Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,311
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,311 results for “literature”
SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC codes
<p><strong>Background and methodology:</strong></p> <p>The dataset consists of a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034507">SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography</a>, prepared for the purposes of quantitative analysis.</p> <p>The list of journals is based on 3955 journal articles in the bibliography dataset that had an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN). To each journal title the project team attributed:</p> <p>- a weight factor based on how many articles from the given journal featured in bibliography dataset</p> <p>- at least one <a href="https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/15181/supporthub/scopus/">All Science Journal Classification</a> (ASJC) code, representing different scientific disciplines</p> <p>- a country of publication. </p> <p>In case of 1853 of those journal titles, the attribution was automatised (we matched the ISSNs of journal titles in our sample against the Scopus Sources list from February 2019). In case of the remaining 349 titles the attribution was accomplished manually, based on the information available in SCOPUS, Web of Science, JSTOR, Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals (MIAR) and ISSN databases.</p> <p><strong>Description of the file:</strong></p> <p>This is a csv file containing a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography, with country of publication and ASJC codes assigned. </p> <p>The file is formatted as follows:</p> <p>Column A: ISSN of the journal</p> <p>Column B: information on how country and ASJC codes were attributed. Value “N” indicates automatic attribution based on match with Scopus list of sources. Other values indicate manual attribution. Values WOS, SCOPUS, JSTOR indicate source of information. Valu “Y” indicates that information was compiled based on multiple sources. </p> <p>Column C: numeric values correspond to the weight factor, i.e. number of time articles from each journal featured in the SHAP-ID Literature Review bibliography. </p> <p>Column D: SHAPE-ID Zotero bibliography identifier.</p> <p>Column E: Journal title</p> <p>Column F: The country of publication</p> <p>Columns G-AD: ASJC codes (numeric and word values) associated with journal entries. </p>
Adsorption kinetics data sets, compiled from the literature. As used in the research article "A revised pseudo-second order kinetic model for adsorption, sensitive to changes in adsorbate and adsorbent concentrations"
<p>Data sets reporting experimental adsorption kinetics, compiled from the literature. These data sets were subjected to empirical analysis in the development of our revised pseudo-second order rate equation (the rPSO model) as discussed in the ChemRxiv pre-print "<a href="https://chemrxiv.org/articles/preprint/A_Revised_Pseudo-Second_Order_Kinetic_Model_for_Adsorption_Sensitive_to_Changes_in_Sorbate_and_Sorbent_Concentrations/12008799">A Revised Pseudo-Second Order Kinetic Model for Adsorption, Sensitive to Changes in Sorbate and Sorbent Concentrations</a>".</p>
Supplementary material 3: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Treatments from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
List of journal/publisher by ranked by treatment count exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total treatments by source, cumulative treatments, and cumulative proportion of treatments.
Supplementary material 2: World Spider Catalog Bibliographic Data: Publications from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Ranked list of journal/publisher exported from the World Spider Catalog 14 October 2014 with total articles by source, cumulative articles, and cucmulative proportion of articles.
Review of definitions of Open Peer Review in the scholarly literature 2016
<p>This data set contains:</p> <ul> <li>Full data files of a 2016 review of definitions of Open Peer Review in the scholarly literature in xls and csv formats</li> <li>Description of data collection methodology (txt)</li> <li>Readme file (txt)</li> </ul> <p>The term “open peer review” has neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations. Recognising the absence of a consensus view on what OPR is, OpenAIRE has undertaken a systematic review of definitions of “open peer review” or “open review”, to create a corpus of 122 definitions. These definitions have been systematically analysed to build a coherent typology of the many different innovations in peer review signified by the term and hence provide the precise technical definition currently lacking. This quantifiable data offers rich information on the range and extent of differing definitions over time and by broad subject area.</p> <p>Contact:</p> <p>Tony Ross-Hellauer: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-7027 / ross-hellauer@sub.uni-goettingen.de</p>
RRID Gold Set of annotations for software tools in the biomedical literature
