Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs. 17– 20. Euoniticellus intermedius. 17 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 17– 20. Euoniticellus intermedius. 17) Mandible; 18) Detail of the tip of the incisor lobe of the mandible; note the type of setae covering the basal surface; 19) Molar lobe of the mandible; 20) Detail of fine transverse ridges of the molar lobe.

Figs. 30– 33. Attavicinus monstrosus. 30 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 30– 33. Attavicinus monstrosus. 30) Maxilla; note the cluster of setae at the base of the first and second sclerite (arrow); 31) Galea with one of the two types of setae present; 32) Small setae on the galea; 33) Apex of the fourth segment of the maxillary palp.

Figs. 13– 16 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 13– 16. Epipharynx of Euoniticellus intermedius. 13) Dorsal view; 14) Detail of setae on the proximal end (arrow); 15) Detail of the phlegmatic area; 16) Distribution of setae on the dorsal side; note the long setae become sparser and start to form a line as they near the medial suture.

Figs. 7– 12. Liatongus rhinocerulus. 7 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 7– 12. Liatongus rhinocerulus. 7) Detail of two types of setae on their posterior end of the epipharynx; 8) Distribution of setae on the incisor lobe of the mandible; 9) Detail of setae on the basal incisor lobe of the mandible; 10) Maxilla; 11) Detail of setae on the galea and lacinia; note the scaly structures on the stipital sclerites (arrow); 12) Apex of the fourth segment of the maxillary palp.

Figs. 1– 6 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 1– 6. Epipharynx of Liatongus rhinocerulus. 1) Dorsal view; 2) Detail of the anterior area of the medial process and the distribution of setae on its surface; 3) Distribution of setae on the medial process (arrow) near the distal end; 4) Posterior area of the medial process; note the structures on either side of the base of the nesium and the lack of setae on the nesium (arrow); 5) Lateral tormae of the epipharynx; 6) Detail of the distribution and different types of setae (arrow).

Figs. 21–22. Euoniticellus intermedius. 21 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 21–22. Euoniticellus intermedius. 21) Maxilla; note the two types of setae and the development of the galea;

Figs. 24–27 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits

Figs. 24–27. Epipharynx of Attavicinus monstrosus. 24) Setae on the cephalic part of the medial process; 25) Large, thick setae covering the posterior part, with abundant spines and much thinner setae on the acroparia; 26) Thick and medium-sized setae interspersed near the nesium; 27) Detail of ovoid setae on the base of the nesium base; note that the nesium is completely smooth (arrow).

Fig. 7. Mantura chrysanthemi. A in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 7. Mantura chrysanthemi. A) Male showing punctation on the head, pronotum, and elytra, B) Punctation of male elytron, C) Schematic of male elytral length and width measurements, D) Schematic of male pronotal length measurement and distance between posterior longitudinal furrows, E) First tarsomere (arrow), female, F) Enlarged first tarsomere (arrow), male.

Fig. 8 in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 8. Mantura chrysanthemi, head and antennae. A) Male antennomeres 3–9 showing sensilla chaetica and sensilla trichodea, B) Terminal three antennomeres of male showing clustered "collar" sensilla trichodea (S.t), C) Apical antennomere of female showing ventral concavity with clustered sensilla basiconica, D) Schematic of head capsule measurements; arrows indicate the measurement from the top of the clypeus to the vertex and another between the most dorsal points of the antennal fossae.

Fig. 6 in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 6. Mantura chrysanthemi, abdominal sexual dimorphism: A) Male lobate fifth abdominal ventrite; arrows indicate posterior (P) and lateral (L) orientation, B) Female rounded fifth abdominal ventrite; arrows indicate posterior (P) and lateral (L) orientation, C) Schematic of aedeagal length and width measurements; D) Aedeagus showing rounded apex.

Fig. 4. Altica sylvia. A in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 4. Altica sylvia. A) Elytron showing confused punctation, dorsal view, B) Head and pronotum, lateral view; arrow indicates location of semi-circular patch of deep pronotal punctures, C) Left elytron, lateral view; arrows indicate deep punctures along the lateral margin, D) Deep punctures (arrows) on the lateral margin of the elytron, E) Schematic of elytral measurements; arrows indicate length and width measurements, F) Schematic of pronotal measurements; arrows indicate length and width measurements; deep punctures are visible at the points of the transverse arrow.

Fig. 3. Altica sylvia, abdominal sexual dimorphism. A in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 3. Altica sylvia, abdominal sexual dimorphism. A) Female fifth abdominal ventrite, ventral view; arrows indicate posterior (P) and lateral (L) orientation, B) Male fifth abdominal ventrite; arrows indicate posterior (P) and lateral (L) orientation and grooves (G) in the posterior margin of the ventrite, C) Male displaying lobate fifth abdominal ventrite and exposed aedeagus, D) Female rounded fifth abdominal ventrite with exposed styli (S); arrows indicate lateral (L) and posterior (P) orientation, E) Aedeagus, ventral view; arrow indicates nipple-shaped tip, F) Aedeagus, dorsal view; arrow indicates nipple-shaped tip.

