Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
93
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
93 results for “taxonomic differentiation”
Figs. 35–37 in Taxonomic Status Of A Florida Differentiate In The Erynnis Brizo Species Group: Classical Evidence (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae)
Figs. 35–37. Male genitalia of Erynnis somnus twixt Fla. S-14 and Econfina River, 2.2 mi. S of U.S. 98, 19 mi. W Perry, Taylor County, Florida, March 27, 1977, J. M. Burns collector (dissection JMB 1407). 35, Valvae and phallus in dorsal view. 36–37, Valvae in lateral views: 36, Right valva. 37, Left valva.
Data from: Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co-flowering community differentially affect Cakile edentula pollination at different spatial scales
1. The number of co-flowering species, floral density and floral trait diversity can be major determinants of pollinator-mediated plant-plant interactions in a community. However, evaluation of how each one of these co-flowering components affects the pollination success of a single focal plant species, and how these effects vary at different spatial scales, is lacking. 2. Here we evaluated the effects of functional diversity (flower morphology and colour), taxonomic diversity (reflecting potential sampling effects) and flower density (conspecific and heterospecific), on the pollinator environment (i.e. visitation rate and pollinator diversity), and pollination success (i.e. pollen load size and number of pollen tubes per style) of Cakile edentula (Brassicaceae). We applied structural equation models (SEM's) at the floral-neighbourhood (plot level) and community-wide scales to uncover the factors that mediate co-flowering community effects on C. edentula pollination success. 3. We found that co-flowering community effects at the community level are more important than fine-scale floral-neighbourhood differences in mediating plant pollination success in our study species. Increasing plant functional diversity decreased pollinator visitation rate but increased the diversity of pollinator functional groups visiting C. edentula flowers. Taxonomic diversity negatively affected pollinator diversity suggesting that other unmeasured floral traits may be relevant or that single-species effects (sampling effects) may be important. Overall, our results suggest that functional floral trait diversity in a community may be the most important factor influencing pollination success of species in a community. We also found evidence for intra- and interspecific pollinator competition mediated by flower density but none of these effects seemed to have a significant impact on pollination success. 4. This study is an important step towards understanding the complexity of co-flowering community effects on the pollination success of individual plant species at multiple spatial scales. This study further reveals the potential importance of plant functional diversity in a community in helping predict competitive and facilitative interactions in co-flowering communities. 5. Synthesis. Floral density, taxonomic and functional co-flowering diversity are important drivers of pollination success in flowering plants. The effects of the co-flowering diversity on the pollination success of plant species can largely depend on the spatial scale being studied. Only evaluating the outcomes of pollinator-mediated plant-plant interactions at multiple stages of the pollination process can lead to a complete understanding of their ecological consequences in nature.
FIGURE 4. Discriminant function analysis depicting morphological differentiation within the C. vittatus-hansenae group. Close grey circle indicates C. vittatus Group II. Open circle denotes C. hansenae Group I. Closed black circle represents C. hansenae Group II in Re-evaluating the taxonomic status of Chiromantis in Thailand using multiple lines of evidence (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae)
FIGURE 4. Discriminant function analysis depicting morphological differentiation within the C. vittatus-hansenae group. Close grey circle indicates C. vittatus Group II. Open circle denotes C. hansenae Group I. Closed black circle represents C. hansenae Group II.
FIGURE 4 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 4. The typical color pattern of the two species of giant salamanders and their hybrid. Andrias japonicus (upper), A. davidianus (middle), and first filial hybrid individual (lower).
FIGURE 3 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 3. Box plots of ratio of HW to SVL (A), ratio of VTW to SVL (B), and ratio of TAL to SVL (C) of Andrias japonicus (JM, males; JF, females), A. davidianus (DM, males; DF, females), and their hybrids (HM, males; HF, females). (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001; ns, P ≥ 0.05).
FIGURE 2 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 2. Scatter plots of CAN1 and CAN2 (A), and box plots of CAN1(B) of Andrias japonicus (JM, males; JF, females), A. davidianus (DM, males; DF, females), and their hybrids (HM, males; HF, females). In scatter plots (A), circles show plots of A. japonicus, diamonds show A. davidianus, and triangles show hybrids; closed symbols show males and open symbols show females. (* P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001; ns, P ≥ 0.05).
FIGURE 1 in Morphological differentiation in giant salamanders, Andrias japonicus, A. davidianus, and their hybrids (Urodela, Cryptobranchidae), and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 1. Morphological character dimensions. (A) Ventral view of the whole specimen; (B) dorsal view of the head; (C) left lateral view of the head; (D) palatal view of the upper jaw; (E) dorsal view of the left hand; (F) dorsal view of the left foot; (G) left lateral view of the tail; (H) dorsal view of the head showing tubercles; (I) ventral view of the head showing tubercles. Roman numerals indicate digit numbers.
FIGURE 9 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 9. Holotype of Saurodactylus slimanii sp. nov. from dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) view. Photos by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 12 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 12. Three (adult) paratypes of Saurodactylus harrisii sp. nov. Localities from left to right: Guelmime, Guelmime, Sidi Ifni. Photo by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 5. A in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 5. A) Bayesian tree based on concatenated mtDNA sequences (12S + ND4) with S. fasciatus as outgroup. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above nodes and bootstrap support values for Maximum Likelihood are shown below nodes. B) Bayesian tree resulted from collapsing nodes with posterior probabilities smaller than 0.95.
FIGURE 4 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 4. Variation in rostral scalation within Saurodactylus brosseti species complex. Drawings by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 2. A in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 2. A) Bayesian tree based on concatenated mtDNA sequences (12S + ND4), with S. mauritanicus as outgroup. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown below nodes and bootstrap support values for Maximum Likelihood are shown above nodes. Purple square highlights the new lineage. B) Sampling locality codes (1-22) according to Table 4, colors refer to their respective clades in (A).
FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 1. Map showing the distribution range of Saurodactylus brosseti according to Joger et al. 2006 (area surrounded in black dashed line). Solid lines show known ranges of five clades: North (N), i.e., S. brosseti; South (S), i.e., S. harrisii; East (E), i.e., S. slimanii; Anti-Atlas (A-A), i.e., S. elmoudenii; Southeast (SE), i.e., S. splendidus. Based on present study and Rosado et al. (2017). Map source: www.mapsland.com.
FIGURE 7 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 7. Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. in its natural habitat (type locality, Icht). Photo by S. Vogler.
FIGURE 10 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 10. Holotype (top) and paratype (bottom) of Saurodactylus elmoudenii sp. nov. Photos by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 3. Illustrations showing variation in color and pattern among five clades of the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex. Letters a, b, c refer to subcategories of respective morphs. Drawings by Soheila Javanmardi.
FIGURE 13 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 13. Type locality of Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. in Djebel Bani, Icht. View from above, in westerly direction, with Acacia and palm trees. Photo by Sven Vogler..
FIGURE 14 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 14. Holotype of Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. from dorsal (top), ventral (middle) and lateral (bottom) view. Photos by Achim Ritter & S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 10 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 10. Holotype (top) and paratype (bottom) of Saurodactylus elmoudenii sp. nov. Photos by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 12 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 12. Three (adult) paratypes of Saurodactylus harrisii sp. nov. Localities from left to right: Guelmime, Guelmime, Sidi Ifni. Photo by S. Javanmardi.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.