Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 15 in New records of Adelidae from forested habitats of Calabria (South Italy) with an update of the Italian ckecklist (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea)

Fig. 15 – Distribution of Adelidae in the Calabria region. Map created with SimpleMappr (http://www.simplemappr.net).

Figs 11-12 in New records of Adelidae from forested habitats of Calabria (South Italy) with an update of the Italian ckecklist (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea)

Figs 11-12 – Comparison of antennae in the genus Nematopogon. 11, N. robertella, Pietra del Signore; 12, N. garganellus, Bosco dei Gesuiti.

Fig. 10 in New records of Adelidae from forested habitats of Calabria (South Italy) with an update of the Italian ckecklist (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea)

Fig. 10 – Male genitalia of Nematopogon robertella, Pietra del Signore (microscope slide: CREA-0237).

Figs 1-8 in New records of Adelidae from forested habitats of Calabria (South Italy) with an update of the Italian ckecklist (Lepidoptera: Adeloidea)

Figs 1-8 – Adults of Adelidae. 1, Nemophora metallica, Croce di Magara, 17mm; 2, Nemophora scopolii, Croce di Magara, 21mm; 3, Adela mazzolella, Righio, 12mm; 4, Adela reaumurella, Passo della Crocetta, 15mm; 5, Nematopogon robertella, Pietra del Signore, 15mm; 6, Nematopogon sericinellus, Carraci, 14mm; 7, Nematopogon swammerdamella, Timpone Magara, 22mm; 8, Nematopogon garganellus, Bosco Gesuiti, 19mm.

Fig. 4 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 4. Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. cra`ssiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery–forest interface at 2 sites in South Carolina in 2011 and 2012.

Fig. 3 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 3. Mean captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

Fig. 1 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 1. Satellite image of the Mississippi research site (Google, Mountain View, California, USA) with an overlay showing a randomized complete block design of 5 blocks. Representing the 2013 test, each block shown here had a trap placed at −25, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m from the nursery–forest interface.

Fig. 5 in Seasonal and spatial dispersal patterns of select ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from forest habitats into production nurseries

Fig. 5. Mean (± SE) captures of Cnestus mutilatus, Xylosandrus compactus, X. crassiusculus, and X. germanus in ethanol-baited Baker traps deployed at various distances from the nursery–forest interface at 2 sites in Louisiana and Mississippi in 2013 and 2014.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Short Communication Contribution to the knowledge of Ypsolophidae from forested habitats of Southern Italy with an update of the Italian checklist of the genus Ypsolopha Latreille 1796 (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutoidea)

Fig. 1 - Species of the genus Ypsolopha found in Calabria. / Specie del genere Ypsolopha trovate in Calabria. a) Y. alpella, 01.X.2019, Campanella, Sellia, Catanzaro. b) Y. mucronella, 10.V.2016, Il Palmento, Serra San Bruno, Vibo Valentia. c) Y. nemorella, 7.VIII.2013, Fosso Cucolo, Donnici, Cosenza. d) Y. parenthesella, 31.VIII.2016, Piano del minatore, Saracena, Cosenza. e) Y. persicella, 9.XI.2015, Glicarello, Montalto Uffugo, Cosenza. f) Y. scabrella, 17.VIII.2017, Sciortaglie, Alessandria del Carretto, Cosenza. g) Y. sequella, 19.VII.2017, Sciortaglie, Alessandria del Carretto, Cosenza. h) Y. ustella, 25.IX.2019, Coturelle, Albi, Catanzaro. i) Y. vittella, 5.VIII.2013, Pianette, Dipignano, Cosenza.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 1. Географическое поΛожение Норского заповеΑника (А) и картосхема распоΛожения на его территории (Б) учетных пΛощаΑок с фитоценозами (L_1–L_7) на Αвух мониторинговых станциях (I–II). I — МаΛьцевская: L_1 — березняк с участием осины и Λиственницы рябинниковый вейниково-разнотравный; L_2 — осиново-беΛоберезовый рябинниковый вейниково-разнотравный Λес; L_3 — Λиственничник с участием березы пΛоскоΛистной осоково-вейниковый с разнотравьем; L_4 — беΛоберезово-Λиственничный с примесью осины роΑоΑенΑроновый бруснично-осоковый Λес; L_5 — закустаренный, преимущественно тавоΛгой ивоΛистной, разнотравно-вейниковый Λуг. II — Антоновская: L_6 — Λиственничник роΑоΑенΑроново-брусничный; L_7 — Λиственнично-беΛоберезовый с примесью пихты и еΛи закустаренный разнотравно-вейниковый Λес (коΑ типа местообитания соответствуют таковому в табΛ. 1 и 3 и на рис. 2) Fig. 1. Geographical location of the Norsky Nature Reserve (A) and the map (B) of registration sites with phytocenoses (L_1–L_7) at two monitoring stations (I–II). I — Maltsevskaya: L_1 — birch forest with aspen and larch, fieldfare reed-forb; L_2 — aspen-white-birch, fieldfare reed-forb forest; L_3 — larch forest with flat-leaved sedge-reed birch with forbs; L_4 — white-birch-larch with an admixture of aspen rhododendron lingonberry-sedge forest; L_5 — bushy, mostly meadowsweet, forb-reed grass meadow. II — Antonovskaya: L_6 — rhododendron-cowberry larch forest; L_7 — larch-white-birch with fir and spruce, shrubby forb-reed grass forest (the code of the habitat type corresponds to that in Tables 1 and 3 and in Fig. 2) in Structure and dynamics of the taxocenes of shrews in different habitats of the Norsky nature reserve

