Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,155 results for “resolution”
Influence of weather forecast resolution on the circulation of Lake George, NY.
This dataset contains outputs of numerical modeling for Lake George, New York, hydrodynamics. These numerical simulations were generated to assess the impact of increasing the resolution of weather forecasts on the lake’s thermal state. This research focused on June 2017, when an increase of biological activity was associated to the deepening of the thermocline in the south of the lake. Increasing the resolution of the weather forecast led to a more accurate representation of the water temperature in the lake, including the deepening of the thermocline. The dataset was used in support of “The influence of weather forecast resolution on the circulation of Lake George, NY”.
High-resolution orthoimagery of the Altamaha River estuary in November 2017 and October 2018
We acquired two high-resolution (0.15-m per pixel) color digital images of the salinity gradient of the Altamaha River estuary in November 2017 (1 month after Hurricane Irma) and October 2018. Flights ranged from the mouth of the estuary all the way up to the tidal fresh forest habitat. The 1:1200 scale orthoimagery is comprised of 4-bands (Red, Green, Blue, Near Infrarad (RGBNIR)) collected with a Ground Sample Distance (GSD) of 0.5 foot using a Leica ADS100 airborne digital sensor. Individual tiles were georectified using ground control points and merged into a domain-wide mosaic.
SBC LTER: Ocean: High resolution water temperature at Mohawk and Arroyo Quemado, ongoing since 2018
Ocean in-situ temperature data were collected at two nearshore locations: Mohawk and Arroyo Quemado. There are three sites at each of the locations: inshore, offshore, and east of reef. Temperature was recorded using hobo sensors at 1-meter interval along the water column, and the sampling interval is 2 minutes.
A high resolution 7-Tesla resting-state fMRI test-retest dataset with cognitive and physiological measures
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Effects of Phase Regression on High-Resolution Functional MRI of the Primary Visual Cortex
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Abrupt hippocampal remapping signals resolution of memory interference.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Depth of the sea floor along the 5-minute resolution cruise track of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE) derived from GEBCO 2019 bathymetry data.
<p><strong>Dataset abstract</strong></p> <p>Depth of the seabed along the five-minute averaged cruise track (Landwehr et al., 2020; DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3752691) of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE) was calculated from the the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO; GEBCO Compilation Group, 2019) 2019 gridded 30-arc second bathymetry data. The nearest gridded value from the bathymetry dataset was used to find the depth at the averaged position.</p> <p>Provided within this dataset is the average position of the vessel during a five-minute time period (where the time given is the middle time of the averaging interval).</p> <p><strong>Dataset contents</strong></p> <ul> <li>cruise_track_gebco2019_depth_5min.csv, data file, comma-separated values</li> <li>data_file_header.txt, metadata, text</li> <li>README.txt, metadata, text</li> <li>ace_cruise_track_gebco2019_depth_5min_change_log.txt, metadata, text</li> </ul> <p><strong>Change log</strong></p> <p><strong>v1.1</strong> - Added additional data coverage and therefore track coverage from 2016-11-17 - 2016-11-22 inclusive. Updated README.txt with information about data coverage. Added change_log file.</p> <p><strong>v1.0</strong> - Initial release of depth along cruise track data set.</p> <p><strong>Dataset license</strong></p> <p>This GEBCO sea floor depth along the cruise track dataset from ACE is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) whose full text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</p>
Dataset T2 Mapping from Super-Resolution-Reconstructed Clinical Fast Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions
