Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
52
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
52 results for “alien plant species”
Supplementary material 3 from: Zimmermann H, Loos J, von Wehrden H, Fischer J (2015) Aliens in Transylvania: risk maps of invasive alien plant species in Central Romania. NeoBiota 24: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.24.7772
Risk maps for all eight study species.: Explanation note: Risk maps for all eight study species derived from the MAXENT model.
Supplementary material 2 from: Zimmermann H, Loos J, von Wehrden H, Fischer J (2015) Aliens in Transylvania: risk maps of invasive alien plant species in Central Romania. NeoBiota 24: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.24.7772
Check for sampling bias.: Explanation note: We checked our dataset for sampling bias, that is the distribution of presence points (N = 1484) at different road distances.
Supplementary material 1 from: Zimmermann H, Loos J, von Wehrden H, Fischer J (2015) Aliens in Transylvania: risk maps of invasive alien plant species in Central Romania. NeoBiota 24: 55-65. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.24.7772
Table of species localities.: Explanation note: Table of all species localities (latitude and longitude in decimal degrees, WGS 84).
FIGURE 18. Hyperlasion aliens Mohrig, 2004 in Black fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) found in association with cultivated plants and mushrooms in Australia, with notes on cosmopolitan pest species and biosecurity interceptions
FIGURE 18. Hyperlasion aliens Mohrig, 2004 (specimen from Papua New Guinea). A. Hypopygium. B. Flagellomere 3–5. C. Male.
Data set from: Phylogenetic structure of alien plant species pools from European donor habitats
<p><strong>Aim.</strong> Many plant species native to Europe have naturalized worldwide. We tested whether the phylogenetic structure of the species pools of European habitats is related to the proportion of species from each habitat that have naturalized outside Europe (habitat's donor role) and whether the donated species are more phylogenetically related to each other than expected by chance.</p> <p><strong>Location. </strong>Europe (native range), the rest of the World (invaded range).</p> <p><strong>Time period.</strong> Last c. 100 years.</p> <p><strong>Major taxa studied. </strong>Angiospermae.</p> <p><strong>Methods. </strong>We selected<strong> </strong>33 habitats in Europe and analyzed their species pools, including 9,636 plant species, of which 2,293 have naturalized outside Europe. We assessed the phylogenetic structure of each habitat as the difference between the observed and expected mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) for (a) the whole species pool and (b) subgroups of species that have naturalized outside Europe and those that have not. We used generalized linear models to test for the effects of the phylogenetic structure and the level of human influence on the habitats' donor role.</p> <p><strong>Results. </strong>Habitats strongly to moderately influenced by humans often showed phylogenetically clustered species pools. Within the clustered species pools, those species that have naturalized outside Europe showed a random phylogenetic structure. Species pools of less human-influenced natural habitats varied from phylogenetically clustered to overdispersed, with donated naturalized species also often showing random patterns within the species pools. Donor roles in both habitat groups increased with increasing MPD within habitats.</p> <p><strong>Main conclusions. </strong>European h<span>uman-influenced habitats donate closely related species that </span>often naturalize in disturbed habitats outside their native range. <span>Natural habitats donate species from different lineages with various ecological strategies that allow them to succeed in different habitats in the invaded range</span>. However, in most cases, the naturalized species donated are phylogenetically random subsets of the donor habitats' species pools.</p> <p><strong>Aim.</strong> Many plant species native to Europe have naturalized worldwide. We tested whether the phylogenetic structure of the species pools of European habitats is related to the proportion of species from each habitat that have naturalized outside Europe (habitat's donor role) and whether the donated species are more phylogenetically related to each other than expected by chance.</p> <p><strong>Location. </strong>Europe (native range), the rest of the World (invaded range).</p> <p><strong>Time period.</strong> Last c. 100 years.</p> <p><strong>Major taxa studied. </strong>Angiospermae.</p> <p><strong>Methods. </strong>We selected<strong> </strong>33 habitats in Europe and analyzed their species pools, including 9,636 plant species, of which 2,293 have naturalized outside Europe. We assessed the phylogenetic structure of each habitat as the difference between the observed and expected mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) for (a) the whole species pool and (b) subgroups of species that have naturalized outside Europe and those that have not. We used generalized linear models to test for the effects of the phylogenetic structure and the level of human influence on the habitats' donor role.</p> <p><strong>Results. </strong>Habitats strongly to moderately influenced by humans often showed phylogenetically clustered species pools. Within the clustered species pools, those species that have naturalized outside Europe showed a random phylogenetic structure. Species pools of less human-influenced natural habitats varied from phylogenetically clustered to overdispersed, with donated naturalized species also often showing random patterns within the species pools. Donor roles in both habitat groups increased with increasing MPD within habitats.</p> <p><strong>Main conclusions. </strong>European h<span>uman-influenced habitats donate closely related species that </span>often naturalize in disturbed habitats outside their native range. <span>Natural habitats donate species from different lineages with various ecological strategies that allow them to succeed in different habitats in the invaded range</span>. However, in most cases, the naturalized species donated are phylogenetically random subsets of the donor habitats' species pools.</p>
