Find research datasets worth reusing

Comparative morphology of immature stages and adults of Hydroscapha from Taiwan, with a description of a new species from Hong Kong (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Hydroscaphidae)

<p>Original unedited photographs and SEM micrographs to the paper published in Raffles Journal of Zoology.</p>

Figs 28–30 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 28–30. Pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 28. Dorsal view. 29. Lateral view. 30. Ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Figs 26–27 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 26–27. Head of larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 in lateral view. 26. First-instar larva; arrows indicate the 5 stemmata. 27. Last-instar larva. Scale bars: 26 = 0.1 mm; 27 = 3 mm.

Figs 18–19 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 18–19. Habitus of first-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 18. Dorsal view. 19. Ventral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figs 1–2 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 1–2. Habitus of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 1. Dorsal view. 2. Ventral view. Scale bar: 20 mm.

Figs 3–10 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 3–10. Head and fore leg of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 3. Head, dorsal view. 4. Head, ventral view. 5. Right maxilla, ventral view. 6. Left antenna, dorsal view. 7–9. Mandibles (7 = ventral view, 8 = dorsal view, 9 = mesal view). 10. Left prothoracic leg. Scale bars: 3–4 = 3 mm; 5, 7–9 = 2 mm; 6, 10 = 1 mm.

Figs 22–23. Thorax and abdominal segments 4–5 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 22–23. Thorax and abdominal segments 4–5 of first instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 22. Dorsal view. 23. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figs 24–25. Abdominal segments 8–9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 24–25. Abdominal segments 8–9 of first instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 24. Dorsal view. 25. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figs 11–17. Thorax and abdominal segments 5 and 9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 11–17. Thorax and abdominal segments 5 and 9 of last-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 11–12. Thorax (11 = dorsal view, 12 = ventral view). 13. Tergite 5. 14. Sternite 5. 15. Sternite 9. 16. Tergite 9. 17. Abdominal segment 9, posterior view. Scale bars: 3 mm.

Figs 35–36 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 35–36. Extremely fine setae on abdominal segments of pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 35. Setae on tergites 4–5. 36. Setae on sternites 4–5. Scale bars: 3 mm.

Figs 20–21 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 20–21. Head of first-instar larva of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 20. Dorsal view. 21. Ventral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figs 31–34. Abdominal segment 9 in Comparative morphology of immature Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919 and systematic position of the Trictenotomidae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionoidea)

Figs 31–34. Abdominal segment 9, spherical protrusions and spiracles of pupa of Trictenotoma formosana Kriesche, 1919. 31–33. Abdominal segment 9 (31 = dorsal view, 32 = lateral view, 33 = ventral view). 34. Spherical protrusions and spiracles on segments 4–6, lateral view. Abbreviations: sp = spiracle; lsp = lateral spherical protrusion; ssp = second spherical protrusion. Scale bars: 31–33 = 3 mm; 34 = 2 mm.

Figure 78 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 78. Bemisia afer complex, Madeira, Santana, Faja do Niguiera, 15-XII-92, ex. Myrica toya, F. Aguiar, coll.

Figure 77 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 77. Bemisia afer complex, Madeira, Faja do Penedo, 20.iii.92, ex. Marcetella madeirensis, F. Aguiar, coll., #C136.

Figure 79 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 79. Bemisia afer complex, Madeira, Levada above Ribeiro Bonita, nr. Sao Jorge Icod de los Vinos, 01 Apr. 1995, ex. Sibthorpia peregrina (Scrophulariaceae), J. Martin and A. Aguiar, colls., JHM # 6590.

Figure 76 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 76. Bemisia afer complex, Madeira, Faja do Penedo, 20-iii-1992, ex. Marcetella madeirensis, F. Aguiar, coll. # C136.

Figure 71 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 71. Bemisia afer complex, Canary Islands, Tenerife, Barranco de las Moradas, ex. Eschium sp., J. Martin, coll., JHM # 7048.

Figure 70 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 70. Bemisia afer complex, Canary Islands, Tenerife, Barranco de los Moradas, nr. Icod de los Vinos, approx 700-900 m., 18 May 1997, ex Rubus fruticosus grp., J.H. Martin, coll., JHM #7047.

Figure 69 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 69. Bemisia afer complex, Canary Islands, La Palma, Ctr. Barbuento, ex. Rubus sp., 21-VI-1997, E. Hernandez-Suarez, coll.

Figure 68 in A preliminary report on the World species of Bemisia Quaintance and Baker and its congeners (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) with a comparative analysis of morphological variation and its role in the recognition of species Raymond Gill

Figure 68. Bemisia afer complex, Canary Islands, Tenerife, Barranco, de las, Moradas, nr., Icod de los Vinos, at 7-900m, 18 May 1997, ex. Cistus sp., J. Martin, coll., JHM # 7046.