Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
345
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
345 results for “open access”
Open Access journals charging publication fees for a) the ten countries with the highest output of Open Access journals and b) sociological journals (2012, 2014)
<p>The files represent data on Open Access journals charging publication fees for a) the ten countries with the highest output of Open Access journals and b) all sociological journals indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals DOAJ. The data covers a time span of about 18 months, it was collected in November 2012 and June 2014.</p>
Numbers and shares of Open Access Journals from all disciplines and from the discipline Sociology using Creative Commons Licenses as listed by the Directory of Open Access Journals (2014-06-08)
<p>These files contains the data on frequencies and shares of Open Access journals using Creative Commons Licenses (comparing journals from all disciplines and sociologial journals). Date of data collection: 2014-06-08.</p>
Numbers and shares of Open Access Journals in Sociology charging publication fees (article processing charges APCs)
<p>On the eleventh of June 2014 the Directory of Open Access Journals DOAJ listed 109 sociology journals. For these journals the information on publication charges was wrong in more than 10 % of the cases. Focusing on the eleven journals that - according to the DOAJ - used (always or conditionally) APCs the situation is even worse: 10 of these journals (90,9 %) were categorized wrongly.</p> <p>In fact only three out of these 109 journals (2,75 %) are charging their authors. The files contain corrected information for the 109 journals including the sums charged by the journals.</p>
Artikel- und Buchpublikationen aus der Soziologie: Open Science, Open Access zu Texten, Open Access zu Forschungsdaten, Open Access zu Forschungssoftware, Altmetrics [open version]
<p>Die Daten umfassen Stichproben an je 100 Journalartikeln und Buchpublikationen aus der Soziologie. Ausgwählt wurden Veröffentlichungen aus deutschsprachigen und nicht-deutschsprachigen Ländern.</p> <p>Für alle Artikel der Stichprobe wurde geprüft,</p> <p>1) ob sie im Gold Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 2) ob sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 3) auf welchem Repository-Typ sie (im Falle einer Green Open Access Publikation) verfügbar waren<br> 4) seit wann sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 5) ob Forschungsdaten zum Artikel verfügbar waren<br> 6) ob Forschungssoftware zum Artikel verfügbar war<br> 7) wie häufig der Artikel in Google Scholar zitiert wurde<br> 8) wie häufig der Artikel im Web of Science zitiert wurde<br> 9) wie häufig der Artikel in Scopus zitiert wurde<br> 10) wie häufig der Artikel in den Sociological Abstracts zitiert wurde<br> 11) wie viele Mendeley User Counts der Artikel aufwies<br> 12) wie häufig der Artikel getwittert wurde (Datenquelle: Topsy)</p> <p> </p> <p>Für alle Bücher der Stichprobe wurde geprüft,</p> <p>1) ob sie im Gold Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 2) ob sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 3) auf welchem Repository-Typ sie (im Falle einer Green Open Access Publikation) verfügbar waren<br> 4) seit wann sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 5) wie häufig das Buch in Google Scholar zitiert wurde<br> 6) wie häufig das Buch im Web of Science zitiert wurde (als Cited-Reference-Analyse)<br> 7) wie häufig das Buch in Scopus zitiert wurde<br> 8) wie häufig das Buch in der International Bibliography of the Social Sciences zitiert wurde<br> 9) wie viele Mendeley User Counts das Buch aufwies<br> 10) wie häufig das Buch getwittert wurde (Datenquelle: Topsy)</p> <p><br> Da die Impact-Informationen unter Copyright-Schutz der Datenbank-Anbieter stehen, können diese nicht frei zugänglich gemacht werden. Es existiert jedoch eine nicht offen verfügbare Version dieser Datensammlung, die Impact-Informationen enthält und die auf Anfrage bereitgestellt werden kann.</p>
Data of the Open Access Repository Ranking 2015
<p>The Open Access Repository Ranking 2015 ranks open access repositories from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Data for the 2015 ranking was partly submitted by the respective repository managers, and partly automatically validated via the OAI interfaces. The OARR team reviewed all submissions assuring the quality and validity.<br> The ranking is based on an open and transparent metric that was developed in accordance with the open access community. This metric is a synthesis of different schemes and studies that surveyed and describe open access repositories.<br> Data includes the 2015 scores and descriptive information on the repositories as well as the 2015 metric.</p>
Utrecht University Open Access Monitor: Methodology
<p>Methodology used for the Utrecht University Open Access Monitor, which attributes OA labels to peer reviewed journal articles registered by researchers in the UU CRIS and UMCU CRIS (PURE).</p>
National Open Access Monitor, Ireland - Research product metadata
