Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2-methoxyethanol

Figure 2. Treatment group: 2- ME + Resveratrol Standard (10 x10).

Figure 1 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2-methoxyethanol

Figure 1. Control Group (10 x10).

Table 4 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2 - methoxyethanol

Table 4. Cytotoxic effect of various concentrations of Resveratrol and 2-Methoxyethanol Against Primary Neuron cell viability in MTT assay (570 nm).<table><tbody><tr><th>% Inhibition</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Concentration of 2-Methoxyethanol</th><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td></tr><tr><th>and Resveratrol</th><td>Resveratrol (Standard)</td><td>Resveratrol (Tempeh)</td><td>Resveratrol (Soybean Seed Coat)</td></tr><tr><th>IC50</th><td>(17.38 ± 0.99 µg/mL)</td><td>(31.14 ± 0.02 µg/mL)</td><td>(13.40 ± 0.30 µg/mL)</td></tr><tr><th>1.4 (µg/mL)</th><td>12.57</td><td>0</td><td>11.98</td></tr><tr><th>2.8 (µg/mL)</th><td>4.59</td><td>1.75</td><td>17.03</td></tr><tr><th>4.2 (µg/mL)</th><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 3 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2 - methoxyethanol

Table 3. Cytotoxic effect of various concentrations of Resveratrol and 2-Methoxyethanol Against Primary Neuron cell viability in MTT assay (540 nm).<table><tbody><tr><th>% Inhibition</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Concentration of 2-Methoxyethanol</th><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td></tr><tr><th>and Resveratrol</th><td>Resveratrol (Standard)</td><td>Resveratrol (Tempeh)</td><td>Resveratrol (Soybean Seed Coat)</td></tr><tr><th>IC50</th><td>(17.64 ± 0.99 µg/mL)</td><td>(32.22 ± 1.18 µg/mL)</td><td>(17.43 ± 0.16 µg/mL)</td></tr><tr><th>1.4 (µg/mL)</th><td>11.8</td><td>0</td><td>7.95</td></tr><tr><th>2.8 (µg/mL)</th><td>5.27</td><td>0</td><td>14.41</td></tr><tr><th>4.2 (µg/mL)</th><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 2 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2 - methoxyethanol

Table 2. Effect of Various concentrations of Resveratrol and 2-Methoxyethanol against Primary Neuron cell viability (570 nm).<table><tbody><tr><th>% Cell Viability</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Concentration of 2-Methoxyethanol</th><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td></tr><tr><th>and Resveratrol</th><td>Resveratrol (Standard)</td><td>Resveratrol (Tempeh)</td><td>Resveratrol (Soybean Seed Coat)</td></tr><tr><th>1.4 (µg/mL)</th><td>87.43</td><td>100</td><td>88.02</td></tr><tr><th>2.8 (µg/mL)</th><td>95.41</td><td>98.25</td><td>82.97</td></tr><tr><th>4.2 (µg/mL)</th><td>100</td><td>100</td><td>100</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 1 in Potential neuroprotective of trans-resveratrol a promising agent tempeh and soybean seed coats-derived against beta-amyloid neurotoxicity on primary culture of nerve cells induced by 2 - methoxyethanol

Table 1. Effect of Various concentrations of Resveratrol and 2-Methoxyethanol against Primary Neuron cell viability (540 nm).<table><tbody><tr><th>% Cell Viability</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Concentration of 2-Methoxyethanol</th><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td><td>2-ME (10mM)</td></tr><tr><th>and Resveratrol</th><td>Resveratrol (Standard)</td><td>Resveratrol (Tempeh)</td><td>Resveratrol (Soybean Seed Coat)</td></tr><tr><th>1.4 (µg/mL)</th><td>88.2</td><td>100</td><td>92.05</td></tr><tr><th>2.8 (µg/mL)</th><td>94.73</td><td>100</td><td>85.59</td></tr><tr><th>4.2 (µg/mL)</th><td>100</td><td>100</td><td>100</td></tr></tbody></table>

publicJul 2025View details →

dryad36/100

Hormone type, soaking duration and seed coating affect dormancy and germination of pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) lines

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opennotspecifiedJan 2022View details →

FIGURE. SEM micrographs of the seed coats of Ephedra aurea (A) and E. nebrodensis (B):. Seed at low magnification (× 15).. Seed at medium magnification (× 50).. Seed at high magnification (× 300). A. from type material (CAT!) and B. from Sardinia. in Ephedra aurea (Ephedraceae), a new species from Sicily

