Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
383
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
383 results for “soil water”
Soil water content measurements in plots with experimentally altered precipitation variability at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 2011-ongoing
This dataset contains soil moisture data from a study at the Jornada Experimental Range (JER) in southern New Mexico. The study was designed to assess the effect of interannual variability in precipitation on average aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) in Chihuahuan Desert grasslands. The study began in 2009 and has five precipitation treatments (see Methods). While the study began in 2009, contains 50 plots (10 per treatment) and is ongoing, these data have only been collected since July 2011 in a subset of 20 plots (4 per treatment). This dataset is intended to provide information about the amount of water in surface and deep soil layers, as well as verify that experimental precipitation manipulations are effective. This is an ongoing dataset that will be updated yearly.
Soil volumetric water content data from fifteen locations, 3 depths at each location, within the Tromble Weir experimental watershed at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 2010-ongoing
This data package contains 30-minute soil volumetric water content (VWC) data collected at fifteen locations along 3 transects (5 locations per transect) in the Tromble Weir Watershed area of the Jornada Basin in southern New Mexico, USA. At each location, soil sensors measure VWC at three depths, 5, 15 and 30 cm, in units of cubic meters of water per cubic meter of soil. These measurements are used to help quantify the water balance across the small experimental watershed. Values have been used to investigate groundwater recharge, soil infiltration rates, and to evaluate the performance of hydrologic models. This is an ongoing dataset that will be updated annually.
Gravimetric soil water content sampled in and around harvester ant nests in three habitats at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 1987
This dataset contains gravimetric soil water content measurements from harvester ant nests and reference soils in three nesting habitats at the Jornada Basin LTER site in 1987. The purpose of this investigation was to answer three general questions: 1. How does the modification of soil properties and the ratios of resources (e.g., water-N) by ants alter species assemblages of winter annual plants at the edge of the ant nests? 2. How does the "spring cleaning", clipping, predation or herbivory by ants affect success of the winter annual plants at the edge of ant nests? 3. Are there significant differences in the floristic assemblage and belowground standing crop (root biomass) between the edge of ant nest and the surrounding unaffected soils? Five ant nests and paired (non-nest) reference soils were sampled in three study locations on a monthly schedule from January to May 1987. This dataset contains percent (%) soil water content in these samples determined using the gravimetric method. This study was completed in 1987.
Data to support the publication "Soil Water Retention as Affected by Management Induced Changes of Soil Organic Carbon: Analysis of Long-Term Experiments in Europe", https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121362
<p>Soil organic carbon content and water content at the different pressure points, as measured by Ioanna Panagea for the publication "Soil Water Retention as Affected by Management Induced Changes of Soil Organic Carbon: Analysis of Long-Term Experiments in Europe", https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121362 from the the long term experiments belonging in some of the SoilCare project partners. </p>
Soil water content (volumetric %) for 33kPa and 1500kPa suctions predicted at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution
<p>Soil water content (volumetric) in percent for 33 kPa and 1500 kPa suctions predicted at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. Training points are based on a global compilation of soil profiles (<a href="https://ncsslabdatamart.sc.egov.usda.gov/">USDA NCSS</a>, <a href="https://www.isric.org/projects/africa-soil-profiles-database-afsp">AfSPDB</a>, <a href="https://data.isric.org/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/a351682c-330a-4995-a5a1-57ad160e621c">ISRIC WISE</a>, <a href="http://egrpr.esoil.ru/">EGRPR</a>, <a href="https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/content/soil-profile-analytical-database-2">SPADE</a>, <a href="https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/6457fad6-b6f5-47a3-9bd1-ad14aea4b9e0">CanNPDB</a>, <a href="https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/unsoda-20-unsaturated-soil-hydraulic-database-database-and-program-indirect-methods-estimating-unsaturated-hydraulic-properties">UNSODA</a>, <a href="https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.885492">SWIG</a>, <a href="http://www.cprm.gov.br/en/Hydrology/Research-and-Innovation/HYBRAS-4208.html">HYBRAS</a> and <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4228/ZALF.2003.273">HydroS</a>). Data import steps are available <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/compiled-ess-point-data-sets/-/tree/master/themes/sol/SoilHydroDB"><strong>here</strong></a>. Spatial prediction steps are described in detail <strong><a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/tree/master/soil/soil_water">here</a></strong>. Note: these are actually measured and mapped soil content values; no Pedo-Transfer-Functions have been used (except to fill-in the missing NCSS bulk densities). Available water capacity in mm (derived as a difference between field capacity and wilting point multiplied by layer thickness) per layer is available <strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2629148">here</a></strong>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize some of the maps use: <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the maps, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>sol = theme: soil,</li> <li>watercontent.33kPa = water content (volumetric percent) under field capacity (33 kPa suction),</li> <li>usda.4b1c = determination method: laboratory method code,</li> <li>m = mean value,</li> <li>250m = spatial resolution / block support: 250 m,</li> <li>b10..10cm = vertical reference: 10 cm depth below surface,</li> <li>1950..2017 = time reference: period 1950-2017,</li> <li>v0.1 = version number: 0.1,</li> </ul>
Chemical composition, soil water content and 16S rRNA and ITS gene copy numbers of soil aggregates and bulk soil samples
<p>This repository contains all data to reproduce the analyses presented in "Distinct microbial communities are linked to organic matter properties in millimetre-sized soil aggregates", Simon et al 2024, <em>The ISME Journal </em>(DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrae156).</p>
SERENA EJPSoil Soil loss by water erosion of Tuscany (Italy)
<p>The internal EJP SOIL project SERENA contributed to the evaluation of soil multifunctionality aiming at providing assessment tools for land planning and soil policies at different scales. By co-working with relevant stakeholders, the project provided co-developed indicators and associated cookbooks to assess and map them, to report both on soil degradation, soil-based ecosystem services and their bundles, under actual conditions and for climate and land-use changes, at the regional, national, and European scales.</p> <p>One of the objective of SERENA project was to develop methods to calculate and map soil-based ecosystem services and soil threats. The present data was prepared according to the methodology of the SERENA Soil erosion and soil erosion control cookbook. Soil loss was used as an indicator for soil erosion (ST). The map of soil loss by water erosion (soil threat) was based on the RUSLE model. For Italy, the cookbook was applied in the Tuscany region. <br> <br>To create the soil loss map we used:</p> <ul> <li>for R-factor, not freely available database of meteorological parameters spatialized at 250 m (minimum and maximum daily air temperature; cumulate daily precipitation) over Tuscany region (period 1990–2022, Lamma Consortium) and a local linear equation between R and mean annual precipitation (P);</li> <li>for C -factor, Regional Land use map 1:10.000 (2018, freely available at: https://www502.regione.toscana.it/geoscopio/usocoperturasuolo.html) and ESDAC method (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021) ; </li> <li>for K-factor, sand, silt, clay, and O.C. (%) maps (built from 4.000 soil profiles, following FAO’s methodology in GSP-GSOC map, Lamma Consortium), and Torri et al. (1997) function;</li> <li>for LS-factor, DEM 10 m of Tuscany, (freely available at https://www502.regione.toscana.it/geoscopio/cartoteca.html99) and Desmet & Govers (1996) SAGA tool (applied at 10 m and upscaled);</li> <li>for P-factor, not freely available database 1:10.00 of terraced areas (Lamma Consortium, 2020) (for terraced areas a multiplication factor of 0.5 was considered, based on expert evaluation)</li> </ul> <p>Maps was delivered in the GeoTIFF format in the resolution of 100m. <br>Delivered data will be validated by stakeholders from Italy (scientist) in October, 2024.</p>
Input Dataset for Estimating Continuous Soil Water Retention Curves Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
<p>This dataset was used as input to a physics-informed neural network (PINN) model developed to estimate continuous soil water retention curves (SWRCs). It includes basic soil properties such as particle-size distribution (sand, silt, clay), organic carbon content (OC), bulk density (BD), and measurements of soil water retention at various matric potentials. These inputs allow the model to learn the relationship between soil properties and water retention, via both data and embedded physical constraints. This data set consists of 4,200 Danish soil samples with measurements spanning the wet and dry ends of the SWRC. </p>
Live cribwall + slope grating + fascines drainage system - soil-water dynamics
<p>Dataset containing raw time series (August 2022) for soil-water dynamics -i.e., volumetric soil moisture, matric suction, soil-pore water pressure, and soil temperature - retrieved from a live, vegetated cribwall+slope grating+fascines drainage system built in Catterline, Scotland. NBS intervention built to restore a landslide taking place in February 2021. </p>
Data and code from "Water availability is a stronger driver of soil microbial processing of organic nitrogen than tree species composition"
