Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,955
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,955 results for “morphological description”
Fig. 5 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.
Fig. 5. Mesanophrys carcini Small & Lynn in Aescht, 2001, in vivo (A–D) and after protargol staining (E–G). A. Ventral view of a representative individual; arrow shows contractile vacuole. B–D. Ventral views of four individuals; arrow in B shows caudal cilium and arrow in D marks food vacuole. E–F. Ventral views, detailed structure of buccal area. G. Dorsal view; arrow indicates somatic kinety. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica. Scale bars: A–D = 30 μm; E–G = 5 μm.
Fig. 2 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.
Fig. 2. Paramesanophrys typica gen. et sp. nov., from life (A–F) and after protargol staining (G–I). A. Ventral view of a representative individual. B. Different body shapes. C. Changing shapes of buccal field of the same individual. D. Movement trace. E. Food granules. F. Part of pellicle, to show extrusomes. G–H. Ventral (G) and dorsal (H) views of the same specimen (holotype), showing infraciliature and nuclear apparatus. I. Detailed structure of the buccal area. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica. Scale bars: A = 30 μm; B = 40 μm.
Fig. 1. Sampling sites. A in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.
Fig. 1. Sampling sites. A. Coastal waters of the Yellow Sea at Qingdao, Shandong province. B. A coastal mariculture-region in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province. C. Coastal waters of Daya Bay, Guangdong province.
Fig. 6 in Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes
Fig. 6. Ceratitis serrata De Meyer, 1996. a. Head, frontal view. b. Head and thorax, anterodorsal view. c. Thorax, lateral view. d. Thorax, dorsal view. e. Abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm; B–D = 1 mm.
Fig. 3 in Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes
Fig. 3. Ceratitis taitaensis De Meyer & Copeland sp. nov. a. Head and thorax, anterodorsal view. b. Thorax, lateral view. c. Thorax, dorsal view. d. Abdomen, dorsal view. e. Male wing. f. Female wing. g. Female aculeus. h. Aculeus tip. Scale bars: A–F = 1 mm; G–H = 0.1mm.
Fig. 4 in Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes
Fig. 4. Ceratitis sawahilensis De Meyer & Virgilio sp. nov. a. Head and thorax, anterodorsal view. b. Thorax, lateral view. c. Thorax, dorsal view. d. Abdomen, dorsal view. e. Wing. f. Habitus image (credit: S.A. Marshall). g. Female aculeus. h. Aculeus tip. Scale bars: A–F = 1 mm; G–H = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 2 in Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes
Fig. 2. Ceratitis pallidula De Meyer, Mwatawala & Virgilio sp. nov. a. Head and thorax, anterodorsal view. b. Head and thorax, lateral view. c. Thorax, dorsal view. d. Abdomen, dorsal view. e. Wing. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 1. — a–f in Description of new Ceratitis species (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Africa, or how morphological and DNA data are complementary in discovering unknown species and matching sexes
Fig. 1. — a–f. Ceratitis quilicii De Meyer, Mwatawala & Virgilio sp. nov. Ƌ. a. Head and thorax, anterodorsal view. b. Head and thorax, lateral view. c. Thorax, dorsal view. d. Midleg, anterior view. e. Wing. f. Midtibia, anterior view. — g. C. rosa Karsch, 1887 s.str. midtibia, anterior view. Scale bars = 1 mm.
FIG. 7 in Description of a new species of Cynodictis Bravard & Pomel, 1850 (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Quercy Phosphorites with comments on the use of skull morphology for phylogenetics
FIG. 7. — Cranium of Cynodictis lacustris Gervais, 1852 (MNHN.F.Qu1903-20) in dorsal view (A), lateral view (B) and ventral view (C). Abbreviations: bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; ce, carnassial embrasure pit; csm, crista supramastoideus; eo, exoccipital; fm, foramen magnum; fr, frontal; M1, upper first molar; mp, mastoid process; mx, maxillary; nc, nuchal crest; oc, occipital condyle; pa, parietal; pal, palatine; pop, postorbital process of frontal; pp, paroccipital process; pr, promontorium of petrosal; ps, presphenoid; pt, pterygoid; ptp, posttympanic process of squamosal; rt, foramen for ramus temporalis; sc, sagittal crest; tc, temporal crest. Scale bar: 10 mm.
