Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →

FIG. 1 in An emic understanding of honey bees and their environment: attracting bee swarms to nest on rafters in Belitung, Indonesia

FIG. 1. — Hemispherical photographs of three rendap (in pale blue): direct (A), indirect (or semi-open) (B) and well (C) access paths. Credits: N. Césard.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

Datasets to Transient Attracting Profiles in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch

<h1>Summary</h1> This repository contains supplementary datasets to the publication Transient Attracting Profiles in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1215" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kunz et al., 2024, preprint</a>). TRansient Attracting Profiles (TRAPs, <a href="http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16281-x" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Serra et al. (2020)</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4951720" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Serra and Haller (2016)</a>) have been computed using the TRAPs detection software by <a href="https://github.com/MattiaSerra/TRAPs" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mattia Serra (2020)</a>. Raw TRAPs were further post-processed, tracked and analysed using software by <a href="https://github.com/kunzluca/trapsgpgp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Luca Kunz (2024)</a>. Here we provide two comprehensive datasets: <ol> <li> the TRAPS GPGP dataset: This dataset contains 20 years of TRAP detections with various attributes like e.g. TRAP lifetimes, propagation speeds and pattern detections in the surrounding vorticity field. It comes in 20 yearly files named <code>MULTIOBS_24HI_e025_TRAPS_GPGP_20XX.pkl</code>. </li> <li> the TRAPS DRIFTERS HPS dataset: This dataset contains 20 years of drifter-TRAP pair detections with attributes like e.g. drifter-TRAP distances, drifter retention times and TRAP attraction strengths. It comes in one file named <code>MULTIOBS_24HI_e025_GDP_24HI_TRAPS_DRIFTERS_HPS_0019_r075.pkl</code>. </li> </ol>   You can use these scripts to open the datasets and follow the analysis in Kunz et al. (2024): <code>aa_define_classes.ipynb</code> <code>rxa_read_TRAPS_GPGP.ipynb</code> <code>rxb_read_TRAPS_DRIFTERS_HPS.ipynb</code> <code>rxc_ANALYSIS_EXAMPLES.ipynb</code> Make sure you adopt the directory structure that is provided here. You can use the .yml file to set up the working environment via <code>conda env create -f trapsgpgp_condaenvexport.yml</code> or <code>conda create -n trapsgpgp -f trapsgpgp_condaenvexport.yml</code>. For supplementary videos, see: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10943728">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10943728</a> <h1>Source data</h1> Raw TRAPs and relative vorticity are derived from daily snapshots of near-surface geostrophic + Ekman currents from the product Global Total Surface and 15m Current (COPERNICUS-GLOBCURRENT) from Altimetric Geostrophic Current and Modeled Ekman Current Reprocessing that is provided by the E.U. Copernicus Marine Service (<a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00050" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CMEMS, 2022a</a>). Surface drifter positions have been consulted from the Global Drifter Program (<a href="https://doi.org/10.25921/7ntx-z961" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lumpkin and Centurioni, 2019</a>). This repository does not include raw TRAP detections, raw drifter data or relative vorticity fields but they can be shared upon request. <h1>Acknowledgements</h1> This work is a contribution to the project <a href="https://www.trr-energytransfers.de/research/area-l/l3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">L3 Meso- to submesoscale turbulence in the ocean</a> of the Collaborative Research Centre TRR 181 Energy Transfer in Atmosphere and Ocean funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and has been conducted in collaboration with <a href="https://theoceancleanup.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Ocean Cleanup</a>. <h1>Please cite</h1> When using the data, please cite Kunz, L., Griesel, A., Eden, C., Duran, R., and Sainte-Rose, B.: Transient Attracting Profiles in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, Ocean Sci., 20, 1611–1630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1611-2024">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1611-2024</a>, 2024.  and provide a link to the repository.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Diversity of forensically-important dipteran species in different environments in northeastern Brazil, with notes on the attractiveness of animal baits

Fig. 2. Similarity analysis (Cluster's dendrogram) of the diversity of necrophagous Diptera species in 4 types of environment in northeastern Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) response to pyramid traps baited with attractive light and pheromonal stimuli

Fig. 1. Standard black pyramid trap with PHER lure (A) and modified pyramid trap with narrow blue fluorescent light (B).

Fig. 1 in Food attractants to increase pheromone-baited trap performance for Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) in mezcal maguey

Fig. 1. Mean number of Scyphophorus acupunctatus weevils captured per trap biweekly, with various food attractants. Means were calculated from data of 5 biweekly samples. Treatments with similar letters are not significantly different (Tukey, α = 0.05). Error bars indicate SE.

Fig. 3 in Attraction of Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to white light in the presence and absence of ammonia

Fig. 3. Mean numbers ± SE of Rhagoletis indifferens flies caught on clear styrene trap with 60 W halogen bulb and no ammonia lure at different light intensities (lx) shown along the x-axis. Light intensities inside test cage were 90 to 250 lx. Maximum number of flies was 60. Means with same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).

