Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 16 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 16. Radular morphology of Juga canella sp. nov., holotype (USNM 1413106). A. View of the anterior radular ribbon. B. Detail of cutting edge of rachidian and lateral teeth. C. Detail of lateral teeth cusps. D. Detail of rachidian cusps. E. Inner and outer marginal teeth. F. Detail of inner and outer marginal teeth cusps. Scale bars: A = 200 µm; B–C, E = 100 µm; D, F = 50 µm.

Fig. 8 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 8. Shell morphology of Juga acutifilosa (Stearns, 1890). A–C. Type material. D–J. Sequenced vouchers. A. Melania acutifilosa Stearns, 1890. Lectotype, USNM 60596. B. Goniobasis laurae Goodrich, 1944. Paratype, MCZ 221159. C. Goniobasis interioris Goodrich, 1944. Paratype, MCZ 221163. D–E. Topotypic (Melania acutifilosa Stearns, 1890). D. USNM 1413153. E. USNM 1413156. F. Topotypic (Goniobasis laurae Goodrich, 1944), USNM 1413201. G. Topotypic (Goniobasis interioris Goodrich, 1944), USNM 1413191. H. USNM 1239161. I. USNM 1295048. J. USNM 1413073. K. USNM 854634. L. USNM 1152451. M. CASIZ 183594. N. CASIZ 183597. O. UF 520310. P. USNM 858178. Q. USNM 874271. R–S. CASIZ 183594. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 13 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 13. Radular morphology of Juga caerulea sp. nov., holotype (USNM 1294988). A. View of the anterior radular ribbon. B. Detail of cutting edge of rachidian and lateral teeth. C. Detail of lateral teeth cusps. D. Detail of rachidian cusps. E. Cutting edges of inner and outer marginal teeth. F. Detail of inner and outer marginal teeth cusps. Scale bars: A = 200 µm; B = 100 µm; C, E = 50 µm; D = 40 µm; F = 20 µm.

Fig. 24 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 24. Radular morphology of Juga nigrina (I. Lea, 1856) (USNM 1413111, topotypic). A. View of the anterior radular ribbon. B. Detail of cutting edge of rachidian and lateral teeth. C. Detail of lateral teeth cusps. D. Detail of rachidian cusps. E. Inner and outer marginal teeth. F. Detail of inner and outer marginal teeth cusps. Scale bars: A = 200 µm; B–C = 50 µm; D, F = 40 µm; E = 100 µm.

Fig. 19 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 19. Shell morphology of Juga newberryi (I. Lea, 1860). A. Melania newberryi I. Lea, 1860. Lectotype, USNM 118961. B–K. Sequenced vouchers. B. USNM 1295080. C. USNM 1295084. D. USNM 1295085. E. USNM 1413317. F. USNM 1413321. G. USNM 1413332. H. USNM 1413334. I. USNM 1413428. J. USNM 1413429. K. USNM 1413430. L–M. USNM 905120. N. USNM 12174. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 22 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 22. Type material of Juga nigrina (I. Lea, 1856). A. Melania nigrina I. Lea, 1856. Lectotype, USNM 118992. B. Melania shastaensis I. Lea, 1856. Lectotype, USNM 119283. C. Goniobasis circumlineata Tryon, 1865. Lectotype, ANSP 27573. D. Goniobasis chacei Henderson, 1935. Holotype, UCM 18058a. E. Goniobasis coquillensis Henderson, 1935. Holotype, UCM 21168a. F. Goniobasis orickensis Henderson, 1935. Holotype, UCM 17710a. G. Goniobasis yrekaensis Henderson, 1935. Holotype, UCM 17735a. H. Goniobasis yrekaensis obscura Henderson, 1935. Holotype, UCM 17724a. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 27 in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 27. Species erroneously attributed to Juga H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854. A. Goniobasis columbiensis Whiteaves, 1905, syntype (CMML 2042), original figure (Whiteaves 1905: pl. 2 fig. 11). B. Goniobasis rubiginosa I. Lea, 1862, lectotype (Graf 2001: 91) (USNM 119297), original figure (Lea 1863a, 1863b: pl. 38 fig. 193). Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 2. Life habit. A in A systematic revision of the genus Juga from fresh waters of the Pacific Northwest, USA (Cerithioidea, Semisulcospiridae)

