Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in Anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Brazilian state of Amapá, eastern Amazonia: species diversity and knowledge gaps

Fig. 8. Anuran species recorded in the state of Amapá. A. Rhinella aff. castaneotica. B. Rhinella major (Müller & Hellmich, 1936). C. Rhinella margaritifera (Laurenti, 1768). D. Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758). E. Scarthyla goinorum (Bokermann, 1962). F. Scinax boesemani (Goin, 1966). G. Scinax cruentomma (Duellmann, 1972). H. Scinax fuscomarginatus (A. Lutz, 1925). I. Scinax jolyi Lescure & Marty, 2001. J. Scinax nebulosus (Spix, 1824). Photos: C.E. Costa-Campos.

Fig. 3 in Anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Brazilian state of Amapá, eastern Amazonia: species diversity and knowledge gaps

Fig. 3. Anuran species recorded in the state of Amapá. A. Callimedusa tomopterna (Cope, 1868). B. Ceratophrys cornuta (Linnaeus, 1758). C. Chiasmocleis haddadi Peloso, Sturaro, Forlani, Gaucher, Motta & Wheeler, 2014. D. Chiasmocleis hudsoni Parker, 1940. E. Chiasmocleis shudikarensis (Dunn, 1949). F. Cochranella resplendens (Lynch & Duellman, 1973). G. Ctenophryne geayi Mocquard, 1904. H. Dendrobates tinctorius (Cuvier, 1797). I. Dendropsophus amicorum (Mijares-Urrutia, 1998). J. Dendropsophus counani Fouquet, Orrico, Ernst, Blanc, Martinez, Vacher, Rodrigues, Ouboter, Jairam & Ron, 2015. Photos: C.E. Costa-Campos.

Fig. 4 in Anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Brazilian state of Amapá, eastern Amazonia: species diversity and knowledge gaps

Fig. 4. Anuran species recorded in the state of Amapá. A. Dendropsophus haraldschultzi (Bokermann, 1962). B. Dendropsophus leucophyllatus (Beireis, 1783). C. Dendropsophus minusculus (Rivero, 1971). D. Dendropsophus walfordi (Bokermann, 1962). E. Elachistocleis heliannae Caramaschi, 2010. F. Hamptophryne boliviana Parker, 1927. G. Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense (Ayarzagüena, 1992). H. Hyalinobatrachium mondolfii Señaris & Ayarzagüena, 2001. I. Hyalinobatrachium taylori (Goin, 1968). J. Hydrolaetare schmidti (Cochran & Goin, 1959). Photos: C.E. Costa-Campos.

Fig. 7 in Anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Brazilian state of Amapá, eastern Amazonia: species diversity and knowledge gaps

Fig. 7. Anuran species recorded in the state of Amapá. A. Pithecopus hypochondrialis (Daudin, 1800). B. Pristimantis chiastonotus (Lynch & Hoogmoed, 1977). C. Pristimantis gutturalis (Hoogmoed, Lynch & Lescure, 1977). D. Pristimantis inguinalis (Parker, 1940). E. Pristimantis crepitaculus Fouquet, Peloso, Jairam, Lima, Mônico, Ernst & Kok, 2022. F. Pristimantis zeuctotylus (Lynch & Hoogmoed, 1977). G. Pseudis paradoxa (Linnaeus, 1758). H. Pseudopaludicola boliviana Parker, 1927. I. Ranitomeya variabilis Zimmermann & Zimmermann, 1988. J. Rhaebo guttatus (Schneider, 1799). Photos: C.E. Costa-Campos.

Fig. 1 in Anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Brazilian state of Amapá, eastern Amazonia: species diversity and knowledge gaps

Fig. 1. Anuran species recorded in the state of Amapá. A. Adelophryne amapaensis Taucce, CostaCampos, Haddad & Carvalho, 2020. B. Adenomera andreae Müller, 1923. C. Adenomera heyeri Boistel, Massary & Angulo, 2006. D. Adenomera hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868). E. Allobates femoralis Boulenger, 1884. F. Allophryne ruthveni Gaige, 1926. G. Amazophrynella teko Rojas, Fouquet, Ron, HernándezRuz, Melo-Sampaio, Chaparro, Vogt, Carvalho, Pinheiro, Ávila, Farias, Gordo & Hrbek, 2018. H. Ameerega pulchripecta (Silverstone, 1976). I. Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus (Boistel & Massary, 1999). J. Atelopus hoogmoedi Lescure, 1974. Photos: C.E. Costa-Campos.

Fig. 4 in The anuran fauna in a protected West African rainforest and surrounding agricultural systems

Fig. 4. Selected amphibian species from Taï National Park and surrounding agroforestry systems. (A) Conraua alleni inhabits rainforest streams. (B) Ptychadena cf. aequiplicata is a typical inhabitant of primary forest. (C) Chiromantis rufescens breeds in puddles along forest roads and stagnant ponds and puddles in the forest. (D) Arthroleptis cf. poecilonotus (a complex of at least two species) occurs in primary and degraded forest, and is particularly abundant in agroforestry systems. (E) Amnirana galamensis is a typical inhabitant of African savannas and was detected for the first time in the Taï area. (F) Ptychadena mascareniensis is a very abundant frog in rice fields.

