Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

48

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

48 results for “soil erosion”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo36/100

Long-term effectiveness of sustainable land management practices to control runoff, soil erosion, and nutrient loss and the role of rainfall intensity in Mediterranean rainfed agroecosystems

<p>This data set corresponds to the open-access article &quot;Long-term effectiveness of sustainable land management practices to control runoff, soil erosion, and nutrient loss and the role of rainfall intensity in Mediterranean rainfed agroecosystems&quot; published in CATENA. (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104352">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104352</a>), funded by he European Commission Horizon 2020 project Diverfarming [grant agreement 728003].&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Assessing spatial patterns of soil erosion in a high‐latitude rangeland

<p>High‐latitude areas are experiencing rapid change: we therefore need a better understanding of the processes controlling soil erosion in these environments. We used a spatiotemporal approach to investigate soil erosion in Svalbarðstunga, Iceland (66° N, 15° W), a degraded rangeland. We used three complementary datasets: 1) high‐resolution UAV imagery collected from 12 sites (total area ~0.75 km<sup>2</sup>); 2) historical imagery of the same sites; and 3) a simple, spatially‐explicit cellular automata model. Sites were located along a gradient of increasing altitude and distance from the sea, and varied in erosion severity (5–47% eroded). We found that there was no simple relationship between location along the environmental gradient and the spatial characteristics of erosion. Patch‐size frequency distributions lacked a characteristic scale of variation, but followed a power‐law distribution on five of the 12 sites. Present total eroded area is poorly related to current, site‐scale levels of environmental stress, but the number of small erosion patches did reflect site‐level stress. Small (&lt; 25 m<sup>2</sup>) erosion patches clustered near large patches. The model results suggested that the large‐scale patterns observed likely arise from strong, local interactions, which mean that erosion spreads from degraded areas. Our findings suggest that contemporary erosion patterns reflect historical stresses, as well as current environmental conditions. The importance of abiotic processes to the growth of large erosion patches and their relative insensitivity to current environmental conditions makes it likely that the total eroded area will continue to increase, despite a warming climate and reducing levels of grazing pressure.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →
zenodo36/100

Fourier transformed infrared reflectance (FTIR) spectra of peat soils collected from the top and bottom of peatland erosion gullies

<p>Peat soil was randomly&nbsp; collected&nbsp; from gullies within two eroding blanket bogs. Balmoral (BAM) is on a large high-altitude plateau blanket bog in the eastern part of the Cairngorms National Park, Scotland, UK (56.93&deg; N, &minus; 3.16&deg; E, 642 m asl) and Glensaugh (GSA) is an upland livestock farm&nbsp; with sections of and blanket bog peatland in the Grampian foothills (56.55&deg; N, 2.33&deg; E, 412 m asl). Both sites have undergone extensive degradation and peat erosion, and both have, in some parts, recently undergone restoration practices, including bunding and reprofiling.</p> <p>Peat samples were collected at Glensaugh and Balmoral as follows. At Glensaugh, peat at the top 1 cm of exposed gully sides (approximately 10-20cm from the vegetated surface) and at the gully bottom were taken, air dried and passed on for FTIR analysis. These gullies correspond to four erosion pin measurement areas and their corresponding peat sediment trap areas at Glensaugh. At Balmoral, the same approach was taken except six &lsquo;gully top&rsquo; and &lsquo;gully bottom&rsquo; sites were randomly selected and not geographically paired in the same way at Glensaugh.</p> <p>Samples were air dried and finely ball milled, prior to FTIR analysis. FTIR spectra were recorded using a Bruker Vertex 70 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) and OPUS 7.2 software. To record the FTIR spectra, each of the samples were placed, in turn, on a Diamond Attenuated Total Reflectance (DATR) sampling accessory, with a single reflectance system. Data points in the range of 4000-400 cm-1 were recorded with a resolution of 4 cm-1 and average of 64 scans. A spectrum of the empty sampling accessory, with the same resolution and number of scans, was recorded as the background spectrum before each measurement.&nbsp;</p> <p>Since the penetration depth for the DATR accessory is different for each wavelength and is directly proportional to the wavelength of the incident light (The higher the wavenumber the lower the penetration), an ATR correction was applied to the spectra to correct this effect, using the OPUS software. No correction was required for water vapour and CO2 as the spectrometer is continuously purged with dry air.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In the dataset, columns correspond to the following:</p> <p>Site: Balmoral or Glensaugh</p> <p>Gully Position: Top or bottom</p> <p>Gully Number: Replicate gullies within the site</p> <p>Sample date: Date</p> <p>Sample ID: Unique identifier</p> <p>Remaining columns: Reflectance at a given wavelength</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Dataset of bank soil parameters and stochastic modelling of bank erosion processes in the Middle Yangtze River

