs. 7-8 in A new species of the genus Anthrenus (s. str.) from Zambia (Coleoptera: Dermestidae: Megatomini).
Figs. 7-8.- Abdomen of male: 7.- Anthrenus (s. str.) klichai sp. nov. 8.- Anthrenus (s. str.) kantneri Háva, 2003.
Figs. 5-6 in A new species of the genus Anthrenus (s. str.) from Zambia (Coleoptera: Dermestidae: Megatomini).
Figs. 5-6.- Genitalia of male: 5.- Anthrenus (s. str.) klichai sp. nov. 6.- Anthrenus (s. str.) kantneri Háva, 2003.
CLDF dataset derived from Sawka et al.'s "Toka-Leya of Zambia" from 2019
<p>Cite the source of the dataset as:</p> <blockquote> <p>Sawka, Kenneth S. and Mbewe, Christopher and Josephat, Daka and Schwertfeger, Jacob (2019): Toka-Leya of Zambia: Southern Province: Livingstone, Kazungula, Zimba, and Kalomo District. SIL International.</p> </blockquote>
Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma spp. detected from striped leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros vittatus) in Zambia
Fig. 3. Species delimitation of Trypanosoma cruzi clade. Maximum likelihood phylogeny with outgroup (Trypanosoma lewisi) and with Baysian support values presented 17 linages recognized as species for the PTP analysis. Monophyletic groups in red indicated single putative species as well as terminal branches in blue.. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma spp. detected from striped leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros vittatus) in Zambia
Fig. 1. Giemsa staining of Trypanosoma sp. from ZB17–105 in BSK-M medium Representative images of ZB17-105 in the BSK-M medium are displayed at the same magnification (x1000). (a,b) flagellates resembling promastigote forms. (c) possibly epimastigote forms under division. K: kinetoplast, N: nucleus, F: flagellum.
Text-fig. 1. Chara braunii from Lake Magadi, Tanzania. a – top of plants with gametangia, b – oospore with 6 ridges, 400 µm long. in Some Finds Of Charophytes From East-Africa (Zambia, Tanzania, Kenya And Somalia)
Text-fig. 1. Chara braunii from Lake Magadi, Tanzania. a – top of plants with gametangia, b – oospore with 6 ridges, 400 µm long.
Fig. 1 in Preliminary herpetological survey of Ngonye Falls and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia
Fig. 1. (A) Map of western Zambia indicating major localities mentioned in the text, including Sioma Ngwezi National Park (dark grey polygon). The light grey rectangle indicates the study site, and the dotted line indicates the Zambezi River. Inset: Map of Zambia indicating the enlarged region. (B) Enlarged study site with locality names. The Ngonye Falls campsite and visitor's center are both within 1 km of Ngonye Falls and are therefore not indicated on the map.
Fig. 3 in Preliminary herpetological survey of Ngonye Falls and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia
Fig. 3. Selection of reptiles photographed in the vicinity of Sioma Ngwezi National Park and Ngonye Falls in south-western Zambia. (A) Anchieta's Worm Lizard (Monopeltis anchietae), Idjobwa Pan, northern buffer zone of Sioma Ngwezi National Park and (B) close-up of the head, showing the double head shields. (C) Wahlberg's Kalahari Gecko (Pachydactylus wahlbergii wahlbergii), Ngonye Falls campsite. (D) Schmitz's Blind Legless Skink (Acontias schmitzi, PEM R22015), east bank of the Zambezi River opposite Ngonye Falls.
Fig. 2 in Preliminary herpetological survey of Ngonye Falls and surrounding regions in south-western Zambia
Fig. 2. Selection of amphibians and reptiles photographed in the vicinity of Ngonye Falls, south-western Zambia. (A) View of Ngonye Falls from the eastern side of the Zambezi River. (B) Mapacha Grass Frog (Ptychadena cf. mapacha, VMUS 5990), Sioma Ngwezi National Park Headquarters. (C) Long-tailed Worm Lizard (Dalophia longicauda), Sioma Ngwezi National Park Headquarters. (D) Zambezi Rough-scaled Lizard (Ichnotropis grandiceps, TM 86237), Sioma Ngwezi National Park Headquarters. (E) Barotse Blind Legless Skink (Acontias jappi, TM 86232), Sioma Ngwezi National Park Headquarters. (F) Eastern Black-lined Plated Lizard (Gerrhosaurus intermedius), Sioma Ngwezi National Park Headquarters.
Figures 4−6 in Two new species of Strigocossus Houlbert, 1916 (Lepidoptera, Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) from Togo and Zambia
Figures 4−6. Genitalia of Strigocossus (coll. ANHRT): 4. S. takanoi sp. n., holotype; 5. S. takanoi sp. n., paratype, female; 6. S. sanbenai sp. n., holotype.
Figures 7−8 in Two new species of Strigocossus Houlbert, 1916 (Lepidoptera, Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) from Togo and Zambia
Figures 7−8. Habitats of the new Strigocossus species: 7. Hillwood Farm, Ikelenge, NW Zambia, habitat of S. takanoi (photo by Lydia Mulvaney); 8. Fazao-Malfakassa National Park, Togo, habitat of S. sanbenai (photo by Marios Aristophanous).
Figures 1−3 in Two new species of Strigocossus Houlbert, 1916 (Lepidoptera, Cossidae, Zeuzerinae) from Togo and Zambia
Figures 1−3. Adult specimens of Strigocossus (coll. ANHRT): 1. S. takanoi sp. n., holotype, male; 2. S. takanoi sp. n., paratype, female; 3. S. sanbenai sp. n., holotype, male.
Figures 1–8 in Mutinondia, a new genus for a new species from Zambia (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae: Lithosiini)
Figures 1–8. Lithosiina spp., type species of the corresponding genera: adults. Depositories of the specimens: 1, 2, 7 and 8 in ANHRT; 3–6 in MWM/ZSM.
Figures 13–16 in Mutinondia, a new genus for a new species from Zambia (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae: Lithosiini)
Figures 13–16. Lithosiina spp., type species of the corresponding genera: female genitalia. Depositories of the specimens dissected: 13 and 14 in ANHRT; 15 in MWM/ZSM; 16 in OUMNH.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.