Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
406
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
406 results for “plant growth”
Figure 3 in Conditioning of desert sandy soil and investigation of the ameliorative effects of poultry manure and bentonite treatment rate on plant growth
Figure 3. Comparison of Dry Shoot Weight, Dry Root Weight, and Root/Shoot ratio for Bougainvillea plants grown in different substrates (Treatment L100, L95A, L95B, L90A, and L90B. L100 substrate contains 100% Lehbab Sandy Soil without any addition of Bentonite and Poultry Manure. L95A substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure. L95B substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure. L90A substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure. L90B substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure. Statistical letters a, b, c, d, show significant difference between plants attributes grown on different substrates, while the ab, bc, cd etc. show there is no significant difference between plants attributes.
Figure 2 in Conditioning of desert sandy soil and investigation of the ameliorative effects of poultry manure and bentonite treatment rate on plant growth
Figure 2. Comparison of Number of Secondary Branches per Plant and Number of Leaves per Plant for Bougainvillea grown in different substrates (Treatment L100, L95A, L95B, L90A, and L90B. L100 substrate contains 100% Lehbab Sandy Soil without any addition of Bentonite and Poultry Manure. L95A substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure. L95B substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure. L90A substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure. L90B substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure. Statistical letters a, b, c, d, show significant difference between plants attributes grown on different substrates, while the ab, bc, cd etc. show there is no significant difference between plants attributes.
Figure 1 in Conditioning of desert sandy soil and investigation of the ameliorative effects of poultry manure and bentonite treatment rate on plant growth
Figure 1. Comparison of Plant Height, Root Length, and Maximum Branch Length for Bougainvillea grown in different substrates (Treatment L100, L95A, L95B, L90A, and L90B. L100 substrate contains 100% Lehbab Sandy Soil without any addition of Bentonite and Poultry Manure. L95A substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure.L95B substrate contains 95% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 5% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure.L90A substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 10% Poultry Manure. L90B substrate contains 90% Lehbab Sandy Soil, 10% Bentonite, and 15% Poultry Manure. Statistical letters a, b, c, d, show significant difference between plants attributes grown on different substrates, while the ab, bc, cd etc. show there is no significant difference between plants attributes.
Figure 3 in Exogenous application of bio-stimulant and growth retardant improved the productivity of cotton cultivars under different planting arrangement
Figure 3. Influence of MLE and MC on bolls per plant of cotton genotypes cultivated under different planting arrangement in Multan (a) and Shujabad (b).
Figure 2 in Exogenous application of bio-stimulant and growth retardant improved the productivity of cotton cultivars under different planting arrangement
Figure 2. Influence of MLE and MC on flowers per plant of cotton genotypes cultivated under different planting arrangement in Multan (a) and Shujabad (b).
Figure 1 in Exogenous application of bio-stimulant and growth retardant improved the productivity of cotton cultivars under different planting arrangement
Figure 1. Influence of MLE and MC on squares per plant of cotton genotypes cultivated under different planting arrangement in Multan (a) and Shujabad (b).
Fig. 1 in Effect of plant growth regulators on Blissus insularis (Hemiptera: Blissidae)
Fig. 1. Mean Blissus insularis densities (± SE) in St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum, treated with mefluidide, trinexapac-ethyl, or untreated control. Means with the same letter within a sampling date did not differ statis- tically (ANOVA, P> 0.05); there were 5 replicates per treatment.
MADFORWATER: WP3: Adaptation of technologies for efficient water management and treated wastewater reuse in agriculture: Task3.1: Reduction of crop water requirement and tools for irrigation management with treated WW: Subtask 3.1.1: Plant Growth Promotion (PGP) bacteria to enhance crop resistance to water stress and salinity: Subset1
<p>This dataset contains the data underlying the following publication: Mouna Mahjoubi, Simone Cappello, Yasmine Souissi, Atef Jaouani and Ameur Cherif (February 7th 2018). Microbial Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon– Contaminated Marine Environments, Recent Insights in Petroleum Science and Engineering Mansoor Zoveidavianpoor, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72207</p> <p> </p>
Sugarcane Culturable microbiome prospection for plant growth promotion traits in Cynodon dactylon
<p>Data set of running experiments for the prospection of traits for plant growth promotion of bacterial communities from sugarcane tissues: rhizospheric soil, roots, stalks, and leaves. For this experiment, we are using a model plant: Cynodon dactylon known as Bermuda grass.</p>
Fig. 3 in Review paper Stimulation of Plant Growth through Interactions of Bacteria and Protozoa: Testing the Auxiliary Microbial Loop Hypothesis
Fig. 3. Difference in growth responses of 16 cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in autoclaved soil and with a diverse soil bacterial filtrate reinoculated into the farmland soil in presence (black bars) and absence (white bars) of Acanthamoeba sp. Shoot dry weight (a), total root length (b), number of laterals at seminal root (c), and total nitrogen uptake (d). Vertical error bars represent standard deviation (n = 4–9). The symbols * and ** indicate a significant difference at P <0.05 and 0.01 by one way ANOVA, respectively. Data from Somasundaram et al. (2008).