<p>#### Data description<br> Data from large scale, long-term tree diversity experiment in southwestern France (<a href="https://sites.google.com/view/orpheeexperiment/home">ORPHEE</a>), additionally manipulating water contraint. Variables presented are soil nitrogen cycling rates measured using isotope pool dilutions.</p> <p>Companion paper is found here:</p> <p>Maxwell TL, Augusto L, Tian Y, Wanek W & Fanin N (2023). Water availability is a stronger driver of soil microbial processing of organic nitrogen than tree species composition. <em>European Journal of Soil Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13350">https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13350</a></p> <p>#### Metadata<br> Soil sampling: July 2020<br> Maxwell_ShortComm_Data.csv data description</p> <p>ID: unique identifier per sample<br> Block: numbered 1-6. Blocks 1,3,6 are control (unirrigated), Blocks, 2,4,5 are irrigated<br> Plot: numbered plot according to the ORPHEE design. Plot 1 = BP, Plot 5 = PP, Plot 9 = BP_PP<br> Espece: species ID. BP = pure birch (<em>Betula pendula</em>), PP = pure pine (<em>Pinus pinaster</em>), BP_PP (50% mixed birch-pine)<br> Rep: sample replicate, 3 replicates per plot<br> Sample name: long unique identifier per sample. Concatenation of Block, Plot, and Espece<br> PD: gross protein depolymerization rates (micrograms nitrogen per grams dry soil per day = µg N g-1 d-1)<br> AAU: gross free amino acid uptake rates (µg N g-1 d-1)<br> Cmicrobial_ug_g: microbial biomass carbon (µg C g-1)<br> Nmicrobial_ug_g: microbial biomass nitrogen (µg N g-1)<br> MRT_FAA_hrs: mean residence time of free amino acids (hours)<br> FAA_ugN_g: free amino acids (µg N g-1)<br> Moisture_percent: soil moisture percent (%)<br> N_nonfumige_ug_g: nitrogen from non fumigated soils, i.e. extractable N (µg N g-1)<br> C_nonfumige_ug_g: nitrogen from non fumigated soils, i.e. extractableC (µg C g-1)</p>
Soil water content before and after rain events, May-July 2014-2016, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva
<p>This dataset contains soil water content data used for the analysis published in Fischer-Bedtke et al., (2023). It gives spatially distributed soil water contents evaluated at a rain event scale covering the following periods:</p> <p>May 5 - July 26 2014</p> <p>May 13 - July 28 2015</p> <p>May 25 - July 24 2016</p> <p>The enclosed files cover two different soil depth: topsoil (soil depth 7 cm) and subsoil (soil depth 27 cm).</p> <p>Fischer et al. (2023) give details about the included data and should be cited along the with the dataset when using the data.</p> <p><strong>Related datasets</strong></p> <p>Design information on the soil water content measurement points, including position to the next tree, hydraulic soil properties can be found in the follwowing associated dataset</p> <p>Metzger, Johanna Clara, Hildebrandt, Anke, & Filipzik, Janett. (2023). Soil moisture sensor network, design, location attributes and soil properties, Hainich, Germany, project AquaDiva (1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8065170</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Fischer, C., Metzger, J. C., Demir, G., Wutzler, T., and Hildebrandt, A.: Throughfall spatial patterns translate into spatial patterns of soil moisture dynamics – empirical evidence, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-418, 2023.</p>
Water soluble organic matter from Delmarva Bay soils
Little is known about how hydrologic processes along the terrestrial-aquatic interface in wetland dominated landscapes influence carbon dynamics, particularly regarding soil-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) transport and transformation. To understand the role of different soil horizons as potential sources of DOM to wetland systems, we measured water soluble organic matter (WSOM) in soil horizons collected from upland to wetland transects at four Delmarva Bay wetlands. The Delmarva Bays used in this study are located on property managed by The Nature Conservancy on the Delmarva Peninsula in the eastern United States. Transects ranged from 25 – 45 m in length beginning from a monitoring well in the wetland center to an upland monitoring well. Each transect had four points (Upland, Transition, Edge, and Wetland). Soils were sampled in the late winter (January 17 and March 10) and autumn (September 21 and November 1) of 2020. Soils were sampled by horizon to a depth of approximately 50 cm at each transect point. WSOM extracted in the laboratory was analyzed for WSOM concentration, reported as Water Soluble Organic Carbon (mg WSOC / g soil). WSOM absorbance and fluorescence data were used to calculate composition metrics, providing insight to organic matter sources and chemical characteristics. WSOM fluorescence excitation-emission matrices were evaluated using the 13 component Cory and McKnight (2005) PARAFAC model. Extracted leaf litter, surface water, and groundwater samples were collected in addition to soil samples for the purpose of comparing WSOM to DOM end-members along the Delmarva Bay terrestrial-aquatic continuum. Continuous water level data, averaged to a daily time-step, was collected over the 2020 water year (October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020) in previously established wetland and upland monitoring wells. The hydrologic conditions (e.g. mean water level, number of saturation events, duration of saturation) at each transect point were characterize
Seedling emergence and biomass data of nine dryland plant species characterizing the impact of soil residual auxin herbicide across two soil types and water pulse events on greenhouse growth; Las Cruces, New Mexico, Spring 2021.