Рис. 1. Географическое поΛожение Норского заповеΑника (А) и картосхема распоΛожения на его территории (Б) учетных пΛощаΑок с фитоценозами (L_1–L_7) на Αвух мониторинговых станциях (I–II). I — МаΛьцевская: L_1 — березняк с участием осины и Λиственницы рябинниковый вейниково-разнотравный; L_2 — осиново-беΛоберезовый рябинниковый вейниково-разнотравный Λес; L_3 — Λиственничник с участием березы пΛоскоΛистной осоково-вейниковый с разнотравьем; L_4 — беΛоберезово-Λиственничный с примесью осины роΑоΑенΑроновый бруснично-осоковый Λес; L_5 — закустаренный, преимущественно тавоΛгой ивоΛистной, разнотравно-вейниковый Λуг. II — Антоновская: L_6 — Λиственничник роΑоΑенΑроново-брусничный; L_7 — Λиственнично-беΛоберезовый с примесью пихты и еΛи закустаренный разнотравно-вейниковый Λес (коΑ типа местообитания соответствуют таковому в табΛ. 1 и 3 и на рис. 2) Fig. 1. Geographical location of the Norsky Nature Reserve (A) and the map (B) of registration sites with phytocenoses (L_1–L_7) at two monitoring stations (I–II). I — Maltsevskaya: L_1 — birch forest with aspen and larch, fieldfare reed-forb; L_2 — aspen-white-birch, fieldfare reed-forb forest; L_3 — larch forest with flat-leaved sedge-reed birch with forbs; L_4 — white-birch-larch with an admixture of aspen rhododendron lingonberry-sedge forest; L_5 — bushy, mostly meadowsweet, forb-reed grass meadow. II — Antonovskaya: L_6 — rhododendron-cowberry larch forest; L_7 — larch-white-birch with fir and spruce, shrubby forb-reed grass forest (the code of the habitat type corresponds to that in Tables 1 and 3 and in Fig. 2)

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in The use of root plates for nesting sites by Anthophora abrupta (Hymenoptera: Apidae) may be common within forested habitats

Fig. 1. Root plate examples from Green River Game Lands (North Carolina), Fontainebleau State Park (Louisiana), and Mud Creek (Alabama). Map depicts physiographic provinces and relative locations of root plate sites. Upper right picture shows close-up of Anthophora abrupta turrets from BS root plate. BS = Bluebonnet Swamp Nature Center (Louisiana), FB = Fontainebleau State Park (Louisiana), GR = Green River Game Lands (North Carolina), MC = Mud Creek (Alabama), SL = Salem Lake (North Carolina).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in Composition and structure of the helminth community of rodents in matrix habitat areas of the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil

Fig. 3. Bipartite plot of the interactions between the mammal hosts and the helminth parasites identified in the present study.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 2 in Composition and structure of the helminth community of rodents in matrix habitat areas of the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil

Fig. 2. Species accumulation curve of the helminths recorded in each mammalian host: a. Akodon cursor b. Mus musculus c. Necromys lasiurus.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Composition and structure of the helminth community of rodents in matrix habitat areas of the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling sites within the REBIO Poço das Antas and the APA-BRSJ in Rio de Janeiro state (RJ), southeastern Brazil, showing the distribution of the different vegetation types and the canals that separate the two reserves.

