Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
8,537
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
8,537 results for “Openness”
Quantum spin coherence and electron spin distribution channels in vanadyl-containing lantern complexes. Open dataset
<p>Data supporting the original figures 3 and 4 of the related publication</p>
Detecting Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity in Randomly Oriented Radical Pairs Photogenerated by Hole Transfer. Open data set
<p>Data supporting the original figures 2 through 7 of the related publication.</p>
Supplementary Materials of the Tutorial: "Promotion of Open Science in Requirements Engineering: Leveraging the ORKG and ORKG Ask for FAIR Scientific Information"
<h1>Summary</h1> <p>This collection contains all the supplementary materials of the second tutorial titled "<a href="https://conf.researchr.org/details/RE-2025/RE-2025-tutorials/1/Promotion-of-Open-Science-in-Requirements-Engineering-Leveraging-the-ORKG-and-ORKG-A" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Promotion of Open Science in Requirements Engineering: Leveraging the ORKG and ORKG Ask for FAIR Scientific Information</a>", accepted at the <a href="https://conf.researchr.org/home/RE-2025" target="_blank" rel="noopener">33rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference 2025</a>.</p> <p>The materials complement the tutorial sessions and provide participants with resources to enhance their understanding and application of open science principles in the field of Requirements Engineering (RE) by leveraging the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG)</a> and <a href="https://ask.orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG Ask</a> for FAIR scientific information. These materials contain all the presentation slides and exercise materials so that everyone can repeat the theoretical presentations independently and carry out the practical exercises themselves at any time.</p> <h1>Contents</h1> <h2>1. Slides - All slides used in the tutorial.</h2> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Files</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>0. RE25 Tutorial - All Sessions.pdf</td> <td>The complete set of all slides used in the tutorial, which are also provided individually for each session of the tutorial.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1. RE25 Tutorial - Welcome.pdf</td> <td>The welcome with an overview of the content of the tutorial.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2. RE 25 Tutorial - Introduction to Open Science in RE.pdf</td> <td>The theoretical introduction to open science regarding its importance, benefits, and incentives for researchers themselves and the wider RE community.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3. RE25 Tutorial - Introduction to ORKG and ORKG Ask.pdf</td> <td>The theoretical introduction to the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) and ORKG Ask.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>4. RE25 Tutorial - Using SciKGTeX.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use the LaTeX package <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SciKGTeX</a> to create a FAIR-annotated publication and import it into the ORKG.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>5. RE25 Tutorial - Using the ORKG.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG </a>to describe publications regarding their scientific information and use these descriptions to create and publish an ORKG comparison.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>6. RE25 Tutorial - Using the ORKG Ask and ORKG CSV Import.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use <a href="https://ask.orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG Ask</a> and the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG</a> CSV Import to describe publications regarding their scientific information and use these descriptions to create and publish an ORKG comparison.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7. RE25 Tutorial - Reflection and Closing.pdf</td> <td>The summary, reflection, and closing of the tutorial with an outlook to the future of <a href="https://gitlab.com/TIBHannover/orkg/ExtracTable" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ExtracTable</a>.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>2. Exercise Materials - All exercise materials used in the tutorial.</h2> <h3>2.1 SciKGTeX Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Folder</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>SciKGTeX_Example</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an example publication and all required SciKGTeX files for annotating the scientific information.</p> <p>Files:</p> <ol> <li>example.tex : LaTeX file of the example publication.</li> <li>scikgtex.lua : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>scikgtex.sty : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>project.zip : Zip file containing all above files for uploading as a project in Overleaf.</li> </ol> <p><em>Remark:</em> SciKGTeX is constantly being further developed. For the latest version of the required files, please refer to the corresponding <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GitHub project</a>.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>SciKGTeX_Solution</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an Overleaf project with the solution for a possible annotation of the example publication provided.</p> <p>Files:</p> <ol> <li>example.pdf : PDF with annotations embedded into the PDF's XMP metadata.</li> <li>example.tex : LaTeX file of the example publication with annotations.</li> <li>output.xmp_metadata.xml : XMP file generated by SciKGTeX to check the annotations created.</li> <li>scikgtex.lua : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>scikgtex.sty : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>project.zip : Zip file containing all above files for uploading as a project in Overleaf.</li> </ol> <p><em>Remark:</em> SciKGTeX is constantly being further developed. For the latest version of the required files, please refer to the corresponding <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GitHub project</a>.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>2.2 ORKG Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Folder</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Exemplary_Comparison</td> <td> <p>The folder contains a created ORKG comparison as a PDF and PNG file, consisting of 4 exemplary publications that were described with the ORKG template provided for the tutorial.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Exemplary_Publications</td> <td> <p>The folder contains 20 PDF files with short summaries of scientific findings on empirical research practices from 20 different publications of the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. The participants have received these PDFs to enter them in the ORKG and then create an ORKG Comparison.</p> <p><em>Remark:</em> We have provided the short summaries instead of the full publications to simplify the extraction process due to time constraints.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Template</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an overview of the ORKG template used in the tutorial as a PNG file and an N3 file of its RDF structure.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>2.3 ORKG Ask & ORKG CSV Import Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>File</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>empty_orkg_csv_file_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains an empty template for creating an ORKG CSV file for the ORKG CSV Import with own content.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>empty_orkg_csv_file_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p> </p> The file contains an empty template for creating an ORKG CSV file for the ORKG CSV Import with own content. <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>orkg_ask_synthesized_answer_and_link_to search.txt</td> <td>The file contains the synthesized answer with references from ORKG Ask for the question "What is the state of the art in empirical research applied in requirements engineering?" with a link to the associated saved search.