Synthetic-auxin herbicides are often used to control woody plants and aid in grassland restoration. Seed-based restoration is common alongside herbicide applications and there may be unintended effects of these herbicides on dryland plant species at the seed and seedling stages. Additionally, abiotic conditions at the time of herbicide application may influence herbicide-soil-plant interactions. We conducted a greenhouse study to examine the effects of a common shrub-control herbicide mix and its interaction with soil type and a post-herbicide water pulse on common desert plant seeds and seedlings. In this greenhouse study, we found that a subset of species responded negatively to soil residual herbicide activity of a mixture of aminopyralid, clopyralid, and triclopyr at the seed and seedling stages. Species sensitive to soil herbicide residues were primarily shrub and forb species that are often the target species of herbicide applications for woody plant control, such as Prosopis glandulosa (honey mesquite) and Larrea tridentata (creosote bush). However, two shrub species (Atriplex canescens [four-wing saltbush] and Yucca elata [soaptree yucca]) and one perennial grass species (Digitaria californica [Arizona cottontop]), which are used in dryland restoration projects, were found to be particularly sensitive to soil residual herbicide activity. Thus, if using these herbicides to control woody plants and restore herbaceous vegetation via active seeding or relying on the in situ seed bank, considerations should be given to what species are used in the seed mix, what species are already present in the soil seed bank, and other details of the circumstances of herbicide application.
Water-soluble organic matter and nutrients from stormwater control measure and urban wetland soils
Water-soluble organic matter (WSOM) represents organic matter that has the potential to be readily released from soils. WSOM has been understudied in urban, engineered soils relative to natural soils. To understand the potential for organic matter and nutrient release, we extracted WSOM from the soils of stormwater control measures (SCM) and urban wetlands. In February 2022, we sampled soils from 20 SCMs and natural wetlands in the Rappahannock River watershed of the mid-Atlantic United States. The SCMs reflected a variety of design configurations including bioretention, rain gardens, wet ponds, and swales. We also sampled naturally occurring floodplain wetlands that are located in this urban watershed. Soils were sampled to a depth of approximately 40 cm. If there was standing water present in the SCMs and wetlands at the time of sampling, we also collected surface water samples. If present, grab samples of leaf litter or biomass were collected. Soil characteristics, such as pH, bulk density, soil moisture, soil organic matter, and cation exchange capacity were also determined for each site. WSOM was extracted from soils and biomass in the laboratory and analyzed for organic matter concentration (dissolved organic carbon) and composition (absorbance and fluorescence metrics), along with dissolved nutrient concentrations (total dissolved nitrogen, total dissolved phosphorus, nitrate, ammonium, and orthophosphate). In addition to the 20 sites in the Rappahannock watershed, soils from 2 additional bioretention SCMs on the Virginia Tech campus were sampled on a monthly basis from February 2022 to February 2023 to explore temporal variability in WSOM. To characterize changes in soil hydrologic conditions during monthly SCM sampling, we applied a Thornthwaite-type monthly water balance model. Finally, we performed a simple scaling exercise to WSOM results based on SCM area, sample depth, and soil bulk density to estimate potential SCM contributions of organic matter.
The Jefferson Project 2021 hydrologic, water quality, and soil quality data from 12 Tributary Stations within the Lake George basin, NY, USA.