FIGURE. SEM micrographs of the seed coats of Ephedra aurea (A) and E. nebrodensis (B):. Seed at low magnification (× 15).. Seed at medium magnification (× 50).. Seed at high magnification (× 300). A. from type material (CAT!) and B. from Sardinia.

dryad32/100

Improving dryland seedling recruitment using fungicide seed coatings

The success of seed-based restoration in dryland regions of the world is often low or sporadic, with most mortality occurring between germination and emergence. Fungal pathogenesis is one process that may reduce seedling emergence and limit restoration success. Our objective was to determine whether fungicide seed coatings constitute an economically viable strategy for increasing emergence by reducing fungal pathogenesis and mortality. We performed an experiment across two sites and three years, using bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) as a model species. We found that fungicide coatings increased germination by 8.8% and emergence by 54.0% on average compared to the control. A cost analysis indicated that the fungicide coating was economically viable with an average estimated effective cost reduction of 18.8% under the study conditions. There was a strong interaction (P < 0.001) between the effects of the fungicide coating, site, and year on emergence. The fungicide coating increased emergence compared to the control in five of the six sites and years, with the effect ranging from a 33.7% decrease (P = 0.042) to a 150.9% increase (P = 0.004). The observed interaction was likely related to the effect of the hydrothermal microsite environment on disease severity. In the site and year that the fungicide coating performed worse than the control, prolonged periods of exceptionally low soil moisture may have reduced disease severity through a variety of individual and community scale mechanisms. Overall, these results indicate that fungicide seed coatings have the potential to improve dryland restoration efforts.

opencc-zeroFeb 2022View details →

FIGURE 4 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 4: Seed coat anatomy in cross section of nine species of the genus Erysimum using the light microscope (200x). a: E. badghisi, b: E. crassicaule, c: E. sp., d: E. crassipes, e: E. griffithianum, f: E. ischnostylum, g: E. kerbabaevii, h: E. repandum, k: E. stocksianum.

FIGURE 3 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 3: Different layers in cross sections of seed coat of E. repandum using light microscope. Os: Osteosclereids, Ep: Epidermis layer, Se: Subepidermis layer, Pal: palisade layer, Par: Parenchymatous layer, Al: Aleurone.

FIGURE 6 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 6: UPGMA analysis of the species of the genus Erysimum in Northeast of Iran based on seed characters. The numbers above the branches are the groups discussed in the text. The species are labeled by the following symbols. cr: E. crassicaule, st: E. stocksianum, is: E. ischnostylum, ba: E. badghisi, ke: E. kerbabaevii, re: E. repandum, gr: E. griffithianum, cra: E. crassipes,: cr*: E. sp.

FIGURE 5 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 5: The diagram resulting of the PCA of nine species of Erysimum. A: Position of species based on the first and second principal components. B: Position of species based on the first and third principal components. C: Position of species based on the second and third principal component (number in the parenthesis indicates the percentage of variation along each axis). black square=E. crassicaule, white triangle=E. ischnostylum, black triangle =E. badghisi, diamond =E. stocksianum, star =E. sp., white square =E. kerbabaevii, white circle =E. repandum, black circle =E. griffithianum, and rectangle =E. crassipes.

FIGURE 2 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 2: Pictures of seed microsculpture of nine species of the genus Erysimum using the scanning electron microscope. 1: E. badghisi, 2: E. crassicaule, 3: E. sp., 4: E. crassipes, 5: E. griffithianum, 6: E. ischnostylum, 7: E. kerbabaevii, 8: E. repandum, 9: E. stocksianum (A: scale bar = 100 µm, B: scale bar = 10 µm).

FIGURE 1 in Seed-coat anatomy and microsculpturing of the genus Erysimum (Brassicaceae) in Northeast of Iran

FIGURE 1: Seed images of nine species of the genus Erysimum using the stereo microscope. a: E. badghisi, b: E. crassicaule, c: E. sp., d: E. crassipes, e: E. griffithianum, f: E. ischnostylum, g: E. kerbabaevii, h: E. repandum and k: E. stocksianum.

