Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 5. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). Topotype male (USNM 1480197). A. Whole specimen, dorsal view. B. Anterior end, dorsal view. C. Same, lateral view. D. Posterior end, dorsal view. E. Pharynx dissected, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C = 0.5 mm; E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 4 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 4. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). Topotypes (USNM 1480190). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Supra-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 59. D. Sub-acicular heterogomph falcigers, chaetiger 59. E. Right jaw, dorsal view. F. Chaetiger 1, left parapodium. G. Chaetiger 10, left parapodium. H. Chaetiger 21, left parapodium. I. Chaetiger 41, left parapodium. J. Chaetiger 59, left parapodium. K. Chaetiger 72, left parapodium. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm; C–D = 10 μm; E = 0.25 mm; F–K = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 3 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 3. Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884). A–C, G–J. Lectotype of Nereis bairdii (USNM 4786). D–F. Paralectotypes (USNM 1660576). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Pharynx, ventral view. D. Left jaw, dorsal view. E. Pharynx, ventral view. F. Pharynx, lateral view. G. Chaetiger 2, right parapodium. H. Chaetiger 11, right parapodium. I. Chaetiger 34, right parapodium. J. Chaetiger 57, right parapodium. Scale bars: A–C, E–F = 0.5 mm; D, G–J = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2. Perinereis anderssoni Kinberg, 1865 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 2. Perinereis anderssoni Kinberg, 1865. Topotype (ECOSUR P3208). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Posterior end, dorsal view. C. Posterodorsal tentacular cirri. D. Left jaw, dorsal view. E. Chaetiger 1, right parapodium. F. Chaetiger 10, right parapodium. G. Chaetiger 28, right parapodium. H. Chaetiger 45, right parapodium. I. Chaetiger 62, right parapodium. J. Supra-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 62. K. Sub-acicular heterogomph falciger, chaetiger 28. Scale bars: A–C = 1 mm; D = 0.25 mm; E–I = 0.1 mm; J–K = 10 μm.

Fig. 1 in Reinstatement of Perinereis bairdii (Webster, 1884) and description of P. websteri sp. nov. from Bermuda, including the reproductive morphology of two Atlantic Perinereis species (Annelida: Errantia: Phyllodocida)

Fig. 1. Parapodial morphology of species of Perinereis Kinberg, 1865 and points used to obtain segments and length ratios of parapodial structures described in this work. Arrows and labels correspond to points used for the measuring parapodial structures as described in Material and methods section. A. Parapodium from posterior chaetiger of Perinereis floridana (Ehlers, 1868) (ECOSUR P1100). B. Parapodium from natatory region of Perinereis floridana (LACM-AHF 7376). Abbreviations: Dc = dorsal cirrus; DDoL = distal lobe of dorsal ligule; DoL = dorsal ligule; LDc = lower lamella of dorsal cirrus; LoM = lower lamella of median ligule; LVc = lower lamella of ventral cirrus; MeL = median ligule; NeL = neuroacicular ligule; PDoL = proximal lobe of dorsal ligule; PoL = neuropodial postchaetal lobe; PreL = notopodial prechaetal lobe; UDc = upper lamella of dorsal cirrus; UVc = upper lamella of ventral cirrus; Vc = ventral cirrus; VeL = ventral ligule; VeLa = ventral lamella.

Fig. 5 in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 5. Spores of the new species Asplenium danxiaense K.W.Xu sp. nov. and its affinities. A, B. A. danxiaense K.W.Xu sp. nov. C. A. cornutissimum X.C.Zhang & R.H.Jiang. D. A. coenobiale Hance. E. A. pulcherrimum.(Baker) Ching ex Tardieu.

Fig. 2 in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 2. The phylogenetic position of Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. based on nuclear gene pgiC. The numbers associated with branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLBS) values followed by bayesian inference posterior probabilities (PP). * indicates MLBS = 100% or PP=1.

Fig. 4. Asplenium danxiaense K.W in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 4. Asplenium danxiaense K.W.Xu sp. nov. A. Danxia landform in the type locality of the new species. B. Habitat of the new species in a cave. C. Habit. D. Abaxial view of lamina. E. Abaxial view of lamina apex. F. Adaxial view of lamina. E. Rhizome and root.

Fig. 1 in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 1. The phylogenetic position of Asplenium danxiaense K.W.Xu sp. nov. based on five plastid markers (atpB, rbcL, rps4-trnS, rpl32-trnP, and trnL-F). The numbers associated with branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLBS) values followed by bayesian inference posterior probabilities (PP). * indicates MLBS = 100% or PP = 1.

Fig. 6 in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 6. Estimation of Asplenium danxiaense K.W.Xu sp. nov. genome size by flow cytometry. The internal control Zea mays L. cv. B73 has 1C = 2.3Gbp.

Fig. 3 in Asplenium danxiaense sp. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Aspleniineae), a new tetraploid fern species from Guangdong, China, based on morphological and molecular data

Fig. 3. Scale morphology of the new species and its affinities. A, E. Asplenium danxiaenseK.W.Xu sp. nov. B, F. A. pulcherrimum (Baker) Ching ex Tardieu. C, G. A. coenobiale Hance. D, H. A. cornutissimum X.C.Zhang & R.H.Jiang.