<p>This dataset provides various acquisitions for T2 mapping of the MnCl2 array of the NIST phantom at 1.5T. Data were acquired on a MAGNETOM Sola (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), with an 18-channel body coil and a 32-channel spine coil (12 elements used). It gathers original acquisitions from Lajous H. et al. (2020) T2 Mapping from Super-Resolution-Reconstructed Clinical Fast Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions. In: Martel A.L. et al. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2020. MICCAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_12.</p> <p>The dataset is composed of DICOM images from:</p> <p>i) Gold-standard single-echo spin echo (SE) sequences acquired at variable TE;</p> <p>ii) Alternative reference multi-echo spin echo (MESE) acquisitions;</p> <p>iii) Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-shot Turbo spin Echo (HASTE) images at variable TE in three orthogonal orientations.</p> <p>The acquisition parameters are further detailed in the ReadMe.txt file provided along with the images.</p> <p>These acquisitions were repeated independently on three different days during the month of January 2020.</p> <p>These data are made publicly available as a support for further reproducibility studies as well as for the validation of new T2 relaxometry strategies.</p> <p>Works using any of these data should cite the following two references:</p> <p>- Lajous H. et al. (2020) T2 Mapping from Super-Resolution-Reconstructed Clinical Fast Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions. In: Martel A.L. et al. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2020. MICCAI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_12</p> <p>- Lajous, Hélène, Ledoux, Jean-Baptiste, Hilbert, Tom, van Heeswijk, Ruud B., & Bach Cuadra, Meritxell. (2020). Dataset T2 Mapping from Super-Resolution-Reconstructed Clinical Fast Spin Echo Magnetic Resonance Acquisitions [Data set]. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3931812</p>
iSDAsoil: soil clay content (USDA system) for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil clay content (USDA system) in % predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, <a href="https://landpotential.org/data-portal/">LandPKS</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_clay_tot_psa_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil clay content mean value,</li> <li>sol_clay_tot_psa_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil clay content (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: clay_tot_psa R-square: 0.746 Fitted values sd: 16.5 RMSE: 9.63 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -75.803 -4.512 -0.178 3.748 82.146 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 4.494652 8.914671 0.504 0.61413 regr.ranger 1.076957 0.003611 298.210 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.012617 0.004678 -2.697 0.00699 ** regr.cubist 0.030730 0.003930 7.820 5.32e-15 *** regr.nnet -0.238376 0.365390 -0.652 0.51415 regr.cvglmnet -0.044547 0.004379 -10.174 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 9.629 on 122269 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7458, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7458 F-statistic: 7.175e+04 on 5 and 122269 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil extractable Iron for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Iron (Fe) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.fe_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Iron mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.fe_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Iron model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.fe_mehlich3 R-square: 0.817 Fitted values sd: 0.497 RMSE: 0.235 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -4.0165 -0.1312 -0.0082 0.1238 2.5077 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 3.913522 1.869721 2.093 0.036344 * regr.ranger 0.856893 0.007912 108.306 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.027856 0.007738 3.600 0.000318 *** regr.cubist 0.146095 0.007230 20.207 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.879348 0.402810 -2.183 0.029037 * regr.cvglmnet 0.005610 0.004470 1.255 0.209415 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.2349 on 57526 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8173, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8173 F-statistic: 5.148e+04 on 5 and 57526 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil extractable Calcium for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Calcium log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.ca_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Calcium mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.ca_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Calcium model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.ca_mehlich3 R-square: 0.84 Fitted values sd: 1.24 RMSE: 0.543 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -6.0376 -0.2577 0.0076 0.2756 5.3825 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 5.737959 3.850998 1.490 0.136 regr.ranger 1.054018 0.003175 331.978 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.030930 0.003939 -7.853 