<p>This dataset contains the foundational data for the National Open Access Monitor under an open license. OpenAIRE will routinely provide monthly data dumps to Zenodo, encompassing a comprehensive set of data and indicators related to the Open Access Monitor. This collaborative effort ensures accessibility and openness in sharing the data, promoting transparency and facilitating its use for research and analysis purposes.<br>The dataset comprises of the metadata of the research products metadata stored in the parquet format. The file contains two columns ("id", "xml"), the first of which is the OpenAIRE identifier of the research product and the the second the xml representation of the metadata. The schema of the metadata can be found in https://www.openaire.eu/schema/1.0/oaf-1.0.xsd and a detailed description of the contents can be found in https://graph.openaire.eu/docs/ and https://zenodo.org/records/2643199</p>
pofatu/pofatu-data: Pofatu, a curated and open-access database for geochemical sourcing of archaeological materials
<p>Geochemical fingerprinting of artefacts and sources has proven to be the most effective way to use material evidence in order to reconstruct strategies of raw material procurement, exchange systems, and mobility patterns among past societies. In order to facilitate access to this growing body of data and to promote comparability and reproducibility in provenance studies, we designed Pofatu, the first online and open-access database presenting geochemical compositions and contextual information for archaeological sources and artefacts.</p> <p>The data repository includes a compilation of geochemical data and supporting analytical metadata, as well as the archaeological provenance and context for each sample. All information on Samples related to sources and artefacts can be accessed on this platform or downloaded from Zenodo or GitHub.</p> <p>While most prehistoric quarries and surface procurement sources used in the past have yet to be identified, provenance studies must also integrate wide and reliable geological data. For this reason, we advise Pofatu users to also consult other open-access repositories focusing specifically on geological samples, such as GeoRoc and EarthChem.</p>
National Open Access Monitor Survey: Organisational Identity: Responses Dataset
<p>This dataset contains the response data from the 'National Open Access Monitor Survey: Organisational Identity which was carried out between 9th October and 9th November 2023 under the National Open Access Monitor Project: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8420404">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8420404</a></p><p><strong>This survey was run to:</strong></p><ul><li>compile a complete list of Irish research performing organisations (RPO) and research funding organisations (RFO) to be represented by the National Open Access Monitor.</li><li>ensure each organisation/entity is categorised correctly as an RPO or an RFO (or both), as applicable.</li><li>identify if an organisation/entity is publicly funded.</li><li>identify formally affiliated organisations/entities where <strong>all </strong>research outputs of one organisation/entity should also be included in the research outputs of another organisation/entity.</li><li>capture the persistent identifiers for RPOs, RFOs and publishers, to enable identification of relevant research outputs for the National Open Access Monitor.</li></ul><p><strong>To note: </strong></p><ul><li>Respondents' email addresses have been redacted.</li><li>Responses have been pseudonymised to the level of stakeholder-group e.g. Contributor A, Research Funding Organisation A, where requested by the participant in the participant consent form: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7589770">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7589770</a>.</li><li>Respondents were notified of the limits of pseudonymisation for this survey. Due to the nature and purpose of this survey on Organisational Identity, the identity of the organisation/entity could not be pseudonymised. Participants were advised only to participate if they were happy to do so under these conditions.</li><li>Survey responses were deleted by request of certain respondents. These responses are not included in these files.</li><li>Survey respondents were enabled to update their submissions. These changes are captured in the <i>NationalOpenAccessMonitorSurvey.OrganisationalIdentity.MasterChangeFile.</i></li></ul><p><strong>There are four files within in this dataset:</strong></p><p>- <i>Results.NationalOpenAccessMonitorSurvey.OrganisationalIdentity.README - </i>this PDF details the changes made to the raw data, as specified in the bullet points above and a description of the files within the dataset.</p><p>- <i>Results.NationalOpenAccessMonitorSurvey.OrganisationalIdentity.Pseudonymised.101123</i> - this is the original raw data, in csv format, as downloaded from the Online Surveys platform and subsequently pseudonymised and redacted.</p><p>- <i>NationalOpenAccessMonitorSurvey.OrganisationalIdentity.MasterChangeFile.101123 </i>- this is a change file, in csv format, which documents the changes which participants requested to be made to their submissions after they were received.