The Jefferson Project at Lake George -- a partnership between Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, IBM Research, and Lake George Association -- combines Internet of Things technology and powerful analytics with science to create a new model for environmental monitoring and prediction. The project is building a computing platform that captures and analyzes data from a network of sensors tracking water quality and movement. These sensor data are combined with other monitoring and experimental data to create a thorough understanding of the factors that drive the lake's food web, hydrology, and water quality. More information about The Jefferson Project is available at https://jeffersonproject.rpi.edu/ In 2021, The Jefferson Project had twelve tributary monitoring stations around the lake collecting data on water quality, soil quality, and hydrology. These stations are TS_Finkle, TS_Hague, TS_Indian, TS_NorthwestBay, TS_Outlet, TS_PoleHill, TS_English, TS_Sunset, TS_Sucker, TS_ShelvingRock, TS_East, and TS_West. The stations have a sensor payload that may include some or all of the following sensors: YSI EXO2 Multi-parameter sonde, Campbell Scientific CS451 pressure transducer, SonTek-IQ+ multi-beam acoustic flow meter, Sontek-SL Doppler current meter, YSI WaterLOG® H-3123 submersible pressure transducer, and Stevens HydraProbe soil moisture sensor. The sensors collect data at high-frequency (~1 sample per minute) and the data are transferred in near real-time to off-site databases for monitoring and review by Jefferson Project researchers. The data provided here are level 4 data which underwent data correction and downsampling to an hourly frequency.
Soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream water temperature, stream stage and discharge data from Soil Moisture Station 01, Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, NC, USA, 2022-2025
Measurements of soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream temperatue, and stream stage/discharge were collected as part of a long-term monitoring project at the Highlands Biological Station, Western Carolina University, Highlands, North Carolina. The sensor station is located in an acidic cove forest (high elevation subtype) dominated by an understory of Rhododendron maximum and an overstory of Betula alleghanensis and formerly Tsuga canadensis, the latter of which has mostly succombed to the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid.
Daily Summary of Soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream water temperature, stream stage and discharge data from Soil Moisture Station 01, Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, NC
Measurements of soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream temperatue, and stream stage/discharge were collected as part of a long-term monitoring project at the Highlands Biological Station, Western Carolina University, Highlands, North Carolina. The sensor station is located in an acidic cove forest (high elevation subtype) dominated by an understory of Rhododendron maximum and an overstory of Betula alleghanensis and formerly Tsuga canadensis, the latter of which has mostly succombed to the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid.
Soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream water temperature, stream stage and discharge data from Soil Moisture Station 02, Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, NC, 2021-2025
Measurements of soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream temperatue, and stream stage/discharge were collected as part of a long-term monitoring project at the Highlands Biological Station, Western Carolina University, Highlands, North Carolina. The sensor station is located in a remnant old-growth Canada Hemlock Forest (typic subtype) community dominated by an understory of Rhododendron maximum and an overstory of Tsuga canadensis, the majority of which are still alive and have been treated with systemic insecticides to protect against infestations of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Other trees include Betula alleghanensis, Acer rubrum, and Quercus rubra. The pressure transducer is located in the thalweg of Coker Creek, a second order stream that flows into Lindenwood Lake.
Daily Summary of Soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream water temperature, stream stage and discharge data from Soil Moisture Station 02, Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, NC, 2021-2025
Measurements of soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream temperatue, and stream stage/discharge were collected as part of a long-term monitoring project at the Highlands Biological Station, Western Carolina University, Highlands, North Carolina. The sensor station is located in a remnant old-growth Canada Hemlock Forest (typic subtype) community dominated by an understory of Rhododendron maximum and an overstory of Tsuga canadensis, the majority of which are still alive and have been treated with systemic insecticides to protect against infestations of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Other trees include Betula alleghanensis, Acer rubrum, and Quercus rubra. The pressure transducer is located in the thalweg of Coker Creek, a second order stream that flows into Lindenwood Lake.
Soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream water temperature, stream stage and discharge data from Soil Moisture Station 03, Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, NC, 2021-2025
Measurements of soil moisture, soil temperature, air temperature, stream temperatue, and stream stage/discharge were collected as part of a long-term monitoring project at the Highlands Biological Station, Western Carolina University, Highlands, North Carolina. The sensor station is located in an acidic cove forest (high elevation subtype) dominated by an understory of Rhododendron maximum and an overstory of Liriodendron tulipifera, Betula alleghanensis, and Tsuga canadensis, the latter of which has several trees that have succombed to the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid, though living trees have been treated with a systemic insecticide. The pressure transducer is located in a second order stream known as Station Branch.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.