Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 1 in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 1. PC1 vs. PC2 factor scores of the principal components analysis of Pseudophilautus schneideri, n. sp. and P. folicola, show these species to separate well from each other in PC space. Most of the variation is explained by the PC1 axis, which relates mainly to body size (P. schneideri being smaller). The PC2 axis is mostly explained by nostril-to-snout length and length of finger 3; here, P. schneideri overlaps completely with P. folicola.

FIGURE 6. Pseudophilautus schneideri n in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 6. Pseudophilautus schneideri n. sp.: a, ventral aspect of left manus; b, ventral aspect of left pes; and c, semi-diagrammatic representation of the left-pes webbing pattern of the holotype, male,WHT 6355, 22.8 mm SVL. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIGURE 10. Pseudophilautus hankeni n in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 10. Pseudophilautus hankeni n. sp.: a, ventral aspect of left manus; b, ventral aspect of left pes; and c, semi-diagrammatic representation of the left-pes webbing pattern of the holotype, male, WHT 6304, 21.9 mm SVL. Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIGURE 7 in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 7. Distribution of Pseudophilautus schneideri, n. sp. (circles) and Pseudophilautus hankeni, n. sp., (squares), in Sri Lanka.

FIGURE 3 in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 3. Maximum likelihood tree of 12s and 16s rRNA gene fragments, with posterior probabilities from the Bayesian analysis shown above nodes and Maximum Parsimony Bootstrap values shown below nodes. Pseudophilautus schneideri and P. hankeni are indicated by asterisks.

FIGURE 9. Pseudophilautus hankeni n in Two new species of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae: Pseudophilautus) from Sri Lanka

FIGURE 9. Pseudophilautus hankeni n. sp.: a, lateral; b, dorsal; and c, ventral aspects, respectively, of head of holotype, male, WHT 6304, 21.9 mm SVL. Scale bar: 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2013View details →

Species TX OK Distribution Map FH Hosts Phloeotribus liminaris (Harris) 1* 1* SENA 15 ph Prunus Phloeotribus pseudoscabricollis Atkinson 1 MEX+NT 16 ph Zanthoxylum Phloeotribus texanus Schaeffer 1 1* SE+MEX 17 ph Celtis Phloeosinina Chramesus chapuisii LeConte 1 1 SE+MEX 18 ph Celtis Chramesus hicoriae LeConte 1* 1* SENA 19 ph Carya Chramesus mimosae Blackman 1 MEX+NT 18 ph Legume trees Chramesus subopacus Schaeffer 1 MEX+NT 20 ph Celtis Chramesus varius Wood 1 MEX+NT 19 ph Legume trees Phloeosinus cristatus (LeConte) 1 SWNA 21 ph Cupressus Phloeosinus dentatus (Say) 1 1 SENA 22 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus hoferi Blackman 1 SWNA 25 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus scopulorum neomexicanus Blackman 1 SWNA 23 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus serratus (LeConte) 1 SWNA 24 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus taxodii Blackman 1 SE+MEX 21 ph Taxodium Hypoborina Chaetophloeus fasciatus (Blackman) 1 SWNA 26 ph Prosopis Chaetophloeus heterodoxus (Casey) 1 SWNA ph Rosaceae Chaetophloeus mexicanus Wood 1* MEX+NT 27 ph Eysenhardtia Chaetophloeus sulcatus Wood 1* MEX+NT 28 ph Composite shrubs Liparthrum squamosum (Blackman) 1? SENA 29 ph Maclura pomifera Polygraphina Carphobius arizonicus Blackman 1 SWNA 30 ph Juniperus Carphoborus bicornus Wood 1* 1* SENA 31 ph Pinus Carphoborus bifurcus (Chapuis) 1* SENA 32 ph Pinus Carphoborus convexifrons Wood 1 SWNA 31 ph Pinus in Atlas and checklist of the bark and ambrosia beetles of Texas and Oklahoma (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae)