<p>This data is a subset of a larger human curated, machine assisted gold standard data set of RRID citations within the text of the scientific literature. The full set is accessible via Hypothes.is at https://hypothes.is/users/scibot?q=group%3A__world__ and via individual RRID records such as RRID:SCR_016250 https://scicrunch.org/resolver/SCR_016250/mentions?q=&i=rrid:scr_016250 </p><p>The data is based on authors who added RRIDs into their manuscripts. The data was then extracted by SciBot (RRID:SCR_016250), into Hypothes.is (RRID:SCR_000430) and then manually checked by a curator to determine if the author and the database agreed. The list of annotators is available in Hypothes.is user group: SciBotCurationGroup.</p><p>There are 78,140 rows and each row contains an annotation (annotation id, URI), linked to a paper (paper identifiers: PMID, DOI, PMC) and linked to the RRID (scr_id, exact, text_quote_selector). </p><p>A second spreadsheet contains a list of 8,322 software tools from the SciCrunch Registry (available here https://scicrunch.org/resources/data/source/nlx_144509-1/search ), enhanced by additions by thousands of individual authors, and curated over 10 years (Ozyurt et al., 2016). </p><p>The third spreadsheet contains a data dictionary and links to related ontologies, and tagging sets. </p><p> </p><p> </p>
Screened literature for mapping review of environmental problem shifting (EPS)
<p>Final literature sample used in manuscript. (506 publications). </p><p>Version 2 after revision. </p><p>Columns from the Scopus API:</p><ul><li>DOI, ISSN, ISBN</li><li>Subjabbr: Abbreviation of Scopus subject area</li><li>Publication year</li><li>Pubname: The name of the journal</li><li>Authkeywords: The article keywords</li><li>Title: The document title</li></ul><p> </p><p>Columns from our classification:</p><ul><li>Articletype: Classification into empirical, review and conceptual-theoretical.</li><li>Documenttype: The type of publication: journal article, book chapter, reports.</li><li>Counter: Marks the 13 studies that find no shifting or positive environmental impacts only.</li><li>Miti measures: The type of mitigation option.</li><li>Split measures: The subtype of mitigation. Only coded for <i>CDR</i>; <i>Solar, hydro and wind power</i> and <i>Other</i>.</li><li>Methods: The method(s) used in empirical papers</li><li>Impacts: The environmental impact.</li><li>Split impacts: The environmental impact specified for subtypes of mitigation.</li></ul>
Bibliographic Dataset for the Systematic Literature Review on Industry 5.0 Concepts and Enabling Technologies, Towards an Enhanced Conservation Practice
<p>This database contains all the bibliographic information found after applying the Search Strategy used for the Industry 5.0 Concepts and Enabling Technologies, Towards an Enhanced Conservation Practice: Systematic Literature Review. The following electronic databases were searched:</p> <ul> <li>Scopus.</li> </ul> <p>A total of 907 records were found. The search was conducted on 16/02/2024.</p> <p>The information is presented in .ris, .bib, and .csv format.</p>
Reproduction package for paper "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review"
<p>Checklist and data extracted from publications analyzed for "How far are we from reproducible research on code smell detection? A systematic literature review" paper, together with processing scripts and calculations of Cohen's Kappa.</p> <p>Paper that describes details of the data is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106783</p>
Power forecasting literature search
<p>Dataset of metadata of documents returned from a search in Scopus database and saved in .csv format. This dataset is used for a bibliographic analysis (about electricity consumption forecasting) in the PhD thesis of the author.</p> <p>The Scopus search was done on 5th November 2021. The query corresponds to:</p> <p>TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( *power* OR "*load consumption*" OR "*load forecast*" OR "*load predict*" OR *consumption* ) AND ( *predict* OR *forecast* ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "ENGI" ) OR LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "ENER" ) OR LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , "COMP" ) )</p> <p>In total, 245421 documents were returned from the search. The dataset contains the metadata that was possible to export and download from these documents.</p>
MSCA-IF-896925_MaMo_WP1-A_Archives-Literature
<p>This dataset contains a set of data related to the archives' material and main Albanian published sources consulted during the implementation of the research activities foreseen in WP1. This dataset has been curated by Dr Federica Pompejano. The materials listed can be filtered according to the codes assigned to the five MaMo macro-areas of investigation and to the main issues identified as pivotal for the MaMo research project. The data contained in this dataset are open for public disposal under the terms and conditions described in the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. The consultation of each archival or published source is possible at the archive or library that preserves the listed sources, under each library’s and/or archive's specific terms and conditions. Contacts of each archive and library are provided in the respective .xlsx files. This dataset and all its content are part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 896925.</p>
Sharing research data and findings relevant to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak - Literature sources
<p>The spreadsheet in the present dataset (CSV format) includes the sources considered during the literature review stage for the report: From intent to impact: Investigating the effects of open sharing commitments. Please note that not all sources in this deposit have been referenced in the above-mentioned report and that the report may include additional sources</p>
Supplemental Material for a Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches
<p>Bug benchmarks are used in development and evaluation of debugging approaches. Quantitative performance comparison of different debugging approaches is only possible when they have been evaluated on the same dataset or benchmark. However, benchmarks are often specialized towards usage for certain debugging approaches in their contained data, metrics, and artifacts. Such benchmarks can not be easily used on debugging approaches outside their scope as such approach may rely on specific data such as bug reports or code metrics not included in the dataset. Furthermore, benchmarks vary in their size w.r.t. the number of subject programs and the size of the individual subject programs. For these reasons, we have performed a systematic literature review where we have identified 73 benchmarks that can be used to evaluate debugging approaches.</p> <p>We compare the different benchmarks with respect to their size and the provided information such as bug reports, contained test cases, and other code metrics. Furthermore, we have investigated how well the benchmarks realize the <a href="https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/">FAIR guiding principles</a>. This comparison is intended to help researchers to quickly identify all suitable benchmarks for evaluating their specific debugging approaches. More information can be found in the publication:</p> <blockquote> <p>Thomas Hirsch and Birgit Hofer: "A Systematic Literature Review on Benchmarks for Evaluating Debugging Approaches", Journal of Systems and Software, in press, 2022.</p> </blockquote>
DISTANT-CTO: A Zero Cost, Distantly Supervised Approach to Improve Low-Resource Entity Extraction Using Clinical Trials Literature
<p><strong>Datasets</strong></p> <ol> <li>DISTANT-CTO is a weakly-labelled dataset of 'Intervention' and 'Comparator' entity annotated sentences. The dataset was obtained using candidate generation the approach described in "DISTANT-CTO: A Zero Cost, Distantly Supervised Approach to Improve Low Resource Entity Extraction Using Clinical Trials Literature". <ol> <li>distantcto_high_conf.txt - ds conf 1.0 (full dataset)</li> <li>extraction1_pos_posnegtrail_conf09.txt - ds conf 0.9 (partial dataset)</li> </ol> </li> <li>The physio test set is a dataset comprising 153 PICO annotated randomized controlled trial abstracts from Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. This dataset was used as an additional benchmark to evaluate the generalization power of the weakly annotated dataset and NER model for this sub-domain.</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>Utility</strong></p> <p>The dataset could be used as an input for training 'Intervention' named-entity recognition (NER) models.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Availability</strong></p> <p>This directory includes extraction1_pos_posnegtrail_conf09.txt - This text data file contains all the weak annotations (source intervention terms mapped onto target sentences) from clinicaltrials.org (CTO) with a confidence score of 0.9 and above.</p> <p>The directory also includes ‘physio_sent_annot2POS_posnegtrail.txt’ – This data file contains manually annotated (Intervention entity) data from the physiotherapy and rehabilitation domain. It follows a roughly similar structure as described in the ‘Description for long targets’ section. (‘Participant’ and ‘Outcome’ annotations are removed from this file)</p>
Washover morphometry: lidar-derived and reported in literature
<p>This portfolio includes three sets of data, used and explained in Lazarus, Williams & Goldstein (2022, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100098">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100098</a>):</p> <ol> <li>washover morphometry measured from lidar-derived topographic change along the coastline of New Jersey, USA, following Hurricane Sandy (2012) ('NJ_Sandy_metrics.csv');</li> <li>the geospatial data layers used to generate those measurements ('WashoverGIS.zip');</li> <li>and a compilation of washover morphometry reported in the literature ('washover_LAV_literature_examples.csv').</li> </ol> <p> </p> <p><strong>Washover morphometry datasets</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>NJ_Sandy_metrics.csv</strong> – The lidar-derived washover morphometry dataset includes: deposit width (m), intrusion length (m), deposit area (m<sup>2</sup>), deposit volume (m<sup>3</sup>), deposit perimeter (m), built fraction, the storm event (Sandy 2012), and a general location note.</li> <li><strong>washover_LAV_literature_examples.csv</strong> – Also included here are 35 measurements of washover morphometry reported in the literature by six different studies, sampling different storm events in different coastal barrier settings (Carruthers et al., 2013; Williams, 2015; Jamison-Todd et al., 2020; Rodriguez et al. 2020; Hansen et al., 2021; Williams & Rains, 2022). The literature-based dataset includes: intrusion length (m), deposit area (m<sup>2</sup>), deposit volume (m<sup>3</sup>), the reference (dataset) in which the measurements were reported, and additional notes.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Geospatial data layers ('WashoverGIS' [zipped])</strong></p> <p>The lidar data underpinning the geospatial data layers here are available from the NOAA Digital Coast Data Viewer (<a href="https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/">https://coast.noaa.gov/dataviewer/#/</a>): "2012 USGS EAARL-B Lidar: Pre-Sandy" (pre-storm), and "2012 USGS EAARL-B Lidar: Post-Sandy" (post-storm).