Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,152
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,152 results for “outputs”
Assessment of vulnerability to climate change of coastal communities in the Gulf of California and the Yucatan Peninsula: vulnerability outputs
<p>The dataset includes the outputs of the project: "Assessment of vulnerability to climate change of coastal communities in the Gulf of California and the Yucatan Peninsula: vulnerability outputs" funded by the David and Lucille Packard Foundation and awarded to H. Reyes-Bonilla (UABCS). </p> <p>This study analyzed vulnerability of fisheries-dependent coastal communities based on three components: a) adaptive capacity (84 indicators), which reflect the ability of a community to respond and recover after adverse events; b) susceptibility (11 indicators) which was determined based on fishing dependence; and c) exposure (31 indicators) that was evaluated with current environmental data. Future vulnerability was determined for a 2050 horizon and based on two climate change scenarios: SSP126, which represents low emissions, and SSP585, which takes into consideration that the amount of greenhouse gases will continue to increase. These data come from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6), which serves as the basis for the 6th IPCC report. We evaluated vulnerability using indicators what were available at the local scale.</p>
Sample outputs from beamModelTester (SE607 HBA)
<p>A series of plots generated using <a href="https://github.com/creaneroDIAS/beamModelTester">beamModelTester</a> to characterise the relationship between the Hamaker model of a telescope's performance as plotted using <a href="https://github.com/2baOrNot2ba/dreamBeam">dreamBeam</a> and a set of observations of CasA using SE607 LOFAR station. </p>
Atmospheric climate model output of the COSMO-CLM2 regional climate model hindcast run over Antarctica (1987-2016)
<p>The dataset contains monthly output of a COSMO-CLM² (COSMO-CLM coupled to the Community Land Model) atmospheric hindcast simulation over Antarctica which is described and evaluated in the following paper: </p> <p>Souverijns, N., Gossart, A., Demuzere, M., Lenaerts, J.T.M., Medley, B., Gorodetskaya, I.V., Vanden Broucke, S., van Lipzig, N.P.M., 2019. A new Regional Climate Model for POLAR-CORDEX: Evaluation of a 30-year Hindcast with COSMO-CLM² over Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124, 1405-1427. (doi:10.1029/2018JD028862)</p> <p>Details of the model simulation:<br> - COSMO-CLM version 5.0_clm6<br> - Community Land Model version 4.5<br> - Horizontal resolution: 0.25°x0.25°<br> - Vertical resolution: 40 levels<br> - Time period: 1987-2016 (excluding 4 years of spin-up)<br> - Driving model: ERA-Interim<br> </p> <p>The data provided here has a monthly time resolution and contains the monthly average of all variables except denoted otherwise below. As such, each file consists of 360 time steps.<br> - AEVAP_S: Surface evaporation [kg m-2] (summed value for each month)<br> - ALB: Surface albedo [-] (only for austral summer months)<br> - ALHFL_S: Surface latent heat flux [W m-2]<br> - ALWD_S: Downward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ALWU_S: Upward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASHFL_S: Surface sensible heat flux [W m-2]<br> - ASOB_S: Surface net downward shortwave radiation [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIFD_S: Diffuse downward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIFU_S: Diffuse upward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIR_S: Direct downward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ATHB_S: Surface net downward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - P: Pressure at 40 vertical levels [Pa]<br> - QV: Specific humidity at 40 vertical levels [kg kg-1]<br> - RH2M: Relative humidity at 2 meter [%]<br> - SNOW_GSP: Surface snowfall amount [kg m-2] (summed value for each month)<br> - T2M: Temperature at 2 meter [K]<br> - T: Temperature at 40 vertical levels [K]<br> - WS10M: Wind speed at 10 meter [m s-1]<br> - WS: Wind speed at 40 vertical levels [m s-1]</p>
Model output: Crescentic sandbar behaviour along a curved coast
