Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-3.0Feb 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in A DNA barcode-based survey of terrestrial arthropods in the Society Islands of French Polynesia: host diversity within the SymbioCode Project

Fig. 1. Distributions of the elevations at which specimens were collected on each island. Figure'1.'!

Fig. 9 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 9. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 36) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 8 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 8. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 42) of E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917): Ituri 5 (◊), Ituri 6 (♦), Ituri/'Kisangani region' (∆), Epulu 2 (▲), and Ituri 8 (). Also shown are the type specimens of E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (○).

Fig. 7 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 7. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 22) of E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901): 'Kisangani region' 2 (◊), Ituri 3 (♦) and 'Kisangani region' 3 (∆). Also shown are the type specimens examined of E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (○) and E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (●).

Fig. 5 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 5. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 36) of E. cf. miolepis specimens from the Lower Congo: Inkisi (◊), Luki 1 (♦) and Luki 2 (∆). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□) and E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■).

Fig. 3 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 3. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 17 log-transformed measurements (n = 177) of Enteromius Cope, 1867: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa - Corrigendum

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 for a PCA on 10 meristics (n = 177) of Enteromius: E. cf. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (◊), E. cf. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (♦), E. cf. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (∆), and E. cf. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) (▲). Also shown are the type specimens examined of: E. miolepis (Boulenger, 1902) (○), E. holotaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (●), E. eutaenia (Boulenger, 1904) (□), E. kerstenii (Peters, 1868) (■), E. brazzai (Pellegrin, 1901) (), E. tshopoensis (De Vos, 1991) (▼), E. pellegrini (Poll, 1939) (+), and E. atromaculatus (Nichols & Griscom, 1917) ().

Fig. 2. A in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 2. A. ML tree based on 558-bp-long Enteromius COI sequences with 1000 bootstrap replications, with node support shown as NJ/ML bootstrap (bootstrap values> 95% are shown; lineages <2% sequence divergence were collapsed), the label 'Kisangani region' contains samples from the Lomami/ Lobaye system and the Lobilo. B. Map of the Congo basin with the sampled river stretches indicated according to the phylogenetic lineages.

Fig. 9 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 8 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 4 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Fig. 7 in Morphometry and DNA barcoding reveal cryptic diversity in the genus Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Congo basin, Africa

Figures 60–65 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 60–65. Heterolepisma cooloola sp. nov. holotype ♀ (60) presternum, prothoracic sternum and PI; (61) mesothoracic sternum and PII; (62) apex of mesothoracic sternum; (63) metathoracic sternum and PIII; (64) apex of metathoracic sternum; (65) pretarsus of PIII. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 24–31 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 24–31. Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. holotype ♀ (24) presternum, prothoracic sternum and PI; (25) mesothoracic sternum; (26) metathoracic sternum and PIII; (27) urotergite III; (28) idem, sublateral comb; (29) idem, submedial comb; (30) urotergite IX, infralateral combs; (31) urotergite X. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 15–23 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 15–23. Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. holotype ♀ (15) left lateral, anterior and posterior margins of pronotum; (16) idem, detail of left anterior trichobothrial area; (17) idem, detail of right posterior trichobothrial area; (18) idem, left posterior comb of pronotum; (19) lateral margin of mesonotum; (20) idem, trichobothrial areas of right side; (21) idem, left posterior comb of mesonotum; (22) lateral margin of metanotum; (23) idem, trichobothrial areas of left side. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 7–14 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 7–14. Heterolepisma sclerophylla Smith and Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. (7) Heterolepisma sclerophylla Smith, holotype ♀, medial section of pronotal collar. (8–14) Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. holotype ♀ (8) medial section of pronotal collar; (9) lateral bristlecomb of urotergite III and adjacent scale; (10) head; (11) scape, pedicel and basal interval of flagellum, from above; (12) antenna, most distal surviving annuli; (13) maxilla, only larger setae of palp illustrated; (14) labium, setae of palp not strong so not illustrated. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 32–36 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 32–36. Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. holotype ♀, unless otherwise indicated by specimen number (32) urosternite III; (33) idem, posterior comb; (34) coxites VIII and IX, ovipositor and styli; (35) coxite IX, paramere and penis (K.260993); (36) paramere (K.260993). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 78–85 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 78–85. Heterolepisma cooloola sp. nov. holotype ♀ unless otherwise indicated by specimen number (78) stylet IX (QM 207012); (79) apex of anterior gonapophysis; (80) apex of posterior gonapophysis; (81) bases of terminal filaments; (82) most distal surviving divisions of cerci; (83) most distal surviving divisions of median filament; (84) coxites IX, styli and penis of male (QM 207012); (85) paramere. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 49–59 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 49–59. Heterolepisma cooloola sp. nov. holotype ♀ (49) labium, only large setae of palp illustrated; (50) idem, ultimate article of palp; (51) pronotum; (52) idem, right margin; (53) idem, detail of right anterior trichobothrial area; (54) idem, detail of left posterior trichobothrial area; (55) lateral margin of mesonotum; (56) idem, posterior trichobothrial area; (57) idem, anterior trichobothrial area; (58) idem, right posterior comb; (59) lateral margin of metanotum. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figure 4 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figure 4. BI tree for concatenated COI and 28S genes. BI posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values are shown above and below branches, if ≥0.9 or ≥70%, respectively. Asterisks indicate type specimens, with a single asterisk for paratypes and a double asterisk for holotypes.