Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 7. Photographs of neotype skulls for (a) Orcinus rectipinnus (USNM 594671) and (b) Orcinus ater (USNM 594672).

Figure 1 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 1. Expected range maps for (a) resident and (b) Bigg's killer whales, including locations of samples used for mitogenome analysis (figure 5a, resident n = 106, Bigg's n = 93) [15]. Distribution ranges have been inferred based on published identifications of individuals that are identified by ecotype [48–53]. Sample distributions cover the known ranges of both ecotypes, with the exception of residents of Oregon and northern California, and both ecotypes off northern Japan (Hokkaido) in the western Pacific [48,54]. Sample maps for microsatellite data are in electronic supplementary material, figure S2.

Figure 8 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 8. Vertical images of (a) an adult male Bigg's killer whale (BKW) from the West Coast Transient population of Bigg's killer whales and (b) an adult male resident killer whale (RKW) from the sympatric Southern Resident population of resident killer whales. Images are scaled to the estimated asymptotic lengths of 7.3 m [20] and 6.9 m [145], respectively. Vertical images were collected using an octocopter drone using methods described by Durban et al. [146], provided by John Durban and Holly Fearnbach.

Figure 6 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 6. Illustrations of (a) O. ater and (b) O. rectipinnus from Scammon [138,140]. These illustrations were likely made by Scammon, or made under his guidance from his field notes and sketches. Whether they represent renderings of specific specimens, or composite sketches, is unknown.

Figure 2. Canonical variate 1 and 2 in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 2. Canonical variate 1 and 2 plots for cranial shape features that distinguish among ecotypes for (a) skull morphology (resident (n = 17), Bigg's (n = 13) and offshore (n = 6)) and (b) dentary bone morphology (resident (n = 21), Bigg's (n = 12) and offshore (n = 8) specimens) (reprinted from [103]).

Figure 4. Structure assignment probability plots for K in Revised taxonomy of eastern North Pacific killer whales ( Orcinus orca ): Bigg's and resident ecotypes deserve species status

Figure 4. Structure assignment probability plots for K = 3 groups from (a) 26 microsatellites: offshore (n = 5), resident (n = 250), Bigg's (n = 116) samples genotyped at ≥ 20 loci) (56; unpublished); (b) 3340 RADseq SNPs (polymorphic in sample set): offshore (n = 7), resident (n = 52) and Bigg's (n = 37) populations [57,62]. Vertical bars represent the individual assignment probability for each group inferred by Structure (groups identified by shading), with samples sorted by a priori ecotype assignment. See electronic supplementary material for methods and data set information.

Figs 56–65. Type specimens. 56–57 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 56–65. Type specimens. 56–57 – Hesperopenna flava Medvedev & Dang, 1981 (male, holotype, 7.6 mm); 58–59 – Calomicrus persimilis Kimoto, 1989 (male, paratype, 7.1 mm); 60–61 – Martinella merkli Medvedev, 2000 (male, paratype, 8.5 mm); 62–63 – Liroetiella englerae Medvedev, 1995 (female, paratype, 5.8 mm); 64–65 – Liroetiella warisan Mohamedsaid, 1998 (female, paratype, 4.1 mm). 56, 58, 60, 62, 64 – habitus; 57, 59, 61, 63, 65 – labels.

Figs 15–18 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 15–18. Aedeagus (a – dorsal view; b – lateral view; c – ventral view). 15 – H. bonifaci sp. nov.; 16 – H. helferi sp. nov.; 17 – H. sipekorum sp. nov.; 18 – H. zofka sp. nov. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figs 41–47. Spermatheca. 41 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 41–47. Spermatheca. 41 – Hesperopenna medvedevi nom. nov.; 42 – H. persimilis (Kimoto, 1989); 43 – H. tibialis (Kimoto, 1989); 44 – H. arnoldi sp. nov.; 45 – H. helferi sp. nov.; 46 – H. sipekorum sp. nov.; 47 – H. zofka sp. nov. Scale bar 0.25 mm.

Figs 34–40. Female pygidium. 34 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 34–40. Female pygidium. 34 – Hesperopenna medvedevi nom. nov.; 35 – H. persimilis (Kimoto, 1989); 36 – H. tibialis (Kimoto, 1989); 37 – H. arnoldi sp. nov.; 38 – H. helferi sp. nov.; 39 – H. sipekorum sp. nov.; 40 – H. zofka sp. nov. Scale bar 1 mm.

Fig. 70 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Fig. 70. Aedeagus of Hesperopenna granulicollis (Kimoto, 1989) (paratype) (a – dorsal view; b – lateral view; ventral view). Scale bar 1 mm.

