Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
159
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
159 results for “phylogenetic information”
Fig. 7 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n in Assessing troglomorphic and phylogenetically informative traits in troglobionts: a new cave-dwelling centipede illuminates the evolution of a soil-dwelling lineage (Chilopoda: Geophilidae)
Fig. 7 Comparison between Plutogeophilus gen.n., Macronicophilus, and another Geophilidae: a–c labrum, ventral view; d–f, left pretarsus of second maxillae, ventral view; g–i, metasternite at ca. 20% of the antero-posterior series of leg-bearing segments, ventral view. Line drawings from photos, setae omitted: a, d, g PD-G 1359; b, e, h ISLA 11879; c, f, i PD-G 230
Fig. 6 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics
Fig. 6. – Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le, showing habit with inflorescences and flowers. [HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND,CMUB] [Drawing: A. Damthongdee]
Fig. 5 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics
Fig. 5. – Reproductive organs of Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le: A. Flower with petals and stamens removed; B. Flower with petals, stamens, and carpels removed, back view, showing outer side of sepals; C. Same as (B), but on another side, showing a volcano-shaped torus and inner side of sepals; D. Inner side of an outer petal; E. Outer side of an outer petal; F. Inner side of an inner petal; G. Outer side of an inner petal; H. Stamen, abaxial side; I. Stamen, adaxial side; J. Carpels, showing enlarged and irregularly lobed stigmas; K. Fruit, showing longitudinal ridges on monocarp surface; L. Seed, lateral view, showing a raphe; M. Seed, lateral view, showing a pitteand slightly rugose surface; N. Cross section of a seed, showing spiniform endosperm ruminations. [A–J: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB; K: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; L–N: Chaowasku 165, CMUB] [Drawing: A. Damthongdee]
Fig. 3 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics
Fig. 3. – Inflorescence position of Leoheo Chaowasku (A) and Monocarpia Miq. (B). A. Axillary inflorescences/infructescences of Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le; B. Terminal inflorescence of Monocarpia kalimantanensis Kessler. [A: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB; B: Sidiyasa et al. 3469, L] [Photos: A: D.T. Ngo; B: Arbainsyah]
Fig. 4 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics
Fig. 4. – Lower leaf surface of Leoheo Chaowasku (A) and Monocarpia Miq. (B). A. Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le, with a hairy domatium; B. Monocarpia maingayi (Hook. f. & Thomson) I.M. Turner, without domatia. [A: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; B: Promchua 18, CMUB]
Fig. 2. – A in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics
Fig. 2. – A. Leaf of Monocarpia kalimantanensis Kessler, showing conspicuous intramarginal veins; B. Fruit of Monocarpia maingayi (Hook. f. & Thomson) I.M. Turner, showing monocarps without longitudinal ridges; C– H: Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le; C. Leaf without intramarginal veins; D. Fruit, showing monocarps with longitudinal ridges; E. Flowering branches; F. Dissected flower and young fruit; G. Dissected flower, showing detached stamens and stigmas; H. Flower, showing enlarged and irregularly lobed stigmas. [A: Sidiyasa et al. 3469, L; B: Gardner & Sidisunthorn ST0541a, L; C–D: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; E–H: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB] [Photos: A: Arbainsyah; B: S. Gardner & P. Sidisunthorn; C–H: D.T. Ngo]
Figure 1 in Phylogenetic analyses suggest that Psammomitra (Ciliophora, Urostylida) should represent an urostylid family, based on small subunit rRNA and alpha-tubulin gene sequence information
Figure 1. Morphology and infraciliature of Psammomitra retractilis (F–J, from Song & Warren, 1996). A, B, F, individuals in extended states to show the typical body shapes. Arrowheads in (A) mark the long, dominant membranelles. C, lateral view of a contracted specimen. D, posterior part, to demonstrate the long dorsal cilia. E, anterior part. Arrowheads indicate the long membranelles, whereas arrows mark the dorsal cilia. G, H, dorsal and lateral views of contracted cells. I, J, ventral and dorsal views to show the infraciliature and macronuclear nodules. Scale bars: A, C, D, F = 40 Mm; E = 30 Mm.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetic analyses suggest that Psammomitra (Ciliophora, Urostylida) should represent an urostylid family, based on small subunit rRNA and alpha-tubulin gene sequence information
Figure 3. Maximum parsimony phylogeny of small subunit rRNA genes. Psammomitra is highlighted in black, and holostichids are enclosed in rectangles. Thick branches and arrows denote position of investigated species. Numbers on branches are values generated from 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic analyses suggest that Psammomitra (Ciliophora, Urostylida) should represent an urostylid family, based on small subunit rRNA and alpha-tubulin gene sequence information