Fig. 2 in Richness of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) depends on the area and habitat structure in semideciduous forest remnants

Fig. 2. Rarefaction and extrapolation curve (a) and sample-coverage curve (B) of Chrysomelidae assemblage from remnant forest fragments in Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. In both figures, solid lines represent observed data, dashed lines represent the extrapolation (900 individuals) and shaded areas the 95% confidence intervals (based on a bootstrap method with 1,000 replications).

Fig. 1 in Richness of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) depends on the area and habitat structure in semideciduous forest remnants

Fig. 1. Brazil (light grey), Mato Grosso do Sul State (dark grey) and the regions where the Chrysomelidae assemblage was collected (circles).

Fig. 3 in Richness of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) depends on the area and habitat structure in semideciduous forest remnants

Fig. 3. Path diagram showing the direct and indirect effects of the variables on the Chrysomelidae species richness from remnant forest fragments in Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. The directions of the arrows indicate the direction of effects and the width of arrows is proportional to the effect size. The black arrows indicate significant effects (alpha ≤ 0.05) and the gray arrows indicate insignificant effects.

Рис. 24–25. Местообитания виÃов роÃа Carabus Linnaeus, 1758. 24 – C. (Ophiocarabus) ernsti ulastaiensis subsp. n., аΛьпийские Λуга на воÃоразÃеΛе рек Капчик и Зекку; 25 – C. (Alipaster) semenoviellus semenoviellus Breuning, 1934, Λес из еΛи Шренка в горах ТагымбеΛь. Figs 24–25. Habitats of species of the genus Carabus Linnaeus, 1758. 24 – C. (Ophiocarabus) ernsti ulastaiensis subsp. n., alpine meadows on the ridge between Kaptshik and Zekku rivers; 25 – C. (Alipaster) semenoviellus semenoviellus Breuning, 1934, Picea schrenkiana forest in the Tagymbel Mountains. in New data on the taxonomy of the genus Carabus Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the Ili River basin (China)

Рис. 24–25. Местообитания виÃов роÃа Carabus Linnaeus, 1758. 24 – C. (Ophiocarabus) ernsti ulastaiensis subsp. n., аΛьпийские Λуга на воÃоразÃеΛе рек Капчик и Зекку; 25 – C. (Alipaster) semenoviellus semenoviellus Breuning, 1934, Λес из еΛи Шренка в горах ТагымбеΛь. Figs 24–25. Habitats of species of the genus Carabus Linnaeus, 1758. 24 – C. (Ophiocarabus) ernsti ulastaiensis subsp. n., alpine meadows on the ridge between Kaptshik and Zekku rivers; 25 – C. (Alipaster) semenoviellus semenoviellus Breuning, 1934, Picea schrenkiana forest in the Tagymbel Mountains.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Figs. 2–4 in Myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) response to habitat characteristics of tropical montane cloud forests in central Veracruz, Mexico

Figs. 2–4. Species richness, diversity profiles, and rank–abundance curves. Fig. 2. Comparison of the richness of woody plants at a sampling coverage of 90% and of ants at 85% coverage, among 5 fragments of tropical montane cloud forest in central Veracruz, Mexico. Statistical differences are considered when 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, whereas no differences are assumed when they do overlap, with an α = 0.05. Fig. 3. Diversity profiles of the ant assemblages of F1–F5 based on the equivalent species number. Statistical differences are considered when 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, whereas no differences are assumed when they do overlap, with an α = 0.05. Fig. 4. Rank–abundance curves of the ant assemblages of F1–F5. Total number of ant incidences in each fragment is 60 traps. Only those species with a relative abundance equal to or higher than 10% in a given fragment are shown. Ant species are numbered in accordance with Table 2.