Data from: The effects of climate warming and disturbance on the colonization potential of ornamental alien plant species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set from: Phylogenetic structure of alien plant species pools from European donor habitats
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Prioritizing terrestrial invasive alien plant species for management in urban ecosystems
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material 1 from: Vorstenbosch T, Essl F, Lenzner B (2020) An uphill battle? The elevational distribution of alien plant species along rivers and roads in the Austrian Alps. NeoBiota 63: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.55096
Plot information
Supplementary material 2 from: Vorstenbosch T, Essl F, Lenzner B (2020) An uphill battle? The elevational distribution of alien plant species along rivers and roads in the Austrian Alps. NeoBiota 63: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.55096
Appendix 1–8
Supplementary material 2 from: Bustamante RO, Alves L, Goncalves E, Duarte M, Herrera I (2020) A classification system for predicting invasiveness using climatic niche traits and global distribution models: application to alien plant species in Chile. NeoBiota 63: 127-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.50049
Table S2. Basic information obtained for 49 exotic plants in Chile
Supplementary material 3 from: Bustamante RO, Alves L, Goncalves E, Duarte M, Herrera I (2020) A classification system for predicting invasiveness using climatic niche traits and global distribution models: application to alien plant species in Chile. NeoBiota 63: 127-146. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.63.50049
Map of the species
Data from: Commonness and rarity of alien and native plant species – the relative roles of intraspecific competition and plant–soil feedback
The success of invasive alien and common native species may be explained by the same underlying mechanisms. Differences in intraspecific competition as well as differences in plant–soil feedback have been put forward as potential determinants of plant success. We teased apart the relative roles of competition and plant–soil feedback in a greenhouse experiment with 30 common and rare alien and native species from nine plant families. We tested whether plant biomass decreased less for common than rare species, regardless of origin, when grown at higher relative frequencies (1, 3 or 6 out of 9 plants per pot) in a community and in soil previously conditioned by the same species at different frequencies (0, 1, 3 or 6 out of 9 plants per pot) in an orthogonal design for these two factors. Plant survival decreased slightly, but non-significantly, for all species when grown in soil previously occupied by conspecifics. Among surviving plants, we found a decrease in biomass with increasing intraspecific competition across all species (regardless of origin or commonness), and alien species were more negatively affected by previous high plant frequency than native species, but only marginally significantly so. Our findings suggest that, while intraspecific competition limits individual biomass in a density-dependent manner, these effects do not depend on species origin or commonness. Notably, alien species but not natives showed a decrease in performance when grown in soil pre-conditioned with a higher frequency of conspecifics. In conclusion, soil-borne pathogen accumulation might be weak in its effects on plant performance compared to intraspecific competition, with neither being clearly linked to species commonness.
Supplementary material 1 from: Cubino JP, Těšitel J, Fibich P, Lepš J, Chytrý M (2022) Alien plants tend to occur in species-poor communities. NeoBiota 73: 39-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.73.79696
Alien plants tend to occur in species-poor communities
Supplementary material 1 from: Bitani N, Shivambu TC, Shivambu N, Downs CT (2022) An impact assessment of alien invasive plants in South Africa generally dispersed by native avian species. NeoBiota 74: 189-207. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.74.83342
Table S1
Supplementary material 2 from: Bitani N, Shivambu TC, Shivambu N, Downs CT (2022) An impact assessment of alien invasive plants in South Africa generally dispersed by native avian species. NeoBiota 74: 189-207. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.74.83342
Table S2
Supplementary material 3 from: Sirbu C, Miu IV, Gavrilidis AA, Gradinaru SR, Niculae IM, Preda C, Oprea A, Urziceanu M, Camen-Comanescu P, Nagoda E, Sirbu IM, Memedemin D, Anastasiu P (2022) Distribution and pathways of introduction of invasive alien plant species in Romania. NeoBiota 75: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.75.84684
Appendix S3. Publications used to compile distribution of alien plant species in Romania.
Supplementary material 1 from: Sirbu C, Miu IV, Gavrilidis AA, Gradinaru SR, Niculae IM, Preda C, Oprea A, Urziceanu M, Camen-Comanescu P, Nagoda E, Sirbu IM, Memedemin D, Anastasiu P (2022) Distribution and pathways of introduction of invasive alien plant species in Romania. NeoBiota 75: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.75.84684
Appendix S1. List of invasive and potentially invasive alien plant species in Romania
Supplementary material 2 from: Lindemann-Matthies P (2016) Beasts or beauties? Laypersons' perception of invasive alien plant species in Switzerland and attitudes towards their management. NeoBiota 29: 15-33. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.29.5786
English translation of the questionnaire :
Supplementary material 1 from: Lindemann-Matthies P (2016) Beasts or beauties? Laypersons' perception of invasive alien plant species in Switzerland and attitudes towards their management. NeoBiota 29: 15-33. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.29.5786
Short description of the eight invasive alien plant species :
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.