Find research datasets worth reusing

publicMay 2013View details →

Data from: The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2016View details →

Data from: The impact of geographic range, sampling, ecology, and time on extinction risk in the volatile clade Graptoloida

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2013View details →

Data from: Evolutionary and dispersal history of Eurasian wild mice Mus musculus clarified by more extensive geographic sampling of mitochondrial DNA

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2020View details →

Coalescent-based species delimitation is sensitive to geographic sampling and isolation by distance

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenetics of the African horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae): expanded geographic and taxonomic sampling of the Afrotropics

Fig. 3 Maximum likelihood phylogeny of mitochondrial cytochrome-b sequences of Rhinolophus. The phylogeny was inferred in IQ-TREE and its topology was very similar to the Bayesian phylogeny calculated in MRBAYES. Filled black circles on nodes denote bootstrap values (BS) ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95, left-half-filled circles indicate BS ≥ 70% and PP <0.95, right-half-filled circles indicate BS <70% and PP ≥ 0.95, and unmarked nodes indicate BS <70% and PP <0.95. Specific epithets in parentheses following clade names indicate sequences from specimens used in recent species descriptions that were not supported as monophyletic and are subordinate to other clades and would render them paraphyletic. Branch colors indicate individual clade membership; species groups are from [13]

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of the African horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae): expanded geographic and taxonomic sampling of the Afrotropics

Fig. 2 Geographic sampling for the genetic analyses presented by this study. The white circles denote the locations of one or more specimens represented solely by mitochondrial sequences (cyt-b), the half-filled circles indicate specimens or groups represented only by nuclear intron sequences, and the black circles identify locations where samples with both mitochondrial and nuclear sequences were acquired

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 4 a in Molecular phylogenetics of the African horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae): expanded geographic and taxonomic sampling of the Afrotropics

Fig. 4 a Bayesian phylogeny of Rhinolophus based on four nuclear introns. The phylogeny was inferred in MRBAYES and its topology closely resembled the maximum likelihood phylogeny calculated in IQ-TREE. Filled black circles on nodes denote bootstrap values (BS) ≥ 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) ≥ 0.95, left-half-filled black circles indicate BS ≥ 70% and PP <0.95, and unmarked nodes indicate BS <70% and PP <0.95. b–d enlarged sections of the complete nuclear intron tree showing individual relationships. Branch colors indicate individual clade membership; species groups are from [13]. Specimen localities include counties for Kenya. Museum acronyms are defined in Additional file 1

Figure 1c from: Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Figure 1c - Phylogenetic tree of cytochrome-b sequences of Odocoileini (continuation). This is a strict consensus topology resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis. Nodal support is indicated at each node, except where the relationship received negligible support. Posterior probabilities (from the Bayesian inference analysis) and bootstrap values (from the maximum-likelihood analysis) are indicated before and after the slashes ("/") at branches of interest (i.e., nodal support for fairly shallow relationships within intraspecific haplogroups are omitted). The scale represents substitutions per site. For each terminal, country of origin and next-largest administrative unit (state, department, province, etc.) are provided (when reported by the team that generated them; see detailed voucher and locality information in supplementary file 1 for sequences that we generated). GenBank accession numbers are indicated for each terminal.

Figure 1b from: Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Figure 1b - Phylogenetic tree of cytochrome-b sequences of Odocoileini (continuation). This is a strict consensus topology resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis. Nodal support is indicated at each node, except where the relationship received negligible support. Posterior probabilities (from the Bayesian inference analysis) and bootstrap values (from the maximum-likelihood analysis) are indicated before and after the slashes ("/") at branches of interest (i.e., nodal support for fairly shallow relationships within intraspecific haplogroups are omitted). The scale represents substitutions per site. For each terminal, country of origin and next-largest administrative unit (state, department, province, etc.) are provided (when reported by the team that generated them; see detailed voucher and locality information in supplementary file 1 for sequences that we generated). GenBank accession numbers are indicated for each terminal.

Figure 3 from: Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Figure 3 - Hind foot bones of Mazama rufina (A) and Pudu puda (B) sensu Hershkovitz (1982). According to Hershkovitz (1982; see also Brooke 1874, 1878), the union of the cuboideonavicular and external and middle cuneiform tarsal bones into a single bone in Pudu is the only osteological characteristic shared by P. puda and P. mephistophiles that consistently separates them from all other living deer, with exception of the genera Elaphodus and Muntiacus.

Figure 2 from: Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Figure 2 - Overall morphological appearance of "M." pandora (panels A–C) and that of the genus Odocoileus (panels D–F). Notice the grayish pelage and divergent antlers larger than in other species currently classified in Mazama. "M." pandora, panels A and C individuals kept in captivity at the Parque Zoológico del Bicentenario Animaya, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico (photographs by Luis A. Escobedo-Morales)—provenance unknown; panel B individual kept in captivity in Tekax, Yucatán, Mexico (photograph by Rosa María González Marín)—provenance unknown. Odocoileus virginianus (see proposals by Molina and Molinari 1999 and Molinari 2007); panels D and E Monteredondo, Parque Nacional Chingaza, ca. 47 km (by road) E Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia (photographs by Aideé Vargas-Espinoza and Irene Aconcha, respectively); panel F Laguna de Mucubají, Parque Nacional Sierra Nevada, Mérida, Venezuela (photograph by Rodrigo Díaz Lupanow).

Figure 1a from: Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Figure 1a - Phylogenetic tree of cytochrome-b sequences of Odocoileini. This is a strict consensus topology resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis. Nodal support is indicated at each node, except where the relationship received negligible support. Posterior probabilities (from the Bayesian inference analysis) and bootstrap values (from the maximum-likelihood analysis) are indicated before and after the slashes ("/") at branches of interest (i.e., nodal support for fairly shallow relationships within intraspecific haplogroups are omitted). The scale represents substitutions per site. For each terminal, country of origin and next-largest administrative unit (state, department, province, etc.) are provided (when reported by the team that generated them; see detailed voucher and locality information in supplementary file 1 for sequences that we generated). GenBank accession numbers are indicated for each terminal.