Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41,236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41,236 results for “Reviewers”
Fig. 12 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Fig. 12. Habitus photographs of the species of the Eupotemus carinaticollis species group, holotypes: A–C – E. carinaticollis (Basilewsky, 1956); D–F – E. uluguru sp. nov.; G–I – E. taianus sp. nov.
Fig. 1 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Fig. 1. Distribution and phylogenetic relationships of Epimetopidae genera. A – summary of all known records of Epimetopidae, mapped by genera. Records for American Epimetopus adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ (2012). B–E – phylogenetic relationship among genera based on morphological characters (B–C) and DNA data (D–E): B–C – strict consensus tree of the morphology-based maximum parsimony analysis (B – complete tree with bootstrap supports; C – Georissidae + Epimetopidae subtree with characters mapped). D – Bayesian maximum credibility tree based on cox1, 16S, 18S and 28S sequences, with posterior probability of particular clades. E – morphological characters mapped on the molecular topology of Epimetopidae constrained as sister to all other hydrophilid families following the topology by Lඳ et al. (2020).
Fig. 8 in Review of the genus Cavelerius (Heteroptera: Blissidae) with descriptions of three new species from China and Southeast Asia
Fig. 8. Paratype of Cavelerius obscuratus Slater & Miyamoto, 1963 and labels. a – paratype, dorsal view; b – labels (Photographed by Steve Thurston, AMNH).
Fig. 2 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Fig. 2. Morphology of mouthparts and head appendages of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–I – Eupotemus Ji & Jäch, 1998: A, C, E, F, H – E. smithi sp. nov., B, D, G – E. limicola (Delève, 1967), I – E. cameroonensis sp. nov. J–Q – Eumetopus Balfour-Browne, 1949: J, L, M, N, P – E. schuelkei Jäch, 2002, Q – E. bullatus (Sharp, 1875), K, L*, O – E. sp. from Sri Lanka. R–Z, a–l – Epimetopus Lacordaire, 1854: R–W – E. mendeli Fikáček et al., 2011, X–Z, a–c – E. costaricensis Perkins, 1979, g, j – E. thermarum Schwarz & Barber, 1917, e, k – E. trogoides (Sharp, 1874), h – E. costatus group, f, i, l – E. punctipennis Perkins, 1979. Body parts: A–B, J–K, R, X, g–i – labrum; C, L, S, Y – mandibles; D, L*, e–f – mandibular apex; E, M, T, Z – maxilla; U – detail of basal part of ultimate palpomere; F–G, N–O, V, a–b, j–l – mentum and prementum; H–I, P–Q, W, c – antenna. Not to scale.
Fig. 8 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Fig. 8. Male genitalia of the species of the Eupotemus limicola species group, holotypes. A–C, R–S – E. bilobatus sp. nov.; D–F, T–U – E. cameroonensis sp. nov.; G–I, V–W – E. ophioglossus sp. nov.; J–L, X–Y – E. smithi sp. nov.; M–Q – E. limicola (Delève, 1967). A, D, G, J, M – dorsal view; B, E, H, K, N – lateral view; C, F, I, L – ventral view; O – apex of the median lobe, dorsal view; P, R, T, V, X – fork of the median lobe; Q, S, U, W, Y – apex of parameres in lateral view.
Fig. 10 in Review of the genus Cavelerius (Heteroptera: Blissidae) with descriptions of three new species from China and Southeast Asia
Fig. 10. Paratype of Cavelerius sweeti Slater & Miyamoto, 1963 and labels. a – paratype, dorsal view; b – labels (Photographed by Steve Thurston, AMNH).
Fig. 2 in Review of the genus Cavelerius (Heteroptera: Blissidae) with descriptions of three new species from China and Southeast Asia
Fig. 2. Cavelerius antennatus Slater & Miyamoto, 1963. a – male abdominal dorsum, dorsal view; b – basal part of male abdominal dorsum, enlarged; c – pygophore, posterodorsal view; d–g – left paramere, four different aspects; h–i – phallus, dorsal and lateral view; j – sperm reservoir and adjoining portion of phallus, dorsal view.
Fig. 6 in Review of the genus Cavelerius (Heteroptera: Blissidae) with descriptions of three new species from China and Southeast Asia
Fig. 6. Cavelerius minor Slater & Miyamoto, 1963. a – male abdominal dorsum, dorsal view; b – basal part of male abdominal dorsum, enlarged; c – pygophore, posterodorsal view; d–g – left paramere, four different aspects; h–j – phallus, three different aspects; k – sperm reservoir and adjoining portion of phallus, dorsal view.
Fig. 4 in The family Epimetopidae (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea): review of current knowledge, genus-level phylogeny, and taxonomic revision of Eupotemus
Fig. 4. Head and leg morphology of the genera of Epimetopidae. A–B, H, L – Eumetopus acutimontis Ji & Jäch, 1998; D, M – Eumetopus schuelkei Jäch, 2002; C, K–L, Q – Eupotemus smithi sp. nov.; F–G – Epimetopus punctipennis Perkins, 1979 (adopted from Pൾ*©κංඇඌ 2012); E, I–J, R – Epimetopus mendeli Fikáček, Barclay & Perkins, 2011; N–O – Epimetopus costaricensis Perkins, 1979. A – head in dorsolateral view (can – clypeal canthus causing the eye emargination); B–C – head in dorsal view (arrow – the ridge dividing anterior declined part of clypeus); D – mentum and maxilla; E – head in ventral view; F–G – occipital part of the head with median raised tubercle, dorsolateral view (arrows: parallel impressions corresponding to ventral ridges of pronotal hood); H–I – antenna, scapus largely omitted; J – labial palp; K – apical tibial armature, ventral view, mesothoracic leg; L – apical tibial armature and tarsus, ventral view, metathoracic leg; M – mesotibia; N–O – tarsus (N – posterior; O – anterior); P–R – metatibia, dorsal view. Not to scale.
