Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,093
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,093 results for “arthropod”
Arthropod species composition in the turf transplant experiment, 2024 - ongoing.
The Turf Transplant Experiment was set up in the summer of 2024. Paired experimental sites were established in two tundra community types - dry meadow and moist meadow - with one site of each community type pair in a lower elevation/warmer area and one site in a higher elevation/cooler area. Subplot turfs (25 cm^2) were transplanted (1) between sites of the same community type at different elevations/temperatures, (2) between plots within the same site or (3) left in place as non-transplant controls. This data package contains measurements of arthropods.
Supplementary Material - The conservation status of the Cretan Endemic Arthropods under Natura 2000 network
<p>Arthropod decline has been globally and locally documented, yet they are still not sufficiently protected. Crete (Greece), a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot, is a continental island renowned for its diverse geology, ecosystems and endemicity of flora and fauna, with continuous research on its Arthropod fauna dating back to the 19th century. Here we investigate the conservation status of the Cretan Arthropods using Preliminary Automated Conservation Assessments (PACA) and the overlap of Cretan Arthropod distributions with the Natura 2000 protected areas. Moreover we investigate their endemicity hotspots and propose candidate Key Biodiversity Areas. In order to perform these analyses, we assembled occurrences of the endemic Arthropods in Crete located in the collections of the Natural History Museum of Crete together with literature data. These assessments resulted in 75% of endemic Arthropods as potentially threatened. The hotspots of endemic taxa and the candidate Key Biodiversity Areas are distributed mostly on the mountainous areas where the Natura 2000 protected areas have great coverage. Yet human activities have significant impact even in those areas, while some taxa are not sufficiently covered by Natura 2000. These findings call for countermeasures and conservation actions.</p> <p><strong></strong><br>The code is available here <a href="https://github.com/savvas-paragkamian/arthropods_assessment_crete">https://github.com/savvas-paragkamian/arthropods_assessment_crete</a> and a zipped version of the repository is included here (arthropods_assessment_crete-1.2.0.tar). </p> <p>Supplementary Material 1 is the Supplementary-material-1.xlsx file which contains the Arthropod occurrences as compiled from the literature and the specimens of the NHMC. In addition all references of the literature are included in a separate sheet.</p> <p>Supplementary Material 2 1 is the Supplementary-material-2.docx which contains two (2) supplementary figures and two (2) supplementary tables.</p> <p> </p>
Additional data for publication: Simple protocol for combined extraction of exocrine secretions and RNA in small arthropods.
<p>Additional data and results are given in this repository. It contains the trimmed reads (fastp; raw reads also on SRA accession numbers SRR29851544-SRR29851549, Bioproject PRJNA1136254), full busco reports for individual transcriptomes, assembly of all six RNAseqs together (transcriptome as base for differential expression analysis) and results of salmon.</p>
Soil microarthropods, ground-dwelling arthropods and soil properties in mown and grazed grasslands in the Veluwe region
<p>In order to find out which factors limit the restoration of soil life and their ecosystem services under grasslands on sandy soils, we studied 40 grasslands of which 20 had agricultural and 20 nature land use, all after an agricultural history.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Site selection</strong></p> <p>Within the Veluwe region (The Netherlands), we selected 40 grasslands: 20 agricultural grasslands and 20 nature grasslands which were managed as new nature reserves since last tillage. Within each of these two land-use types, two types of grassland management were selected: mowing and grazing. Within each of the four combinations of land use and management we selected ten grasslands over a broad age range since last tillage. All grasslands were located on sandy soils (Typic Haploquod and Plaggeptic Haploquod; Soil Survey Staff 1999) with a deep water table to rule out dispersal of soil fauna during waterlogging (Siepel 1996; Jabbour & Barbercheck 2008).