Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
59
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
59 results for “questionnaire survey”
Figure 4 in A questionnaire survey of the Brazilian dipterological research community
Figure 4. Employment profiles of the respondents to the survey of dipterists in Brazil, according to their career level/ stage, given in absolute numbers (n = 126). Professionals working in academia (subgroup 1) are represented in green; professionals in non-academic sectors (subgroup 2) in red; and under- and postgraduate students (subgroup 3) in black.
Figure 1 in A questionnaire survey of the Brazilian dipterological research community
Figure 1. The number of respondents to the survey of dipterists in Brazil according to sex (n = 126). Females are represented in blue and males in orange.
Research integrity practices and environmental impact of research: Questionnaire of the survey conducted at two French institutions
<p>This dataset is a questionnaire designed to evaluate researchers' understanding, application, and perception of responsible research principles, and to identify strengths and weaknesses in their implementation.<br>It contains about thirty questions and covers various and sometimes complex topics: responsible and inclusive research practices, public trust in science, climate crisis, reduction of GHG emissions caused by research activities, research integrity, researchers' engagement in the public sphere.</p> <p>It is divided into 6 sections:<br>- Relations between science and society <br>- Conducting research in a changing world <br>- Ethics and research integrity <br>- Engaged research <br>- Science communication </p> <p>To enable comparative analysis, it incorporates questions from other surveys which are cited as references.</p>
Survey questionnaire and results on user needs for energy models for the European energy transition, related to Süsser et al. (2021)
<p>The online survey was designed and conducted in the framework of the EU H2020 project SENTINEL in collaboration with the project openENTRANCE. The aim of the survey was to identify needs by modellers and model result users across Europe for energy modelling. We developed it as an explorative, semi-quantitative, self-completion online questionnaire, using the online tool “LimeSurvey”. We performed the online survey among different stakeholders from academia, policy, NGO’s and energy industry. </p> <p>The study by Süsser <em>et al.</em> (2021) investigates the differences between energy model improvements and adjustments as perceived by modellers, and the actual needs of users of model results. If you use this questionnaire in an academic publication, please cite the corresponding article:</p> <p><em>Süsser, D., Gaschnig, H., Ceglarz, A., Stavrakas, V., Flamos, A. & Lilliestam, J. (under review). Better suited or just more complex? </em><em>On the fit between user needs and modeller-driven improvements of energy system models. Energy.</em></p>
Survey questionnaires supporting the journal article with doi:10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.6
<p>These questionnaires support the journal article "A fuzzy logic model for evaluating the motivation for high-quality publications: Evidence from a Bulgarian university" with doi:10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.6.</p> <p>They are developed for exploring the motivation for high-quality publications based on fuzzy logic and Vroom's motivation theory.</p> <p>The questionnaires address the internal stakeholders of the university, including the researcher, the department head and the top university management. </p>
TAM survey questionnaire responses of a head-mounted assistive mouse controller for people with upper limb disability
<p>This dataset contains TAM survey questionnaire and the corresponding responses of a head-mounted assistive mouse controller for people with upper limb disability.</p>
Grey literature strategies survey results and questionnaires: producers, users and collecting services
<p>Survey results from three online surveys conducted in 2013 of research producing organisations,research users and collecting services involved in research for public policy and practice. Most respondents were from Australia. </p> <p>Questionnaires and SPSS versions also provided.</p> <p>Results have been published in various publications available in this collection.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Data set for survey questionnaires to assess self-medication practices
<p>This is pubmed and web of science data sets for a review on self medication survey questionnaires. </p>
Additional reference file for descriptive components of the survey questionnaires
<p>Additional references for descriptive components of the survey questionnaires for manuscript entitled "A systematic review of the literature on survey questionnaires to assess self-medication practices"</p>
Data file 1. Survey Questionnaire
<p>Underlying data - This file contais the questions from the survey, "<strong>COVID – 19 and psychiatry teaching during the outbreak of the pandemic at the Eduardo Mondlane Medical School" </strong>arrangend by category.</p> <pre> </pre>
"Towards Responsible Publishing" - Online researcher survey questionnaire