</p> <p>Geospatial analysis was done in QGIS version 3.22.5. We masked both the pre- and post-storm surfaces to isolate only positive elevations, and subtracted the pre-storm surface from the post-storm surface to calculated the difference between them; we then retained only the positive differences in the resulting surface to isolate sites of sediment deposition. We manually digitized the perimeters of depositional forms we interpreted as washover, corroborated by aerial imagery (<a href="https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/">https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/</a>).</p> <p>Basic geometric characteristics (perimeter, area) were taken directly from the washover polygons; washover length and width were taken from oriented minimum bounding boxes around each polygon. Volume for each washover polygon was measured using the Volume Calculation Tool (version 0.4) plugin for QGIS (<a href="https://github.com/REDcatch/Volume_calculation_for_QGIS3">https://github.com/REDcatch/Volume_calculation_for_QGIS3</a>). In built settings, each washover deposit was associated with a locally estimated built fraction (Lazarus et al., 2021). Elements of the built environment (i.e., buildings) were isolated by creating a binary mask of the pre-storm surface, such that all elevations ³5 m were set to a value = 1, and all elevations <5 m set to zero. Minimum enclosing circles were drawn around each washover polygon, and the total built area (masked value = 1) within each circle summed using the QGIS Zonal Statistics tool. Here, local built fraction is the total built area within a minimum enclosing circle divided by the area of that circle.</p> <p>Geospatial files here include:</p> <ul> <li><strong>NJ_north_wash_metrics.shp</strong> // <strong>NJ_south_wash_metrics.shp </strong>– shapefiles of the digitized washover deposits, with morphometric characteristics compiled in their attribute tables</li> <li><strong>NJ_north_BBs.shp</strong> // <strong>NJ_south_BBs.shp</strong> – oriented bounding boxes to determine deposit intrusion length & width</li> <li><strong>NJ_north_MECs.shp</strong> // <strong>NJ_south_MECs.shp</strong> – minimum enclosing circles, used for calculating local built fraction</li> <li><strong>NJ_north_dSandy_POS.tif</strong> // <strong>NJ_south_dSandy_POS.tif </strong>– positive [post-storm - pre-storm] elevation differences</li> <li><strong>NJ_north_rooftops_th05.tif</strong> // <strong>NJ_south_rooftops_th05.tif </strong>– binary mask based on the pre-storm lidar layer ("2012 USGS EAARL-B Lidar: Pre-Sandy") used for calculating built fraction, in which all topographic elements >= 5 m are set = 1, and all < 5 m are set = 0</li> </ul> <p> </p>
GERDAT011 Literature search for publication - Geriatric assessment in the management of older patients with cancer – a systematic review (update).xlsx
<p>Search data belonging to the publication Geriatric assessment in the management of older patients with cancer – a systematic review (update)</p>
GERDAT010 Dataset for literature search linked to publication "Information needs of older patients newly diagnosed with cancer"
<p>Dataset of the literature search belonging to the publication "Information needs of older patients newly diagnosed with cancer"</p>
Supplementary data to `Do science maps from open access literature capture the overall topic structure of an academic field?`
<p>The dataset contains the 8,528 academic articles records related to Sustainable Food research sourced with the query `TS=("sustainab*" NEAR/2 "food*")` .</p> <p>They are the records present in the largest component of the citation network, as specified in the manuscript. </p> <p>The dataset was sourced from OpenAlex based on the original data used in the manuscript and it is composed of the following columns:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><em><strong>Column</strong></em></td> <td><em><strong>Description</strong></em></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Id</td> <td>OpenAlex ID</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DOI</td> <td>Document Object Identifier</td> </tr> <tr> <td>display_name</td> <td>The article title</td> </tr> <tr> <td>publication_year</td> <td>The publication year of the article</td> </tr> <tr> <td>open_access</td> <td>An object with details of the open access status of the article</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>We choose the `.rdata` format for easy loading in R. Use the function `load()` to add the data frame to the enviroment. </p>
Privacy-by-Design Maturity Model: literature review, coding, model creation and evaluation
<p>Results from two multivocal literature reviews (MLRs) and subsequent coding, formulation of capabilities and dependencies, creation of maturity matrix and evaluation results. Used in the creation of a PbD domain model and extraction of core activities for PbD in Information Systems design. Part of the <a href="https://www.privacymaturity.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Privacy-by-Design Maturity</a> research project by the <a href="https://www.uu.nl/en/research/ai-labs/ai-lab-for-the-public-services" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AI Lab for Public Services</a>.</p>
S98 | TIRECHEM | Tire-Related Chemicals in Environment from Literature
<p>This is the collection associated with list S98 TIRECHEM | Tire-Related Chemicals in Environment from Literature on the NORMAN Suspect List Exchange.</p> <p><a href="https://www.norman-network.com/nds/SLE/">https://www.norman-network.com/nds/SLE/</a></p> <p>This list includes tire-related chemicals found in the environment plus analytical data from literature studies and will be expanded as new data is published.</p> <p>v 0.2.0 : New chemicals added on 13 May 2024</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.