4.1e-15 *** regr.cubist 0.061829 0.003561 17.364 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.855297 0.561006 -1.525 0.127 regr.cvglmnet -0.065040 0.003225 -20.166 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.5428 on 144593 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8403, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8402 F-statistic: 1.521e+05 on 5 and 144593 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil fine-earth bulk density for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil fine-earth bulk density in 10×kg/m3 predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, <a href="https://landpotential.org/data-portal/">LandPKS</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_db_od_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil bulk density mean value,</li> <li>sol_db_od_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil bulk density model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: db_od R-square: 0.819 Fitted values sd: 0.269 RMSE: 0.126 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.06778 -0.06450 0.00215 0.06585 0.90016 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.05538 0.04860 -1.140 0.25451 regr.ranger 0.86305 0.01577 54.733 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.15383 0.01651 9.315 < 2e-16 *** regr.cubist 0.02039 0.01113 1.832 0.06695 . regr.nnet 0.03465 0.03710 0.934 0.35036 regr.cvglmnet -0.03021 0.01032 -2.927 0.00343 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.1263 on 13565 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8194, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8193 F-statistic: 1.231e+04 on 5 and 13565 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to kg/m-cubic use:</p> <pre><code>kg/m3 = y * 10</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil extractable Phosphorus for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Phosphorus (P) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.p_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Phosphorus mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.p_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Phosphorus model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.p_mehlich3 R-square: 0.486 Fitted values sd: 0.687 RMSE: 0.707 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -3.2892 -0.3942 -0.0637 0.2614 4.9466 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 3.378801 3.143200 1.075 0.282 regr.ranger 0.861655 0.011099 77.631 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.066139 0.013091 5.052 4.38e-07 *** regr.cubist 0.157674 0.008886 17.744 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -1.649621 1.442240 -1.144 0.253 regr.cvglmnet 0.013628 0.010407 1.310 0.190 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.7066 on 53493 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.486, Adjusted R-squared: 0.486 F-statistic: 1.012e+04 on 5 and 53493 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil extractable Magnesium for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Magnesium (Mg) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.mg_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Magnesium mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.mg_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Magnesium model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.mg_mehlich3 R-square: 0.815 Fitted values sd: 1.05 RMSE: 0.498 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -5.8775 -0.2312 0.0028 0.2465 3.7400 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.034349 0.051219 -0.671 0.5025 regr.ranger 1.034217 0.003263 316.950 <2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.008057 0.003854 -2.091 0.0366 * regr.cubist 0.073223 0.003649 20.067 <2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.017388 0.009528 -1.825 0.0680 . regr.cvglmnet -0.075566 0.003402 -22.213 <2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.4979 on 136681 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8152, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8152 F-statistic: 1.206e+05 on 5 and 136681 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil stone content for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil stone content / coarse fragments log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.wpg2_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil stone content model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.wpg2 R-square: 0.709 Fitted values sd: 1.25 RMSE: 0.803 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -4.0555 -0.3113 -0.0222 0.2378 4.5794 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -0.008606 1.361982 -0.006 0.995 regr.ranger 0.972265 0.004443 218.854 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.034649 0.006404 5.411 6.3e-08 *** regr.cubist 0.069589 0.005229 13.308 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.012756 0.796535 -0.016 0.987 regr.cvglmnet -0.056645 0.005509 -10.283 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.8032 on 92785 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.7092, Adjusted R-squared: 0.7092 F-statistic: 4.525e+04 on 5 and 92785 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16 </code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to % use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>% = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
