Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 8 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 8. Volume renderings of Symphylurinus sp. 1 (AMNH JZC-DR005) in Miocene Dominican amber. A, dorsal habitus. B, ventral habitus. C, right lateral habitus. All to the same scale. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 7 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 7. Camera lucida drawings of Symphylurinus sp. 1 (AMNH JZC-DR005) in Miocene Dominican amber. A, left ventrolateral habitus. B, detail of right tarsi of leg III. C, right abdominal stylus V. D, right abdominal stylus VI. E, right abdominal stylus VII. F, detail of infundibuliform complex of left cercus. Abbreviations: a, apical macroseta; lp, labial palpus; M, sternal macroseta; sa, subapical macroseta; scA, lateral subcoxal appendage; stI–stVII, stylus I–VII; vm, ventromedial macroseta. C–F are to the same scale. Scale bars: 0.5 mm in A; 0.2 mm in B; 0.1 mm in C–F.

Figure 5 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 5. Volume renderings of holotype of Symphylurinopsis punctatus gen. et sp. nov. (M-2232) in Miocene Dominican amber. A, dorsal habitus. B, ventral habitus. C, left lateral habitus. All to the same scale. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 1 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of Recent specimens representing the two body plans of predatory diplurans. A, Japygoidea specimen from Malta, dorsal view. B, Projapygoidea specimen from Thailand, ventral view. C, detail of cercal forceps. D, detail of right cercus. Scale bars: 2 mm in A; 0.5 mm in B.

Figure 4 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 4. Camera lucida drawings of holotype of Symphylurinopsis punctatus gen. et sp. nov. (M-2232) in Miocene Dominican amber. A, detail of cerci. B, dorsal habitus. Abbreviations: lp, labial palp; scA, lateral subcoxal appendage; stI– stVII, stylus I–VII. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figure 3 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 3. Photomicrographs of holotype of Symphylurinopsis punctatus gen. et sp. nov. (M-2232) in Miocene Dominican amber. A, dorsal habitus. B, detail of setigerous punctures on tergites IV–VII. C, detail of head. D, detail of cerci in ventral view. Abbreviations: gp, genital papilla; lp, labial palp; mp, maxillary palp; stVII, stylus VII. Scale bars: 0.5 mm in A; 0.1 mm in B–D.

Figure 2 in Fossil diversity in 'dawn' hexapods (Diplura: Projapygoidea), with direct evidence for being chemically predaceous in the Cretaceous

Figure 2. Holotype of Electroprojapyx alchemicus gen. et sp. nov. (AMNH JZCBu-1957) in Cretaceous Burmese amber. A, photomicrographs of left ventrolateral habitus of the dipluran fossilized in a preying-and-spraying position with its prey. B, detail of cerci with arrows pointing to the secreted substance. C, camera lucida drawing of the specimen with the secreted filaments in red. D, detail of antennae of the dipluran with the Collembola between them. Abbreviations: b, bubble; scA, lateral subcoxal appendage; stII–stVII, stylus II–VII. Scale bars: 0.5 mm in A, C, D; 0.1 mm in B.

Fig. 4 in An extensive study on the chemical diversity of lipophilic extractives from Eucalyptus globulus wood

Fig. 4. Radial profile of different chemical families (proportion of chemical families) in the lipophilic DCM along the tree height levels (0%, 35% and 60%) in E. globulus mature wood trees.

Fig. 3 in An extensive study on the chemical diversity of lipophilic extractives from Eucalyptus globulus wood

Fig. 3. Proportion of chemical families in the lipophilic DCM extracts of E. globulus mature wood trees. Average of 36 runs (3 trees × 3 height levels x 2 extractions x 2 injections).