Figs 1–10 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 1–10. Morphological details of Hesperopenna sipekorum sp. nov. 1 – head; 2 – pronotum in lateral view; 3 – prothorax; 4 – meso- and metathorax; 5 – left elytron in lateral view; 6 – right antenna; 7 – left hind leg; 8 – claw; 9 – vaginal palpi; 10 – tignum and sternite VIII. Scale bars: 1 mm for Figs 1–5 and 9–10, 2 mm for Figs 6–7, 0.25 mm for Fig. 8.

Figs 66–69 in Revision of the genus Hesperopenna (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). I. Generic redescription, definition of species groups and taxonomy of H. medvedevi species group

Figs 66–69. Aedeagus (a – dorsal view; b – lateral view; ventral view). 66 – Hesperopenna vietnamica (Medvedev, 2000) (paratype); 67 – H. antennalis (Kimoto, 1989); 68 – H. minor (Kimoto, 1989) (paratype); 69 – H. bicolor (Kimoto, 1989) (paratype). Scale bar 1 mm.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Taxonomy of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Muscidae): revision of the subgenera Morellia s. str. and Parapyrellia Townsend.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Taxonomy of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Muscidae): revision of the subgenera Morellia s. str. and Parapyrellia Townsend". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="http://bionomia.net/dataset/69b1046e-47bc-4f26-b32c-97d79da7a35d">https://bionomia.net/dataset/69b1046e-47bc-4f26-b32c-97d79da7a35d</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/69b1046e-47bc-4f26-b32c-97d79da7a35d">https://gbif.org/dataset/69b1046e-47bc-4f26-b32c-97d79da7a35d</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

Fig. 10 in Integrative taxonomy helps to revise systematics and questions the purported cosmopolitan nature of the type species within the genus Diaforobiotus (Eutardigrada: Richtersiusidae)

Fig. 10 Diaforobiotus svalbardicus sp. nov.: eggs seen in PCM: A, D, G focus on egg processes surface; B, E, H focus on egg processes midsections; C, F, I focus on egg surface between processes. Triples A–C, D–F, G–I represent three different eggs photographed with dif-

Fig. 1 in Integrative taxonomy helps to revise systematics and questions the purported cosmopolitan nature of the type species within the genus Diaforobiotus (Eutardigrada: Richtersiusidae)

Fig. 1 Diaforobiotus islandicus (Richters, 1904): habitus and cuticular pores seen in PCM: A adult habitus, dorso-ventral projection (neotype); B, C cuticular pores on dorsal and ventral side of the body, respectively; D pulvinus on the internal surface of leg III. Filled flat arrowheads indicate cuticular bars above the claws in legs I–III. Scale bars inμm

Fig. 8 in Integrative taxonomy helps to revise systematics and questions the purported cosmopolitan nature of the type species within the genus Diaforobiotus (Eutardigrada: Richtersiusidae)

Fig. 8 Diaforobiotus svalbardicus sp. nov.: bucco-pharyngeal apparatus seen in PCM: A dorsal projection of the entire bucco-pharyngeal apparatus; B, C dorsal (B) and ventral (C) views of the oral cavity armature; D, E dorsal (D) and ventral (E) view of macroplacoids. Empty arrows indicate dorsal spikes, filled flat arrowheads indicate the first band of teeth, empty flat arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth, filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth, empty indented arrowhead indicates the medial tooth in dorsal portion of the third band of teeth whereas filled arrows indicate constrictions in macroplacoids. Scale bars in μm

Fig. 4 in Integrative taxonomy helps to revise systematics and questions the purported cosmopolitan nature of the type species within the genus Diaforobiotus (Eutardigrada: Richtersiusidae)

Fig. 4 Diaforobiotus islandicus (Richters, 1904): eggs seen in PCM: A, C, E focus on egg processes; B, D, F focus on egg surface between processes. Pairs A–B, C–D, E–F represent three different eggs photographed with different focus. Filled flat arrowheads indicate rings of pores surrounding egg processes. Scale bars in μm

Fig. 6 in Integrative taxonomy helps to revise systematics and questions the purported cosmopolitan nature of the type species within the genus Diaforobiotus (Eutardigrada: Richtersiusidae)

Fig. 6 Diaforobiotus svalbardicus sp. nov.: habitus and cuticular pores seen in PCM: A adult habitus, dorso-ventral projection (holotype); B, C cuticular pores on dorsal and ventral side of the body, respectively (holotype). Filled flat arrowheads indicate cuticular bars above the claws in legs I–III. Scale bars in μm