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Vegetation and insect surveys</strong></p> <p>Within each grassland a 5×5 meter monitoring plot was laid-out for plant cover surveys, insect and soil-microarthropod sampling and soil analyses. The vegetation surveys were carried out in 2019 at the end of May and in early June, using the Braun-Blanquet method (Braun-Blanquet 1932). In June 2019 soil-surface dwelling insects were sampled with a pitfall trap (Wiggers et al. 2015). Three pitfall traps (8 cm diameter, ca. 20 cm deep) were placed in each plot. Traps were half filled with a solution of water and glycol (3:1) and 3 % Extran soap. A plexiglass cover 20 cm above the trap prevented rainfall diluting the liquid. Traps were removed and emptied after seven days. Insects were identified and grouped at the order level, however, predator groups (carabid and staphylinid beetles, ants and spiders) were identified to the species level in order to group those by their feeding guild.</p> <p> Before analyzing the pitfall trap catches we first removed certain groups from the counts because pitfall traps are not well-suited to catch them systematically: Acari, Collembola, Psocoptera, Thysanoptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Siphonaptera, Diptera, Symphyta, Apocrita, and Parasitica. The remaining 62.0% of the caught individuals were surface-dwelling animals, and their totals (of three pitfall traps per site) were analyzed with negative-binomial generalized linear models. We also analyzed the subset of predators (73.6% of the surface dwellers).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Soil chemical and pesticide sampling and analysis</strong></p> <p>On 8, 9 and 16 October 2019, a bulk soil sample of 50 soil cores (0 - 10 cm) was collected from each 5×5 meter monitoring plot. After homogenization a sub-sample was analyzed for soil chemical analysis. Prior to chemical analysis, samples were oven-dried at 40 °C. Soil acidity of the oven-dried samples was measured in 1 M KCl (pH-KCl). Soil Organic Matter (SOM) was determined by loss-on-ignition (Ball 1964). Ammonium-lactate-extractable P (PAL) was determined according to the standard method (Bronswijk et al. 2003). Total potassium (K) in solution was determined using flame photometry after extraction of soil with HCl (0.1 M) and oxalic acid (0.5 M) in a 1:10 M:V ratio and filtration (Bronswijk et al. 2003). Clay (<2 μm diameter) content was determined through density fractionation (NEN 5753, 2018). Another soil sub-sample was sent to Eurofins Zeeuws-Vlaanderen for pesticide/residue analysis. Samples were freeze-dried and homogenized prior to analysis. Homogenized samples were extracted with acetone, petroleum ether and dichloro-methane using an optimized mini-Luke method. In total 664 pesticides and pesticide residues were analyzed with gas chromatography (Agilent) and liquid chromatography (LC-chromatograph (Agilent) and MSMS (Sciex)). Glyphosate, its residue AMPA and gluphosinate were analyzed using single residue analysis. The detection limit (LOD) was 0,1 mg per kg sample.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Soil microarthropods sampling and determination</strong></p> <p>Grasslands were sampled for microarthropods on 8, 9 and 16 October 2019, taking three cores per monitoring plot of 5×5 m. Cores were 5 cm Ø and 5 cm deep mineral soil plus upper litter. Cores were taken in the middle of the monitoring plots, 1 m apart from each other. Cores were extracted on a Tullgren funnel for 7 days. During that period temperature was increased from 35 to 45 <sup>0</sup>C. Ethanol 70% was used as conservation fluid and microarthropods obtained were put into lactic acid 30% for clarification and identification (Siepel & van de Bund 1988). Identification for the main groups is according to Weigmann (2006) for Oribatida, Karg (1993) for Gamasina and Karg (1989) for Uropodina. Nomenclature is according to Siepel et al. (2009) (Oribatida), Siepel et al. (2016) (Astigmatina) and Siepel et al. (2018) (Mesostigmata).