Fig. 2 in An extensive study on the chemical diversity of lipophilic extractives from Eucalyptus globulus wood

Fig. 2. Example of one GC-MS chromatogram of dichloromethane extracts (as TMS derivatives) of Eucalyptus globulus mature wood trees and range of the principal chemical family distribution. Main peaks: 3 - Decanoic acid (C10:0); 5 - Vanillin; 11 - Dodecanoic acid (C12:0); 12 - 4-hydroxy-3,5- dimethoxybenzaldehyde; 13 - homovanillic alcohol; 14 - Vanillic acid; 25 - Syringic acid; 36 - Propiovanillone; 39 - Hexadecanoic acid (C16:0); 52 - Octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid (C18:2); 55 - Octadecanoic acid (C18:0); 66 - ω-hydroxy fatty acid (C18:2); 67 - Icosanoic acid (C20:0) 74 - 1-palmitoylglycerol (G- C16:0); 79 - 2-hydroxy-decane-1,10-dioic acid (C10:0); 86 - Octacosane (C28); 90 -Tetracosanoic acid; 94 - Hexacosan-1-ol (C26); 102 - a-tocopherol; 109 - campesterol; 115 - tritriacontane (C33); 118 - β-Sitosterol; 123 - 2-tetracosanoylglycerol (G-C24:0); 140 - Betulinic acid isomer; 146 - 1-hexacosanoylglycerol (G-C26:0); 147 - Ursolic acid; 161 - Arjunolic acid; 162 - Asiatic acid; 168 - sitosteryl 3-β-D-glucopyranoside. All the identified peaks are listed in Tables 1–6

Fig. 1 in An extensive study on the chemical diversity of lipophilic extractives from Eucalyptus globulus wood

Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of sapwood heartwood outer and inner in the stems of E. globulus trees harvested for these study. Heartwood area and extractives content (average of three trees ± STDEV) (Adapted from Gominho et al., 2015).

Fig. 2 in Taxanes and taxoids of the genus Taxus - A comprehensive inventory of chemical diversity

Fig. 2. Taxane-based anti-cancer drugs: A) paclitaxel (Taxol®), B) docetaxel (Taxotere®), C) cabazitaxel (Jevtana®).

Fig. 1 in Taxanes and taxoids of the genus Taxus - A comprehensive inventory of chemical diversity

Fig. 1. Attributes of members of the genus Taxus: A) T. baccata tree in an old-growth forest, B) T. baccata as a trimmed hedge, C) twig of female tree with characteristic red arils, D) immature male cones (artwork courtesy of C. F. Conner).

Fig. 4 in Taxanes and taxoids of the genus Taxus - A comprehensive inventory of chemical diversity

Fig. 4. Outline of Taxol biosynthesis. Enzymatic reactions are numbered (above reaction arrows). Blue color is used to indicate known enzymes, while red color is used to depict as yet unidentified enzymatic steps: (1) geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; (2) taxadiene synthase; (3) taxadiene 5α-hydroxylase; (4) taxadiene 5α- ol acetyltransferase; (5) taxane 10β-hydroxylase; (6) taxane 13α-hydroxylase; (7) taxoid 14β-hydroxylase; (8) taxoid 2α-hydroxylase; (9) taxoid; 7β-hydroxylase; (10) taxoid 2α-benzoyltransferase; (11) taxoid 10β-acetyltransferase; (12) taxoid C9 hydroxylase; (13) taxoid C1 hydroxylase; (14) benzoic acid CoA ligase; (15) taxoid Oacetyltransferase; (16) taxoid O-acetyltransferase; (17) taxoid O-acetyltransferase; (18) taxoid C9 hydroxyl oxidase; (19) phenylalanine aminomutase; (20) β-phenylalanine CoA ligase; (21) taxoid C13 phenylpropanoid side chain CoA acyltransferase; (22) taxoid 2′-hydroxylase; (23) taxoid C13 side chain N-benzoyltransferase. For details see text.

Fig. 3. Taxane occurrence across the genus Taxus. A in Taxanes and taxoids of the genus Taxus - A comprehensive inventory of chemical diversity

Fig. 3. Taxane occurrence across the genus Taxus. A) Categorization of taxane structures by major groups (note that 3,11-cyclotaxanes and all tetra-, penta- and hexacyclic taxanes are summarized under 'cyclotaxanes'; 3,8-secotaxa-3,8,11-trienes, 3,8-secotaxa-3,7,11-trienes, 3,8-secotaxa-3,7,12-trienes, and 11,12-secotaxanes are summarized under 'secotaxanes'). B) Distribution of sub-groups within the 6/8/6-taxane group.