Fig. 1 in Review paper Stimulation of Plant Growth through Interactions of Bacteria and Protozoa: Testing the Auxiliary Microbial Loop Hypothesis
Fig. 1. Respiration of glucose-C (µg CO -C * g–1 soil) after addi2 tion of 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 ppm glucose to soil from the Heteren field site (Scheu 1992). 1,000 ppm glucose are completely respired by soil microorganisms within a single day, but glucose was not lasting longer than 4 days after saturation of the soil with glucose at 2,000–8,000 ppm (mean of 3 replicates ± 1 SD, see Ekelund et al. (2009) for a characterization of the soil).
Fig. 2 in Suitability of selected ornamental plants for growth and survival of Lissachatina fulica (Gastropoda: Achatinidae)
Fig. 2. Mean percent survival of newly hatched Lissachatina fulica afer 70 d of feeding on a single diet treatment. (A) Annual plants. (B) Perennial plants. Means topped by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Dunn's test). Error bars indicate standard error.
Plant Growth Form Data from NMNH Botany specimens
<p>Plant growth form data from specimen labels in the collections of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History Botany Department, current version</p>
Fig. 2 in LED grow lights alter sorghum growth and sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) plant interactions in a controlled environment
Fig. 2. Growth characteristics of grain sorghum grown under conventional lighting (A) from within an environmental chamber, fitted with a W2238 LED grow panel (B and C, see Fig. 1 for light spectrum measured), and for sorghum cv MORHC 858, DKS 37-07, TX 2783, and WSH117 afer 21 d in a growth chamber fitted with a W2238 LED grow panel.
Fig. 3 in LED grow lights alter sorghum growth and sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) plant interactions in a controlled environment
Fig. 3. Number of true leaves on 4 different sorghum entries grown under conventional and LED light sources.
Fig. 4 in LED grow lights alter sorghum growth and sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) plant interactions in a controlled environment
Fig. 4. Plant height (cm) for 2 different sorghum entries grown under conventional and LED light sources.
Fig. 1 in LED grow lights alter sorghum growth and sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) plant interactions in a controlled environment
Fig. 1. Light emission spectrum of the W2238 LED grow panel over the visible spectrum and into the near infrared. The inset spectrum is zoomed vertically to show details of any weaker emissions.
Figure 1. Plant tissue-culture growth chamber Percival. A in Survivorship of soybean aphid biotypes (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on winter hosts, common and glossy buckthorn
Figure 1. Plant tissue-culture growth chamber Percival. A) Soybean plants maintained in a plant growth chamber for 21 days before placed Rhamnus cathartica. B) Leaf of R. cathartica infested with soybean aphid biotype 1. C) Leaf of Frangula alnus with soybean aphid biotype 4.
Data from: Invasive plants have greater growth than co-occurring natives in live soil subjected to a drought-rewetting treatment
<p>Although several studies indicate that invasive plant species respond more negatively to drought than native plant species, little remains understood of how and whether drought-rewetting events may affect growth of invasive and co-occurring native plant species both directly and indirectly through soil microorganisms. In a fully crossed factorial design, we grew individuals of four congeneric pairs of invasive and native plant species in 2.5 L pots that contained live or sterilized field soil under one of three drought treatments: no-drought, drought, drought-rewetting. Results show that drought caused a significantly greater decline in total biomass of invasive plants than that of native plants regardless of the presence of live soil microorganisms. However, total biomass of the invasive plants exhibited a greater recovery from drought following rewetting than did that of the native plant species. Moreover, the recovery from drought in invasive species tended to be stronger in live soil than in sterilized soil, while for the native plants, recovery from drought was stronger in sterilized soil than in live soil. Overall, these results suggest that soil biota may enable invasive plants to grow larger than co-occurring native plant species in ecosystems that experience cycles of drought and rewetting.</p>
Screening the maize rhizobiome for consortia that improve Azospirillum brasilense root colonization and plant growth outcomes
<p>Data corresponds to results from: <em>Barua N, Clouse KM, Ruiz Diaz DA, Wagner MR, Platt TG and Hansen RR (2023) Screening the</em> <em>maize rhizobiome for consortia that improve Azospirillum brasilense root colonization and plant growth outcomes. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7:1106528. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1106528</em></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.