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Litter decomposition</strong></p> <p>To determine the potential decomposition of soil organic matter on each grassland the Tea Bag Index (TBI) was used (Keuskamp et al. 2013). In each grassland four green tea and four rooibos tea bags were buried at 8 cm deep in May 2019 in the 5×5 meter monitoring plots. After 90 days tea bags were collected and stored at 4 ⁰C prior to drying at 70 ⁰C for 48 hours. After drying, remaining sand and (fine) plant roots were carefully removed and the teabags were weighted to determine weight loss. The decomposition rate (<em>k</em>) and the litter stabilization factor (<em>S</em>) of the tea was calculated using the Tea Bag Index (Keuskamp et al. 2013).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data files</strong></p> <p><em><strong>siteData.csv</strong></em></p> <p>site: grassland ID</p> <p>landuse: agricultural or nature land use</p> <p>treat: mowing or grazing management</p> <p>yearsManaged: number of years since last tillage</p> <p>fertilization: kg available nitrogen applied per hectare</p> <p>nGrazingDaysPerHa: livestock days per hectare per year</p> <p>N: mg nitrogen per 100 g </p> <p>PAl: mg P<sub>2</sub>0<sub>5</sub> per 100 g</p> <p>organicMatter: soil organic matter percentage</p> <p>clay: soil clay percentage</p> <p>nPlantSpecies: number of plant species</p> <p>nForbSpecies: number of forb species</p> <p>nMitesSpringtails: total number of individuals of mites and springtails in three core samples</p> <p>nMitesSpringtailsSpecies: number of mite and springtail species in three core samples</p> <p>shannonMitesSpringtails: Shannon diversity index for microarthropods (mites and springtails)</p> <p>nHerboFungivorousGrazerMitesSpringtails: total number of individuals of mites and springtails that are (herbo-)fungivorous grazers, in three core samples</p> <p>nInsectsSpidersPitfall: number of ground-dwelling insect and spider individuals in pitfall traps</p> <p>nPredatorInsectsSpidersPitfall: number of ground-dwelling insect and spider individuals that are predators, in pitfall traps</p> <p>decompositionRate: decomposition rate based on the Tea Bag Index</p> <p>litterStabilisationFactor: litter stabilization factor based on the Tea Bag Index</p> <p>nPesticides: number of detected pesticides</p> <p>avicidesTotalConcentration: microgram antraquinon per kg dry soil</p> <p>fungicidesTotalConcentration: total microgram of fungicides per kg dry soil</p> <p>insecticidesTotalConcentration: total microgram of insecticides per kg dry soil</p> <p>herbicidesTotalConcentration: total microgram of herbicides per kg dry soil</p> <p>pesticidesTotalConcentration: total microgram of pesticides (avicides+fungicides+herbicides+insecticides) per kg dry soil</p> <p>nPredatorCarabids: number of predator carabid beetles in pitfall traps</p> <p>nPredatorStaphylinids: number of predator staphylinid beetles in pitfall traps</p> <p>distanceToNearestHighway: shortest distance (in meters) to the nearest highway (A-road)</p> <p>distanceToNearestNroad: shortest distance (in meters) to the nearest national road (N-road)</p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>mitesSpringtails.csv</strong></em></p> <p>core: core ID, consisting of the site ID (number) and core-within-site ID (letter)</p> <p>species: soil mite or springtail taxon encountered in a soil core</p> <p>guild: feeding guild of the soil mite or springtail taxon:</p> <p> b: bacterivorous</p> <p> fb: fungivorous browser</p> <p> fg: fungivorous grazer</p> <p> gp: general predator</p> <p> hb: herbivorous browser</p> <p> hfg: (herbo-)fungivorous grazer</p> <p> hg: herbivorous grazer</p> <p> o: omnivore</p> <p> ohf: opportunistic herbo-fungivore</p> <p>droughtSens: drought strategy of soil mite and springtail taxa</p> <p> 1: drought avoiders</p> <p> 2: drought sensitive</p> <p> 3: drought mesotolerant</p> <p> 4: drought tolerant</p> <p>microart: number of individuals of a taxon found in a soil core</p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>insecticideData.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em><strong>fungicideData.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em><strong>herbicideData.csv</strong></em></p> <p>site: grassland ID</p> <p>other variables: microgram of a certain pesticide per kg dry soil</p> <p> </p>
Cothran, R. D., F. Radarian, and R. A. Relyea. 2011. Altering aquatic food webs with a global insecticide: Arthropod-amphibian links in mesocosms that simulate wetland communities. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:893-912.