</p><p>- R<i>esults.NationalOpenAccessMonitorSurvey.OrganisationalIdentity.Pseudonymised.Updated.101123 - </i>this is the original raw data, pseudonymised and redacted, with the requested changes implemented.</p><p><strong>Notes for data use:</strong></p><ul><li>The "affiliated organisations/entities" section of the survey was insufficiently described in the survey text. One-to-one follow-up and support was provided to clarify to respondents that questions 12 and 13 of the survey intended to identify where <strong>all </strong>research outputs of one organisation/entity should appear on that organisation's/entities' own RPO or RFO dashboard within the National Open Access Monitor, and <strong>also </strong>on the dashboard of another organisation/entity. </li><li>Survey respondents were notified in the introduction section to the "affiliated organisations/entities" section that "<strong>only where all entities agree there is a formal relationship in place</strong> that should be reflected in the Monitor will the link be implemented". Therefore, for the National Open Access Monitor project, only where both parties have asserted that <strong>all </strong>research outputs of one organisation/entity should also appear on the dashboard of another organisation/entity, will it be considered validated and implemented. </li><li>The geographic scope of the National Open Access Monitor Project is the Republic of Ireland. Where respondent's RPO or RFO organisations/entities are based outside the Republic of Ireland, or where respondents stated affiliations with overseas organisations/entities, they will not be actioned or implemented. To note: the survey invited responses from international <i>publishers</i> to enable filtering functionality by publisher within the National Open Access Monitor, these responses are <i>not </i>out of scope. </li></ul><p>-----------------------</p><p>The context for the survey is detailed in the National Open Access Monitor Project Plan: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7331431">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7331431</a>, the National Open Access Monitor Advisory Group Meeting Minutes, 18th September 2023: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8405472">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8405472</a> and the Developing the National Open Access Monitor, Ireland: Stakeholder Webinar, 22nd September 2023: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8370578">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.8370578.</a></p><p>This project is managed by <a href="http://www.irel.ie/">IReL </a>and has received funding from Ireland's National Open Research Forum under the NORF Open Research Fund. <a href="https://norf.ie/funding/">https://norf.ie/funding/ </a><a href="https://norf.ie/orf-projects-announcement/">https://norf.ie/orf-projects-announcement/</a></p>
National Open Access Monitor, Draft Report: Stakeholder Feedback: Response Dataset
<p>This dataset contains the response data from the 'National Open Access Monitor, Draft Report: Stakeholder Feedback' Form which was open from 16th to 30th November 2023 under the National Open Access Monitor Project. A PDF reference copy of the Feedback Form is available here: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10141988">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10141988</a></p><p>The purpose of the form was to capture stakeholder feedback on the National Open Access Monitor, Ireland Draft Report, for actioning by OpenAIRE in the final National Open Access Monitor Report to be delivered in January 2024. The draft is an interim report, and includes reference to the initial feedback from IReL and the National Open Access Monitor Project Advisory Group.</p><p><strong>To note: </strong></p><ul><li>Responses have been pseudonymised to the level of stakeholder-group e.g. Contributor I, Research Performing Organisation I, where requested by the participant in the participant consent form: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7589770">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7589770</a></li><li>This is the original raw data file, in csv format, as downloaded from the Online Surveys platform and subsequently pseudonymised.</li></ul><p>-----------------------</p><p>The context for the feedback form is detailed in the National Open Access Monitor Project Plan: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7331431">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7331431</a>, the National Open Access Monitor Advisory Group Meeting Minutes, 27th October 2023: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10105023 ">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10105023 </a>and the OpenAIRE National Open Access Monitor Ireland, Draft Report: <a href="https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10136295">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10136295</a></p><p>This project is managed by <a href="http://www.irel.ie/">IReL </a>and has received funding from Ireland's National Open Research Forum under the NORF Open Research Fund. <a href="https://norf.ie/funding/">https://norf.ie/funding/ </a><a href="https://norf.ie/orf-projects-announcement/">https://norf.ie/orf-projects-announcement/</a></p>
Video 4 - Open Science: equitable access for everyone.
