Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,920
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,920 results for “implications”
FIGURES 13–24 in The floral organogenesis of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei (Sapindaceae) and its systematic implications
FIGURES 13–24. Floral development of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei. Fig. 13. Sequential initiation of a second adaxial petal primordium. The other one is hidden between sepals 1–3. Fig. 14. A young flower showing sepals, petals, stamens and carpel primordia (see stars). Fig. 15. Almost simultaneous initiation of the five petals and eight stamen primordia. There is an overlap between the initiation of the two petals next to sepal five and the last two stamens (arrows). Figs. 16 & 17. Slightly older stages, stamen primordia overtake the two delayed petal primordia (arrows) in size. Fig. 18. Differentiation of central carpellary area. Fig. 19. Carpel primordia initiate on the floral apex (see stars). Figs. 20 & 21. Successive stages of stamen diferentiation and carpel growth. Carpels expand progressively around a central meristem and develop a trilete apical slit. Two petals remain smaller for a long time (see arrows). Note the difference in size of the different petals. Figs. 22. Older stages of stamen diferentiation and carpel growth, showing the hairs starting to appear on the ovary and two smaller petals (see arrows). Fig. 23. Preanthesis staminate flower, showing parts of long folded filaments (see arrows) and disk; the degenerated ovary remains hidden. Fig. 24. In pistillate flowers, the ovary bulges out and the stamen development is arrested. Abbreviations in the images, C, carpel; F, floral primodia; N, disk; O, ovary; P, petal; S, stamen; and Se, sepal. Scale bars Figs. 13 & 15–21=50 μm, Figs. 14 & 22=100 μm, Figs. 23 & 24=200 μm.
FIGURES 1–12 in The floral organogenesis of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei (Sapindaceae) and its systematic implications
FIGURES 1–12. Floral morphology and organogenesis of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei. Fig. 1. Longitudinal section of lateral shoot of inflorescence with three flowers at different developmental stages. Differentiation of petals visible in top flower. Fig. 2. Transverse section of a young flower showing the arrangement and position of all organs. Fig. 3. A pistillate flower, showing bulging ovary, closed slits and degenerated stamens. Fig. 4. Staminate flower with stamens removed showing the extent of development of the extrastaminal disk. Fig. 5. Mature staminate flower with expanded filaments and nectary disk. Fig. 6. Transverse section of ovary, showing axile placentation. Fig. 7. A mature pistillate flower partly dissected showing two parallel ovules per locule. Fig. 8. Transverse section of ovary, showing the development of one or two ovules and the degeneration of the other ones. Fig. 9. Inflorescence primordium with more than five bracts being initiated in a spiral sequence. Lateral shoots arise in the axil of the bracts (visible where bracts are removed). Fig. 10. View of two floral primodia; the topflower shows the initiation of three sepals. Fig. 11. Apical view of lateral shoot with three flowers; sepal initiation visible on the top flower. Fig. 12. Five sepals are initiated sequentially. The arrow points to the first petal. Abbreviations in the images, B, bract; F, floral primodium; N, disk; P, petal; and Se, sepal. Scale bars: Figs. 9–12=50 μm, Figs. 2, 6 & 8=200 μm, Figs. 1, 3–5 & 7=500 μm.
FIGURE 1 in On the neglected Scopoli's name Senecio littoralis (Compositae) and its nomenclatural implications
FIGURE 1. Neotype of the name Senecio littoralis (GZU 000235952). Copyright of the Herbarium GZU of the Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
FIGURE 3 in Plastid phylogenomic study of grape species and its implications for evolutionary study and conservation of Vitis
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree of Vitis based on large single copy region inferred from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on IQTREE website. Purple branches represent species from North America, yellow branch represent species from Europe, and green branches represent species from Asia. Value of ultrafast bootstrap approximation are indicated on the branches.
FIGURE 2 in Plastid phylogenomic study of grape species and its implications for evolutionary study and conservation of Vitis
FIGURE 2. Sliding window analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of 13 Vitis taxa (window length: 600 bp, step size: 50 bp). X- axis: position of the midpoint of a window, Y-axis: nucleotide diversity of each window.
FIGURE 1 in Diversification of inflorescence types in Portulaca (Portulacaceae) and its systematic implications
FIGURE 1. Bayesian allcompat tree of Portulacaceae and outgroups. Analysis of a combined matrix of chloroplast atpI-atpH, trnK-matK, and trnT-psbD intergenic spacers, ndhA intron, and coding ndhF sequences. Nodes with posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are indicated.
FIGURE 2 in Diversification of inflorescence types in Portulaca (Portulacaceae) and its systematic implications
FIGURE 2. Ancestral character reconstruction of inflorescence types in Portulacaceae and outgroups. Phylogenetic tree with the highest likelihood retrieved from the Bayesian analysis of a combined matrix of atpI-atpH, trnK-matK, and trnT-psbD intergenic spacers, ndhA intron, and coding ndhF sequences. A) Parsimony reconstruction. B) Maximum likelihood reconstruction; proportional likelihoods for each character state are shown as pie charts at nodes.
FIGURE 4 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 4. Pollen grain ornamentation in Lentibulariaceae and pollen types in Utricularia L. Genlisea A.St.-Hil.: G. filiformis (A); Pinguicula L. ser. Albidae Casper: P. filifolia subsp. alba (B); Utricularia L.: Type I, U. juncea (C); Type II, U. simulans (D); Type III, U. foliosa (E). Bars = 10 μm.
FIGURE 1 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 1. Photomicrographs of pollen grains of Genlisea A.St.-Hil. and Pinguicula L. ser. Albidae Casper. Genlisea filiformis (A, polar view); Pinguicula albida (B, polar view; C, equatorial view); P. cubensis (D, polar view; E, equatorial view); P. filifolia subsp. alba (F, polar view; G, equatorial view); P. filifolia subsp. filifolia (H, polar view; I, equatorial view). Bars = 10 μm.
