Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,920
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,920 results for “implications”
FIGURE 12 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 12. Female terminalia of an typical specimen of Rhinoleucophenga gigantea from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously determined as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). a: dorsal view; b: spermathecal capsule; c: ventral view (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, e: epiproct,h: hypoproct, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6, T7: tergite 7.
FIGURE 11 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 11. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, female, typical specimen from São Domingos, Goiás. Terminalia, a: ventral view; b: spermathecal capsule; c: dorsal view (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, e: epiproct,h: hypoproct, S6: sternite 6, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6.
FIGURE 7 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 7. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen from Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco. a: general habitus, dorsal view; b: general habitus, lateral view; c: wing; d: head, frontal view; e: abdomen, dorsal view (scale bar 1.0 mm).
FIGURE 3 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 3. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. a: general habitus, lateral view; b: thorax, dorsal view; c: head, frontal view; d: abdomen, dorsal view (scale bar 1.0 mm, except in c: 0.5 mm).
FIGURE 6 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 6. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, typical specimen from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously identified as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). a: head, frontal view; b: thorax, dorsal view; c: abdomen, dorsal view; d: wing (scale bar 0.5 mm).
FIGURE 1 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 1. Geopolitical map of South America with localities of Rhinoleucophenga specimens previously determined as R. obesa and re-analyzed in the present paper: (1) Bossoroca (Poppe et al 2014), (2) São Luiz Gonzaga and (3) Cruz Alta (Ho- chmüller et al 2010)—Rio Grande do Sul; (4) Deodoro, Rio de Janeiro (Costa Lima 1935); (5) Salobra, Mato Grosso do Sul (Malogolowkin 1946); (6) Tangará da Serra, Mato Grosso (Blauth & Gottschalk 2007); (7) São Domingos, Goiás (Mata et al 2008) and (8) Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco (Poppe et al 2017). Note: specimens form localities N° 1, 2, 3 and 7 were here determined as R. gigantea; and the others were here determined as R. cantareira.
FIGURE 2 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 2. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, typical specimen previously determined by A. Costa Lima (1935) as R. obesa. a: general habitus, lateral view; b: general habitus, dorsal view; c: head, frontal view (scale bar 1.0 mm).
FIGURE 5 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 5. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, female (♀09), typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. Terminalia, a: dorsal view; b: ventral view; c: spermathecal capsule (scale bar 0.1 mm). c: cercus, h: hypoproct, S6: sternite 6, S7: sternite 7, T6: tergite 6, T7: tergite 7.
FIGURE 4 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 4. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, male (♂03), typical specimen previously determined by C. Malogolowkin (1946) as R. obesa. Terminalia, a: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, dorsal view; b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, lateral view; c: aedeagus, paraphysis and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view; d: epandrium, anterior view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, pa: paraphysis, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 10 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 10. Rhinoleucophenga gigantea, male, typical specimen from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul, previously identified as R. obesa (Poppe et al 2014). Terminalia, a: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, dorsal view; b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view; c: epandrium, anterior view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 9 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 9. Rhinoleucophenga cantareira, male, typical specimen from the Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco. Terminalia, a: ep- andrium, anterior view b: aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme, ventral view (scale bar 0.1 mm). a: aedeagus, aa: aedeagal apodeme, c: cercus, p: prensisetae, s: surstylus.
FIGURE 8 in The identity of some specimens previously (mis)identified as Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Brazil, based on morphological and molecular data, with implications on distribution
FIGURE 8. Epandrium of Rhinoleucophenga cantareira specimens from (a) Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco and (b) Salobra, Mato Grosso do Sul (C. Malogolowkin (1946)); and Rhinoleucophenga gigantea specimens (c–f) from Bossoroca, Rio Grande do Sul. Arrows point to the different curved shape of epandria ventral lobe among the specimens from Bossoroca. Note: specimens c, d and e: sp_3, sp_2 and sp_4, respectively, in the molecular analyzes (see tables 1 and 3).