Fig. 5 in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Fig. 5. Altica sylvia, head and antennae. A) Schematic of head capsule measurements; arrows indicate the measurement from the top of the clypeus to the vertex and another between the most dorsal points of the antennal fossae, B) Male antenna; C) Female apical antennomere, ventral view, showing several sensilla types: sensilla basiconica (S.bs) with "star" tips located on posteriorly; patch of simple sensilla basiconica (S.b) found centrally; and sensilla chaetica (S.c) on all surfaces of the antennomere, D) Female apical antennomere showing sensilla basiconica with "star" tips, E) Sensilla basiconica with "star" tip on female apical antennomere, F) Patch of simple sensilla basiconica located ventrally on the female apical antennomere.

Figs. 1–2. 1 in Morphological Comparison ofAltica sylviaMalloch, 1919 andMantura chrysanthemi(KOCH, 1803) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini), with a Focus on Sexual Dimorphism

Figs. 1–2. 1) Adult blueberry flea beetle, Altica sylvia, feeding on lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium; 2) Adult Mantura chrysanthemi on sheep sorrel, Rumex acetosella.

opennotspecifiedMay 2021View details →

FIGURE 2. Comparison between Pogostemon jaitapurensis Chandore & S.R in Pogostemon jaitapurensis (Lamiaceae), a new species from India based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIGURE 2. Comparison between Pogostemon jaitapurensis Chandore & S.R.Yadav, sp. nov., P. deccanensis (Panigrahi) Press, and P. erectus (Dalzell) Kuntze. A. P. jaitapurensis flower; B. P. deccanensis flower; C. P. erectus flower; D. P. jaitapurensis bract; E. P. deccanensis bract; F. P. erectus bract; G. P. jaitapurensis calyx, H. P. deccanensis calyx; I. P. erectus calyx; J. P. jaitapurensis dissected calyx (outer surface); K. P. deccanensis dissected calyx (outer surface); L. P. erectus dissected calyx (outer surface). Photos by A.N. Chandore & S.R. Yadav.

opennotspecifiedJan 2021View details →

FIGURE 4. Morphological comparison between Camellia langbianensis and C. vidalii. A, D in Rediscovery of Camellia langbianensis (Theaceae) in Vietnam

FIGURE 4. Morphological comparison between Camellia langbianensis and C. vidalii. A, D. Indumentum of pedicel; B, E. Indumentum of abaxial bracteole; C, F. Indumentum of adaxial bracteole; G, J. Indumentum of abaxial sepal; H, K. Indumentum of adaxial sepal; I, L. Indumentum of abaxial petal; M, P. Indumentum of adaxial petal; N, Q. Indumentum at the base of inner filaments; O, R. Indumentum of the style. C. langbianensis: A–C, G–I, M–O photoed by L. V. Dung from V. D Luong. & Q. C. Truong DL190401 (DLU); C. vidalii: D–F, J–L, P–R photoed by S. X. Yang from S. X. Yang et al. 6237 (KUN).

opennotspecifiedOct 2021View details →

FIGURE 2. Morphological comparison between B. hamatum and B. omerandrum. A in Bulbophyllum hamatum (Orchidaceae), a new species from Hubei, central China

FIGURE 2. Morphological comparison between B. hamatum and B. omerandrum. A. Leaf and pseudobulb(A-1: B. omerandrum; A- 2 & A-3: B. hamatum); B. Inflorescence (B-1: B. omerandrum; B-2: B. hamatum); C. Flower, front view (C-1: B. omerandrum; C-2: B. hamatum); D. Flower, side view (D-1: B. omerandrum; D-2: B. hamatum); E. Column and lip, side view(E-1: B. omerandrum; E-2: B. hamatum); F. Stelidia and anther cap (F-1: B. omerandrum; F-2: B. hamatum)

opennotspecifiedDec 2012View details →

FIGURES 16–21 in Detailed morphological description of the mature larva of Anthrenus latefasciatus Reitter, 1892 (Dermestidae: Megatominae: Anthrenini) with comparisons to related species

FIGURES 16–21. Mature larva of A. latefasciatus Reitter, 1892: 16, pronotum (dorsal, right half); 17, right proleg (dorsal); 18, abdominal tergum I (dorsal, right half); 19, abdominal tergum VII (dorsal, right half); 20, abdominal tergum VIII (dorsal, right half); 21, abdominal tergum IX (dorsal, left part). Scale bar = 0.1 mm. In Figs 16, 18–20 large circles with ring inside represent points of insertion of spicisetae, small circles represent points of insertion of hastisetae, dots represents of black pigmented areas.

opennotspecifiedDec 2012View details →

FIGURES 1–4 in Detailed morphological description of the mature larva of Anthrenus latefasciatus Reitter, 1892 (Dermestidae: Megatominae: Anthrenini) with comparisons to related species

FIGURES 1–4. Exuvium of mature larva of A. latefasciatus Reitter, 1892: 1–2, dorsal view; 3, latero–ventral view; 4, ventral view.