iSDAsoil: soil extractable Sulphur for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil extractable Sulphur (S) log-transformed predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_log.s_mehlich3_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Sulphur mean value,</li> <li>sol_log.s_mehlich3_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil extractable Sulphur model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: log.s_mehlich3 R-square: 0.548 Fitted values sd: 0.423 RMSE: 0.384 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -2.5729 -0.2102 -0.0264 0.1694 5.0049 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.459208 4.154229 0.351 0.725 regr.ranger 0.937179 0.016167 57.967 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost 0.002587 0.016252 0.159 0.874 regr.cubist 0.145396 0.010890 13.351 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.672062 1.796642 -0.374 0.708 regr.cvglmnet -0.045157 0.011256 -4.012 6.04e-05 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.3841 on 37530 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.5481, Adjusted R-squared: 0.548 F-statistic: 9103 on 5 and 37530 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to ppm use the following formula:</p> <pre><code>ppm = expm1( y / 10 )</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
MeteoSerbia1km: the first daily gridded meteorological dataset at a 1-km spatial resolution across Serbia for the 2000–2019 period
<p>MeteoSerbia1km is the first daily gridded meteorological dataset at a 1-km spatial resolution across Serbia for the 2000–2019 period. The dataset consists of five daily variables: maximum, minimum and mean temperature, mean sea level pressure, and total precipitation. Besides daily summaries, it contains monthly and annual summaries, daily, monthly, and annual long term means (LTM). Daily gridded data were interpolated using the Random Forest Spatial Interpolation methodology based on Random Forest and using nearest observations and distances to them as spatial covariates, together with environmental covariates.</p> <p>Complete script in R and datasets used for modelling, tuning, validation, and prediction of daily meteorological variables are available <a href="https://github.com/AleksandarSekulic/MeteoSerbia1km">here</a>.</p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the MeteoSerbia1km maps, or if you have a question please use <a href="https://github.com/AleksandarSekulic/MeteoSerbia1km/issues">this channel</a>.</p> <p>File naming convention of .zip files and containing MeteoSerbia1km files:</p> <ul> <li>Daily summaries per year: day_<em>yyyy</em>_<em>proj</em>.zip <ul> <li><em>var</em>_day_<em>yyyymmdd</em>_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> </ul> </li> <li>Monthly summaries: mon_<em>proj</em>.zip <ul> <li><em>var</em>_mon_<em>yyyymm</em>_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> </ul> </li> <li>Annual summaries: ann_<em>proj</em>.zip <ul> <li><em>var</em>_ann_<em>yyyy</em>_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> </ul> </li> <li>Daily, monthly and annual LTM: ltm_<em>proj</em>.zip <ul> <li>daily LTM: <em>var</em>_ltm_day_mmdd_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> <li>monthly LTM: <em>var</em>_ltm_mon_mm_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> <li>annual LTM: <em>var</em>_ltm_ann_<em>proj</em>.tif</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>where:</p> <ul> <li><em>var</em> is a daily meteorological variable name - tmax, tmin, tmean, slp, or prcp</li> <li><em>proj</em> is a dataset projection - wgs84 or utm34</li> </ul> <p>Units of the dataset values are</p> <ul> <li>temperature (Tmean, Tmax, and Tmin) - tenths of a degree in the Celsius scale (℃)</li> <li>SLP - tenths of a mbar</li> <li>PRCP - tenths of a mm</li> </ul> <p>All dataset values are stored as integers (INT32 data type) in order to reduce the size of the GeoTIFF files, i.e., temperature values should be divided by 10 to obtain degrees Celsius, and the same for SLP and PRCP to obtain millibars and millimeters.<br> </p>