opennotspecifiedMay 2021View details →

FIGURE. Seeds of genera and subgenera of Bromelioideae. A–C. Bromelia aff. reversacantha (Leme 4609). A. Longitudinal section of the fruits with seeds connected to placenta by the funicular appendage. B. Seeds with the funicular appendage manually detached. C. Frontal view of the distal funicular pole of the seeds with the funicular appendage backwardly inrolled to the seeds and attached under an aril-like coat. D. Disteganthus lateralis (Leme 9390). E. Aechmea of the "Streptocalycoid complex": A. nidularioides (Leme 2150). F. Aechmea subg. Chevaliera s.l.: A. digitata (Leme 4019). G. Araeococcus subg. Araeococcus: A. flagellifolius (Leme 9501). H. Pseudaraeococcus lageniformis (Leme 9603). I. Cryptanthus pickelii (Leme 3873). J. Fernseea bocainensis (Leme 1422). K. Greigia stenolepis (Leme 9738). L. Neoglaziovia variegata (Leme 9631). M. Aechmea subg. Chevaliera s.l.: A. ornata (Leme 6760). N. Billbergia subg. Billbergia: B. amoena var. stolonifera (Leme 215-B). O. Billbergia subg. Helicodea: B. zebrina (Leme 128). P. Quesnelia subg. Quesnelia: Q. quesneliana (Leme 107). Q. Portea petropolitana var. noetiigii (Leme 5277). R. Billbergia subg. Billbergia: B. tweedieana (Leme 278). S. Quesnelia subg. Billbergiopsis: Q. liboniana (Leme 2361). T. Wittmackia lingulatoides (Leme 9585). Bars = 1 mm. in Re-evaluation of the Amazonian Hylaeaicum (Bromeliaceae: Bromelioideae) based on neglected morphological traits and molecular evidence

FIGURE. Seeds of genera and subgenera of Bromelioideae. A–C. Bromelia aff. reversacantha (Leme 4609). A. Longitudinal section of the fruits with seeds connected to placenta by the funicular appendage. B. Seeds with the funicular appendage manually detached. C. Frontal view of the distal funicular pole of the seeds with the funicular appendage backwardly inrolled to the seeds and attached under an aril-like coat. D. Disteganthus lateralis (Leme 9390). E. Aechmea of the "Streptocalycoid complex": A. nidularioides (Leme 2150). F. Aechmea subg. Chevaliera s.l.: A. digitata (Leme 4019). G. Araeococcus subg. Araeococcus: A. flagellifolius (Leme 9501). H. Pseudaraeococcus lageniformis (Leme 9603). I. Cryptanthus pickelii (Leme 3873). J. Fernseea bocainensis (Leme 1422). K. Greigia stenolepis (Leme 9738). L. Neoglaziovia variegata (Leme 9631). M. Aechmea subg. Chevaliera s.l.: A. ornata (Leme 6760). N. Billbergia subg. Billbergia: B. amoena var. stolonifera (Leme 215-B). O. Billbergia subg. Helicodea: B. zebrina (Leme 128). P. Quesnelia subg. Quesnelia: Q. quesneliana (Leme 107). Q. Portea petropolitana var. noetiigii (Leme 5277). R. Billbergia subg. Billbergia: B. tweedieana (Leme 278). S. Quesnelia subg. Billbergiopsis: Q. liboniana (Leme 2361). T. Wittmackia lingulatoides (Leme 9585). Bars = 1 mm.

Seed coating for Brassica napus L.

These .xlsx files contain results of seed coating analyses in canola (B. napus L.) plants. 1. Biomass.xlsx and Length.xlsx files include the results showing the effect of seed coating on canola seedlings growth.  2. Gene_expression.xlsx file includes the relative expression level of BnRSH genes in the canola seedlings germinated from uncoated (control) or coated seeds.  3. Germination.xlsx file includes final germination percentage (FGP), index of germination velocity (IGV), and mean germination time (MGT) of canola seeds depending on seed coating. 4. Seed_weight.xlsx file includes the seed weight depending on different variants of seed coating. 5. SOD.xlsx file includes results of the measurements of the activity of SOD in canola seedlings germinated from uncoated and coated seeds. 6. Fungi_growth.xlsx file includes results showing the growth inhibition of fungi plant pathogens species. 7. Statistical analysis.

opennotspecifiedApr 2020View details →

Fig. 8. Proposed structures for 1 in Identification of iron-chelating phenolics contributing to seed coat coloration in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) expressing aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-12

Fig. 8. Proposed structures for 1:1:1 complexes between genistin, iron, and galacturonic acid (left) or digalacturonic acid (right).

opennotspecifiedApr 2020View details →

Fig. 5 in Identification of iron-chelating phenolics contributing to seed coat coloration in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) expressing aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-12

Fig. 5. UHPLC separation of color-enriched seed coat extracts from event DAS-411Ø4-7 and non-transgenic control with UV absorbance detection at 272 nm. Red trace, DAS-411Ø4-7; blue trace, non-transgenic control. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)