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>original_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains the original content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is revised in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>original_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p>The file contains the original content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is revised in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>revised_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains the revised content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is used in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>revised_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p>The file contains the revised content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is used in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h1>Usage Notes</h1> <p>These materials are intended for use by the participants of the tutorial, the broader RE community, and everyone interested in open science. They are provided to support the long-term transition towards FAIR scientific information and to empower researchers to integrate open science infrastructures into their work.</p> <h1>License</h1> <p>The materials are released under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license</a>, allowing for reuse and distribution in accordance with open science practices.</p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Open Access Compliance Monitoring 2018
<p><strong>I. Executive summary</strong></p> <p>The Austrian Science Fund (FWF), which is Austria's main funding organisation for basic research, encourages and helps all project leaders and project staff members to make their peer-reviewed research results freely available on the Internet. Since 1 January 2016, open access has been mandatory for all peer-reviewed publications listed in final reports on FWF-funded projects. Any exceptions must be clearly indicated and justified. For projects that started after 1 January 2015, open access has been compulsory for all peer-reviewed publications.</p> <p>All principal investigators in FWF-funded projects are obliged to submit a final report within three months of completing their projects. In 2018 all in all 549 final reports were submitted to the FWF, 37 out of them couldn't report publications by now.</p> <p>The publications and other data mentioned in those reports are archived and analysed by the FWF. This report examines the state of compliance with open access requirements on the basis of final project reports submitted in the year 2018.</p> <p>Main findings:</p> <ul> <li>A total of 10.354 publications were listed in the final project reports submitted in 2018.</li> <li>Of those publications, 7.702 were conclusively identified as peer-reviewed.</li> <li>Regarding compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy, the report shows that 92% of the peer-reviewed publications that arose from submitted final reports of FWF projects in 2018 are openly accessible (2015: 83%, 2016: 92%, 2017: 90%).</li> <li>The most frequently chosen option is <em>hybrid open access </em>(39%)<em>. </em>Since last year's report, the use of<em> </em><em>hybrid open access </em>has declined by 2% and <em>g</em><em>old open access </em>has increased by 4%. The share of <em>green open access </em>and <em>other open access </em>remained contant (20% and 16%).</li> <li>The majority of peer-reviewed publications submitted are journal articles (90%), 93% of which are openly accessible.</li> <li>The lowest rate of compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy can be found in editions, contributions to edited volumes and monographs (65%).</li> <li>Although open access is not compulsory, 41% of non peer-reviewed publications are freely available through the internet.</li> <li>The absolute number of publications listed in final reports in 2018 includes 886 publications that are mentioned several times in different projects; however, those repetitions do not ultimately affect the relative share of open access publications (92%).</li> </ul> <p><strong>II. Bias</strong></p> <p>All publications were entered in the FWF’s database manually and with the utmost care when the final project reports were received. Nevertheless, it is not possible to rule out minor errors entirely. Moreover, some systematic problems need to be solved in the future; the FWF is currently preparing to implement a research information system in which FWF-funded researchers will be able to enter and update their research data on an ongoing basis.</p> <ul> <li>Due to the amount of data involved, it was not possible to check the current open access status of all publications twice. The last check was performed in January 2019.</li> <li>In some cases, the embargo period may have expired after submission, and publications labelled o<em>ther open access</em> in the FWF’s database may now be accessible through <em>green open access.</em></li> <li>Whenever the status "peer-reviewed" could not be clearly identified according to FWF guidelines, the publications were classified as non peer-reviewed.</li> <li>Openly available non peer-reviewed publications were entered as <em>other open access</em>.</li> </ul>
Long-term, Open-label Safety Extension Study of Retigabine/Ezogabine in Pediatric Subjects (>= 12 Years Old) With POS or LGS
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01668654. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of T4090 Ophthalmic Solution Versus Rhopressa® Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06394973. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Different Glaucoma Treatments Effect on Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation With Postural Change in Eyes With Open-angle Glaucoma
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02868502. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 14.
Open Label Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Long-Term Immunogenicity of ARCT-021
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04728347. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Phase III Open-Label Extension Study Of Gabapentin As Adjunctive Therapy In Japanese Pediatric Patients With Partial Seizures
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00620555. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
3-year, Open-Label Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Lorecivivint in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04931667. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
An Expanded Access, Open-Label Study of Obinutuzumab (GA101) Plus Chlorambucil in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01868893. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A 2-Part, Phase 2 Open-label and Crossover Study of Belumosudil for Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02688647. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
An Open-label Safety Study of Lusutrombopag (S-888711) in Adults With Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01129024. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Bioequivalence Study With Clinical Endpoint Comparing Brinzolamide 1% Ophthalmic Suspension to Azopt® 1% Ophthalmic Suspension In the Treatment of Chronic Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02512042. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Effect of Travoprost 0.004% on Retinal Oximetry in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01711177. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Phase 1b/2, Multicenter, Open-label Study of ACP-196 in Subjects With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02586857. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Study of 0.03% Bimatoprost in the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02020512. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
An Open Label Dose Escalation Study Of E7080
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00121719. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 0.
Open-Label Creatine Study for Female Meth Users
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02189915. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
An Open-label, Single-dose, Single-centre Study, Investigating the Pharmacokinetics of BIA 2-093
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02281422. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.