iSDAsoil: soil pH for Africa predicted at 30 m resolution at 0-20 and 20-50 cm depths
<p>iSDAsoil dataset soil pH (1:1 Soil-Water Suspension) predicted at 30 m resolution for 0–20 and 20–50 cm depth intervals. Data has been projected in WGS84 coordinate system and compiled as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">COG</a>. Predictions have been generated using multi-scale Ensemble Machine Learning with 250 m (MODIS, PROBA-V, climatic variables and similar) and 30 m (DTM derivatives, Landsat, Sentinel-2 and similar) resolution covariates. For model training we use a pan-African compilations of soil samples and profiles (<a href="https://www.isda-africa.com/national-soil-services/">iSDA points</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, and other national and regional soil datasets). Cite as:</p> <p>Hengl, T., Miller, M.A.E., Križan, J. <em>et al.</em> African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning. <em>Sci Rep</em> <strong>11, </strong>6130 (2021). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y</a></p> <p>To open the maps in QGIS and/or directly compute with them, please use the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/africa-soil-and-agronomy-data-cube"><strong>Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFF version</strong></a>.</p> <p>Layer description:</p> <ul> <li>sol_ph_h2o_m_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil pH mean value,</li> <li>sol_ph_h2o_md_30m_*..*cm_2001..2017_v0.13_wgs84.tif = predicted soil pH model (prediction) errors,</li> </ul> <p>Model errors were derived using bootstrapping: md is derived as standard deviation of individual learners from 5-fold cross-validation (using spatial blocking). The model 5-fold cross-validation (<a href="https://mlr.mlr-org.com/reference/makeStackedLearner.html">mlr::makeStackedLearner</a>) for this variable indicates:</p> <pre><code>Variable: ph_h2o R-square: 0.818 Fitted values sd: 0.972 RMSE: 0.459 Random forest model: Call: stats::lm(formula = f, data = d) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -5.5939 -0.2328 -0.0066 0.2222 4.7477 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.113440 1.164473 0.956 0.338986 regr.ranger 1.032918 0.003138 329.116 < 2e-16 *** regr.xgboost -0.014201 0.004185 -3.393 0.000691 *** regr.cubist 0.049667 0.003709 13.392 < 2e-16 *** regr.nnet -0.188570 0.188214 -1.002 0.316398 regr.cvglmnet -0.059763 0.003636 -16.438 < 2e-16 *** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 0.4591 on 133378 degrees of freedom Multiple R-squared: 0.8176, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8176 F-statistic: 1.195e+05 on 5 and 133378 DF, p-value: < 2.2e-16</code></pre> <p>To back-transform values (y) to index use:</p> <pre><code>index = y / 10</code></pre> <p>To submit an issue or request support please visit <a href="https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil"><strong>https://isda-africa.com/isdasoil</strong></a></p>
Labeled high-resolution orthoimagery time-series of an alluvial river corridor; Elwha River, Washington, USA.
<h2>Labeled high-resolution orthoimagery time-series of an alluvial river corridor; Elwha River, Washington, USA.</h2><h4>Daniel Buscombe, Marda Science LLC</h4><p>There are two datasets in this data release:</p><p>1. <strong>Model training dataset</strong>. A manually (or semi-manually) labeled image dataset that was used to train and evaluate a machine (deep) learning model designed to identify subaerial accumulations of large wood, alluvial sediment, water, and vegetation in orthoimagery of alluvial river corridors in forested catchments. </p><p>2. <strong>Model output dataset</strong>. A labeled image dataset that uses the aforementioned model to estimate subaerial accumulations of large wood, alluvial sediment, water, and vegetation in a larger orthoimagery dataset of alluvial river corridors in forested catchments. </p><p>All of these label data are derived from raw gridded data that originate from the U.S. Geological Survey (<i>Ritchie et al., 2018</i>). That dataset consists of 14 orthoimages of the Middle Reach (MR, in between the former Aldwell and Mills reservoirs) and 14 corresponding Lower Reach (LR, downstream of the former Mills reservoir) of the Elwha River, Washington, collected between the period 2012-04-07 and 2017-09-22. That orthoimagery was generated using SfM photogrammetry (following <i>Over et al., 2021</i>) using a photographic camera mounted to an aircraft wing. The imagery capture channel change as it evolved under a ~20 Mt sediment pulse initiated by the removal of the two dams. The two reaches are the ~8 km long Middle Reach (MR) and the lower-gradient ~7 km long Lower Reach (LR). </p><p>The orthoimagery have been labeled (pixelwise, either manually or by an automated process) according to the following classes (inter class in the label data in parentheses):</p><p>1. vegetation / other (0)</p><p>2. water (1)</p><p>3. sediment (2)</p><p>4. large wood (3)</p><h3>1. Model training dataset.