<p>An interview about the necessity of funding Open Science platforms as a means of achieving equitable science with Iryna Kuchma, Open Access Programme Manager for EIFL; Ana María Cetto, Professor of Physics at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Yensi Flores, Postdoctoral researcher at the Cancer Research Centre, University College Cork; and <span>Bregt Saenen, Senior Policy Officer for Open Science at Science Europe</span>.<br><br></p> <p><span>Science is a global enterprise targeting global problems – limiting access to science defeats this purpose. Open Science platforms are necessary for researchers from all countries and organizations to be able to participate in the global scientific effort. Funding bodies can support Open Science platforms as a way of ensuring equitable and trustworthy science. </span></p> <p> </p>
Data for publication "Benefits of open access to researchers from lower-income countries: A global analysis of reference patterns in 1980–2020"
<p>Data to reproduce figures for the publication "Benefits of open access to researchers from lower-income countries: A global analysis of reference patterns in 1980–2020" (DOI: 10.1177/01655515241245952). Each file contains the data underlying the figure corresponding to the file name.</p>
Patristisches Textarchiv. Ein Open Access-Archiv antiker christlicher Texte
The "Patristic Text Archive" offers anyone interested a collection of texts and translations of Christian texts from antiquity (i.e. "Patristic" is conceived in a very broad sense).
Dataset for Earth Sciences at Freie Universität Berlin: Open Access, Licenses and Persistent Identifiers Monitoring
<p>In <em>Version 4</em>, <strong>publishers </strong>and <strong>journals</strong> names has been extended.</p> <p>In <em>Version 3</em>, new entries have been added for both <strong>journal </strong>and <strong>non-journal article outputs</strong>, specifically including data from the year <strong>2023</strong>. Minor adjustments were also made to URLs and open access (OA) statuses.</p> <p><em>Note</em>: Data for journal and non-journal article outputs from the year 2023 were unavailable at the time of preparing the <strong>short paper</strong> presenting the results, findable under <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14170751" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.5281/zenodo.14170751</a> [1]).</p> <p><br>Started in 2021, Berlin University Alliance (BUA) Open Science Dashboards, followed by the BUA Open Science Magnifiers projects, seek to investigate Open Science (OS) practices across different research domains and communities. A primary focus of these initiatives lies in the development of OS indicators, tailored to discipline specific ones, alongside their visualisation for monitoring.</p> <p>Collaborating closely with the Department of Earth Sciences at Freie Universität Berlin (FU), one of the project's key objectives is the implementation of an Open Science Dashboard for Earth Sciences FU. The visualisation of the first OS metrics is already available under <a href="https://quest-open-earthsciences.charite.de/">https://quest-open-earthsciences.charite.de/</a>.</p> <p>The datasets utilized include the outputs from the Department of Earth Sciences at FU, i.a. on Open Access (OA) categorisations and statuses, persistent identifiers (PIDs) and Open Licences (Creative Commons) availability, published between 2016-2023. These datasets consist of (i) <strong>"journal_articles_v3.csv"</strong> and (ii) <strong>"non_journal_articles_outputs_v3.csv"</strong>, the latter including “book”, “book chapter”, “conference paper”, “conference abstract”, and “other research outputs” (e.g. book reviews, project reports, book chapters in school books, or electronic supplementary material).</p> <p>Data for the dashboard was obtained from the FU university bibliography (<a href="https://frub-berlin.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/">https://frub-berlin.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/</a>), but coverage of PID information was incomplete, OA category information was incomplete and often erroneous, and copyright/open licence information was missing in this data set. Therefore, the data set was <strong>enriched with manually researched information</strong>. Data enrichment was different for journal articles and for non-journal-article publications. For <strong><em>journal articles</em></strong>, <em>copyright/open licence</em> information was added, and <em>open access category</em> information was checked and added or corrected. For <strong><em>non-journal-article outputs</em></strong>, missing <em>PIDs</em> were added and <em>open access category</em> information was checked and added or corrected. </p> <p>The "<em>data_dictionary_earth_sciences_v3.csv"</em> table documents all variables of each data file containing here.