Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 6 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 6. Mouthparts of Neurostigma xanthopterum (male I…male XIII): (A) Right maxillary palp of MI; (B) Labrum of MI; (C) Labium of MI; (D) Right mandible of MI; (E) Left mandible of MI; (F) Rl of MI; (G) Ll of MI; (H) 43. Rl of MII; (I) Rl of the MIII; (J) Ll of MIII; (K) Rl of MV; (L) Ll of MV; (M) Rl of MVI; (N) Ll of MVI; (O) Rl of MVIII; (P) Ll of MVIII; (Q) Rl of MX; (R) Ll of MX; (S) Rl of MXI; (T) Ll of MXI; (U) Rl of MXII; (V) Rl of MXIII; (W) Ll of MXIII. Scales in mm. Abbreviations: MI…MXIII: male I…male XIII; Rl: right lacinia; Ll: Left lacinia.

Figure 4 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 4. Neurostigmaxanthopterum (Female I): (A) Front view of head; (B) Right forewing; (C) Right hindwing; (D) Placa subgenital; (E) Ninth sternum; (F) Clunium, right paraproct and epiprocto; (G) Right gonapophyses. Scales in mm.

Figure 8 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 8. Pterostigma of the Neurostigma xanthopterum (male I…male VII): (A) PRF of MI; (B) 70. PLF of MI; (C) PRF of MII; (D) PLF of MII; (E) PRF of MIII; (F) PLF of MIII; (G) PRF of MIV; (H) PLF of MIV; (I) PRF of MV; (J) PLF of MV; (K) PRF of MVI; (L) PLF of MVI; (M) PRF of MVII; (N) PLF of MVII. Abbreviations: MI…MVII: male I… male VII. PRF: pterostigma of right forewing, PLF: pterostigma of left forewing.

Figure 7 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 7. Pterostigma of the Neurostigma xanthopterum (female I…female IV): (A) PRF of FI; (B) PLF of FI; (C) PRF of FII; (D) PLF of FII; (E) PRF of FIII; (F) PLF of FIII; (G) PRF of FIV; (H) PLF of FIV; (I) PRF of FV; (J) PLF of FV. Scales in mm. Abbreviations: FI…FIV: female I…female IV; PRF: pterostigma of right forewing, PLF: pterostigma of left forewing.

Figure 9 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 9. Pterostigma of the Neurostigma xanthopterum (male VIII…male XIV): (A) PRF of MVIII; (B) PLF of MVIII; (C) PRF of MIX; (D) PLF of MIX; (E) PRF of MX; (F) PLF of MX; (G) PRF of MXI; (H) PLF of MXI; (I) PRF of MXII; (J) PLF of MXII; (K) PRF of MXIII; (L) PLF of MXIII; (M) PRF of MXIV; (N) PLF of MXIV. Scales in mm. Abbreviations: MVIII…MXIV: male VIII…male VXIV. PRF: pterostigma of right forewing, PLF: pterostigma of left forewing.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2007View details →

Figure 10 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae

Figure 10. Left manus of Compsognathus longipes (holotype), articulated by camera lucida.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2007View details →

Figure 9 in On the manual morphology of Compsognathus longipes and its bearing on the diagnosis of Compsognathidae

Figure 9. Isolated elements that may be referable to first phalanges of digit III.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2006View details →

Fig. 4 in Morphology and distribution of the cave knifefish Eigenmannia vicentespelaea Triques, 1996 (Gymnotiformes: Sternopygidae) from Central Brazil, with an expanded diagnosis and comments on subterranean evolution

Fig. 4. Regression between OD and LEA in Eigenmannia vicentespelaea (n = 25).

dryad36/100

Supporting information for: Integrating morphological, molecular, and cytogenetic data for F2 sea turtle hybrids diagnosis revealed balanced chromosomal sets

Hybridization could be considered part of the evolutionary history of many species. The hybridization among sea turtle species on the Brazilian coast is atypical and occurs where nesting areas and reproductive seasons overlap. Integrated analysis of morphology and genetics is still scarce, and there is no evidence of the parental chromosome set distribution in sea turtle interspecific hybrids. In this study, chromosome markers previously established for pure sea turtle species were combined with morphological and molecular analyses aiming to recognize genetic composition and chromosome sets in possible interspecific hybrids initially identified by mixed morphology. The data showed that one hybrid could be an F2 individual among Caretta caretta × Eretmochelys imbricata × Chelonia mydas, and another is resulting from backcross between C. caretta × Lepidochelys olivacea. Native alleles of different parental lineages were reported in the hybrids, and, despite this, it was verified that the hybrid chromosome sets were still balanced. Thus, how sea turtle hybridism can affect genetic features in the long term is a concern, as the implications of the crossing-over in hybrid chromosomal sets and the effects on genetic function are still unpredictable.

opencc-zeroAug 2023View details →

dryad36/100

Supporting information for: Integrating morphological, molecular, and cytogenetic data for F2 sea turtle hybrids diagnosis revealed balanced chromosomal sets

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2023View details →

Figure 1 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 1. Neurostigma xanthopterum. (male I). (1) Lateral view. Scale in mm.