<p><a href="https://www.research-consulting.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Research Consulting</a> and the <a href="https://www.cwts.nl/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)</a> were commissioned to determine to what extent the vision, mission and objectives set out in the TRP proposal serve the needs of the global research community. Through a consultative approach, we sought to assess whether there is appetite for the type of change proposed by cOAlition S in the TRP proposal. In addition, we aimed to understand how the ‘Towards Responsible Publishing’ proposal may be modified or refined to ensure it resonates with the research community and sees broad adoption; identify any showstoppers or unintended consequences and propose proactive measures to mitigate them, ensuring successful implementation; and ascertain whether the existing scholaly communication infrastructure can support this proposal and if not, identify where research funders can strengthen the infrastructure.</p> <p>As part of the consultation, the Centre for Science and Technology Studies and Research Consulting developed a researcher survey to gather researcher feedback on aspects of the scholarly communication system. This deposit provides our online survey questionnaire.</p>
Checklist v. 1.0 - Survey volcanic crises exercises: from open-question questionnaires to a prototype checklist
<p>Volcanic crisis exercises are usually run to test response capabilities, communication protocols, and decision-making procedures by those agencies, such as volcano observatories and/or Civil Protection authorities, with responsibilities to cope with scenarios of volcanic unrest with inherent uncertainty. During the last decades, the use of questionnaires has been increased to evaluate people’s knowledge on volcanic hazards and their perception of risk, which could affect their preparedness to respond to emergency measures plans. In this paper, we show the study carried out within the EUROVOLC European project focused on extracting information on the experience gained during volcanic-crisis exercises by the project’s participants and beyond. In particular, we first distributed an open-question questionnaire survey within the project community. Based on the results obtained, we developed a more user-friendly online multi-choice questionnaire that was submitted to different volcanological communities within and outside the project. From the answers to the on-line questionnaire, we extracted a prototype checklist for guiding those who need to design such exercises in the future. Here, we give details on the lessons learnt from this study, in particular about the need to increase training activities, to improve external (between players and general public/media) communication tools, equipment and protocols and to better define decision-makers' needs. Our preliminary results confirm that this type of survey is a very useful tool for gathering information on participants' experience and knowledge, and to understand which data and information may be useful when designing exercises for scientists, emergency managers and others involved in a volcanic crisis. </p>
The state of digital archaeological archiving policies and practice [questionnaire survey results]
<p>The digital transition in archaeology is often taken for granted, yet the process is far from complete. The topic of digital archiving has been addressed by both the EAC Working Group for Archaeological Archives and the SEADDA project. These two entities joined forces to produce a special issue of the Internet Archaeology journal, bringing together papers on digital archiving practices in over two dozen countries (Richards et al. 2021). The papers were later analysed by EAC and SEADDA to compare the international situation. The results reveal both shared difficulties associated with the issue of documentary archives worldwide and examples of good practices that help to overcome these problems.</p> <p>A questionnaire survey was also carried out to complement the findings resulting from the interpretation of the published articles with supporting data covering the whole European area in a balanced way. The survey allowed for the compilation of an overview of the situation in 27 countries (30 regions) of Europe. All respondents were experts involved in digital archiving and/or heritage data management in individual countries. Based on the collected information, the disproportion in value of archaeological data and their position within heritage management practice is already proving to be a major shortcoming. Presented dataset contains the questionnaire and the survey results, serving as complementary material to the published interpretation (Novák et al. <em>forthcoming</em>).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Novák, D. - Oniszczuk, A. - Gumbert, B. <em>forthcoming</em>: Digital archaeological archiving policies and practice in Europe: the EAC call for action. Internet Archaeology 63. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.63.7">https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.63.7</a></p> <p>Richards, J.D., Jakobsson, U., Novák, D., Štular, B. and Wright, H. 2021: Digital Archiving in Archaeology: The State of the Art. Introduction, Internet Archaeology 58. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.23">https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.23</a></p>
SPELLFLICT survey questionnaire results
<p>File formats: SPSS</p> <p>Number of files: 4</p> <p>Number of respondents: 2000</p> <p>Country of origin of respondents: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia</p>