<p>This data set contains the model output used in the journal article Rutten et al. 'Simulating crescentic sandbar behaviour along a curved coast'. </p> <p>ORGANIZATION:<br> The data set consists of 50 netcdf files, corresponding to the 50 model runs. Bed level change was simulated under time-variant and time-invariant wave conditions over a period of 20 days. The reference runs are named RunRef1.nc (time-invariant wave forcing at the offshore boundary) and RunRef2.nc (time-varying wave forcing at the offshore boundary). Runs 1-39 are variations on the forcing, whereas Runs 40-48 are variations on the bathymetry (see Table 1 in the journal publication for the boundary condition in each run). </p> <p>Each file contains the grid, time vector and bed elevation. Also, the x- and y-component of the current and the sediment transport are provided. Output is given every 24 hours over a length of 20 days.</p> <p>longshore Longshore distance [m]<br> cross-shore Cross-shore distance [m]<br> time Time [days]<br> ZF Bed elevation [m]<br> UCX x-component current [m/s]<br> UCY y-component current [m/s]<br> QTX x-component sediment transport [m3/m/s]<br> QTY y-component sediment transport [m3/m/s]</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Great Lakes WRF-FVCOM model ensemble outputs: Summer 2018 daily LST and T2m
<p>Postprocessed model data for the paper: "Coupled Lake-Atmosphere-Land Physics Uncertainties in a Great Lakes Regional Climate Model"</p> <p>Perturbed Physics Ensemble outputs from a coupled lake-atmosphere-land Great Lakes regional model: <br>- Time period: May, June, July of 2018 <br>- Computational domain: Great Lakes region as contained within <a href="../api/records/10806629/draft/files/wrf_grid.nc/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrf_grid.nc</a> (atmosphere-land) and <a href="../api/records/10806629/draft/files/fvcom_grid.nc/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">fvcom_grid.nc</a> (lake).<br>- Quantities of interest: lake surface temperature and 2-m near-surface air temperature<br>- Training set: "<a href="../api/records/10806629/draft/files/wfv_global_daily_temperature_training_set.pkl/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wfv_global_daily_temperature_training_set.pkl</a>" [18 members]. Associated with "<a href="../api/records/10806629/draft/files/perturbation_matrix_9variables_korobov18.nc/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">perturbation_matrix_9variables_korobov18.nc</a>" input model configuration matrix.<br>- Test set: "<a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/13863491/draft/files/wfv_global_daily_temperature_test_set.pkl/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wfv_global_daily_temperature_test_set.pkl</a>" [9 members]. Associated with "<a href="https://zenodo.org/api/records/13863491/draft/files/perturbation_matrix_9variables_latin_hypercube9.nc/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">perturbation_matrix_9variables_latin_hypercube9.nc</a>" input model configuration matrix.</p>
Seefeld Cold-Air Pool Experiment (SEECAP): WRF Simulation Output with snow cover January 12 2020 0000 UTC to January 13 2020 1200 UTC
<p>The Seefeld Cold-Air Pool Experiment (SEECAP) focused on the cross-country skiing area Olympiaregion Seefeld and in particular the topographic setting in the Nordic ski arena which favors the formation of cold-air pools and took place between December 2019 and March 2020. The measurement data are described in Rudolph (2022) and Rauchöcker et al. (2024d) and meteorological measurement data associated with SEECAP are published in Rauchöcker et al. (2024c). This upload contains WRF simulation output data for the night between January 12 and January 13 2020 with snow cover. The night between January 12 and January 13 2020 featured an undisturbed cold-air pool for almost the entire night. This case was considered to feature in Rauchöcker et al. (2024d), but a different case was chosen because some measurement data was not available during this period. Also available in a different dataset are data from simulations of the night between January 16 and January 17 2020, which initially featured ideal condition for cold-air pool formation followed by a disturbance around midnight, with snow cover (Rauchöcker et al., 2024a) and also without snow cover (Rauchöcker et al., 2024b).</p> <h3><strong>WRF Simulation Output</strong></h3> <h3><strong> </strong></h3> <p>This Dataset includes data generated with WRFlux v1.4.1 (Göbel et al., 2022), a fork of the Weather Research and Forecasting model WRF (Skamarock et al. 2021). WRFlux allows to calculate the contribution of different processes to the potential temperature tendency at each grid point. The data published here is from the innermost simulation domain with 40m horizontal resolution and 10m vertical resolution close to the surface. The simulations were initialized at 00:00 UTC January 12 2020 and run until 12:00 UTC January 13 2020 and results for the same night but a coarser grid spacing are described in Rauchöcker (2022). Compared to the simulation with 200m grid spacing presented there, this simulation offers a significantly improved resolution. As input, we used ERA5 reanalysis data, 1-arc second SRTM terrain data and Corine 2018 land cover classification. The simulation was performed with modified snow cover as described in Rauchöcker (2022) and the MYNN 2.5-order PBL parameterization. A detailed description of the model setup can be found in Rauchöcker et al (2024d) and in the file <em>namelist.input</em> that was used to generate the simulation results.