</p> <p>Both for the dashboard, and in our following publications, we categorized <strong>"bronze"</strong> OA outputs as closed access. Although such publications are openly available on the publisher's websites, they lack licence information and thus cannot be openly reused, and presumably even change its openness status at any time. Following the methodology of Charité Dashboard on Responsible Research (<a href="https://quest-dashboard.charite.de/#tabStart">https://quest-dashboard.charite.de/#tabStart</a>) we only include "gold", "hybrid" and "green" OA as true OA. Further details about the enrichment process conducted on these datasets can be found under <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099821" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.5281/zenodo.1099821</a>9 [2]</p> <p> </p> <p>[1] Duine, M., Iarkaeva, A., & Hübner, A. (2024, November 15). Initiating discipline-specific Open Science Monitoring with the Open Science Dashboard for Earth Sciences. 28th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI2024), Berlin, Germany. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14170751" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14170751</a><br>[2] Duine, M., Hübner, A., & Iarkaeva, A. (2024). Enrichment of university bibliography data for open science monitoring. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10998219">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10998219</a></p>
Fachinformationsdienst (FID) BAUdigital: Ergebnisse der Umfrage zu Open Access und Forschungsdaten 2021
<p>Die im Rahmen des Fachinformationsdienstes BAUdigital durchgeführte Umfrage (Laufzeit: 08. März - 30. April 2021) hatte das Ziel, die Publikationskulturen der adressierten Disziplinen zu ermitteln und bedarfsorientiert zu erheben, welche Dienstleistungen und Informationsangebote für die Fachcommunity wichtig sind. Die Umfrage richtete sich daher vorrangig an Forschende der Fachdisziplinen Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik, aber auch an Fachvertreter*innen aus Lehre und Wirtschaft. </p> <p>Für die Erhebung der Daten wurde LimeSurvey verwendet, die Beantwortung des Fragebogens dauerte durchschnittlich 15 Minuten und erfolgte anonym.</p> <p>Der DFG-geförderte Fachinformationsdienst BAUdigital ist ein Verbundprojekt der Universitätsbibliothek Braunschweig, der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt, der TIB – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Technik und Naturwissenschaften und dem Fraunhofer-Informationszentrum Raum und Bau.</p>
UK HESA 2020 Academic women: Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access
<p>This Zenodo entry includes the full data files (.csv and .xlsx) for Figure 6: 'Percentages of women academic staff (headcount) in a subset of 165 United Kingdom universities by grouping, 2020', included in the manuscript "Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access", authored by members of the Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative (COKI). The analysis is of publicly available data sourced from the United Kingdom Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).</p>
Modular control of human movement during running: an open access data set
<p>The human body is an outstandingly complex machine including around 1000 muscles and joints acting synergistically. Yet, the coordination of the enormous amount of degrees of freedom needed for movement is mastered by our one brain and spinal cord. The idea that some synergistic neural components of movement exist was already suggested at the beginning of the XX century. Since then, it has been widely accepted that the central nervous system might simplify the production of movement by avoiding the control of each muscle individually. Instead, it might be controlling muscles in common patterns that have been called muscle synergies. Only with the advent of modern computational methods and hardware it has been possible to numerically extract synergies from electromyography (EMG) signals. However, typical experimental setups do not include a big number of individuals, with common sample sizes of five to 20 participants. With this study, we make publicly available a set of EMG activities recorded during treadmill running from the right lower limb of 135 healthy and young adults (78 males, 57 females). Moreover, we include in this open access data set the code used to extract synergies from EMG data using non-negative matrix factorization and the relative outcomes. Muscle synergies, containing the time-invariant muscle weightings (motor modules) and the time-dependent activation coefficients (motor primitives), were extracted from 13 ipsilateral EMG activities using non-negative matrix factorization. Four synergies were enough to describe as many gait cycle phases during running: weight acceptance, propulsion, early swing and late swing. We foresee many possible applications of our data, that we can summarize in three key points. First, it can be a prime source for broadening the representation of human motor control due to the big sample size. Second, it could serve as a benchmark for scientists from multiple disciplines such as musculoskeletal modelling, robotics, clinical neuroscience, sport science, etc. Third, the data set could be used both to train students or to support established scientists in the perfection of current muscle synergies extraction methods.