Fig. 6 in Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France

Fig. 6. Heatmap highlighting variation of volatile compounds across the 63 hop accessions from Northern France. This heatmap has been generated with normalized data for the top 51 molecules responsible for differences between the chemical profiles. Red and green colors indicate lowest and highest performance of the traits, respectively. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France

Fig. 5. Identification of population genetic structure of the 63 accessions of Humulus lupulus L. sampled in Northern France (Hauts-de-France region) using 11 microsatellites. A. Bar plot showing the distribution of individual assignations estimated for K = 2 and K = 6 clusters, from Bayesian inference cluster analysis performed with the 53 Humulus lupulus haplotypes sampled from the 14 locations (from A to K). Each vertical line represents an individual and the length of each colored line corresponds to the membership coefficient (scale at the left of the bar plot) for each cluster. Individuals are grouped according to their sampling locations. B. Frequencies of the 6 clusters (represented by colors) within each sampled location. Colors are same than on Fig. 5A. C. Principle Component Analysis (PCoA) based on genetic distances between each accession. Individuals were colored according to their sample site collection. D. Dendrogram underlying genetic clustering of the 63 hop accessions, including 10 commercial varieties (samples 1 to 10), 3 heirloom varieties (samples 11 to 13) and 50 wild sampled from 11 geographical locations (cf Table 1). 1: Nugget, 2: Strisselspalt, 3: Golding, 4: Challenger, 5: Brewers Gold, 6: Cascade, 7: Magnum, 8: Northern Brewer, 9: Target, 10: Fuggle, 11: Groene Bel, 12: Star, 13: Coigneau, Location A: 14 to 18; Location B: 19 to 23; Location C: 24 to 28; Location D: 29 to 32; Location E: 33 and 34; Location F: 34 and 35; Location G: 37 and 38; Location H: 39 to 42; Location I: 43 to 52; Location J: 53 to 58; Location K: 59 to 63. The tree was constructed using the unweighted neighbor-joining method based on genetic dissimilarity among the haplotypes according to microsatellite markers. Each branch corresponds to a hop genotype and the colors of branches indicate locations from which the genotypes were sampled. The color code is the same as the one on Fig. 5C.

Fig. 2 in Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France

Fig. 2. Analysis of volatile compounds in hop cones by GC-MS. A. Chemical structure of main volatile compounds found in hop cones. B. GC-MS total ion chromatogram of a hop cone sample (cv. Nugget). Compounds identified correspond to the following compounds: (1) β-myrcene; (2) β-caryophyllene; (3) linalool; (4) 2- undecanone; (5) copaene; (6) α-humulene; (7) γ-muurolene.

Fig. 4 in Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France

Fig. 4. Results of characterization of soil samples collected close to the root environment of the 63 hops studied. These 63 hops samples are represented by ten commercial varieties: Nugget comes from « comm_1 »; Strisselspalt comes from « comm_2 » and other commercial cultivars come from the same field « comm_3–10 »; three heirloom varieties coming from the same field identified as « old »; and fifty wild hops identified according to Table 1. The characterization of soil samples was based on pH and conductivity measurements, on organic matter content determined by loss of ignition as well as on dosage of the sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium elements. A. Dendrogram including hierarchical cluster analysis (N = 8) among soil samples determined by soil characterization. B. Heatmap associated to the dendrogram. The 8 clusters of the hierarchical clustering were reported on the heatmap. C. Pictures of soil samples from locations B (Tourbi`ere de Vred, Vred) (1), D (Cap Blanc nez, Wissant) (2) and K (Dunes d'Ecault) (3).

Fig. 1. Main hop prenylated phenolic compounds A in Multivariate analysis of chemical and genetic diversity of wild Humulus lupulus L. (hop) collected in situ in northern France

Fig. 1. Main hop prenylated phenolic compounds A. Chemical structure of major chalcones and acylphloroglucinols produced by hops and their molecular weight. B. Chromatogram of a crude hydro-ethanolic extract of hops (cultivar Nugget) at 330 nm. XN: xanthohumol, α1: co-humulone; α2: humulone; α3: ad-humulone; β1: colupulone; β2: lupulone; β3: ad-lupulone.