Fig. 2 in The anuran fauna in a protected West African rainforest and surrounding agricultural systems

Fig. 2. The different habitats in and around Taï National Park which were surveyed for amphibians. (A) and (B) near primary forest; (C) cocoa plantation; (D) rubber plantation; (E) heavily degraded forest edge; (F) rice field.

Fig. 3 in The anuran fauna in a protected West African rainforest and surrounding agricultural systems

Fig. 3. Species accumulation curve (triangles) and estimated amphibian species richness (Chao 2, squares; and Jack-knife 1, circles) of the Taï National Park and surrounding agroforestry system. The mean values of 500 random runs of the daily species lists are given. A daily species list comprised the presence/absence records collected during seven hours of sampling (four hours during daylight, and three hours during night) on one plot by two people for a total of 14 person-hours.

Fig. 1 in The anuran fauna in a protected West African rainforest and surrounding agricultural systems

Fig. 1. Locations of the 32 study plots in the Taï National Park and surrounding agroforestry systems (see Appendix 1 for the plot list and habitat descriptions). Inset figure: position of Taï National Park in Côte d'Ivoire.

Fig. 13 in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Fig. 13. Unrooted Maximum-likelihood (ML) consensus tree inferred from 18S SSU rDNA sequences illustrating the phylogenetic position of Trichodina koloti sp. nov. (at the top of the tree in bold), derived from 2551 nucleotide positions. Support values at the nodes are for bootstrap values/Bayesian posterior probabilities (ML/BI). Synonyms for both T. koloti and T. hypsilepis Wellborn, 1967 are indicated in brackets.

Figs 12a–f in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Figs 12a–f. Denticle dimensions, as proposed by van As and Basson (1989; 1992), of Trichodina hypsilepis Wellborn, 1967 (syn. T. heterodentata) as recorded by and redrawn from: a – Population A of Duncan (1977), b – Population B of Duncan (1977), c – from van As and Basson (1989), d – from Tang and Zhao (2007), e – from Pádua et al. (2012), f – from Valladão et al. (2013).

Figs 10a–f in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Figs 10a–f. Denticle dimensions, as by van As and Basson (1989, 1992), of Trichodina koloti sp. nov. representatives from six different populations collected at the Nxamasere Floodplain, where a–e from Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1927) and f – S. poweri (Hewitt, 1935) tadpoles during the 2016 winter (July to August) expedition (scale = 10 µm).

Figs 2–5 in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Figs 2–5. Micrographs of representative Trichodina koloti sp. nov. specimens from each of the six populations measured from the Nxamasere Floodplain; 2 – Haematoxylin stained nuclear material; 3–5 – collected from the skin and gills of Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1927) (scale = 10 µm).

Fig. 1 in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Fig. 1. Map of the Okavango River System in southern Africa, including the Nxamasere Floodplain where Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1923) and S. poweri (Hewitt, 1953) were collected (redrawn and adapted from West et al. 2015) (scale = 200 km).

Figs 11a–f in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Figs 11a–f. Denticle dimensions, as proposed by van As and Basson (1989, 1992), of Trichodina koloti sp. nov. as recorded by and redrawn from: a and b – Arthur and Lom (1984), c – Kruger et al. (1993a), d – Dias et al. (2009), e and f – Pala et al. (2018).

Figs 6–9 in A New Trichodina Species (Peritrichia: Mobilida) from Anuran Tadpole Hosts, Sclerophrys spp. in the Okavango Panhandle, Botswana, with Comments on this Taxon

Figs 6–9. Micrographs of representative Trichodina koloti sp. nov. specimens from each of the six populations measured from the Nxamasere Floodplain; 6–8 – collected from the skin and gills of Sclerophrys gutturalis (Power, 1927); 9 – collected from the skin and gills of S. poweri (Hewitt, 1935) tadpoles during the 2016 winter (July to August) expedition (scale = 10 µm).

Fig. 2 in Strange tadpoles from the lower Miocene of Turkey: Is paedogenesis possible in anurans?

Fig. 2. Sites of collection of the fossil tadpoles in the Gürcü Valley studied here (enlarged from Fig. 1), Turkey. A. Ahlath Dere, where the specimen MNHN 1998.9173 was collected. B. Agaöz, where the specimen MNHN 1998.9174 and the slab with the mass of roundish spots MNHN 1998.9191 were collected.

Fig. 1 in Strange tadpoles from the lower Miocene of Turkey: Is paedogenesis possible in anurans?

Fig. 1. Map of Northwestern Turkey showing the area which yielded the fossil tadpoles in this study, near Güvem, in the Gürcü Valley. See Fig. 2 for detailed map of this area.

Fig. 5 in Strange tadpoles from the lower Miocene of Turkey: Is paedogenesis possible in anurans?

Fig. 5. Photograph of the isolated group of spots (MNHN 1998.9191 from Agaöz, Gürcü Valley, lower Miocene, Turkey).

Fig. 4 in Strange tadpoles from the lower Miocene of Turkey: Is paedogenesis possible in anurans?

Fig. 4. Photograph of the fossil tadpole MNHN 1998.9174 from Agaöz, Gürcü Valley, lower Miocene, Turkey, bearing a few spots in the abdominal region.