</p> <p>Standard WRF output can be found in <em>wrfout_40m_jan12</em>. The mean wind speed components, which were necessary to rotate the tendencies in a coordinate system that is aligned with the valley orientation, are contained in <em>windout_40m_jan12</em>. These variables were contained in the unprocessed output files produced by WRFlux; the full files were unfortunately too large to be included here. The postprocessed tendencies are stored in <em>tend_40m_jan12</em>.</p>
Data, Analytical Code, and Model Outputs From: Restoration Treatments Enhance Tree Growth and Alter Climatic Constraints During Extreme Drought
<p>This archive includes data (forest inventories, tree ring measurements, climate variables), statistical code, model outputs, and a preprint copy of Rodman et al. (2024). For more information on specific information, processing methods, and data formats, see "README.md" or "README.html" files associated with this archive</p>
Seafloor output from the MEDUSA model
<p>- Output from the MEDUSA model (Yool et al., GMD, 2013)</p> <p>- NEMO resolution 1/4-degree</p> <p>- REGRID versions are regridded from ORCA025 grid to a regular 0.25-degree grid</p> <p>- Simulation performed as part of the ROAM project (UK Ocean Acidification Research Programme)</p> <p>- CMIP5 Historical and RCP 8.5 extension (1975-2099 inclusive)</p> <p>- Simulation described in Yool et al., JGR, 2015</p> <p>- Subset of output prepared for Mission Atlantic project by A. Yool in April 2021</p> <p>- Seafloor fields of physical and biogeochemical properties for the periods 2016-2025 and 2090-2099</p> <p>- Note that this is test output produced for a specific purpose</p> <p>- The output has been regridded to a regular 1/4-degree grid</p>
Seafloor output from the MEDUSA model
<p>- Output from the MEDUSA model (Yool et al., GMD, 2013)</p> <p>- NEMO resolution 1/4-degree</p> <p>- REGRID versions are regridded from ORCA025 grid to a regular 0.25-degree grid</p> <p>- Simulation performed as part of the ROAM project (UK Ocean Acidification Research Programme)</p> <p>- CMIP5 Historical and RCP 8.5 extension (1975-2099 inclusive)</p> <p>- Simulation described in Yool et al., JGR, 2015</p> <p>- Subset of output prepared for Mission Atlantic project by A. Yool in April 2021</p> <p>- Seafloor fields of physical and biogeochemical properties for the periods 2016-2025 and 2090-2099</p> <p>- Note that this is test output produced for a specific purpose</p> <p>- v1.3 corrects a problem in the regridding at v1.2</p>
Publishing Reproducible Research Outputs - Interviewees and interview questions
<p>The table '<strong>Interview questions</strong>' shows the focus of our investigation and stakeholder engagement activities. It should be noted that not all interview questions were asked to all stakeholder groups based on appropriateness and time available. Some questions in the table may appear to be repeated: this is because slightly different phrasing was used based on the stakeholder interviewed.</p> <p>Legend:</p> <ul> <li>Research Funding Organisations: RFO</li> <li>Research Performing Organisations: RPO</li> <li>Infrastructure Providers: IP </li> <li>Academic Publishers: AP</li> <li>Researchers and research groups: RRG</li> </ul> <p>The table '<strong>List of interviewees</strong>' includes all stakeholders engaged in the context of this research.</p>
Publishing Reproducible Research Outputs - Thematic coding of interview findings
<p>The spreadsheet in the present dataset (CSV format) includes the anonymised thematic coding that has been applied to our interview findings. A list of interviewees and interview questions is available <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5141665">here</a>.</p> <p>The thematic coding has been applied by using <a href="https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home">NVivo</a>, a professional qualitative analysis software, and then exported in spreadsheet form for public sharing. The findings of this analysis have been used to inform our final report, which is available in our <a href="https://zenodo.org/communities/ke-prro/?page=1&size=20">Zenodo project Community</a>.</p>
Outputs from Control REACT Workstream 2 [Data]