Fig. 2. Life habit. A. On leaves. Drift Creek on Cascade Highway NE, Oregon (J. plicifera (I. Lea, 1838)). B. Under submerged stones (with gelatinous egg masses). Youngs River Falls, just upstream of Youngs River Rd, Oregon (J. plicifera). C. On mud and leaves. Muddy Hollow, Oregon (J. bulbosa (A. Gould, 1847)). D. On submerged wood. Unnamed Creek at Skookum Creek Rd, Oregon (J. canella sp. nov.). E. On sand. Hat Creek, California (J. douglasi sp. nov.). F. On the spray-moistened sides of boulders. Pit River at U.S. Hwy 299, California (J. occata (Hinds, 1844)).

opencc-zeroDec 2022View details →

dryad40/100

Not so weak-PICO: Leveraging weak supervision for Participants, Interventions, and Outcomes recognition for systematic review automation

Objective: PICO (Participants, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes) analysis is vital but time-consuming for conducting systematic reviews (SRs). Supervised machine learning can help fully automate it, but a lack of large annotated corpora limits the quality of automated PICO recognition systems. The largest currently available PICO corpus is manually annotated, which is an approach that is often too expensive for the scientific community to apply. Depending on the specific SR question, PICO criteria are extended to PICOC (C-Context), PICOT (T-timeframe), and PIBOSO (B-Background, S-Study design, O-Other) meaning the static hand-labelled corpora need to undergo costly re-annotation as per the downstream requirements. We aim to test the feasibility of designing a weak supervision system to extract these entities without hand-labelled data. Methodology: We decompose PICO spans into its constituent entities and re-purpose multiple medical and non-medical ontologies and expert-generated rules to obtain multiple noisy labels for these entities. These labels obtained using several sources are then aggregated using simple majority voting and generative modelling approaches. The resulting programmatic labels are used as weak signals to train a weakly-supervised discriminative model and observe performance changes. We explore mistakes in the currently available PICO corpus that could have led to inaccurate evaluation of several automation methods. Results: We present Weak-PICO, a weakly-supervised PICO entity recognition approach using medical and non-medical ontologies, dictionaries and expert-generated rules. Our approach does not use hand-labelled data. Conclusion: Weak supervision using weak-PICO for PICO entity recognition has encouraging results, and the approach can potentially extend to more clinical entities readily.

Preparedness for Contingencies: A Systematic Review of the Factors that Influence the Crisis Resilience of Project Managers

The goal of this review paper is to investigate factors that contribute to project managers' crisis resilience through a systematic review of the literature and bibliometric analysis using VOXviewer. Existing research on project management and resilience focuses on urban resilience, community resilience, organisational resilience, team resilience, individual resilience, resilience of critical infrastructure, and flood resilience. In the context of project managers, however, the factors that influence crisis resilience and preparedness remain unclear. Using the PRISMA framework for systematic literature, 55 peer-reviewed articles published between 1993 and 2022 that met our criteria were identified through a structured keyword search in the Scopus and WoS databases. The systematic review and bibliometric analysis reveal eight (8) clusters, which we further categorise into four determinants. This is the most important finding of this review. In the context of the roles of project managers, the results of a comparative analysis reveal four prominent factors for enhancing crisis resilience: 1. leadership (individual resilience, influence, team trust, emotional intelligence); 2. interpersonal skill (conflict management, persistence, crisis preparedness); 3. agility (proactiveness, coping capacity, and adaptive capacity); 4. risk management and vulnerability (perception, awareness) . These factors are essential for developing project managers who are less susceptible to future crises and disasters. This study has exhaustively characterised the possibilities and capacities of crisis resilience in terms of competency, integration, collaboration, and novelty; however, the search was restricted to a small number of databases and a short period of time, which could be explored in future research. According to the findings, most previous research on crisis resilience focused on emergency preparedness and was primarily conducted in Western and American studies. There is a lack of a holistic perspective on crisis resilience, which will be developed. We believe that international collaboration efforts to establish a platform for the exchange of knowledge between Western and American nations and ASEAN members are necessary

Supplementary data for A Systematic Literature Review on the Code Smells Datasets and Validation Mechanisms

The attached Microsoft Excel files contain the data and diagrams of the paper: A systematic literature review on the code smells datasets and validation mechanisms The article is under review in the ACM Computing Surveys.