Fig. 4 in Attraction of Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to white light in the presence and absence of ammonia

Fig. 4. Mean numbers ± SE of Rhagoletis indifferens flies caught on sticky yellow traps with ammonia lure in control (no heat) and heat treatments, using a painted 75 W halogen bulb: (A) 76.3 °C black bulb; (B) 105.8 °C black bulb; (C) 65.0 °C white bulb; (D) 90.5 °C white bulb. Light was provided to each trap by using a 45 W LED. Top temperature inside bar is that on the bulb surface; lower temperature is that at 2.5 cm from the bulb. Light intensities inside the test cage were 90 to 250 lx. Maximum number of flies was 60.

Fig. 2 in Attraction of Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to white light in the presence and absence of ammonia

Fig. 2. Mean numbers ± SE of Rhagoletis indifferens flies caught on sticky yellow traps with no ammonia lure at different light intensities (lx) shown along the x-axis: (A) experiment 3, 60 W halogen bulb and (B) experiment 4, 60 W LED bulb. Light intensities inside test cage were 90 to 250 lx. Maximum number of flies was 60. Means with same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).

Fig. 1 in Attraction of Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to white light in the presence and absence of ammonia

Fig. 1. Mean numbers ± SE of Rhagoletis indifferens flies caught on sticky yellow traps with ammonia lure at different light intensities (lx) shown along the x-axis: experiment 1: (A) test 1A, 60 W halogen bulb; (B) test 1B, 75 W halogen bulb; experiment 2: (C) test 2A, 60 W LED bulb; (D) test 2B, 60 W LED bulb. Light intensities inside test cage were 90 to 250 lx. Maximum number of flies was 60. Means with same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05, Tukey's HSD test).

Fig. 5 in Attraction of Rhagoletis indifferens (Diptera: Tephritidae) to white light in the presence and absence of ammonia

Fig. 5. Mean numbers ± SE of Rhagoletis indifferens flies caught on sticky yellow traps with no ammonia lure: (A) experiment 7 using a black bulb: control (light off) and heated (light on); (B) experiment 8 using an iron: control (iron off) and heated (iron on). No bulb light was provided in either experiment. Top temperature above bar is that on the surface; lower temperature is that at 2.5 cm from the heat source. Light intensities inside the test cage were 90 to 250 lx. Maximum number of flies was 60.

Fig. 2 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 2. Response of males of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF-120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), Buminal® (= Buminal), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 3 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 3. Response of females of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF- 120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), Buminal® (= Buminal), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 1 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 1. Response of adult males (A) and females (B) of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis in field cages to Nu-Lure® Insect Bait (= Nu-Lure), beer waste, Bugs for Bugs® Fruit Fly Bait (= Bugs for Bugs), and Buminal® (= Buminal) either alone or with added ammonium acetate (= AA) or ammonium carbonate (= AC). Water was used as a negative control. For each fly species and sex, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 4 in Attraction of Bactrocera cucurbitae and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) to beer waste and other protein sources laced with ammonium acetate

Fig. 4. Response of males of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis to GF-120® NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait (= GF-120), beer waste, Nu-Lure® Insect Bait (= Nu-Lure), and water (negative control) either in the absence (A), or presence (B) of ammonium acetate (= AA). For each species, different letters (lowercase: B. cucurbitae; uppercase: B. dorsalis) indicate significant differences according to ANOVA and the Fisher LSD tests at P ≤ 0.05.

Fig. 1 in Brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) attraction to various light stimuli

Fig. 1. Average distance Halyomorpha halys adults were found away from the light source for each color tested at 30 lx using mixed sex adult H. halys populations. Dark (0 lx) trials were used as the no-attractive-stimulus control. Error bars represent the standard error. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P <0.05; ANOVA and Tukey HDS).

Fig. 3 in Brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) attraction to various light stimuli

Fig. 3. Average distance Halyomorpha halys adults were found away from the light source for each combination of sex and intensity. Error bars represent the standard error.

Fig. 4 in Brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) attraction to various light stimuli

Fig. 4. The distribution of Halyomorpha halys around the light source for the adult male and female trials for both the 0 (dark) and 75 lx trials. The grid shown is a two dimensional representation of the distances for each stink bug as the actual data was not gathered on a flat plane. The light source is demarcated by the small circle in the center. The average distance for the group is shown with the black dashed circle. Grey filled-in circles show 1 SD from the mean. Means and SD values were rounded to the nearest 10 cm, and the angle of H. halys that were not found on the light wall were estimated to show general direction in this figure. The ending position of each H. halys adult is represented by a black dot.

Fig. 2 in Brown marmorated stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) attraction to various light stimuli

Fig. 2. Average distance Halyomorpha halys individuals were found away from the light source for each life stage tested at 75 lx using white light. Error bars represent the standard error. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (P <0.05; ANOVA and Tukey HDS).

Fig. 1 in New attractant food for catching adult rednecked peanutworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in peanut

Fig. 1. Trap containing sugarcane molasses and Stegasta bosqueella adults (see white circles) captured in a peanut crop.