FIG. 5 in Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov., and P. iranense, sp. nov., from Iran

FIG. 5. — Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov. (IRAN 16695 F, holotype): A, terminal hyphal swelling; B, intercalary hyphal swelling; C, D, monoclinous antheridia with inflated or non-inflated antheridial stalks and antheridial cells attached to oogonia; E, monoclinous antheridium originated from swollen part of oogonial stalk; F, monoclinous antheridium and intercalary oogonium with two oospores; G, intercalary oogonium provided with two onoclinous antheridia; H, diclinous antheridium and intercalary oogonium;I, sessile diclinous antheridium with constriction attached to oogonium; J, chain of ogonia and hyphal swelling; K, plerotic oospores; L, aplerotic oospore; M, peanut-shaped oospore; N, double oospore. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B-E, 5 µm F-N, 10 µm.

FIG. 2 in Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov., and P. iranense, sp. nov., from Iran

FIG. 2.— Neighbor-joining tree of Pythium Pringsheim clades F and G species inferred from partial coxI sequences. Bayesian/maximum parsimony/neighborjoining posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values are given at the nodes. – indicates support <50% for a particular clade. Pythium minus Ali-Shtayeh (CBS 22688) from clade E was used as outgroup. Scale bar: 0.01 substitutions.

FIG. 1 in Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov., and P. iranense, sp. nov., from Iran

FIG. 1.— Neighbor-joining tree of Pythium Pringsheim clades F and G species inferred from complete ITS region sequences. Bayesian/maximum parsimony/ neighbor-joining posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values are given at the nodes. – indicates support <50% for a particular clade. Pythium minus AliShtayeh (CBS 22688) from clade E was used as outgroup. Scale bar: 0.1 substitutions.

FIG. 3 in Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov., and P. iranense, sp. nov., from Iran

FIG. 3.— Neighbor-joining tree of Pythium Pringsheim clade J1 species inferred from complete ITS region sequences. Bayesian/maximum parsimony/neighborjoining posterior probabilities and bootstrap support values are given at the nodes. – indicates support <50% for a particular clade. Phytopythium litorale (Nechw.) Abad, de Cock, Bala, Robideau, Lodhi & Lévesque (CBS 118360) was used as outgroup. Scale bar: 0.1 substitutions.

FIG. 6 in Morphological and molecular taxonomy of Pythium monoclinum Abrinbana, Abdollahz. & Badali, sp. nov., and P. iranense, sp. nov., from Iran

FIG. 6.— Pythium iranense Badali, Abrinbana & Abdollahz., sp. nov. (IRAN 16697 F, holotype): A, terminal hyphal swelling; B, monoclinous antheridium and terminal oogonium; C, two diclinous antheridia attached to oogonium; D, antheridium with wavy stalk and oogonium; E, sessile diclinous antheridium and terminal oogonium; F, antheridial cell with constriction; G, bell-shaped sessile monoclinous antheridium and terminal oogonium on short side branch; H, antheridia attached to oogonium; I, J, crowd of antheridia around oogonia; K, lateral oogonium; L, plerotic and aplerotic oospores; M, peanut-shaped oospore; N, double oospore; O, quadruple oospore; P, oogonium with three papilla; Q, R, immature oospores with projections. Scale bars: A-M, 10 µm; N-R, 5 µm.

Fig. 4 in Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of the Soil Ciliate Anteholosticha rectangula sp. nov. from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Fig. 4. Majority consensus tree from Bayesian inference using nuclear SSU rDNA sequences. Anteholosticha rectangula is indicated in bold in the tree. Posterior probabilities of Bayesian inference (BI) and bootstrap values of maximum likelihood (ML) are presented on each interior branch. Dashes denote a value showing less than half of the full posterior probability or bootstrap value. Scale bar indicates two base substitutions per one hundred nucleotides.

Figs 3A–H in Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of the Soil Ciliate Anteholosticha rectangula sp. nov. from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Figs 3A–H. Photomicrographs of Anteholosticha rectangula after protargol impregnation. A and B – holotype specimen, ventral (A) and dorsal (B) view, arrow denotes pretransverse cirrus; C – dorsal view showing dorsal kineties, arrows denote two dikinetids anterior of right marginal cirral row; D and E – ventral views of anterior body showing buccal, frontal, frontoterminal, and midventral cirri; F–H – ventral views showing variation of the nuclear apparatus. DK1–3 – dorsal kineties 1–3, FC – frontal cirri, FTC – frontoterminal cirri, Ma – macronuclear nodules, Mi – micronuclei. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Figs 2A–J in Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of the Soil Ciliate Anteholosticha rectangula sp. nov. from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Figs 2A–J. Photomicrographs of Anteholosticha rectangula in vivo. A–C – representative individuals showing contractile vacuole (arrows) and ciliatures; D – nuclear apparatus, E–G – cortical granules in ventral (E) and dorsal (F, G) views; H–J – ventral views showing oral apparatus; arrows in I and J show buccal lip and buccal seal, respectively. CG – cortical granules, DB – dorsal bristles, Ma – macronuclear nodules, Mi – micronuclei, RMC – right marginal cirri, TC – transverse cirri. Scale bars: 100 μm (A, C, D), 5 μm (G), 10 μm (H, I).

Figs 1A–I in Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of the Soil Ciliate Anteholosticha rectangula sp. nov. from King George Island, Maritime Antarctica

Figs 1A–I. Drawings of Anteholosticha rectangula in vivo (A, D–G, I) and after protargol impregnation (B, C, H). A – ventral view of a representative specimen; B and C – ventral and dorsal views of holotype, arrows show two dikinetids; D–G – cortical granules on dorsal (D, G) and ventral sides (E, F); H – nuclear apparatus, showing variation in number and morphology; I – contractile vacuole. CG – cortical granules, CV – contractile vacuole, DB – dorsal bristles, DK1–3 – dorsal kineties 1–3, FTC – frontoterminal cirri, Ma – macronuclear nodules, Mi – micronuclei, TC – transverse cirri. Scale bars: 50 μm.