Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Comparative morphology and identification key for females of nine Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic importance in Southern Brazil

Fig. 7. External female morphology of Peckia (Euboettcheria) florencioi. (A) Habitus, lateral view; scale: 2 mm; (B) abdomen, dorsal view; scale: 1 mm; (C) abdominal terminal segments, ventral view; scale: 0.5 mm; (D) abdomen, ventral view, scale: 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Comparative morphology and identification key for females of nine Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic importance in Southern Brazil

Fig. 5. External female morphology of Peckia (Pattonella) resona. (A) Habitus, lateral view; scale: 2 mm; (B) abdomen, dorsal view; scale: 2 mm; (C) abdominal terminal segments, ventral view; scale: 1 mm; (D) abdomen, ventral view; scale: 2 mm.

Fig. 4 in Comparative morphology and identification key for females of nine Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic importance in Southern Brazil

Fig. 4. External female morphology of Peckia (Pattonella) intermutans. (A) Habitus, lateral view; scale: 1 mm; (B) abdomen, dorsal view; scale: 2 mm; (C) abdominal terminal segments, ventral view; scale: 1 mm; (D) abdomen, ventral view; scale: 2 mm.

Fig. 9 in Comparative morphology and identification key for females of nine Sarcophagidae species (Diptera) with forensic importance in Southern Brazil

Fig. 9. External female morphology of Microcerella halli. (A) Habitus, lateral view; scale: 2 mm; (B) abdomen, dorsal view; scale: 2 mm; (C) abdominal terminal segments, ventral view; scale: 1 mm; (D) abdomen, ventral view; scale: 1 mm.

Linked collectors and determiners for: Morphological revision of the hyperdiverse Brueelia - complex (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) with new taxa, checklists and generic key.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Morphological revision of the hyperdiverse Brueelia - complex (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) with new taxa, checklists and generic key". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/d8cc2cd8-8410-49aa-a75d-7a41d9f52b26">https://bionomia.net/dataset/d8cc2cd8-8410-49aa-a75d-7a41d9f52b26</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/d8cc2cd8-8410-49aa-a75d-7a41d9f52b26">https://gbif.org/dataset/d8cc2cd8-8410-49aa-a75d-7a41d9f52b26</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/64c13fcf-4aa5-4887-ad05-67aba877d58e">https://bionomia.net/dataset/64c13fcf-4aa5-4887-ad05-67aba877d58e</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/64c13fcf-4aa5-4887-ad05-67aba877d58e">https://gbif.org/dataset/64c13fcf-4aa5-4887-ad05-67aba877d58e</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: New Neotropical and Nearctic species of water beetles in the genera Hydraena Kugelann and Ochthebius Leach, a key to North American genera and subgenera of the family, new distribution records, and a synopsis of ecology, behavior and morphology related to aquatic life (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "New Neotropical and Nearctic species of water beetles in the genera Hydraena Kugelann and Ochthebius Leach, a key to North American genera and subgenera of the family, new distribution records, and a synopsis of ecology, behavior and morphology related to aquatic life (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/35ec0e5e-a604-44cc-a20f-67222171030d">https://bionomia.net/dataset/35ec0e5e-a604-44cc-a20f-67222171030d</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/35ec0e5e-a604-44cc-a20f-67222171030d">https://gbif.org/dataset/35ec0e5e-a604-44cc-a20f-67222171030d</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Linked collectors and determiners for: Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Heteragrion Selys, 1862 (Zygoptera: Heteragrionidae): male morphology, new species and illustrated key.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Heteragrion Selys, 1862 (Zygoptera: Heteragrionidae): male morphology, new species and illustrated key". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/38e48899-447b-40cc-b9bd-e84bb0ac221e">https://bionomia.net/dataset/38e48899-447b-40cc-b9bd-e84bb0ac221e</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/38e48899-447b-40cc-b9bd-e84bb0ac221e">https://gbif.org/dataset/38e48899-447b-40cc-b9bd-e84bb0ac221e</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2011View details →

FIG. 3. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s in Reinstatement of the endemic New Caledonian genus Thiollierea Montrouz. (Rubiaceae) necessitated by the polyphyly of Bikkia Reinw. as currently circumscribed

FIG. 3. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s. and Thiollierea Montrouz., part 2: A, twisting of anthers; B, indument of filament; C, organization of placentation; D, shape of seeds (L. Barrabé & M. Toussirot). Scale bars: A, B, 1 cm; C, D, 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2011View details →

FIG. 2. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s in Reinstatement of the endemic New Caledonian genus Thiollierea Montrouz. (Rubiaceae) necessitated by the polyphyly of Bikkia Reinw. as currently circumscribed

FIG. 2. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s. and Thiollierea Montrouz., part 1: A, texture of abaxial leaf lamina; B, type and apex of stipules; C, inflorescence habit; D, margins of calyx lobes (L. Barrabé & M. Toussirot). Scale bars: A, C, 1 cm; B, D, 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Two new species of the genus Mystilus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from Vietnam, with discussion on morphological variation based on molecular data, and a revised key for Mystilus species

Fig. 5. Modified Neighbor-Joining tree based on a total of 25 COI sequences of six Mystilus species and other 19 species in the subfamily Mirinae in this study. Coloured squares next to the Mystilus species names indicate character states for three characters.