Species TX OK Distribution Map FH Hosts Phloeotribus liminaris (Harris) 1* 1* SENA 15 ph Prunus Phloeotribus pseudoscabricollis Atkinson 1 MEX+NT 16 ph Zanthoxylum Phloeotribus texanus Schaeffer 1 1* SE+MEX 17 ph Celtis Phloeosinina Chramesus chapuisii LeConte 1 1 SE+MEX 18 ph Celtis Chramesus hicoriae LeConte 1* 1* SENA 19 ph Carya Chramesus mimosae Blackman 1 MEX+NT 18 ph Legume trees Chramesus subopacus Schaeffer 1 MEX+NT 20 ph Celtis Chramesus varius Wood 1 MEX+NT 19 ph Legume trees Phloeosinus cristatus (LeConte) 1 SWNA 21 ph Cupressus Phloeosinus dentatus (Say) 1 1 SENA 22 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus hoferi Blackman 1 SWNA 25 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus scopulorum neomexicanus Blackman 1 SWNA 23 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus serratus (LeConte) 1 SWNA 24 ph Juniperus Phloeosinus taxodii Blackman 1 SE+MEX 21 ph Taxodium Hypoborina Chaetophloeus fasciatus (Blackman) 1 SWNA 26 ph Prosopis Chaetophloeus heterodoxus (Casey) 1 SWNA ph Rosaceae Chaetophloeus mexicanus Wood 1* MEX+NT 27 ph Eysenhardtia Chaetophloeus sulcatus Wood 1* MEX+NT 28 ph Composite shrubs Liparthrum squamosum (Blackman) 1*? SENA 29 ph Maclura pomifera Polygraphina Carphobius arizonicus Blackman 1* SWNA 30 ph Juniperus Carphoborus bicornus Wood 1* 1* SENA 31 ph Pinus Carphoborus bifurcus (Chapuis) 1* SENA 32 ph Pinus Carphoborus convexifrons Wood 1 SWNA 31 ph Pinus

opennotspecifiedSep 2004View details →

Fig. 1. Freshwater interdunal swale showing herbaceous vegetation amid dense Myrica- Baccharis shrubs. A in Rediscovery and Habitat Associations of Photuris Bethaniensis McDermott (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

Fig. 1. Freshwater interdunal swale showing herbaceous vegetation amid dense Myrica- Baccharis shrubs. A large colony of P. bethaniensis was reported from this swale during 1951 and relocated during 1998.

dryad32/100

Data from: The effect of shrub cover on conifer water-use patterns, growth, and response to climate change in the southern Sierra Nevada

<p>As wildfire increases in size and severity, large areas of forest are undergoing substantial increases in shrub cover. In forests where water is the limiting resource, the paritioning of soil water between shrubs and trees may determine how shrubs affect tree growth and water-stress. We analyzed hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in the xylem water for two conifer species and two shrub species to assess how shrub cover affects the water-uptake patterns of conifers in the southern Sierra Nevada. Further, we analyzed tree growth and stable carbon isotopes in tree rings to assess how shrub cover affects tree growth, intrinsic water-use efficiency and response to climate change.</p>

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Fig. 11 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 11. Geleznowia eximia: (a) habitat; (b) habit; (c) flowering stem showing yellowish-green stems and whorls of green leaves; (d) dense flowering heads with up to six flowers; (e) open flower showing broad petals and sepals and style with a distinct obovoid stigma at the apex. Vouchers: K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1832 and KS 1833 (PERTH). Photos: K. A. Shepherd.

Fig. 7 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 7. SVDquartets trees for Geleznowia and two outgroup taxa on the basis of 3338 SNPs. Coloured numbers correspond to genomic groups in the PCA and are coloured by initial morphological identification, and colours of clades match colours in the Structure figure. (a) Lineage tree with individuals represented by a single sequence. Monophyletic groups are collapsed for clarity and labelled with population numbers. Bootstrap support values less than 100 are shown above branches. Pie charts at nodes of interest show site concordance factors: the proportion of informative sites supporting the given branch topology (white) and the two alternative topologies (grey and black). One sample from Group 1 that is placed strangely is indicated with an asterisk (*) in (a) and (b). (b) Consensus network of bootstrap trees for the lineage analysis, showing splits found in at least 10 of the 100 trees. Branch lengths are proportional to bootstrap value; values are omitted for 100 and <20%. (c, top) Species tree with individuals grouped into putative 'species' (genomic groups from the PCA plus the divergent populations P4 and P9). Bootstrap support values less than 100 are shown above branches. (c, bottom) Consensus network of bootstrap trees for the species analysis, showing splits found in at least 10 of the 100 trees. Branch lengths are proportional to bootstrap value; values are omitted for <20%.

Fig. 3 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 3. Principal-component analysis of 1683 SNPs for Geleznowia. The first four principal components are plotted against each other: (a) 2 v. 1; (b) 3 v. 1; (c) 4 v. 1; (d) 3 v. 2. Note that (a), (b) and (c) share the same x-axis, so only the vertical positions of the samples change. Colours and shapes correspond to initial morphological identification, with shading by population. Distinct genomic clusters are indicated with dashed circles and numbered from 1 to 6 (referred to in the text).