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on small subunit rRNA sequences showing the position of Psammomitra retractilis, by Bayesian inferences applying the GTR + G + I model. '-' reflects disagreement between a method and the reference Bayesian tree at a given node. The fully supported (1.00/100%/100%) branches are marked with solid circles. Psammomitra is shaded black, and holostichids are enclosed in rectangles. Thick branches and arrows denote position of investigated species. The scale bar corresponds to five substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. Infraciliature of Oxytricha and Uroleptus (from Foissner et al., 2004), Amphisiella (from Li et al., 2007), Trachelostyla (from Gong et al., 2006), and Holosticha (from Hu & Song, 2001) are also shown.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic analyses suggest that Psammomitra (Ciliophora, Urostylida) should represent an urostylid family, based on small subunit rRNA and alpha-tubulin gene sequence information
Figure 4. Bayesian trees based on different data sets showing phylogenetic relationships amongst Spirotrichea. '-' reflects disagreement between the maximum likelihood/ maximum parsimony method and the reference Bayesian tree at a given node. The fully supported (1.00/100%/100%) branches are marked with solid circles. Species sequenced in the present study are shown in bold type. The scale bar corresponds to 10/2 substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. A, phylogenetic analyses inferred from alpha-tubulin gene sequences data set. B, phylogenetic analyses inferred from alpha-tubulin amino acids data set.
Figure 8 in Description of a new Eocene osteoglossid fish and additional information on †Singida jacksonoides Greenwood and Patterson, 1967 (Osteoglossomorpha), with an assessment of their phylogenetic relationships
Figure 8. Cladograms of the Osteoglossidae with nonoverlapping taxa removed, from the reanalysis of data in (A) Hilton (2003), (B) Li et al. (1997b). † fossil taxa.
Figure 2 in Description of a new Eocene osteoglossid fish and additional information on †Singida jacksonoides Greenwood and Patterson, 1967 (Osteoglossomorpha), with an assessment of their phylogenetic relationships
Figure 2. Reconstruction of †Chauliopareion mahengeense gen. et sp. nov., based on WM 492/96b. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 3 in Description of a new Eocene osteoglossid fish and additional information on †Singida jacksonoides Greenwood and Patterson, 1967 (Osteoglossomorpha), with an assessment of their phylogenetic relationships
Figure 3. Reconstruction of the head of †Chauliopareion mahengeense gen. et sp. nov., based on several specimens. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 1 in Description of a new Eocene osteoglossid fish and additional information on †Singida jacksonoides Greenwood and Patterson, 1967 (Osteoglossomorpha), with an assessment of their phylogenetic relationships
Figure 1. †Chauliopareion mahengeense gen. et sp. nov. A, holotype WM 490/96. B, paratype WM 311/96. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 5 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 5. Agassizia scrobiculata (Valenciennes, 1846). Camera lucida plating diagrams of oral, apical, lateral and posterior surfaces. Fascioles are shown as densely stippled bands. Length of test 35 mm.
Figure 4 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 4. Protenaster australis (Gray, 1851). Camera lucida plating diagrams of oral, apical and posterior surfaces. Fascioles are shown as densely stippled bands. Length of test 63 mm.
Figure 1 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 1. Aboral surface of the test of Brissus unicolor (Leske, 1778) (NHM 39.3.29.38). The peripetalous fasciole shows up clearly as a narrow dark band (arrowed). Length of test 50 mm.
Figure 2 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 2. Test of Ova lacunosus (L., 1758) (NHM 81.11.22.39) in A, apical, and B, lateral views. The peripetalous (pp) and lateroanal (la) fascioles stand out as paler bands of fine tuberculation. Note the highly angular pathway and variable thickness of the fascioles, with angles coincident with the growth centres (o) of individual plates. Plates labelled according to Loven's system (see text for details).
Figure 7 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 7. Meoma ventricosa (Lamarck, 1816). Camera lucida plating diagrams of oral and apical surfaces. Fascioles are shown as densely stippled bands. Length of test 119 mm.
Figure 3 in Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: a new source of phylogenetically informative characters
Figure 3. Fasciole pathways in Eupatagus valenciennesi (Agassiz & Desor, 1847). Camera lucida plating diagrams of oral, apical and posterior surfaces. Fascioles are shown as densely stippled bands. Interambulacral plates are numbered according to Loven's system and shaded grey. Ambulacral zones are unshaded.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.