Pesticides play a critical role in maximizing yields of economically important crops and minimizing the human health threats of disease-carrying pests, but they often have collateral effects on nontarget species. We used a mesocosm study to address how the most commonly used insecticide in the USA, malathion, applied at low, ecologically relevant concentrations (20 and 110 mg/L) affects species interactions in aquatic communities. Unlike many community ecotoxicology studies, our study assessed how malathion affects both consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of predators. We also considered how the vertical distribution of predator cues and malathion (caused by potential stratification) affects species interactions. We found no evidence for vertical stratification of malathion, a result suggesting that exposure to the pesticide was uniform throughout the water column. Malathion was lethal to some primary consumers (cladocerans) at both concentrations and to top predators (dragonflies) at the highest concentration (110 mg/L). These lethal effects initiated density-mediated indirect effects in both cases. Malathion also may have decreased dragonfly foraging efficiency, resulting in increased tadpole survival (trait-mediated indirect effect), which decreased the resources used by tadpoles (periphyton). Collectively, our results show that malathion alters species interactions. However, we suggest that the degree to which pesticides affect aquatic communities will depend strongly on the species composition of communities. Therefore, the community-level consequences of pesticide exposure are likely to vary across the ecological landscape.
Arthropod abundance in sweep net samples of sites near Crested Butte, CO in 2017-2020
The purpose of this study was to track year-to-year variation in arthropod communities of the host plant Ligusticum porteri (Apiaceae). In each study year (2017-2020), we used sweep nets to sample the arthropods at each of twenty sites containing populations of L. porteri. Sampling took place the end of June (June 28-30th), and we standardized sampling effort across years. Two field technicians netted insects from vegetation at a consistent pace for 30 seconds each. We sorted and identified insects to Order using a dissection microscope and a project-specific taxonomic key. Non-insect arthropods were also counted but not identified to additional taxonomic levels.
SGS-LTER Long-Term Montioring Project: Arthropod Pitfall Trapping on Small Mammal Trapping Webs on the Central Plains Experimental Range, Nunn, Colorado, USA 1998-2006, ARS Study Number 118 (Reformatted to a Darwin Core Archive)
This data package is formatted as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A, event core). For more information on Darwin Core see https://www.tdwg.org/standards/dwc/. This Level 2 data package was derived from the Level 1 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/edi/328/2, which was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-sgs/134/17. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. Additional information and referenced materials can be found: http://hdl.handle.net/10217/83450. With the exception of heteromyids, eg kangaroo rats and pocket mice, most small rodents in shortgrass steppe are omnivorous. Depending on season, arthropods (insects and arachnids) make up 40-85% of the diet of grasshopper mice and thirteen-lined ground squirrels, the most widespread rodents in northern shortgrass steppe. Small mammals are among the most important predators of ground-dwelling macroarthropods and herbivorous insects provide a direct resource link between weather and plant production. Understanding temporal variability in the abundance of arthropods is central to determining the mechanisms that drive small rodent populations. At present, there are no long-
Invertebrates of the Andrews Experimental Forest: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods, 1971 to 2002
This publication is not a pro forma species list; rather, it has been generated as the result of diverse ecological studies centered on and around the Andrews Forest beginning in 1971. No attempt has been made to exhaustively collect the area with methodologies appropriate to each invertebrate group. This list provides some insight into the enormous invertebrate diversity present in the coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. It provides reference material for investigators who might be engaged in ecological investigations. We hope that these data, set in an ecological context, will stimulate collaboration and facilitate the design of future research.
Abundance of major taxonomic groups of invertebrates (arthropods and gastropods) collected with pitfall traps at four sites near Toolik Field Station Arctic LTER, Alaska in the summer of 2010.
