Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

73

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

73 results for “experiment / survey”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo36/100

Figure 3 in Concurrent Field Experiments and Satellite Surveys for Assessing Environmental Risk in the Coastal Zone of Southeast Baltic

Figure 3. Map of the study region showing CTD stations and ADCP transects.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →
zenodo36/100

Figure 2. 2015 in Concurrent Field Experiments and Satellite Surveys for Assessing Environmental Risk in the Coastal Zone of Southeast Baltic

Figure 2. 2015 traffic density map of southeast Baltic (© Marine Traffic).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →
zenodo36/100

Supplemental Material: Computational Experiments in Computer Science Research: A literature survey

<p>This laboratory package contains supplemental material from the study: &quot;Supplemental Material: Computational Experiments in Computer Science Research: A literature survey&quot;.&nbsp;The supplementary material contains:<br> 1. The list of the 26 primary studies.<br> 2. The .xlsx file of the dataset used to analyze the RQ.<br> 3. The list of figures published in the scientific article.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Person-Centered Care (PCC) pilot cohort exploring longitudinal potential of USSD mechanism and optimal incentive level for HIV care experience survey response in Lusaka, Zambia 2018-2019

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Post-trial survey data for shared micromobility pricing revealed preference experiment

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2025View details →
dryad36/100

<em>Aedes sierrensis</em> - <em>Lambornella clarki</em> host - parasite interaction data: Field survey and temperature dependence laboratory experiments

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2025View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Initial experiences of US neurologists in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic via survey

<p><strong>Background</strong> The current coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused widespread disease and death. Rapid increases in patient volumes have exposed weaknesses in healthcare systems and challenged our ability to provide optimal patient care and adequate safety measures to healthcare workers (HCWs).</p> <p><strong>Objective</strong> To test the hypothesis that US neurologists were experiencing significant challenges with lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), rapid changes in practice and varying institutional protocols, we conducted this survey study.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> A 36-item survey was distributed to neurologists around the US through various media platforms.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Over a one-week period, 567 responses were received. Of these, 56% practiced in academia. A total of 87% had access to PPE with 45% being asked to reuse PPE due to shortages. The pandemic caused rapid changes in practice, most notably a shift towards providing care by teleneurology, although a third experienced challenges in transitioning to this model. Wide variations were noted both in testing and in the guidance provided for the exposed, sick or vulnerable HCWs. Notably, 59% of respondents felt that their practices were doing what they could, although 56% did not feel safe taking care of patients.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Results from our survey demonstrate significant variability in preparedness and responsiveness to the COVID-19 pandemic in neurology, impacted by region, health care setting and practice model. Practice guidelines from professional societies and other national entities are needed to improve protection for physicians and their patients, promote recommended practice changes during a pandemic, and optimize future preparedness for public health emergencies.</p> <p></p><p></p><p></p>

opencc-zeroMay 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: What influence do courses at medical school and personal experience have on interest in practicing family medicine? – results of a student survey in Hessia

Aim: Against the background of an impending shortage of family practitioners, it is important to investigate the factors influencing the choice to become one. The aim of this study was to identify factors that encourage medical students to choose to practice family medicine. Method: Using a questionnaire, students in the fourth and fifth years of their studies in the Federal State of Hesse were asked about the factors that had influenced their choice of medical specialty and their experience of courses in family medicine. Predictors of an interest in practicing family medicine were calculated using multiple logistic regression. Results: 361 questionnaires were returned, representing a response rate of 70.9%. Confirmation of personal strengths, an interest in the field, and practical experience of the subject generally turned out to be important factors influencing the choice of medical specialty. 49.3% of students expressed an interest in practicing family medicine. A link existed between an interest in working as a family doctor and the opportunity to take over an existing practice, experience of medicine in rural areas, and an appreciation of the conditions of work. With regard to education at medical school, positive experiences during a clinical traineeship in family medicine and positive role models among teachers of general practice were identified as predictors. Conclusion: Almost half the medical students were open to the idea of practicing family medicine. Experience of medicine in rural areas and positive experiences of courses in general practice were linked to an increased interest in working as a family doctor. To promote this interest, it may be a promising approach to increase opportunities to collect experience of medicine in rural areas, and to encourage highly motivated teaching practices.