<p><span>A probabilistic process-based model of bank erosion has proposed,&nbsp;</span><span>embedding the probability distributions of</span><span> different bank soil parameters. <span><span>&nbsp;The dataset includes the spatial distribution characteristics of critical shear stress, friction angle, and cohesion. The prediction results analyzed the effects of soil erosion resistance capacity and the variability of shear strength parameters in the simulation of bank erosion processes, obtaining the probability of mass failure and the distributions of bank erosion width. Additionally, the study investigated the effect of varying water content on bank erosion modeling and further analyzed how considering more influencing factors in the model affects prediction uncertainty and accuracy. Moreover, the relationship between the variability of these factors and river morphology was discussed. The dataset provides the aforementioned prediction results, and relevant plots were generated using MATLAB or Python, with the associated plotting code also uploaded.</span></span></span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Effects of Grass Cover on the Overland Soil Erosion Mechanism under Simulated Rainfall

<p><span>Grass cover has a complex influence on overland soil erosion. This study quantified the impact of grass cover on overland soil erosion using a dimensionless water flow path index. It systematically analyzed the response mechanism among overland soil erosion, slope gradient, rainfall intensity, and hydrodynamic parameters, aiming to identify the optimal hydrodynamic parameters capable of characterizing overland soil erosion. A predictive model for soil erosion was constructed based on general dimensionless water flow intensity parameters, comprehensively evaluating the mechanism of soil erosion on grass-covered overland under simulated rainfall conditions. The results indicate that the model constructed using dimensionless parameters exhibits strong adaptability and can be effectively validated in other experiments.</span></p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Gas, erosion, runoff and soil data and metadata derived from Diverfarming project

<p>Gas, erosion, runoff and soil data and metadata of the different cases studies and long terms from WP5&nbsp;&quot;Environmental impact and delivery of ecosystem services by crop diversification&quot;, derived from H2020 Diverfarming project. This workpackage&nbsp;has been designed to provide sound and robust scientific understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of the tailored diversified cropping systems for improvement of the environmental quality and delivery of ecosystem services in each pedoclimatic region. http://www.diverfarming.eu.</p>

embargoedcc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →
zenodo36/100

Monitoring the effect of water erosion on soil surface microtopography using Lidar

<p>This dataset contains three dimensional (3D) reconstructions of laboratory soil surfaces eroding under rainfall simulation experiments. Experiments were conducted using the Walnut Gulch Rainfall Simulator at the USDA-ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center in Tucson, Arizona. A terrestrial laser scanner was used to collect soil surface 3D data.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Input data for soil erosion practical

<p>This dataset is to be used for the soil erosion practical published at: https://github.com/wieka29/Soil-erosion-practical</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →
zenodo36/100

Measured properties in soil samples and marine sediment collected in Galion Bay (Martinique, France) in order to trace erosion sources in insular tropical catchments

<p>This dataset was compiled in order to select the optimal suite of tracers and identify and quantify the main sources of sediment deposited in Galion Bay and associated chlordecone transfers since the 1960s. It includes measured properties for potential sources collected across the Galion catchment (Martinique, France) and along a sediment core sampled in Galion Bay (GAL17-04, N°IGSN TOAE0000000573). Associated with this dataset, metadata are integrated for sources and targets registered using International Geological Sample Numbers (IGSN).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Long-term soil erosion monitoring in China using the RUSLE model based on Google Earth Engine

<p>This dataset contains soil erosion maps in China at 500m resolution from 2010 to 2020.&nbsp;The dataset is stored in GeoTif format with the unit of t/(km<sup>2&nbsp;</sup>&middot; a).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Incorporating biological soil crusts into the B factor to enhance the accuracy of soil erosion models in drylands

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2025View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Rates and processes of aeolian soil erosion in West Greenland

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2017View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Assessing spatial patterns of soil erosion in a high‐latitude rangeland

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Trade-off between vegetation type, soil erosion control and surface water in global semi-arid regions: A meta-analysis