Fig. 8 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 8. Distributions of all seven Geleznowia species in Western Australia. The base map is sourced from GADM (ver. 3.6, see https://gadm.org), with grey borders showing IBRA regions and subregions (Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment 2020).

Fig. 6 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 6. Concatenation maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Geleznowia and two outgroup taxa. Monophyletic groups are collapsed for clarity and labelled with population numbers. Coloured numbers correspond to genomic groups in the PCA and are coloured by initial morphological identification, whereas colours of clades match colours in the Structure figure. Support values are Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test values and ultrafast bootstrap values, in that order. All branches have full support (100/100) except where shown. The scale bar indicates the average number of substitutions per site. Branches are cut in the main figure for clarity, but full branch lengths are provided at the top left.

Fig. 14 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 14. Geleznowia uberiflora: (a) habitat; (b) habit, highlighting the prolific flowers observed in some plants; (c) solitary flower before anthesis, subtended by a few pale yellow bracts tinged with green at the apex; (d) side view of flowers showing the ovate green leaves and the young yellowish-green branchlet (red arrow); (e) flower beginning to open, showing the large obovoid stigma (red arrow); (f) open flower showing the large pale yellow sepals hiding the bracts below, and the bright yellow elliptic petals. Vouchers: A.D. Crawford ADC 1839 (b, c); K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1828 (d, f); K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1824 (e). Photos: A. D. Crawford (b, c); K. A. Shepherd (a, d–f).

Fig. 10 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 10. Geleznowia calycina: (a) single-stemmed habit; (b) flowering heads showing the large pale yellow bracts subtending the inflorescence (some tinged red at the apex) with whorls of grey–green leaves below; (c) dense flowering head post-pollination, highlighting the red bracts and sepals; (d) open flower showing the broad pale yellow sepals with bracts below, bright yellow petals and obovoid stigma at the apex of the style; (e) mixed population of G. calycina (left) with a multiple-stemmed habit and clusters of flowers tinged red, compared with G. uberiflora (right) with single pale yellow terminal flowers. Vouchers: K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1848 (a); K.A. Shepherd & C.F.Wilkins KS 1723 (b); K.A. Shepherd & J.A. Wege KS1300 (c); A.D. Crawford ADC 1344 (d); A.D. Crawford ADC 1840 (right) and ADC 1839 (left) (e). Photos: K. A. Shepherd (a–c, e); A. D. Crawford (d).

Fig. 9 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 9. Geleznowia amabilis: (a) habitat; (b) single-stemmed habit; (c) dense head of vivid yellow flowers above whorls of silvery grey–green leaves; (d) open flower showing the large, vivid yellow sepals surrounding broad, orange–yellow petals and narrow stigma. Voucher: K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1840. Photos: K. A. Shepherd.

Fig. 4 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 4. Results of Structure runs for Geleznowia on the basis of 1683 unlinked SNPs. Sample ancestry assignments for major modes of K6–8 are shown as vertical bars for each sample. Numbered groups (1–6) at the bottom correspond to the six genomic groups identified from the PCA, whereas P4 and P9 refer to divergent populations. The estimated log probability of the data and delta K are shown at the right for K1–15. Values are from the top 10 runs for each K, and error bars show ±s.d.

Fig. 13 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 13. Geleznowia occulta: (a) habitat; (b) habit; (c) flowering stems with young buds showing solitary flowers with few bracts; (d) single flower showing petals as long as sepals and obovoid stigma; (e) old fruit. Vouchers: K.A. Shepherd & C.F. Wilkins KS 1744 (a, d); K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1853 (b); K.A. Shepherd & C.F. Wilkins KS 1743(PERTH) (c, e). Photos: K. A. Shepherd.

Fig. 15 in Using RADseq to resolve species boundaries in a morphologically complex group of yellow-flowered shrubs (Geleznowia, Rutaceae)

Fig. 15. Geleznowia verrucosa: (a) habitat; (b) single-stemmed habit; (c) multi-stemmed habit showing large numbers of flowers; (d) yellowish-green branchlet with small elliptic grey–green leaves and inflorescences with four or five flowers; (e) flower showing petals almost as long as the sepals and the obovoid stigma; (f) mature fruits surrounded by sepals tinged red. Vouchers: K.A. Shepherd & C.F. Wilkins KS 1736 (a); K.A. Shepherd & J.A. Wege KS 1312 (b); K.A. Shepherd & B.M. Anderson KS 1845 (c, e); A.D. Crawford ADC 1369 (d); K.A. Shepherd & J.A. Wege KS 1309 (f). Photos: K. A. Shepherd (a, e, f); A. D. Crawford (b, d); B. M. Anderson (c).