Survey questionnaire and data of health management strategies of resilient honey bee stock throughout Southern California
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Requirements and access needs of patients with chronic disease to their hospital electronic health record: results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
Objectives: To identify patient's views on the functionality required for personalised access to the secondary care EHR and their priorities for development. Design: Quantitative analysis of a cross-sectional self-complete survey of patient views on required EHR functionality from a secondary care EHR, including a patient ranking of functionality. Setting: Secondary care patients attending a regional cystic fibrosis unit in the north of England Participants: 201 adults [106 (52.7%) male], median age 29 years (range 17-58 years) entered and completed the study. Inclusion criteria; a confirmed diagnosis of CF, aged 16 years and over, at a time of clinical stability Outcome measures: Quantitative responses within 4 themes; 1) value placed on aspects of the EHR; 2) access requirements to functions of the EHR; 3) views on information sent to the EHR 4) patient feedback entered into the EHR. A ranked score for 15 functions of the EHR was obtained Results: Highest ratings (% reporting item as very important/important) were reported for access to clinical measures [lung function (94%), CRP (84%), sputum microbiology (81%) and blood results (80%)], medication changes (82%) and lists (83%) and sending repeat prescription (83%) and treatment requests (80%), whilst sending symptom diaries was less so (62%). Email contact with clinicians was the most valuable communication element of the EHR (84% very important/important). Of 15 features of the EHR [1=most desirable to 15=least desirable) patients identified 'clinical measures' [2.62 (CI 2.07-3.06)], and 'access to medication lists' [4.91 (CI 4.47-5.44)], as highest priority for development and the ability to comment on errors/ommissions [11.0 (CI 10.6-11.5)] or experience of care [11.8 (CI 11.4-12.2)] as lowest. Conclusions: Patients want extensive personal access to their hospital EHR, placing high importance on the viewing of practical clinical measures and medication management. These influence routine day to day care and are priorities for development
Expectations and basic knowledge in ultrasound screening among pregnant women: A questionnaire survey
<h3>Objective</h3> <p>This study aimed to evaluate the disparity of the expectations and basic knowledge of prenatal ultrasound (US) screening among pregnant women and make a comparison with the current scientific knowledge and national recommendations. We hypothesize that sociodemographic factors, including age, education, and professional occupation, may be associated with different levels of knowledge.</p> <h3>Methods</h3> <p>This was a cross-sectional study performed in 2021 of 336 women aged 18 to 46 years in a maternity facility in a tertiary hospital in Portugal. The main outcome measures were questionnaire data from questions divided into four categories (sociodemographic, expectations, knowledge, and final considerations/suggestions). The data were grouped according to the sociodemographic factors (age, educational level, and professional occupation) and analyzed and compared as a function of the social groups as well as overall tendencies.</p> <h3>Results</h3> <p>Our data confirmed a significant discrepancy between the expectations and general knowledge of pregnant women regarding prenatal US when compared with the current scientific knowledge. Importantly, we found that both depended greatly on sociodemographic factors, particularly educational level. This reiterated the importance of conducting effective dissemination actions of current scientific knowledge, focusing on the main objectives of US screening as well as the limitations of the existing technology.</p> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <p>This study will help in defining strategies for future dissemination actions aiming to improve current practice and lead to a higher synchrony of expectations towards US between couples and practitioners.</p>
Post ICU Follow up: A Questionnaire Survey of Aftercare in Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02784574. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.
Data from: Requirements and access needs of patients with chronic disease to their hospital electronic health record: results of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Poleward expanding species and non-indigenous species along the Italian, Croatian and Montenegrin coasts: a large‐scale survey based on online questionnaires.
<p>The following dataset contains information from an online survey that was carried out by three different research institutes: the Institute for Environmental Protection and Italy (ISPRA), the IRBIM- CNR, Institute of Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, Italy and the Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia. The survey was implemented on Google Forms and it was advertised on Facebook groups about recreational spearfishing and sea angling; some questionnaires were also snowballed in the community of recreational spearfishers and sea anglers, on Twitter. Respondents were from Italy, Croatia and Montenegro. The questionnaire was translated in Italian and Croatian. Overall, the questionnaire took approximately 10 minutes to complete.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.