Invertebrates (spiders, insects and slugs) were collected weekly using pitfall traps at four sites near the Arctic LTER at Toolik Field Station, Alaska. Traps were placed along transects in shrub (shrub-dominant) and open (tussock-dominant) tundra sites. Pitfall traps were placed for 48-hour intervals once per week from early June until mid-July 2010. Collected invertebrates were counted and identified to class (all invertebrates), order or family (for some of the most common families collected).
Abundance and biomass of major taxonomic groups of arthropods collected with pitfall and vacuum sampling in Arctic LTER plots fertilized for 24 years near Toolik Field Station, Alaska in the summer of 2013.
Arthropods (spiders and insects) were collected three times during the 2013 summer using pitfall traps and vacuum sampling in plots fertilized with Nitrogen and Phosphorus for 24 years, and in control plots, in an experiment established near Toolik Field Station, Alaska. Pitfall traps were placed for 48-hour intervals; vacuum samples were taken in a 1m2 area. Collected invertebrates were counted and identified to order or family.
Arthropod pitfall trap biomass captured (weekly) and pitfall biomass model predictions (daily) near Toolik Field Station, Alaska, summers 2012-2016.
This data set contains information about the per pitfall trap arthropod biomass captured (or modeled using GAM modelling approaches) near Toolik Field Station from 2012 to 2016 under National Science Foundation (NSF) Office of Polar Programs ARC 0908444 (to Laura Gough), ARC 0908602 (to Natalie Boelman), and ARC 0909133 (to John Wingfield). It is associated with publication DOI: 10.1111/jav.01712.
Vegetation influences desert soil arthropods and their response to altered precipitation
Altered size and frequency of precipitation pulses will influence both plant and soil communities in water-limited systems such as the Sonoran Desert. Little is known about the response of desert soil fauna communities, particularly the mesofauna that are important components of the detrital food web. Further, while there is a well-documented impact of vegetation on soil fauna communities, the role of vegetation in buffering the soil community against such environmental changes is unclear. We conducted a short-term field study to (1) assess how the amount and frequency of monsoon season precipitation pulses influence soil arthropod communities and (2) explore the role of plant-soil linkages in the response of soil arthropod communities to altered precipitation. We experimentally altered the size (ambient and 50% increase) and frequency (ambient and 2X reduced frequency) of monsoon season precipitation for two dominant shrubs representing distinctly different functional types, as well as interplant spaces. We measured the resulting soil arthropod abundance, diversity, and composition, as well as key soil properties to characterize the soil habitat beneath each vegetation type.
Arthropod communities in the Second College Grant, NH
Arthropods are active during the winter in temperate regions. Many use the seasonal snowpack as a buffer against harsh ambient conditions and remain active in a refugium known as the subnivium. While the use of the subnivium by insects and other arthropods is well-established, far less is known about winter community composition, abundance, biomass, and diversity and how these characteristics compare with the community in the summer. Understanding subnivean communities is especially important given observed and anticipated changes in snowpack depth and duration with changing climate. We studied winter and summer insects and other arthropods using pitfall trapping in northern New Hampshire, where snowpack is still relatively intact. We found that compositions of the subnivium and summer arthropod communities differed. The subnivium arthropod community featured moderate levels of richness and other measures of diversity that tended to be lower than in the summer community. More striking, the subnivium community was much lower in overall abundance and biomass than the summer community. Interestingly, some groups and species of arthropods were dominant in the subnivium but either rare or absent in summer collections. These putative “subnivium specialists” included one spider (order: Araneae), Cicurina brevis (Emerton, 1890), and three rove beetles (order: Coleoptera, family: Staphylinidae) Arpedium cribratum Fauvel, 1878, Lesteva pallipes LeConte, 1863, and Porrhodites inflatus (Hatch, 1957). This study provides a detailed account of the subnivium arthropod community, presents novel concepts, and establishes baseline information on arthropod communities in the North American northeastern temperate forest.