<p>Outputs from the Network Innovation Allowance project "Control REACT" (workstream 2), sponsored by National Grid Electricity System Operator (NGESO). This deposit contains underlying data used in this project. The R code (Rmarkdown) and html renders of these workbooks are available in a separate deposit linked below. See description there for further details. In order to run the R scripts, data and code must be arranged in the directory structure given in "Directory Structure.pdf".</p> <p>Wind, solar and net-demand data are derived from raw data made available by <a href="https://www.bmreports.com/">Elexon</a> and <a href="https://www.solar.sheffield.ac.uk/pvlive/">Solar Sheffield</a> via public APIs. See respective websites for details, our processed (aggregated and cleaned) versions of this data are shared here under a CC-BY license. Weather forecast data are derived from historic operational forecasts from the <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/">ECMWF</a> HRES model and are shared under a CC-BY licence. For details on how these were processed please see references.</p>
Model output used in the manuscript "Seasonality in carbon flux attenuation explains spatial variability in transfer efficiency"
<p>This *.zip file contains the model output from seasonal variability experiments using the NPZD-DOP GEOMAR biogeochemical model (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2010.05.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kriest et al., 2010</a>) coupled with the MITgcm 2.8deg ocean circulation via the transport matrix method (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Khatiwala et al., 2005</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB002923" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Khatiwala, 2007</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1246300" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Khatiwala, 2018</a>).</p> <p>These model outputs are presented and discussed in the Preprint "<em>Seasonality in carbon flux attenuation explains spatial variability in transfer efficiency</em>", published by Geophysical Research Letters (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107050" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo et al., 2024</a>). The manuscript describes the experiments performed, the parameter values used and the modifications done to the original model. For this matter, we also refer you to <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007101" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo et al. (2022)</a>.</p> <p>All files uploaded were generated from simulations run by the authors, except: the grid file, the salinity field, and the temperature field, which came with the model; and the density fields, who were computed from the MITgcm 2.8deg transport matrix by Dr Rafaelle Bernadello, using a TEOS-10 Matlab routine (<a href="http://www.teos-10.org/">http://www.teos-10.org/</a>).</p> <p>For specific information about each file uploaded, please refer to the README file. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.</p>
CESM2 Idealized Experiment Output: Summer atmospheric response to zero May North American snow cover
<p>The National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Community Earth System Model version 2.2 (CESM2) (Danabasoglu et al., 2020) was run in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) configuration. SSTs and sea-ice were prescribed as monthly varying seasonal cycles based on the observed climatology from 2005 to 2015 (i.e., component set: F2010climo) (Hurrell et al., 2008). We employed the Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) (Bogenschutz et al., 2018)<span> </span>as the atmospheric component and the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) (Lawrence et al., 2019) as the land-surface component. Each model was run with a horizontal resolution of 0.9˚ latitude by 1.25˚ longitude.</p> <p>We ran a control simulation in this configuration for ten consecutive years. We then modified the land-surface restart files for May 1st of each year by reducing the snow cover over North America to zero. Using these modified files, we then completed a reduced snow simulation by rerunning three-month simulations from May through July for each of the ten years. </p>
Model output used in the manuscript "The evolution of a non-autonomous chaotic system under non-periodic forcing: a climate change example"
