Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →

Figure 5 in Feeding and reproductive behavior of the dung beetle Canthon rutilans cyanescens (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)

Figure 5 - Number and weight of the brood balls built by Canthon rutilans cyanescens couples fed with distinct amounts of food resource. A) Number of brood balls over the offer of 1 g and 5 g of supply in small and B) big couples. C) Brood balls weight constructed with the same amount of food offered to small and D) big couples. The central line of each box corresponds to the median per couples, boxes show 75th percentile and 25th, lines are the upper and lower limits and points are outliers.

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →

Figure 1 in Feeding and reproductive behavior of the dung beetle Canthon rutilans cyanescens (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)

Figure 1 Reproductive behavior and development stages of Canthon rutilans cyanescens observed in the laboratory. A - Copula; B - Female producing the oviposition chamber inside the brood ball with its mouth parts; C - Couple next to the future brood ball; D – Female defecating inside the future brood ball chamber; E - Brood balls with external feces pellets; F - Egg; G - Newly hatched larvae; H - Larva growing as it feeds; I - Larva in its maximum size, frequently defecating; J - Last larval stage, when preparing to pupa stage, expelling all fecal contents; K - Pupa; L - Newly hatched adult with moult remains in the clypeus and pronotum.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 3. Extreme feeding. A in Leeches in the extreme: Morphological, physiological, and behavioral adaptations to inhospitable habitats

Fig. 3. Extreme feeding. A) Hirudo verbana, a commercially important and frequently traded species of European medicinal leech. B) Several individuals of Hirudo verbana feeding on blood inside a nitrile rubber glove.

Fig. 1 in Feeding behavior of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on soybeans exhibiting antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance resistance

Fig. 1. Mean number of potential drops by Aphis glycines on soybean genotypes for a 15 h (900 min) period.

Fig. 2 in Feeding behavior of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on soybeans exhibiting antibiosis, antixenosis, and tolerance resistance

Fig. 2. Mean duration of sieve element phase by Aphis glycines on soybean genotypes for a 15 h (900 min) period.

Fig. 3 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 3. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in barley. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 6 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 6. Number (SE) of S. zeamais male and female (n = 200) emergence when reared on the individual host grains: corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 5 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 5. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in brown rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 2 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 2. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in corn. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 1 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 1. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 4 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 4. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Fig. 2. A in Behavior and feeding of two beetle pollinators of Zamia integrifolia (Cycadales): Rhopalotria slossoni (Coleoptera: Belidae) and Pharaxanotha floridana (Coleoptera: Erotylidae)

Fig. 2. A) Pharaxanotha floridana spend more time on the ovulate cone scale than control (p = 0.035) and equal amounts of time on pollen and ovulate cone scales in 30 mins no-choice behavior trials. B) No visible evidence of feeding damage on ovulate cone scale parenchyma tissue, nor on ovules afer 24 h. C) No visible feeding damage on pollen cone scale parenchyma tissue afer 24 h. D) Pharaxanotha floridana E) More mass (mg) is consumed per surviving beetle from ovulate cone scales than from pollen cone scales over 24 h (p = 0.0033). In A and E, summary boxplots are shown with raw data values overlaid.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Fig. 1. A in Behavior and feeding of two beetle pollinators of Zamia integrifolia (Cycadales): Rhopalotria slossoni (Coleoptera: Belidae) and Pharaxanotha floridana (Coleoptera: Erotylidae)

Fig. 1. A) Rhopalotria slossoni spend more time on pollen cone scales than ovulate cone scales (p = 0.041) in 30 mins no-choice behavior trials but show no statistical difference between ovulate and control. B) Ovulate cone scales show extensive feeding damage on their parenchyma tissue afer 24 h. C) Pollen cone scales show feeding damage on the parenchyma tissue afer 24 h. D) Rhopalotria slossoni E) The mass (mg) of tissue consumed per surviving weevil is equal between pollen and ovulate cone scales. In A and E, summary boxplots are shown with raw data values overlaid.

Fig. 4 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 4. Activity period of (A) two glossophagine species (Anoura caudifer + Glossophaga soricina) and Phyllostomus discolor on Musa paradisiaca inflorescence, and of (B) two approaching strategies (upside landing and hovering) performed by two glossophagine species in an orchard located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 3. Phyllostomus discolor (Wagner, 1843) with its wings completely open and its head directed toward the flowers performing the downside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 2 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 2. Glossophaga soricina (Pallas, 1766) with its wings folded alongside the body performing the upside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 1 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 1. Anoura caudifer (É. Geoffroy, 1818) with its snout partially inserted in floral tube performing the hovering strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2010View details →

Figs. 1–4 in Notes on the feeding behavior of Teratocoris saundersi (Hemiptera: Miridae) in Iceland: phytophagy, zoophagy, and adventitious biting

Figs. 1–4. Teratocoris saundersi Douglas & Scott, 1869 in Iceland: host plant and feeding habits. 1 – Leymus arenarius (Poaceae), a host plant on sandy shore, Reykjavík; 2 – female preying on a chironomid fly on the grass L. arenarius; 3 – male scavenging on a fly on thinstem lady's mantle, Alchemilla filicaulis (Rosaceae); 4 – fifth instar piercing human skin ('adventitious biting').

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2009View details →

Fig. 1 in Scientific Note Feeding behavior and follower fishes of Myrichthys ocellatus (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) in the western Atlantic

Fig. 1. Capture sequence of Myrichthys ocellatus involving head and tail: (a) initial scattering movements with the head; (b) tail taking over the position of the head; (c) widening hole with the tail; (d) moment of prey capture. Illustrated by Francisco Costa.