Canopy opening increased leaf shredding arthropods and nutrient mineralization but not mass loss in a wet tropical forest
Canopy opening increased leaf shredding arthropods and nutrient mineralization but not mass loss in a wet tropical forest Support for this work was provided by grants BSR-8811902, DEB-9411973, DEB-9705814 , DEB-0080538, DEB-0218039 , DEB-0620910 , DEB-1239764, DEB-1546686, and DEB-1831952 from the National Science Foundation to the University of Puerto Rico as part of the Luquillo Long-Term Ecological Research Program. Additional support provided by the University of Puerto Rico and the International Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service.
Ground Arthropod Community Survey in Grassland, Shrubland, and Woodland at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico (1992-2004)
This data set contains records for the numbers of selected groups of ground-dwelling arthropod species and individuals collected from pitfall traps at 4 sites on the Sevilleta NWR, including creotostebush shrubland, both black and blue grama grasslands, and a pinyon/juniper woodland. Data collections begin in May of 1989, and are represented by subsequent sample collections every 2 months. One site (Goat Draw/Cerro Montosa) was discontinued in 2001, and a new site (Blue Grama) was initiated . Only three sites, creosotebush, black grama, and blue grama were continued between 2001-2004.
FIG. 10 in On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
FIG. 10. — Elder ungulatus (Münster, 1839). Specimen MNHN.F.A33549 under UV light. Scale bar: 1 cm. Photograph: L. Cazes.
FIG. 7 in On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
FIG. 7. — Other Erymoidea from the Late Jurassic Solnhofen Lithographic Limestones (Bavaria, Germany): A-C, specimen MNHN.GG.2004/8245 of Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822) from Solnhofen: specimen in natural light (A), specimen in UV light (B) and line drawing (C); D, specimen MNHN.F.B13445 of Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822) from Solnhofen in UV light. Abbreviations: a1, antennule; a2, antenna; e, eye; Mxp3, third maxillipeds; P1-P5, periopods 1 to 5. Scale bars: A-C, 1 cm; D, 0.5 cm. Photographs: L. Cazes. Line drawing: J. Devillez.
FIG. 8 in On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
FIG. 8. — Mecochirus longimanatus (Schlotheim, 1820): A, B, specimen MNHN.F.A33537; A, specimen in natural light; B, specimen in UV light; C, specimen MNHN.F.B13457; D-F, specimen MNHN.F.A70929; D, general view in UV light; E, view of the carapace in natural light; F, line drawing of the carapace; G, H, specimen MNHN.F.A33539; G, specimen in natural light; H, specimen in UV light. Abbreviations: ac, antennal carina; e1e, cervical groove; gc, gastro-orbital carina; oc, orbital carina. Scale bars: 1 cm. Photographs: L. Cazes. Line drawing: G.P. Odin.
FIG. 4 in On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
FIG. 4. — Antrimpos undenarius Münster, 1839 from Nusplingen, housed at the MNHN: A, picture of the old label; B, C, specimen MNHN.F.A49615; B, natural light picture; C, line-drawing of the grooves; D, specimen MNHN.F.A49610; E, specimen MNHN.F.A49622; F, G, specimen MNHN.F.A49608; F, UV picture; G, line-drawing of the rostrum; H, specimen MNHN.F.A49624. Abbreviations: b, antennal groove; b1, hepatic groove; ct, cephalothorax; e1e, cervical groove; hs, hepatic spine; r, rostrum; rs, rostral spines; s1-s5, pleonal somites; ss, supraorbital spine. Scale bars: B-F, H, 1 cm; G, 2 cm. Photographs: L. Cazes (except A: G. P. Odin). Line drawing: G. P. Odin.
FIG. 5 in On unreported historical specimens of marine arthropods from the Solnhofen and Nusplingen Lithographic Limestones (Late Jurassic, Germany) housed at the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
FIG. 5. — Antrimpos undenarius Münster, 1839 from Nusplingen, housed at the SMNS: A, specimen SMNS 80480; B, specimen SMNS 80481; C, specimen SMNS 80482; D, specimen SMNS 80483; E, specimen SMNS 24228; F, specimen SMNS 66122. Scale bars: A-F, 2 cm. Photographs: G. Schweigert.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.