<p>This *.zip file contains the model output from ensemble simulations for the Lorenz 84-Stommel 61 model (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.2001.00241.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Van Veen et al, 2001</a>; <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034021" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Daron and Stainforth, 2013</a>). To run these simulations, we used the Low-EFFourth ensemble generator (<a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.03313" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo, 2025a</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15566109" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo, 2025b</a>), which is a MATLAB-based framework that allows for large ensembles of low-dimensional dynamical systems to be run and studied in a systematic way (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-14755" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo and Stainforth, 2023</a>).</p> <p>These model outputs are presented and discussed in the article "<em>The evolution of a non-autonomouys chaotic system under non-periodic forcing: a climate change example</em>", published by Chaos (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0180870" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de Melo Viríssimo et al., 2024</a>). The manuscript describes the experiments performed, the parameter values used and the modifications done to the original L84-S61 model. For this matter, we also refer you to <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034021" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Daron and Stainforth (2013)</a>.</p> <p>All files uploaded were generated from simulations run by the authors.</p> <p>For specific information about each file uploaded, please refer to the README file. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.</p> <p><strong>Note:</strong> This version (v1.1) is the same version as v1.0 but with the correct README file.</p>
Output data for "Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol. Part 2: strong surfactants" by Vepsäläinen et al. (2023)
<p>Output data of the models used in "Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol. Part 2: strong surfactants" by Vepsäläinen et al. (2023).</p><p>Output data is included for 50 nm particles containing sodium myristate (c14na) and myristic acid (myristica), mixed with NaCl (nacl) in different surfactant mass fractions. Data about the critical points is also included for particles containing sodium myristate for particle size range 50-200 nm.</p><p>Plotters have been provided for the following:</p><ul><li>Part2_plotter_50_200_nm: Plots the critical supersaturations, diameters, and the relative change in cloud droplet concentrations for dry particles with 50-200 nm diameters containing c14na</li><li>Part2_plotter_50nm: Plots the Köhler curves, surface tension and partitioning factors for 50 nm particles containing c14na</li><li>Part2_plotter_50nm_myristica: Plots the Köhler curves and surface tensions for 50 nm particles containing myristica and also plots c14na for comparison (separate output files for the compounds and c14na data here is different than for the Part2_plotter_50nm plotter)</li></ul><p>Each plotter needs the user to set the location where the output files are stored. </p><p>In addition, a function is included:</p><ul><li>relative_change_in_cloud_droplet_number_conc: This function is called in "Part2_plotter_50_200_nm" and calculates the relative change in cloud droplet number concentration from the critical supersaturations.</li></ul>
Air mass back-trajectory modeling output along an urban-rural transect in central Ohio, 2021
This data package contains modeled air parcel back-trajectories generated using the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model (STILT) via the R interface. The purpose of the study was to characterize the geochemical and isotopic signatures of dust in relation to different land uses, and to connect the geochemistry of deposited dust to air mass trajectories. Back-trajectories are three-dimensional paths of air parcels from a receptor site (the dust collection site) backwards in time and space for the duration of the tracking interval, calculated iteratively using wind fields from high-resolution gridded meteorological data. To calculate a probability of potential pathways, rather than a single back-trajectory, STILT introduces small random perturbations into the wind fields during each time step. For four sites along an urban-rural transect in central Ohio for June-July 2021, we generated weekly footprints of potential sources for the dust deposited at each site. These back-trajectories can be paired with geochemical data to establish a connection between land use and anthropogenic dust composition. This dataset is complete and will not be updated.
Saddle catchment Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model Simulation (DHSVM) surface variable outputs (SWE, snowmelt, streamflow, soil moisture), 2 meter, 2000-2019.