</h3><p>Imagery was labeled using a combination of the open-source software Doodler (<i>Buscombe et al., 2021</i>; <a href="https://github.com/Doodleverse/dash_doodler">https://github.com/Doodleverse/dash_doodler</a>) and hand-digitization using QGIS at 1:300 scale, rasterizeing the polygons, and gridded and clipped in the same way as all other gridded data. Doodler facilitates relatively labor-free dense multiclass labeling of natural imagery, enabling relatively rapid training dataset creation. The final training dataset consists of 4382 images and corresponding labels, each 1024 x 1024 pixels and representing just over 5% of the total data set. The training data are sampled approximately equally in time and in space among both reaches. All training and validation samples purposefully included all four label classes, to avoid model training and evaluation problems associated with class imbalance (<i>Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022</i>). </p><p>Data are provided in geoTIFF format. The imagery and label grids (imagery) are reprojected to be co-located in the NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N projection, and to consist of 0.125 x 0.125m pixels.</p><p>Pixel-wise labels measurements such as these facilitate development and evaluation of image segmentation, image classification, object-based image-analysis (OBIA), and object-in-image detection models, and numerous potential other machine learning models for the general purposes of river corridor classification, description, enumeration, inventory, and process or state quantification. For example this dataset may serve in transfer learning contexts for application in different river or coastal environments or for different tasks or class ontologies.</p><h4>Files:</h4><p>1. Labels_used_for_model_training_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 63 MB, label tiffs</p><p>2. Model_<i>training_</i> images1of4.zip, 1.5 GB, imagery tiffs</p><p>3. Model_<i>training_</i> images2of4.zip, 1.5 GB, imagery tiffs</p><p>4. Model_<i>training_</i> images3of4.zip, 1.7 GB, imagery tiffs</p><p>5. Model_<i>training_</i> images4of4.zip, 1.6 GB, imagery tiffs</p><h3>2. Model output dataset.</h3><p>Imagery was labeled using a deep-learning based semantic segmentation model (<i>Buscombe, 2023</i>) trained specifically for the task using the Segmentation Gym (<i>Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022</i>) modeling suite. We use the software package Segmentation Gym (<i>Buscombe and Goldstein, 2022</i>) to fine-tune a Segformer (<i>Xie et al., 2021</i>) deep learning model for semantic image segmentation. We take the instance (i.e. model architecture and trained weights) of the model of <i>Xie et al. (2021)</i>, itself fine-tuned on ADE20k dataset (<i>Zhou et al., 2019</i>) at resolution 512x512 pixels, and fine-tune it on our 1024x1024 pixel training data consisting of 4-class label images.</p><p>The spatial extent of the imagery in the MR is [455157.2494695878122002,5316532.9804129302501678 : 457076.1244695878122002,5323771.7304129302501678] (NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N). Imagery width is 15351 pixels and imagery height is 57910 pixels. The spatial extent of the imagery in the LR is [457704.9227139975992031,5326631.3750646486878395 : 459241.6727139975992031,5333311.0000646486878395] (NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N). Imagery width is 12294 pixels and imagery height is 53437 pixels. Data are provided in Cloud-Optimzed geoTIFF (COG) format. The imagery and label grids (imagery) are reprojected to be co-located in the NAD83(2011) / UTM zone 10N projection, and to consist of 0.125 x 0.125m pixels. All grids have been clipped to the union of extents of active channel margins during the period of interest.