FIGURE 3 in Taxonomic review of two fossil crocodylians from the Cenozoic of South America and its implications for the crocodylian fauna of the continent
FIGURE 3. Comparison between the holotype of Caiman venezuelensis in ventral view and extant Caiman. A, C. venezuelensis (OR-1677, holotype), in ventral view. B, C. crocodilus apaporiensis (FMNH-69812, holotype), premaxillae in ventral view. C, C. crocodilus (MCT-148-RR), premaxillae in ventral view. D, C. yacare (MACN-30595), premaxillae in ventral view. Abbreviations: m = maxilla, pm = premaxilla, pms = suture between both premaxillae. Scale bars = 1 cm.
FIGURE 2 in Taxonomic review of two fossil crocodylians from the Cenozoic of South America and its implications for the crocodylian fauna of the continent
FIGURE 2. Comparison between the holotype of Caiman venezuelensis in dorsal view and extant Caiman. A, C. venezuelensis (OR-1677, holotype), in dorsal view. B, C. crocodilus apaporiensis (FMNH-69812, holotype), premaxillae in dorsal view. C, C. crocodilus (MCT-148-RR), premaxillae in dorsal view. D, C. yacare (MACN-30595), premaxillae in dorsal view. Abbreviations: m = maxilla, n = nasal, pm = premaxilla, pms = suture between both premaxillae. Scale bars = 1 cm.
FIGURE 1. Comparison between similar globular teeth crowns found among alligatoroids. A in Taxonomic review of two fossil crocodylians from the Cenozoic of South America and its implications for the crocodylian fauna of the continent
FIGURE 1. Comparison between similar globular teeth crowns found among alligatoroids. A, Balanerodus logimus, holotype, in labial view (UCMP-45787). B, Allognathosuchus wartheni (YPM PU-16989), right dentary tooth in lateral view. C, Kuttanacaiman iquitosensis (MUSM-1942), left dentary teeth in medial view. D, Caiman wannlangstoni (MUSM-2377, holotype), right maxillary tooth in lateral view. E, Brachychampsa montana (AMNH-5032, holotype), right maxillary teeth in medial view. F, Procaimanoidea utahensis (USNM-15997, paratype), posterior right dentary teeth in medial view. G, Melanosuchus niger (MN-64), posterior right dentary teeth in lateral view. H, Caiman latirostris (MACN-30612), posterior left maxillary teeth in medial view. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Gassmann Consistency for Different Inclusion-based Effective Medium Theories: Implications for Elastic interactions and Poroelasticity
<p>This is the dataset associted with the paper published in JGR: Gassmann Consistency for Different Inclusion-based Effective Medium Theories: Implications for Elastic interactions and Poroelasticity</p>
Fig. 5 in Phylogeography of three closely related myrmecophytic pioneer tree species in SE Asia: implications for species delimitation
Fig. 5 Distribution of the different ant species on their respective host plants M. constricta, M. griffithiana, and M. motleyana (including data from Quek et al. 2007 = lineages A, B, D, K, and G/H)
Fig. 2 in Phylogeography of three closely related myrmecophytic pioneer tree species in SE Asia: implications for species delimitation
Fig. 2 Statistical parsimony network based on cpDNA haplotype data, generated with the TCS program (Clement et al. 2000). Each circle represents a unique haplotype (indicated by numbers). Circle sizes are proportional to the number of individuals carrying the respective
Fig. 7 in New ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae) from Miocene Mexican and Dominican ambers and their paleobiogeographical implications
Fig. 7 Pods and seeds of Hymenaea spp. Pods of H. courbaril, Simojovel de Allende, Mexico; (a) complete pod; (b) pod cut in half, note the thickness of the wall. Pods and seeds of H. oerrucosa, Ambahy (Nosy Varika), Madagascar; (c) complete pods in a bifurcated branch; (d) complete pods in a single branch; (e) sample of two seeds contained inside a pod
Fig. 6 in New ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae) from Miocene Mexican and Dominican ambers and their paleobiogeographical implications
Fig. 6 Paleogeographic map of the Oligocene showing simplified oceanic circulation system proposed as responsible for current distribution of Hymenaea spp. in the Antilles and fossil records for the genus. The map has been modified after Langenheim and Lee (1974), Stramma and England (1999), Ali and Huber (2010), and Beal et al. (2011)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.