Fig. 2 in Two new species of the genus Mystilus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from Vietnam, with discussion on morphological variation based on molecular data, and a revised key for Mystilus species

Fig. 2. Dorsal and lateral habitus with variation of Mystilus frederici, new species. A, holotype, male; B, paratype, female; C, lateral view of male; D–F, variation of pronotum colouration. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Two new species of the genus Mystilus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from Vietnam, with discussion on morphological variation based on molecular data, and a revised key for Mystilus species

Fig. 1. Dorsal and lateral habitus with variation of Mystilus carvalhoi, new species. A, holotype, male; B, paratype, female; C, lateral view of male; D–F, variation of pronotum colouration. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Two new species of the genus Mystilus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae: Mirinae) from Vietnam, with discussion on morphological variation based on molecular data, and a revised key for Mystilus species

Fig. 3. Parameres and endosome of Mystilus spp. A–D, M. carvalhoi, new species; E–H, M. frederici, new species. A, E, left paramere; B, F, right paramere; C, D, G, H, endosoma; sc, sclerite; sg, secondary gonopore. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 4. Oral papillae sensu lato. A in Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions

Fig. 4. Oral papillae sensu lato. A. Ventral side of a schematic brittle star. B. One angle of the oral frame includes a dental plate (DP), two oral plates (= half-jaws) (OP), two adoral shields (AdSh), and one oral shield (OSh), positioned from proximal towards distal. The typical position of teeth, tooth papillae, secondary infradental papillae (2IPa), infradental papillae (IPa), buccal scale, secondary adoral shield spine (2AdShSp), adoral shield spine (AdShSp) on DP, OP and AdSh are illustrated, respectively. The presence / absence, number and shape of each papilla vary among different taxa.

Fig. 6 in Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions

Fig. 6. DELTA interactive key workspace. The software window shows: available characters (blue box), used characters (grey), remaining taxa (green) and eliminated taxa (red).

Fig. 2 in Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions

Fig. 2. SEM images of various brittle star ossicles. A–E. Disc structures. A. Dorsal disc, radial shield with tubercles (Ophiomusa lymani (Wyville-Thomson, 1873)). B. Dorsal disc (Ophiolimna bairdi (Lyman, 1883)). C. Ventral disc (Ophionereis porrecta Lyman, 1860), the interradius is assumed as a triangle and H gives its height. D. Dorsal disc, triangular radial shield (Ophiactis savignyi (Müller & Troschel, 1842)). E. Ventral disc, mouth (Ophioderma sp.). – F–H. Atypical arm spines. F. Umbrella-shaped arm spine (Ophiotholia spathifer (Lyman, 1879)). G. Hook-shaped arm spine (Asteronyx loveni Müller & Troschel, 1842). H. Bristle spines (Ophiernus vallincola Lyman, 1878). – I–L. Lateral arm plates (LAP). I. LAP with constriction (Ophioscolex glacialis Müller & Troschel, 1842). J. Dorsal and ventral part of LAP without constriction (Ophiura ophiura (Linneaus, 1758)). K. Ventral part of LAP projecting ventro-proximalwards (Ophiopallas paradoxa Koehler, 1904). L. Ventral part of LAP not projecting ventro-proximalwards (Ophiosphalma fimbriatum (Koehler, 1922)).

Fig. 5. Typical arm spine shape. A in Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions

Fig. 5. Typical arm spine shape. A. Tapering (conical): distally ⅓ as thick as proximal diameter with a round cross-section; Pointed: distally half as thick as proximal diameter with a round cross-section; Cylindrical: same thickness at both ends with flat/round tip. B. Flat: distally half as thick as proximal diameter with oval cross-section. Red dashed lines show the ⅓ distal cross-section. The letters ʻaʼ and ʻbʼ illustrate the diameter of ⅓ distal and basal cross-sections, respectively. ʻa/bʼ shows the approximate ratio of these diameters.

Fig. 3 in Interactive identification key to all brittle star families (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) leads to revised morphological descriptions

Fig. 3. SEM images of various ossicle structures in brittle stars. A. Muscle and nerve opening on LAP separated by small ridge if at all (Amphiura chiajei Forbes, 1843). B. Muscle and nerve opening on LAP separated by large, prominent ridge or regular stereom (Ophiolycus purpureus (Düben & Koren, 1846)). C. Non-keeled vertebra (Amphiura chiajei). D. Keeled vertebra (Ophiothrix fragilis Abildgaard, 1789). E. Vertebra with oral bridge (Euryale aspera Lamarck, 1816). F. Sockets indicate teeth and tooth papillae on dental plate as single row (Amphilepis norvegica (Ljungman, 1865)). G. ½ single row of teeth and ½ tooth papillae (Ophiothrix fragilis). H. ⅔ single row of teeth and ⅓ tooth papillae (Ophiocamax vitrea Lyman, 1878). I. Sockets on dental plate covering evenly (Asteronyx loveni Müller & Troschel, 1842). J–K. LAP not arched = position lateral. L. LAP arched = wrapped around the arm.