<p>Soil erosion control and water resource protection can closely interact during restoration of terrestrial ecosystems. In semi‐arid ecosystems, an urgent issue is how vegetation restoration can achieve the goal of soil erosion mitigation and water conservation, which in turn, feeds back to ecosystem functioning.</p> <p>We reviewed 78 articles from 22 countries in semi‐arid areas to evaluate the effects of vegetation type (i.e. forest, grassland and scrubland) on runoff and sediment yields across different environmental conditions (i.e. vegetation coverage, rainfall intensity, slope gradient and soil texture).</p> <p>Our meta‐analysis shows that runoff and sediment reduction both increased as the vegetation coverage increased, and tended to be stable when vegetation coverage exceeded 60%. Vegetation provided a greater benefit for sediment reduction than for runoff control under intense rainfall. Grasslands were generally more effective in reducing sediment than other vegetation types. Forests, grasslands and scrublands were most efficient in soil erosion control on 20°–30°, 0°–25° and 10°–25° slopes respectively. Grasslands and scrublands generally performed better with respect to soil erosion control on moderately coarse soils, whereas forests were most effective on medium‐textured and moderately fine soils.</p> <p>Synthesis and applications. Effective restoration and soil erosion control in semi‐arid ecosystems strongly depends on the selection of vegetation type. Our study further indicates that, for land managers, it is critical to consider local slope, and soil texture, and maintain appropriate vegetation coverage to achieve ecosystem sustainability. Grasslands might be particularly suitable to optimize the trade‐off between soil erosion control and surface water resource in semi‐arid regions.</p>

opencc-zeroFeb 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Integrated Modeling of Flow, Soil Erosion, and Nutrient Dynamics in a Regional Watershed: Assessing Natural and Human-Induced Impacts

<p>Attached file is the verification data for the submitted manuscript "Integrated Modeling of Flow, Soil Erosion, and Nutrient Dynamics in a Regional Watershed: Assessing Natural and Human-Induced Impacts" .</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Soil Erosion on United States. Present and Future (2020-2050)

<p>Brought on by anthropogenic actions, accelerated soil erosion inflicts extreme changes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These field-scale (30&nbsp;m) changes have neither been fully surveyed in the present, nor predicted for a probable future. Water-driven soil erosion (<em>i.e</em>., sheet and rill erosion) rates across the contiguous United States were estimated for the present, and then predicted for the future using three alternative Shared Socioeconomic Pathway and Representative Concentration Pathway (SSP-RCP) scenarios (2.6, 4.5, and 8.5) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). The G2 erosion model which is integrated with Machine Learning (ML) and Remote Sensing (RS) techniques were used to estimate soil erosion based on gauge observations of long-term precipitation, and climate and land use land cover (LULC) scenarios. The baseline model (2020) estimated soil erosion rates of 2.32&nbsp;Mg&nbsp;ha<sup>&minus;1</sup>&nbsp;yr<sup>&minus;1</sup> under current conservation agriculture practices (CPs). Maintaining current CPs, future scenarios predict an 8&nbsp;% to 21&nbsp;% increase in soil erosion under different combinations of SSP-RCP climate and LULC change scenarios. The findings of this study can help policy makers for future conservation planning on maintaining soil fertility, mitigating environmental impacts, and promoting food security.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>This reprository provide the soil erosion maps for united states in present and future.</p>

openDec 2021View details →
zenodo32/100

Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Modeling - Southern Caspian Sea River Basins

<p>Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Modeling - Southern Caspian Sea River Basins</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Reducing soil erosion by improving community functional diversity in semi-arid grasslands

1. Great efforts have been made to control soil erosion by restoring plant communities in degraded ecosystems world-wide. However, soil erosion has not been substantially reduced mainly because current restoration strategies lead to large areas of mono-specific vegetation, which are inefficient in reducing soil erosion because of their simple canopy and root structure. Therefore, an advanced understanding of how community functional composition affects soil erosion processes, as well as an improved restoration scheme to reduce soil erosion, is urgently needed. 2. We investigated the effect of community functional composition on soil erosion in restored semi-arid grasslands on the Loess Plateau of China. Community functional composition of 16 restored grasslands was quantified by community-weighted mean (CWM) and functional diversity (FD) trait values, which were calculated from nine plant functional traits of thirteen locally dominant plant species. Species richness and evenness were also measured. Soil erosion rates were measured using standard erosion plots. The multimodel inference approach was used to estimate the direction and the relative importance of these biodiversity indices in reducing soil erosion. 3. A robust and strong negative effect of functional divergence (FDiv) on soil erosion was found. The prevalence of particular trait combinations can also decrease soil erosion. The greatest control over soil erosion was exerted when the community mean root diameter was small and the root tensile strength was great. 4. Synthesis and applications: These findings imply that community functional diversity plays an important role in reducing soil erosion in semi-arid restored grasslands. This means that current restoration strategies can be greatly improved by incorporating community functional diversity into restoration design. We propose a trait-based restoration framework for reducing soil erosion, termed 'SSM' (Screening–Simulating–Maintaining). SSM aims to translate the target of community functional diversity into community assemblages that can be manipulated by practitioners. Based on this framework, a comprehensive procedure, highlighting functional diversity as the primary concern in determining optimal community assemblages, was developed to meet the pressing need for more effective restoration strategies to reduce soil erosion.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Trade-off between vegetation type, soil erosion control and surface water in global semi-arid regions: A meta-analysis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Reducing soil erosion by improving community functional diversity in semi-arid grasslands

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2015View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record