Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Global and temporal spread of a taxonomically challenging invasive ant, Brachyponera chinensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 1. Distribution of Brachyponera chinensis in Asia presenting records identified as part of the B. chinensis species complex (light gray) and confirmed records of B. chinensis s.s. (dark gray).

Fig. 4 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 4. MDS on the different sizes, sites and seasonal independent groups. The total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults (S = 3 8 cm). The three sites sampled along the catchment were: site 1 (P1), an upstream first order section of the basin near its spring; site 2 (P2), a second order middle section of the basin; and site 3 (P3), a downstream third order section of the basin. Seasons compared were: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July andAugust) and Spring=PRI (September, October and November).

Fig. 5 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 5. MDS on the different sizes, sites and seasonal groups. Total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults(S = 3 8 cm) and seasons were: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July andAugust) and Spring=PRI (September, October and November).

Fig. 2 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 2. Geographical location of the rio Ribeirão basin, with indication of the three sampling sites (P1, P2, and P3).

Fig. 3 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 3. UPGMA cluster analysis using Morisita-Horn similarity coefficient on the different sizes, sites and seasonal groups. Total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults (S = 3 8 cm). The three sites sampled along the catchment were: site 1 (P1), an upstream first order section of the basin near its spring; site 2 (P2), a second order middle section of the basin; and site 3 (P3), a downstream third order section of the basin. The seasons are: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July and August), and Spring=PRI (September, October, November). A (> 70 % similarity) = with a predominance of Autochthonous Insects, Allochthonous Insects and Non Identifiable Arthropod Parts; B (> 80 % similarity) = with a predominance of Detritus and Allochthonous and Autochthonous Insects; and C (> 80 % similarity)= with a predominance of Allochthonous plants and Detritus.

Fig. 1. Monthly rainfall for 2002 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 1. Monthly rainfall for 2002 (x) and 2003 (filled triangles) in the study region, and average temperature in 2002 (filled squares) and 2003 (open squares). Source: IAPAR.

Fig. 5 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 5. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Anastrepha fraterculus in (A) pears, (B) peaches, and (C) mandarins. Cn = Canelones, Py = Paysandú; FTD = flies per trap per d; Af = Anastrepha fraterculus.

Fig. 6 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 6. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata males (M) in Jackson traps (Cc) and females (H) in McPhail traps. A, B, C, D = cultivars where fruit infestation was recorded (A, B = Canelones; C, D = Paysandú); E, F, G, H = cultivars where no fruit infestation was recorded (E, F = Paysandú; G, H = San José).

Fig. 4 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 4. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in mandarins (A) with fruit infestation and (B) without fruit infestation. Py = Paysandú, SJ = San José, W = Washington; FTD: flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 3 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 3. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in (A) pears and (B) peaches. Cn = Canelones, SJ = San José; FTD = flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 2 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of accumulated captures and fruit infestation of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 seasons. Ap = Apple: ERO = Early Red One, RCh = Red Chief, RD = Red Delicious; Pch = Peach: JG = June Gold, EL = Elegant Lady, RM = Rey del Monte, PC = Pavía Canario, F = Forastero; Nc = Nectarine: L = Lara, F = Fantasía; Pr = Pear: W = William's; Mn = Mandarin: E = Elenadalle, O = Ortanique, S = Satsuma; Or = Orange: V = Valencia, WN = Washington Navel; Gf = Grapefruit: SR = Star Rubí. Cc = C. capitata, Af = A. fraterculus. The accumulated captures per season were calculated by adding captures from the date that traps were installed (1 Sep, 30 Oct, and 1 Nov 2014 in San José, Canelones, and Paysandú, respectively) until 30 Jun 2015, and for the same period from spring 2015 until Jun 2016.

Fig. 1 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 1. Average number of fruit flies per McPhail trap per d (FTD) of Ceratitis capitata (Cc) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Af) in Paysandú (Py) and Canelones (Cn).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →

Fig. 2 in Insights Into The Spatial And Temporal Ecology Of The Sunda Clouded Leopard Neofelis Diardi

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of hourly activity for Sunda clouded leopard based on 135 independent photo-captures.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →

Fig. 1 in Insights Into The Spatial And Temporal Ecology Of The Sunda Clouded Leopard Neofelis Diardi

Fig. 1. Study site, showing the home-range of the Sunda clouded leopard derived from radio telemetry.

Figure 3 in Temporal dynamics of the recruitment of glass eels in two valleys of French Polynesia (Tahiti and Moorea Islands)

Figure 3. – Annual monitoring of glass eels recruitment for each of the three species in: A: Moorea; B: Tahiti; C: Moorea and Tahiti, given in number of specimens per month.

Figure 4 in Temporal dynamics of the recruitment of glass eels in two valleys of French Polynesia (Tahiti and Moorea Islands)

Figure 4. – Composition of the recruitment of Anguilla species from Moorea and Tahiti Islands given in percent; * test chiº, p-value <0.001.

Figure 5 in Temporal dynamics of the recruitment of glass eels in two valleys of French Polynesia (Tahiti and Moorea Islands)

Figure 5. – Mean length (in mm) of the glass eel specimens at recruitment, for the three species in Moorea and Tahiti islands; * test chiº, p-value <0.001.

Figure 2 in Temporal dynamics of the recruitment of glass eels in two valleys of French Polynesia (Tahiti and Moorea Islands)

Figure 2. – Annual monitoring of glass eels recruitment in the Opunohu River on the Moorea Island and in the Vaituoru River on the Tahiti Island per year, given in number of specimens caught per day.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in South American Sea Lions Otaria flavescens, a good indicator of relative spatial and temporal changes in the distribution and abundance of marine resources?

Fig. 2. Frequency of occurrence of the main prey taxa in the diet of Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800) from the San MatÍas Gulf, Argentina.

Fig. 3 in A influência de um sangradouro na distribuição espaço-temporal do isópode Tholozodium rhombofrontalis (Isopoda, Sphaeromatidae)

Fig. 3. Perfil topográfico dos três locais de coleta (distante, intermediário e sangradouro) ao longo das oito amostragens realizadas na praia de Barrancos, Paraná, Brasil.