FIGURE 6 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 6. Pollen types (I, II and III) identified in Utricularia species according to cluster analysis based on morphometric characteristics. U.fol = U. foliosa, U.gib = U. gibba, U.jun = U. juncea, U.pus = U. pusilla, U.res = U. resupinata, U.sim = U. simulans, U.sub = U. subulata.
FIGURE 5 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 5. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) performed on the pollen metric variables for Genlisea, Pinguicula, and Utricularia. G.fil = Genlisea filiformis, P.alb = Pinguicula albida, P.cub= P. cubensis, P.fil.a = P. filifolia subsp. alba, P.fil.f = Pinguicula filifolia subsp. filifolia, U.fol = Utricularia foliosa, U.gib = U. gibba, U.jun = U. juncea, U.pus = U. pusilla, U.res = U. resupinata, U.sim = U. simulans, U.sub = U. subulata.
FIGURE 3 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 3. Photomicrographs of pollen grains of Utricularia L. Utricularia pusilla (A, polar view; B, equatorial view); U. resupinata (C, polar view; D, equatorial view; E, ornamentation); U. simulans (F, polar view; G, equatorial view); U. subulata (H, polar view; I, equatorial view). Bars = 10 μm.
FIGURE 2 in Pollen morphology of selected species of Lentibulariaceae Rich. from Western Cuba based on light microscopy and its taxonomic implications
FIGURE 2. Photomicrographs of pollen grains of Utricularia L. Utricularia foliosa (A, polar view; B, equatorial view; C, ornamentation); U. gibba (D, polar view; E, equatorial view; F, ornamentation); U. juncea (G, polar view, H, equatorial view; I, ornamentation). Bars = 10 μm.
FIGURE 7 in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 7. Colour photographs of leaves: Monotes autennei. A. Duvigneaud 5260, B. Duvigneaud & Timperman 2545. M. katangensis: C. Duvigneaud & Timperman 2233; D. Duvigneaud & Timperman 2641. Scale bar = 5 cm.
FIGURE 8 in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 8. Colour photographs of leaves in members of Monotes. A1-A2. M. africanus (Duvigneaud 2006: 2 leaves). B. M. doryphorus (Duvigneaud 5267). C. M. hirtii (Duvigneaud 3513). D. M. katangensis (Duvigneaud & Timperman 2641). E. M. pearsonii (Duvigneaud 5233). Scale bar = 5 cm.
FIGURE 3 A–H in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 3 A–H. Details of lower surface of the leaf. A. Monotes adenophyllus var. adenophyllus (Duvigneaud 5112). B. M. adenophyllus var. homblei (Duvigneaud 4601). C. M. africanus (Duvigneaud 2006). D. M. autennei (Duvigneaud 5260). E. M. dasyanthus var. dasyanthus (Duvigneaud & Timperman 2341). F. M. dasyanthus var. heterotrichus (Duvigneaud 1141). G. M. dasyanthus var. mutetetwa (Duvigneaud 950). H. M. doryphorus (Duvigneaud 5267).
FIGURE 5 A–H in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 5 A–H. SEM photographs of leaf blade surfaces for 12 members of Monotes. A. M. adenophyllus var. adenophyllus, lower surface (Delevoy 524, type of M. delevoyi). B. M. autennei, lower surface (Duvigneaud 3267 (type of M. autennei)). C. M. autennei, upper surface (Duvigneaud 3267). D. M. hypoleucus var. angolensis, lower surface (Duvigneaud 950M2, type of M. oxyphyllinus). E. M. hypoleucus var. angolensis, upper surface (Duvigneaud 950M2). F. M. hypoleucus var. caloneurus, lower surface (Schmitz 1332 (type of M. schmitzii)). G. M. hypoleucus var. caloneurus, upper surface (Schmitz 1332 (type of M. schmitzii)). H. M. hypoleucus var. hypoleucus, lower surface (Welwitsch 1036 (type of M. hypoleucus)).
FIGURE 12 in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 12. Colour photographs of leaves: Monotes hypoleucus var. caloneurus. A. Duvigneaud 4764, B. Duvigneaud 4850, C. Duvigneaud 3203, D. Duvigneaud 3338, E. Duvigneaud 2123, F. Duvigneaud 5095, G. Duvigneaud & Timpeman 2109. Scale bar = 5 cm.
FIGURE 2 in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 2. Inflorescence architecture in Monotes. A. Axillary cymes (M. adenophyllus, M. africanus, M. doryphorus, M. hypoleucus, M. glaber, M. magnificus, M. pearsonii). B. Short terminal congested panicle (often subtended by a variable number of axillary cymes) (M. dasyanthus, M. duvigneaudii, M. hirtii). C. Long terminal thyrses (M. autennei, M. katangensis). D. Axillary panicle or thyrse born below the leaves (M. rubriglans subsp. upembensis).
FIGURE 4 A–H in Revision of the genus Monotes (Dipterocarpaceae) in D.R. Congo, with implications for Angola and its distinction from Marquesia
FIGURE 4 A–H. Details of upper surface of the leaf. A. Monotes adenophyllus var. adenophyllus (Duvigneaud 5044). B. M. adenophyllus var. homblei (Duvigneaud 4570). C. M. africanus (Duvigneaud 2006). D. M. autennei (Plancke 111/1532). E. M. dasyanthus var. dasyanthus (Duvigneaud & Timperman 2341). F. M. dasyanthus var. heterotrichus (Duvigneaud 4493). G. M. dasyanthus var. mutetetwa (Duvigneaud 950). H. M. doryphorus (Duvigneaud 5267).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.