The Saddle Catchment of the Niwot Ridge LTER is a densely observed, high elevation site that is ideal for hydrological model simulation and calibration. The files produced are the result of a calibration of the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation model (DHSVM) using observationally based states and forcings. Input state files of vegetation, soil properties, shading, and elevation were generated using ground and satellite observations, which, in the case of coarse-resolution or point scale observations, were then interpolated to match the high resolution of the model (2-meter grid cells). Temporally continuous meteorological forcings at the hourly time-step were used to force the model to produce an hourly simulation of the surface and subsurface hydrology within the Saddle catchment. DHSVM was calibrated to effectively reproduce the annual cycle (r^2) and total volume (percent bias) of observed runoff using observations of streamflow at the outflow pour point of the Saddle Catchment from 2001-2019. Calibrated parameters include the lateral conductivity of soil types, exponential decrease of soil conductivity, snow roughness, the snow melting temperature threshold, and the vertical conductivity of the soils. The resulting simulation generated spatially distributed time series of the snow water equivalent, snow melt, precipitation, total evapotranspiration, potential evapotranspiration, and a time-series of the total runoff generated at the outflow pour-point of the Saddle catchment. This data package contains the spatially distributed time series of snow water equivalent, snow melt, and runoff, as well as the model configuration file. Outputs of precipitation, total evapotranspiration, actual evapotranspiration, as well as model inputs are archived separately on the Environmental Data Initiative.
Saddle catchment Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model Simulation (DHSVM) precipitation and transpiration variable outputs (precipitation, total, potential and actual evapotranspiration), 2 meter, 2000-2019.
The Saddle Catchment of the Niwot Ridge LTER is a densely observed, high elevation site that is ideal for hydrological model simulation and calibration. The files produced are the result of a calibration of the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation model (DHSVM) using observationally based states and forcings. Input state files of vegetation, soil properties, shading, and elevation were generated using ground and satellite observations, which, in the case of coarse-resolution or point scale observations, were then interpolated to match the high resolution of the model (2-meter grid cells). Temporally continuous meteorological forcings at the hourly time-step were used to force the model to produce an hourly simulation of the surface and subsurface hydrology within the Saddle catchment. DHSVM was calibrated to effectively reproduce the annual cycle (r^2) and total volume (percent bias) of observed runoff using observations of streamflow at the outflow pour point of the Saddle Catchment from 2001-2019. Calibrated parameters include the lateral conductivity of soil types, exponential decrease of soil conductivity, snow roughness, the snow melting temperature threshold, and the vertical conductivity of the soils. The resulting simulation generated spatially distributed time series of the snow water equivalent, snow melt, precipitation, total evapotranspiration, potential evapotranspiration, and a time-series of the total runoff generated at the outflow pour-point of the Saddle catchment. This data package contains the spatially distributed time series of precipitation, total evapotranspiration and actual evapotranspiration Outputs of snow water equivalent, snow melt, and runoff, as well as the model configuration file, as well as model inputs are archived separately on the Environmental Data Initiative.
Future hydrologic outputs using the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM) for the Saddle Catchment, 2001 - 2100.
The Saddle Catchment of the Niwot Ridge LTER is subject to warming in a future climate and thus changes in precipitation phase, precipitation redistribution, and timing and distribution of surface water inputs (the summation of rainfall and snowmelt) as well as changes in atmospheric demand (potential evapotranspiration, PET) and the amount of evapotranspiration (ET). The input warming data were developed to first force a future climate across the Saddle Catchment and evaluate resultant hydrologic outputs using the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM). Future forcing data were generated by calculating and implementing delta values between daily average historical data and those generated from end-of-current-century Weather Research Forecasting model data. The variables perturbed in the warming DHSVM simulation were: precipitation, air temperature, relative humidity and longwave radiation. Target outputs included: daily spatially distributed precipitation (historical and future), daily spatially distributed surface water inputs (historical and future), total spatially distributed PET (historical and future), and total spatially distributed ET (historical and future). The precipitation and surface water inputs products are orthorectified (UTM projection) raster products, and the forcing data and PET and ET are CSV files. The forcing data represent catchment averages, which are distributed within DHSVM, and all other files are at the 2 m resolution.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.