Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2009View details →

Figure 6 in Revalidation of Leucetta floridana (Haeckel, 1872) (Porifera, Calcarea): a widespread species in the tropical western Atlantic

Figure 6. Leucetta sp. from Brazil. A, live specimen (photo: G. Muricy); B, triactine I; C, tetractines I; D, triactine II and tetractine II. Scale bars: A = 1 cm, B–D = 100 Mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2009View details →

Figure 3. Leucetta microraphis from New Caledonia. A in Revalidation of Leucetta floridana (Haeckel, 1872) (Porifera, Calcarea): a widespread species in the tropical western Atlantic

Figure 3. Leucetta microraphis from New Caledonia. A, preserved specimen; B, triactine I; C, triactine II and several triactines I and tetractines I; D, tetractine I. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B–D = 100 Mm.

Fig. 7 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 7. Parameres and median lobe in ventral view. a. Strigoderma villosella (Blanchard, 1851). b–f. Strigoderma spp. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 3. Tegmen with the parameres in perpendicular position. a. Strigoderma villosella (Blanchard, 1851). b. Moroniella Ramírez-Ponce, 2015. c. Balanogonia Paucar-Cabrera, 2003. d. Callirhinus Blanchard, 1851. e. Mazahuapertha Morón & Nogueira, 1998. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 2. Dorsal habitus of American genera of Anomalini Peringuey, 1902 with their corresponding tegmen in ventral view. Scale bars: specimen = 2 mm; tegmen = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 6 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 6. Dorsal habitus of the genera with perpendicular parameres. a. Strigoderma villosella (Blanchard, 1851). b. Moroniella Ramírez-Ponce, 2015. c. Balanogonia Paucar-Cabrera, 2003. d. Callirhinus Blanchard, 1851. e. Mazahuapertha Morón & Nogueira, 1998. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 1. Aedeagus and its parts. a–b in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 1. Aedeagus and its parts. a–b. Paranomala corcovada Ramírez-Ponce et al., 2014. a. Lateral view. b. Dorsal view. c–l. Tegmen in dorsal and lateral view. c–d. Paranomala inbio Ramírez-Ponce et al., 2014. e–f. Paranomala strigodermoides (Filippini et al., 2015). g–h. Epectinaspis moreletiana (Blanchard, 1851). i–j. Strigoderma ngabe Ramírez-Ponce & Curoe 2014. k–l. Paranomala Casey, 1915. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: BP = basal piece; IS = internal sac; ISarm = internal sac armature; ML = median lobe; PM = parameres.

Fig. 9 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 9. Distribution map of the genera with perpendicular parameres (the only genus not endemic to Mexico is Moroniella Ramírez-Ponce, 2015, which extends into Central America).

Fig. 8 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 8. Morphological characters in Lamoana villosella (Blanchard, 1851). a. Ventral view of habitus. b. Oblique view of habitus.c. Metasternum.d. Dorsal view of head and pronotum. e. Protibia.f. Protarsus.

Fig. 4 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 4. Parameres (caudal view) and median lobe (ventral view). a–b. Strigoderma villosella (Blanchard, 1851). c–d. Moroniella Ramírez-Ponce, 2015. e–f. Balanogonia Paucar-Cabrera, 2003. g–h. Callirhinus Blanchard, 1851. i–j. Mazahuapertha Morón & Nogueira, 1998. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 5 in Comparative morphology of the genera with perpendicular parameres in Anomalini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae) allows revalidation of the endemic Mexican genus Lamoana Casey, 1915 stat. rev.

Fig. 5. Lateral view of the genera with perpendicular parameres. a. Strigoderma villosella (Blanchard, 1851). b. Moroniella Ramírez-Ponce, 2015. c. Balanogonia Paucar-Cabrera, 2003. d. Callirhinus Blanchard, 1851. e. Mazahuapertha Morón & Nogueira, 1998. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 13 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 13. Distribution map of A. crateriferum sp. nov. (●), A. sahelense sp. nov. (■) and A. quercicola sp. nov. (▲).

Fig. 12. A in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 12. A. Acanthinozodium tibesti Jocqué, 1991, holotype ♀ (MRAC 133011), epigyne, ventral view; arrows indicate both sides plugged. B. Acanthinozodium sahariense Denis, 1959 (CRB), male palp, dorsolateral view; arrow indicates the crater-like plug pit. C. Acanthinozodium sericeum Denis, 1956 (CRB), male palp, dorsolateral view; arrow shows the crater-like plug pit. D. Idem, detail of previous. E. Same specimen, abdomen, ventral view. F. Idem, detail of previous. G. Same specimen, femoral organ on leg II. Scale bars: A–B = 0.2 mm; C, E = 100 μm; F = 20 μm D, G = 10 μm.

Fig. 10 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 10. Acanthinozodium quercicola sp. nov., holotype Ƌ. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Idem, ventral view. C. Palp, dorsal view; arrow indicates the crater-like plug pit. D. Idem, prolateral view. E. Idem, ventral view. F. Idem, retrolateral view; arrow indicates the tooth at base of the RTA. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–F = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 9 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 9. Acanthinozodium sahelense sp. nov. SEM photos of Ƌ and ♀ from Faro Game Reserve (MRAC 221183). A. Male palp, base of cymbium, dorsal view. B. Detail of previous showing "plug pit", dorsal view. C. Male palp, ventral view. D. Detail of previous, showing MA in expanded position. E. Male, femoral organ. F. Epigyne, after digestion, dorsal view; arrows indicate the two spermatheca chambers; star indicates the atria. G. Detail of previous showing spermatheca with two chambers. Scale bars: A, C–D, F–G = 100 μm; B, E = 10 μm.

Fig. 11 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 11. Acanthinozodium quercicola sp. nov., holotype Ƌ, palp. A. Ventral view. B. Retrolateral view. Scale bar = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 7 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 7. Acanthinozodium sahelense sp. nov., holotype Ƌ, palp. A. Prolateral view. B. Ventral view. C. Retrolateral view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 8 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 8. Acanthinozodium sahelense sp. nov., Ƌ from Faro Game Reserve (MRAC 221205), palp. A. Detail of bulbus with MA in expanded position, ventral view; arrow indicates the indentation of the MA tip. B. Tibia and base of bulbus, prolateral view; arrow indicates position of the crater-like plug pit. C. Retrolateral view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 5 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 5. Acanthinozodium sahelense sp. nov. A–B. Ƌ from Faro Game Reserve (MRAC 221205). C–H. ♀♀ from same sample. A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Idem, ventral view. C. Female habitus, dorsal view. D. Idem, ventral view. E. Female, mouthparts and palps, ventral view. F. Female, abdomen, modiFed setae in front of tracheal spiracle, ventral view. G. Epigyne, ventral view. H. Epigyne, other specimen; arrow indicates plug. Scale bars: A–D = 1 mm; E–F = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 6 in Revalidation of Acanthinozodium Denis, 1966 with description of three new species and discovery of a remarkable male palpal character (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Fig. 6. Acanthinozodium sahelense sp. nov. A–B. Holotype Ƌ. A. Palp, ventral view. B. Idem, retrolateral view. C. ♀ from Faro Game Reserve (MRAC 221205), epigyne, ventral view. Scale bars = 0.2 mm.