</p> <p>The "RAW_DATA.RData" R list consists of elements of S3 class "EMG", each of which is a human locomotion trial containing cycle segmentation timings and raw electromyographic (EMG) data from 13 muscles of the right-side leg. Cycle times are structured as data frames containing two columns that correspond to touchdown (first column) and lift-off (second column). Raw EMG data sets are also structured as data frames with one row for each recorded data point and 14 columns. The first column contains the incremental time in seconds. The remaining 13 columns contain the raw EMG data, named with the following muscle abbreviations: ME = gluteus medius, MA = gluteus maximus, FL = tensor fasciæ latæ, RF = rectus femoris, VM = vastus medialis, VL = vastus lateralis, ST = semitendinosus, BF = biceps femoris, TA = tibialis anterior, PL = peroneus longus, GM = gastrocnemius medialis, GL = gastrocnemius lateralis, SO = soleus.</p> <p>The file "dataset.rar" contains data in older format, not compatible with the R package <a href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=musclesyneRgies">musclesyneRgies</a>.</p>
Sharkipedia: A Curated Open Access Database of Shark and Ray Life History Traits and Abundance Time-series
<p>This dataset represent the intial launch of Sharkipedia: a curated open access database of shark and ray life history traits and abundance time-series. A curated database of shark and ray biological data is increasingly necessary both to support fisheries management and conservation efforts, and to test the generality of hypotheses of vertebrate macroecology and macroevolution. Sharks and rays are one of the most charismatic, evolutionary distinct, and threatened lineages of vertebrates, comprising around 1,250 species. To accelerate shark and ray conservation and science, we developed Sharkipedia as a curated open-source database and research initiative to make all published biological traits and population trends accessible to everyone. Sharkipedia hosts information on 58 life history traits from 264 sources, for 170 species, from 39 families, and 12 orders related to length (n=9 traits), age (8), growth (12), reproduction (19), demography (5), and allometric relationships (5), as well as 871 population time-series from 202 species. Sharkipedia relies on the backbone taxonomy of the IUCN Red List and the bibliography of Shark-References. Sharkipedia has profound potential to support the rapidly growing data demands of fisheries management, international trade regulation as well as anchoring vertebrate macroecology and macroevolution.</p>
Data and codes: Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access
<p>This Zenodo entry includes data and R codes used to generate the figures included in the manuscript "Changing the Academic Gender Narrative through Open Access", authored by members of the Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative (COKI). These include data that are either publicly available or derived through the COKI data infrastructure.</p> <p>The R file includes codes used to generate Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 1A, 2A and 3A. It uses data contained in the files "au_data_all.csv", "au_groupings.csv", "uk_data_all.csv" and "uk_groupings.csv".</p> <p>This entry also includes the full data files (.csv and .xlsx) for Figures 5 and 6 included in the manuscript:</p> <ul> <li>Figure 5: ‘Percentages of women academic staff (headcount) compared to the total number of academics in the institution for 43 Australian universities by grouping, 2020’. The analysis is of publicly available data sourced from the Australian Department of Education, Skills and Employment.</li> <li>Figure 6: ‘Percentages of women academic staff (headcount) compared to the total number of academics in the institution for a subset of 165 United Kingdom higher education institutions by grouping, 2020’. The analysis is of publicly available data sourced from the United Kingdom Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA).</li> </ul>
Monitoring open access publishing of NWO funded research (2015-2021) data set
<p>This is the dataset underlying the report "Monitoring open access publishing of NWO funded research" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7041897">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7041897</a>)</p> <p>The report presents statistics on the extent to which publications from the period 2015–2021 funded by NWO are available in Open Access. The analyses presented in this report also cover publications funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw. This report builds on two earlier reports, published in <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4446042">2020</a> and <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/5056043">2021</a>, covering publications from the period 2015–2018 and 2015-2020, respectively.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.