FIG. 2 in Description of a new species of Cynodictis Bravard & Pomel, 1850 (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Quercy Phosphorites with comments on the use of skull morphology for phylogenetics
FIG. 2. — Cranium of Cynodictis peignei n. sp. (snout – MNHN.F.Qu9007; neurocranium – MNHN.F.Qu9008) in dorsal view (A), lateral view (B) and ventral view (C). Abbreviations: bo, basioccipital; bs, basisphenoid; C, upper canine; ce, carnassial embrasure pit; csm, crista supramastoideus; eo, exoccipital; fm, foramen magnum; fr, frontal; gf, glenoid fossa; I3, upper third incisor; inf, incisive foramen; iof, infraorbital foramen; ju, jugal; lac, lacrimal; lacf, lacrimal foramen; mp, mastoid process; mpfr, maxillary process of frontal; mx, maxillary; mxt, maxillary tuberosity; na, nasal; nc, nuchal crest; np, nasal process of nasal; oc, occipital condyle; P1, upper first premolar; P2, upper second premolar; P3, upper third premolar; P4, upper ultimate premolar; pa, parietal; pal, palatine; pdp, posterodorsal process of premaxillary; pgp, postglenoid process; pmx, premaxillary; pop, postorbital process of frontal; pp, paroccipital process; pr, promontorium of petrosal; ptp, posttympanic process of squamosal; rt, foramen for ramus temporalis; sc, sagittal crest; sq, squamosal; zpmx, zygomatic process of maxillary; zpsq, zygomatic process of squamosal. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figs 30–35 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)
Figs 30–35. Variation of the male palps, left palps, prolateral views. 30–33. Loxosceles tolantongo sp. nov. 30–32. Tourist Center Grutas de Tolantongo, Municipality of Cardonal, Hidalgo (type locality). 33. 500 m west of the entrance No. 5 to the Tourist Center Grutas de Tolantongo, Municipality of Cardonal, Hidalgo. 34–35. Loxosceles jaca Gertsch & Ennik, 1983. 2.5 km north of Jacala de Ledezma, Municipality of Jacala de Ledezma, Hidalgo. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 56 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)
Fig. 56. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from the concatenated matrix (CO1 + ITS2) of species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 from Mexico. Colors of branches and bars indicate different species. Numbers above bars represent the delimitation methods: 1 = morphology (M); 2 = neighbor joining (NJ); 3 = ABGD with initial partitions (IP); 4–5 = ABGD with recursive partitions (RP); 6 = GMYC yule analysis; 7 = GMYC coalescent analysis; 8 bPTP with ML; 9 = bPTP with IB. Numbers below bars represent species recovered for each delimitation method. Red numbers correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities, black numbers are bootstrap support values from the ML analysis.
Figs 20–25 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)
Figs 20–25. Loxosceles tolantongo sp. nov., ♂ holotype (CNAN-T01317). 20–22. Left palp, prolateral, dorsal and retrolateral views, respectively. 23–25. Detail of the bulb and embolus, retrolateral, dorsal and apical views, respectively. Scale bars: 20–22 = 0.5 mm; 23–25 = 0.2 mm.
Fig. 54 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)
Fig. 54. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from CO1 gene of species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 from Mexico. Colors of branches and bars indicate different species. Numbers above bars represent the delimitation methods: 1 = morphology (M); 2 = neighbor joining (NJ); 3 = ABGD with initial partitions (IP); 4–6 = ABGD with recursive partitions (RP); 7 = GMYC yule analysis; 8 = GMYC coalescent analysis; 9 = bPTP with ML; 10 = bPTP with IB. Numbers below bars represent species recovered for each delimitation method. Red numbers on branches correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities, black numbers are bootstrap support values from the ML analysis.
