Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Figure 4 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 4. Reconstruction of skulls in dorsal view Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz. (a) MMG SaP 237, (b) LFUG 13343, (c) LFUG 13405, (d) MMG SaP 356, (e) LFUG 13391, (f) LFUG 13570, (g) LFUG 13501, (h) LFUG 13292. Darker shading figures depressions on dorsal side of skull roof. Scale equals 10 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Figure 5 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 5. Palate of Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz, in ventral view. (a) LFUG 13394, (b) LFUG 13514. Darker grey is the inner side of the skull roof. Scale equals 10 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

Figure 3 in The life cycle in late Paleozoic eryopid temnospondyls: developmental variation, plasticity and phylogeny

Figure 3. Ontogeny of the dermal ornament in Onchiodon labyrinthicus Geinitz. (a) LFUG 13343, (b) MMG SaP 390, (c) MMG SaP 356, (d) MMG SaP 361, (e) LFUG 13395, (f) LFUG 13391, (g) LFUG 13570, (h) LFUG 13292.

Fig. 4 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 4. Partial ontogenetic sequence representing sub−adult to adult stages in the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa. A. UCMP 41286 in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. SAM−PK−3008 in dorsal (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. CGP/1/135 in dorsal (C1) and ventral (C2) views; arrows indicate ontogenetically variable characters of the cranium of X. africanus, as discussed in the text. Grey shading represents the preserved portions of each skull.

Fig. 3 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 3. Mastodonsaurid temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa, referred specimen CGP/1/135. A. Interpretive drawing (A1) and reconstruction (A2) in dorsal view. B. Interpretive drawing (B1) and reconstruction (B2) in ventral view. Grey shading represents plaster−of−Paris; heavy stiple represents matrix; cross−hatching represents broken bone.

Fig. 2 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 2. Mastodonsaurid temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa. Skulls of three specimens used in this study, reproduced to the same scale. A. Referred specimen CGP/1/135 in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. Lectotype SAM−PK−2360 in dorsal (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. Referred specimen SAM−PK−3008 in dorsal (C1) and ventral (C2) views.

Fig. 1 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 1. Locality map and simplified stratigraphic column. The map shows the extent of surface outcrop of the Cynognathus Assemblage Zone within the main Karoo Basin, South Africa. Stratigraphic column shows only the Triassic part of the Beaufort Group sequence. Skull icon indicates the horizon of Xenotosuchus africanus. Localities: 1, Cuylerville, Queenstown District; 2, Vaalbank, Winaarsbaaken, and Nooitgedacht, Burgersdorp District; 3, Matabele and Koudekraal, Rouxville District.

Fig. 8 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 8. Parotosuchus species from Europe (known from complete skull) in comparison with Parotosuchus ptaszynskii sp. nov. on stratigraphic plot with axis showing the proportions of the subtemporal fossa. Parotosuchus helgolandicus (Schroeder, 1913) and Parotosuchus nasutus (Meyer, 1858) (based on Welles and Cosgriff 1965), Parotosuchus orenburgensis (Konzhukova, 1965) (based on Konzhukova 1965).

Fig. 7 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 7. Capitosaurid amphibian Parotosuchus ptaszynskii sp. nov., Wióry, Late Olenekian. Reconstruction of the mandible based on MPT.P 272. Anterior unpreserved part was based on the holotype of Parotosuchus orenburgensis (after Konzhukova 1965). Postglenoid region in labial (A), lingual (B), and dorsal (C) views.

Fig. 3 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 3. Partial skull of capitosaurid amphibian Parotosuchus ptaszynskii sp. nov., Wióry, Late Olenekian, in a conglomeratic intercalation within a sandstone bed. A. Skull MPT.P 271 in dorsal view, coated with ammonium chloride. B. CT scan of the paroccipital process of the tabular and of the supraoccipital process of the postparietal. C. CT scan of the occipital condyle. D. Interpretative drawing.

Fig. 1 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 1. Simplified geological map showing the Wióry locality in the northern margin of the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland.

Fig. 4 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 4. Skull reconstruction (ventral view) of capitosaurid amphibian Parotosuchus ptaszynskii sp. nov., Wióry, Late Olenekian (A) and comparison with Parotosuchus orenburgensis (Konzhukova, 1965), Rossypnaya, Ural River, Late Olenekian (C). The reconstruction of P. ptaszynskii sp. nov. based on the drawing of P. orenburgensis (from Konzhukova 1965); preserved fragment of P. ptaszynskii marked. B. Shadow of P. orenburgensis at the same scale as P. ptaszynskii in A.

Fig. 2 in A new large capitosaurid temnospondyl amphibian from the Early Triassic of Poland

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic location of Wióry in the profile of the Buntsandstein from the northern margin of the Holy Cross Mountains (based on Ptaszyński and Niedźwiedzki 2006; Becker et al. 2007; Niedźwiedzki and Ptaszyński 2007).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2009View details →

Fig. 2 in On the presence of a pustulated temnospondyl in the Lower Triassic of southern Brazil

Fig. 2. Schematic drawings showing alternative bone arrangements of MCN PV 1999a. A. Peltobatrachus pustulatus (skull not to scale, modified from Panchen, 1959). The black areas show two alternative positions of MCN PV 1999a in P. pustulatus, enlarged in C and D. B. Gerrothorax pulcherrimus (skull not to scale, modified from Jenkins et al. 2008). The black areas show four alternative positions of MCN PV 1999a in G. pulcherrimus, enlarged in E, F, G, and H. Abbreviations: j, jugal; p, parietal; pf, prefrontal; po, postorbital; pp, postparietal; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal; t, tabular.

Fig. 3 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians

Fig. 3. Temnospondyl amphibian Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947), holotype (UCMP 36199), early Anisian, northeastern Arizona. Stereopairs of the posterior part of the lower jaw in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. Note buttresses for articular (missing) projecting from prearticular and surangular, and proportions of postglenoid area.

Fig. 6 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians

Fig. 6. Strict consensus of 38 most parsimonious trees with bootstrap percentages based upon 10,000 replicates.

Fig. 2 in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians

Fig. 2. Temnospondyl amphibian Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947), holotype (UCMP 36199), early Anisian, northeastern Arizona. Stereopair of anterior part of lower jaw in mesial view; note large postsymphyseal foramen.

Fig. 5. A, B in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians

Fig. 5. A, B. Comparisons between the skull of Vigilius wellesi Warren and Marsicano, 2000 (A) and the lower jaw of Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947) (B) drawn to the same proportions; arrows point to changes in degree of curvature of the skull and jaw (skull modified from Warren and Marsicano 2000). C. Right lower jaw ramus of Hadrokkosaurus bradyi (Welles, 1947) in dorsal view showing lengths of segments used for calculating the degree of curvature of the ramus (see text for details). D. Close−up view of posterior part of UCMP 36199, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona.

Fig. 4. A in The brachyopoid Hadrokkosaurus bradyi from the early Middle Triassic of Arizona, and a phylogenetic analysis of lower jaw characters in temnospondyl amphibians

Fig. 4. A. Stereopair of UCMP 36205, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona; incomplete prearticular in dorsal view attributed to Hadrokkosaurus bradyi; arrows mark position and extent of lateral edge of contact area for articular. B. Stereopair of UCMP 36210, early Anisian, northeastern Arizona; broken angular in dorsal view presumably incorrectly attributed to Hadrokkosaurus bradyi; note pronounced boss−like adductor process.