Fig. 20 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 20. Line diagrams of Munidopsis cortesi sp. nov., ov. F 5.2 mm, holotype (MZUCR 3761-01), Costa Rica. (a) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b) Carapace and abdomen, lateral view. (c) Sternal plastron. (d) Telson. (e) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (f) Left Mxp3, lateral view. (g) Right P1, dorsal view. (h) Right P2, lateral view. (i) Right P3, lateral view. (j) Right P4, lateral view. (k) Right P4 dactyli, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 6. Line drawings of Munidopsis aspera Henderson, 1885, ov. F 10.9 mm (MNHN-Ga301), Magellan Strait. (a) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b) Carapace and abdomen, lateral view. (c) Sternal plastron. (d) Telson. (e) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (f) Right Mxp3, lateral view. (g) Left P1, dorsal view. (h) Left P2, lateral view. (i) Left (unattached) P4, lateral view. (j) Left P2 dactyli. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic hypotheses based on the COI data alone resulting from the Bayesian analysis, with results from the species delimitation analyses (ASAP, ABGD, bPTP, GMYC); a grey box indicates that the specimens are not part of the species hypothesis of the black bar. Tip labels in bold indicate new taxa. Colours indicate geographic distribution as specified on the map. Gradients of depth and habitat are also indicated. Asterisks indicate supported nodes: ML bootstrap support>70%/Bayesian posterior probability>0.95.

Fig. 13 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 13. Line diagrams of Munidopsis hendrickxi sp. nov., 1 M 9.1 mm, holotype (MCZ IZ-153106), California. (a) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b) Carapace and abdomen, lateral view. (c) Sternal plastron. (d) Telson. (e) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (f) Left Mxp3, lateral view. (g) Right P1, dorsal view. (h) Right P2, lateral view. (i) Right P3, lateral view. (j) Right P4, lateral view. (k) Right P4 dactyli, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 5. Janetogalathea californiensis (Benedict, 1902). (a) Mxp1, lateral view, California (MCZ IZ-139642). (b) General habitus, dorsal view, 1 M (SIC BIO C11027) San Diego, CA, USA.

Fig. 9 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 9. Line diagrams of Munidopsis girguisi sp. nov., M 18 mm, holotype (MCZ IZ-73856), California. (a) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b) Carapace and abdomen, lateral view. (c) Sternal plastron. (d) Telson. (e) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (f) Left Mxp3, lateral view. (g) Left P1, dorsal view. (h) Right P2, lateral view. (i) Right P3, lateral view. (j) Right P4, lateral view. (k) Right P3 dactyli, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 12 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 12. Line diagrams of Munidopsis granosicorium Williams & Baba, 1989, ov. F 6.1 mm (SIO-BIC C12819), Costa Rica. (a) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b) Carapace and abdomen, lateral view. (c) Sternal plastron. (d) Telson. (e) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (f) Left Mxp3, lateral view. (g) Left P1, dorsal view. (h) Right P2, lateral view. (i) Right P3, lateral view. (j) Right P4, lateral view. (k) Right P3 dactyli, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 8 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 8. (a–g) Line diagrams of Munidopsis carinipes Faxon, 1893, M 10.09 mm, lectotype (MCZ IZ CRU-4561), Panama. (h–n) Line diagrams of Munidopsis quadrata Faxon, 1893 M 9.8 mm, lectotype (MCZ IZ CRU-4560), Mexico. (a, g) Carapace and abdomen, dorsal view. (b, i) Cephalic region, showing antennular and antennal peduncles, ventral view. (c, j) P1, dorsal view. (d, k) Left P2, lateral view. (e, l) Left P3, lateral view. (f, m) Left P4, lateral view. (g, n) Left P2 dactyl. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Cosmopolitan abyssal lineages? A systematic study of East Pacific deep-sea squat lobsters (Decapoda: Galatheoidea: Munidopsidae)

Fig. 3. Haplotype networks with haplotype distributions for (a) Munidopsis aspera and (b) M. quadrata + M. carinipes.