</p><p>Reach-wide pixel-wise measurements such as these facilitate comparison of wood and sediment storage at any scale or location. These data may be useful for studying the morphodynamics of wood-sediment interactions in other geomorphically complex channels, wood storage in channels, the role of wood in ecosystems and conservation or restoration efforts. </p><h4>Files:</h4><p>1. Elwha_MR_labels_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 9.67 MB, label COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)</p><p>2. Elwha<i>MR_ imagery_ part1_ of</i>_<i> </i>2.zip, 566 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)</p><p>3. Elwha<i>MR_ imagery_ part2_ of</i>_<i> </i>2.zip, 618 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)</p><p>3. Elwha_LR_labels_Buscombe_Labeled_high_resolution_orthoimagery_time_series_of_an_alluvial_river_corridor_Elwha_River_Washington_USA.zip, 10.96 MB, label COGs from Elwha River Lower Reach (LR)</p><p>4. ElwhaL<i>R_ imagery_ part1_ of</i>_<i> </i>2.zip, 622 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)</p><p>5. ElwhaL<i>R_ imagery_ part2_ of</i>_<i> </i>2.zip, 617 MB, imagery COGs from Elwha River Middle Reach (MR)<br> </p><p>This dataset was created using open-source tools of the Doodleverse, a software ecosystem for geoscientific image segmentation, by Daniel Buscombe (<a href="https://github.com/dbuscombe-usgs">https://github.com/dbuscombe-usgs</a>) and Evan Goldstein (<a href="https://github.com/ebgoldstein">https://github.com/ebgoldstein</a>). Thanks to the contributors of the Doodleverse!. Thanks especially Sharon Fitzpatrick (<a href="https://github.com/2320sharon">https://github.com/2320sharon</a>) and Jaycee Favela for contributing labels. </p><h3>References</h3><p>• Buscombe, D. (2023). <strong>Doodleverse/Segmentation Gym SegFormer models for 4-class (other, water, sediment, wood) segmentation of RGB aerial orthomosaic imagery (v1.0)</strong> [Data set]. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8172858">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8172858</a></p><p>• Buscombe, D., Goldstein, E. B., Sherwood, C. R., Bodine, C., Brown, J. A., Favela, J., et al. (2021).<strong> Human-in-the-loop segmentation of Earth surface imagery</strong>. Earth and Space Science, 9, e2021EA002085. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002085">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002085</a></p><p>• Buscombe, D., & Goldstein, E. B. (2022). <strong>A reproducible and reusable pipeline for segmentation of geoscientific imagery.</strong> Earth and Space Science, 9, e2022EA002332. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002332">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002332</a> See: <a href="https://github.com/Doodleverse/segmentation_gym">https://github.com/Doodleverse/segmentation_gym</a></p><p>• Over, J.R., Ritchie, A.C., Kranenburg, C.J., Brown, J.A., Buscombe, D., Noble, T., Sherwood, C.R., Warrick, J.A., and Wernette, P.A., 2021, <strong>Processing coastal imagery with Agisoft Metashape Professional Edition, version 1.6—Structure from motion workflow documentation</strong>: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2021–1039, 46 p., <a href="https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211039">https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211039</a>.</p><p>• Ritchie, A.C., Curran, C.A., Magirl, C.S., Bountry, J.A., Hilldale, R.C., Randle, T.J., and Duda, J.J., 2018, <strong>Data in support of 5-year sediment budget and morphodynamic analysis of Elwha River following dam removals</strong>: U.S. Geological Survey data release, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5066/F7PG1QWC">https://doi.org/10.5066/F7PG1QWC</a>.</p><p>• Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J.M. and Luo, P., 2021. <strong>SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers</strong>. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, pp.12077-12090.</p><p>• Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Xiao, T., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A. and Torralba, A., 2019. <strong>Semantic understanding of scenes through the ade20k dataset</strong>. International Journal of Computer Vision, 127, pp.302-321.</p><p><br> </p>
Wollestraat 29, Bruges (BE): high-resolution images of dry wood cores taken form a medieval floor joists, for tree-ring analysis
<ul><li>Dry-wood cores taken from historical timbers of a floor joists in the medieval building 'De Oude Steen', Wollestraat 29, Bruges (Belgium).</li><li><a href="https://id.erfgoed.net/erfgoedobjecten/29956 ">https://id.erfgoed.net/erfgoedobjecten/29956 </a></li><li>The cores were sampled at 22/02/2023 with a dry-wood borer (internal diameter 12 mm, external diameter 19 mm).</li><li>The cores were surfaced with increasingly finer sanding papers, from P60 up to P4000.</li><li>The cores were photograpphed with a Sony alpha7R IV full frame camera and FE 90 mm F/2.8G macro lens.</li><li>The<a href="https://www.wsl.ch/en/services-produkte/skippy/"> Skippy</a> system served as the image capturing platform.</li><li>The individual digital macro-photos were stitched with PTGui into a mosaic image (.tiff).</li><li>The mosaic images have a resolution of ~4 µm.</li></ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.