Fig. 12 in Review of the genus Cavelerius (Heteroptera: Blissidae) with descriptions of three new species from China and Southeast Asia
Fig. 12. Cavelerius tinctus (Distant, 1903). a – male abdominal dorsum, dorsal view; b – basal part of male abdominal dorsum, enlarged; c – pygophore, posterodorsal view; d–g – left paramere, four different aspects; h–j – phallus, three different aspects; k – sperm reservoir and adjoining portion of phallus, dorsal view.
Figures 13–14. Xestipyge skelleyi, male. 13 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 13–14. Xestipyge skelleyi, male. 13) Pygidia and elytral apices, apicodorsal view. 14) Lateral habitus.
Figures 3–5. Xestipyge species. 3 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 3–5. Xestipyge species. 3) X. conjunctum, SC, USA, female pygidium. 4) X. conjunctum, right elytron. 5) X. geminatum, NC, USA, right elytron.
Figures 15–19. Xestipyge species tegmena, dorsal view. 15 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 15–19. Xestipyge species tegmena, dorsal view. 15) X. garbigliettii, Durango, Mexico. 16) X. multistriatum, Veracruz, Mexico. 17) X. conjunctum, SC, USA. 18) X. skelleyi, holotype. 19) X. geminatum, NC, USA.
Figures 1–2 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 1–2. Dorsal habitus of Xestipyge species. 1) X. conjunctum, SC, USA. 2) X. geminatum, NC, USA.
Figures 8–9 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 8–9. Xestipyge multistriatum, Veracruz, Mexico. 8) Dorsal habitus. 9) Close-up of elytral sculpture.
Figures 6–7 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 6–7. Xestipyge garbigliettii, Durango, Mexico. 6) Dorsal habitus. 7) Close-up of elytral sculpture.
Figures 10–12. Xestipyge skelleyi, paratype male. 10 in A brief review of the New World Xestipyge Marseul (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Dendrophilinae: Paromalini) with description of a new species from the southwestern USA
Figures 10–12. Xestipyge skelleyi, paratype male. 10) Genital capsule. 11) Dorsal habitus. 12) Ventral habitus.
Figs 1–8. 1–4 in A review of the genus Alcathousiella Monné, 2005 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)
Figs 1–8. 1–4. Alcathousiella giesberti sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (FSCA). 1. Dorsal habitus. 2. Ventral habitus. 3. Lateral habitus. 4. Head, frontal view. 5–8. Alcathousiella polyrhaphoides White, 1855. Males from Bolivia (FSCA). 5. Head, frontal view. 6. Dorsal habitus. 7. Ventral habitus. 8. Lateral habitus.
Figs 9–18. 9–11, 3–15 in A review of the genus Alcathousiella Monné, 2005 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae)
Figs 9–18. 9–11, 3–15. Alcathousiella polyrhaphoides (White, 1855) (FSCA). 9–10. Elytral pubescence pattern. 9. Male 1. 10. Male 2. 11. Detail of protarsomeres. 13. Slide of one of the syntype specimens (BMNH), deposited at Coleção de Imagens de material-tipo J.S. Moure (DZUP). 14. Male antennomere III with internal spine. 15. Detail of distal ⅓ of elytra. 12, 16–18. A. giesberti sp. nov. (FSCA). 12. Detail of protarsomeres. 16. Detail of distal third of elytra. 17. Male genitalia in lateral view. 18. Schemes of male genitalia: A= median lobe in dorsal view; B = median lobe in lateral view; C = tegmen in dorsal view; D = tegmen in lateral view; E = sternite VIII. Abbreviations: ap = apophysis; ar = arms; ba = basal apophyses; pa = parameres; ri = ring part; ro = roof; ts = tegmen struts.
Figs. 2–13. 2, 3. Live M in A Taxonomic Review of the Trapdoor Spider Genus Myrmekiaphila (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Cyrtaucheniidae)
Figs. 2–13. 2, 3. Live M. neilyoungi from Santa Rosa Co., Florida. 2. Male specimen. 3. Female specimen. 4–13. Color images of male pedipalps, ventral view (top of frame) and retrolateral view (bottom); 6, 12, 13 show ventral view only. 4. M. foliata, Knox Co. Tennessee (rl5retrolateral ledge). 5. M. comstocki, Travis Co., Texas. 6. M. coreyi, Thomas Co., Georgia. 7. M. fluviatilis, Marshall Co., Alabama (ap5accessory prong, e5embolus). 8. M. jenkinsi, Van Buren Co., Tennessee. 9. M. torreya, Liberty Co., Florida. 10. M. neilyoungi, Tuscaloosa Co., Alabama. 11. M. millerae, Grenada Co., Mississippi. 12. M. howelli, Newton Co., Mississippi (le5ledge). 13. M. minuta, Alachua Co., Florida.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.