opencc-zeroDec 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary Material: Perceived Legitimacy of Agricultural Support Schemes: An Investigation Using Factorial Survey Experiments

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Survey experiment Advanced Visualization Lab anonymized

<p>Survey experiment dataset.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong><span>Abstract</span></strong><span><br><span>Visualizing research data can be an important science communication tool. In recent decades, 3D data visualization has emerged as a key tool for engaging public audiences. Such visualizations are often embedded in scientific documentaries screened on giant domes in planetariums or delivered through video streaming services such as Amazon Prime. </span>3D data visualization has been shown to be an effective way to communicate complex scientific concepts to the public. With its ability to convey information in a scientifically accurate and visually engaging way, cinematic-style 3D data visualization has the potential to benefit millions of viewers by making scientific information more understandable and interesting.<span> Maximizing the effectiveness of 3D data visualization has the potential to benefit millions of viewers. To support a wider shift in this professional field towards more evidence-based practice in 3D data visualization to enhance science communication impact, we have conducted a survey experiment comparing audience responses to two versions of 3D data visualizations from a scientific documentary film on the theme of &lsquo;solar superstorms&rsquo; (n=577). This study reveals key strengths and weaknesses of communicating science using 3D data visualization. It also shows the limited power of strategically deployed informational labels to affect audience perceptions of the documentary film and its content. The major difference identified between experimental and control groups was that the ratings of the quality of the documentary film clip were significantly higher for the &lsquo;labeled&rsquo; version. Other outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. The limited effects of informational labels points to the idea that other aspects, such as the story structure, voiceover narration and audio-visual content, are more important determinants of outcomes. This study concludes with discussion of how this new research evidence informs our understanding of &lsquo;what works and why&rsquo; with cinematic-style 3D data visualizations for the public. </span></span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Surveys reporting feedback from families attending Early Childhood Services during 5-month school closure due to COVID-19: an Italian experience

<p>This dataset reports results of two surveys distributed by&nbsp;<em>Cooperativa Sociale Aeris </em> during Covid19 pandemic to families attending its Early Childhood Services dedicated to 0-3 aged children. Aeris is&nbsp;a social enterprise based in northern Italy that deals with socio-educational and welfare services.&nbsp;One of Aeris activities deals with the management of the ten Early Childhood Services located in the northern Italy &nbsp;which are dedicated to 0-3 aged children. After the school closure occurred the 24<sup>th</sup> of February 2020, Aeris organized&nbsp;online activities to keep contacts with families, to support children as well as their parents.&nbsp;With the aim of assessing if the adopted organization and proposed activities had positive feedback on families, a first survey was distributed in May 2020 and a second survey was distributed in October 2020&nbsp;to families attending the Early Childhood Services. Survey results are reported in this dataset. Even if&nbsp;several worldwide actions have been implemented to guarantee educational continuity during Covid19 pandemic, most of these actions targeted 3-18 years old children/adolescents, while the subgroup 0-3 was rarely included.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Global Survey on Newborns' HOspitalisation and Parental Experiences - the HOPE Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06827028. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Influencer Marketing: a Survey-based Experiment

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06433466. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Real Life Experience Survey of Dupilumab in the Netherlands

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05331755. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

QUALITATIVE SURVEY ABOUT NURSES FIRST WORK EXPERIENCE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05110859. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Influencer E-Cigarette and Cannabis Marketing: a Survey-Based Experiment Among Adolescents

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06919263. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Impact of a Mock-up Fact-checking Extension on HPV Vaccine Misinformation: A Survey Experiment

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06405048. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 17.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Initial experiences of US neurologists in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic via survey

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: What influence do courses at medical school and personal experience have on interest in practicing family medicine? – results of a student survey in Hessia

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Dataset of Evaluation Survey of a Conceptual Model for Promoting Digital Forensics Experiments

<p>Dataset of Evaluation Survey of a Conceptual Model for Promoting Digital Forensics Experiments</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record