FIG. 1 in Historical note on the taxonomy of the genus Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) with an amended description of its floral morphology
FIG. 1. — Illustrations showing speciment of Consolida (DC.) Gray with other names than 'Consolida' or 'Delphinium', reproduced from: A, Bourdichon (1505- 1510: 35); B, Fuchs (1542: 27); C, Fuchs (1543: 15); D, Matthioli (1554: 357); E, Laguna (1555: 308); F, Matthioli (1565: 760). A, Plant called by the vernacular French name 'Jalousie'; B, Plant named by the erroneous name 'Chamaemelum eranthemon' and B, C, by the vernacular German name 'Rittersporn' still in use; D-F, Plants are named by the erroneous name 'Cuminum syl. alternum'.
FIG. 3. — A in Historical note on the taxonomy of the genus Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) with an amended description of its floral morphology
FIG. 3. — A, Flower drawing of Chienia honanensis W.T. Wang (modified from Wang [1964]); B, Chienia honanensis specimen [PE00026940] housed at PE herbarium (there are no scales on the original drawing and on the image of the original specimen); C, D, D. grandiflorum L. specimens [PE00477116 and PE00477117 respectively] housed at PE herbarium collected in the same province and the same year as the Chienia honanensis specimen and with which it matches morphologically speaking, excepted that PE00026940 specimen would show a teratological form of the floral structure.
FIG. 2 in Historical note on the taxonomy of the genus Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) with an amended description of its floral morphology
FIG. 2. — Photographs and drawings of flowers from herbarium specimens used for lectotypifying of the genus Delphinium L. or showing a peloric floral organization: A, a1, Consolida regalis Gray (LINN 694.1); B, b1, Delphinium peregrinum L. (BM-000628786); C, c1, D. elatum (S09-28218); D, d1, D. turcicum (H. Duman, Vural, Aytaç & Adigüzel) Espinosa (P04021863). Floral diagrams and formulae of: a2, a3, Consolida regalis; b2, b3, D. peregrinum; c2, c3, D. elatum; d2, d3, D. turcicum. Dark green, peduncle or receptacle, bract and bracteoles; violet, sepals; blue, petals; yellow cream colour, tepals; yellow, stamens; light green, carpels. Scale basr: 1 cm.
Comparative morphology of immature stages and adults of Hydroscapha from Taiwan, with a description of a new species from Hong Kong (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Hydroscaphidae)
<p>Original unedited photographs and SEM micrographs to the paper published in Raffles Journal of Zoology.</p>
FIGURE 3 in Molecular phylogeny, morphology and taxonomy of Moroccan Triops granarius (Lucas, 1864) (Crustacea: Notostraca), with the description of two new species
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic relationships of A, Triops samples obtained in a combined analysis of three molecular markers (12 S, 16 S, 28 S) and B, western Moroccan Triops granarius samples as inferred from 12 S sequences (best scoring trees obtained in RAxML are shown). ML bootstrap support / Bayesian posterior probabilities are given for selected nodes. Provisional taxon labels of previously discovered lineages correspond to those used in Korn et al. (2013). Symbols correspond to those used in Fig. 1.
FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogeny, morphology and taxonomy of Moroccan Triops granarius (Lucas, 1864) (Crustacea: Notostraca), with the description of two new species
FIGURE 2. Schematic drawing of A, a detail of the right lateral margin of the telson of a Triops granarius specimen in dorsal view, showing how the length of the largest furcal spine was measured (dotted line), and B, the endopodite of the second trunk limb in anterior view, demonstrating how the length of the endopodite was measured (dotted line). C, a detail of the row of digging spines positioned at the margin of the endopodite showing three examples of length measurements (dotted lines; note that in the present example the largest spine cannot be identified easily so that several rather large spines have to be measured in order to obtain a value for the length of the largest spine) and the position of subsidiary lines used for measurements of spine lengths (dashed lines). D, the distal part of the endopodite showing the distal claw and three of the digging spines. The point where the dashed line (drawn from the base of the distal claw) meets the dotted line (median line of the distal claw) was used as the starting point for length measurements of the endopodite (in the present study the base of the distal claw was defined as the point where the distalmost digging spine diverges from the endopodite). Grey bars (directed approx. in a right angle to measured lines) indicate where measured lines start and end. Abbreviations: C, distal claw; DS, digging spines; SP, largest furcal spine; SPL, length of largest furcal spine; TE, telson; F, furcal ramus.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.