Figure 12 in Neurostigma xanthopterum New, 1980 (Psocodea: Psocoptera: Epipsocidae): updated diagnosis, description of a female specimen, morphological variations and a checklist of all known species of the genus

Figure 12. Distribution of the Neurostigma xanthopterum specimens.

opennotspecifiedMar 2016View details →

FIGURES 9–12 in A new species of Brasineura Silva-Neto & García Aldrete (Psocodea, 'Psocoptera', Ptiloneuridae), with comments on morphological variation in B. troglophilica and a revised generic diagnosis

FIGURES 9–12. Variation of the fore wing M vein in B. troglophilica. 9–11. Males collected in Serra Norte, Marabá. 12. Paratype male of B. troglophilica. Scales in mm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2016View details →

FIGURES 1–7 in A new species of Brasineura Silva-Neto & García Aldrete (Psocodea, 'Psocoptera', Ptiloneuridae), with comments on morphological variation in B. troglophilica and a revised generic diagnosis

FIGURES 1–7. Brasineura serranortensis sp.n. (Holotype male). 1. Front view of head. 2. Fore wing. 3. Hind wing. 4. Lacinial tip. 5. Clunium, right paraproct and epiproct. 6. Hypandrium. 7. Phallosome. Scales in mm.

Fig. 4 in Divergent Morphology among Populations of the New Guinea Crocodile, Crocodylus novaeguineae (Schmidt, 1928): Diagnosis of an Independent Lineage and Description of a New Species

Fig. 4. Ventral cranial shape variation depicted using transformation grids with corresponding example specimen among drainages in Papua New Guinea. Solid points indicate consensus landmarks for all individuals, and lines extending from points indicate the extent (length) and direction of shape change exhibited by that classifier. Populations in northern drainages (i.e., Sepik; FMNH 14048; Crocodylus novaeguineae) exhibit an extended maxilla and reduced postcranial elements relative to southern populations from Lake Murray/Binaturi (C. halli; LSUMZ 44740) and the Aramia River (C. halli; USNM 211290), exhibiting strikingly shorter maxilla and enlarged postcranial elements.

Fig. 3 in Divergent Morphology among Populations of the New Guinea Crocodile, Crocodylus novaeguineae (Schmidt, 1928): Diagnosis of an Independent Lineage and Description of a New Species

Fig. 3. Dorsal cranial shape variation depicted using transformation grids with corresponding example specimen among drainages in Papua New Guinea. Solid points indicate consensus landmarks for all individuals, and lines extending from points indicate the extent (length) and direction of shape change exhibited by that classifier. Populations in northern drainages (i.e., Sepik River; FMNH 14048; Crocodylus novaeguineae) exhibit an extended maxilla and reduced postcranial elements relative to southern populations from Lake Murray/Binaturi (C. halli; LSUMZ 44740), exhibiting strikingly shorter maxilla and enlarged postcranial elements, or Aramia River (C. halli; USNM 211290), exhibiting a morphology closer to consensus.

Fig. 1 in Divergent Morphology among Populations of the New Guinea Crocodile, Crocodylus novaeguineae (Schmidt, 1928): Diagnosis of an Independent Lineage and Description of a New Species

Fig. 1. Homologous landmarks used in geometric morphometric analysis for dorsal (top, n ¼ 15 landmarks) and ventral (bottom, n ¼ 13 landmarks) views. LSUMZ 44740.

Fig. 2 in Divergent Morphology among Populations of the New Guinea Crocodile, Crocodylus novaeguineae (Schmidt, 1928): Diagnosis of an Independent Lineage and Description of a New Species

Fig. 2. Map of localities for specimens examined; Crocodylus novaeguineae from the Sepik (circle) and Hunstein (pentagon) drainages, and Crocodylus halli from Lake Murray (square), Binaturi (triangle), and Aramia (star) rivers.

Fig. 5 in Divergent Morphology among Populations of the New Guinea Crocodile, Crocodylus novaeguineae (Schmidt, 1928): Diagnosis of an Independent Lineage and Description of a New Species

Fig. 5. Canonical variates analysis exhibiting position in morphospace among specimens from SCN (Lake Murray, Binaturi, and Aramia; Crocodylus halli) and NCN (Sepik; Crocodylus novaeguineae) from dorsal (A; CV1 ¼ 75% variance, CV2 ¼ 13.7% variance) and ventral (B; CV1 ¼ 49% variance, CV2 ¼ 27.4% variance) perspectives.