Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in The phyllostomid bat (Mammalia, Chiroptera) assemblage in a fragmented landscape in Midwestern Brazil

Fig. 1. Sampling points at Fazenda Dona Amélia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (circles, points in the large fragment; stars, points in the riparian forest; triangles, points in the small fragments).

Fig. 4 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 4. Activity period of (A) two glossophagine species (Anoura caudifer + Glossophaga soricina) and Phyllostomus discolor on Musa paradisiaca inflorescence, and of (B) two approaching strategies (upside landing and hovering) performed by two glossophagine species in an orchard located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 3. Phyllostomus discolor (Wagner, 1843) with its wings completely open and its head directed toward the flowers performing the downside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 2 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 2. Glossophaga soricina (Pallas, 1766) with its wings folded alongside the body performing the upside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Figs 2, 3 in Susceptibility of targets to the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus are proportional to their abundance in Atlantic Forest fragments?

Figs 2, 3. Two records of the approach of Desmodus rotundus (É. Geoffroy, 1810): 2, a bat landing on a trunk near a deer (Mazama americana); 3, a bat on the ground very close to a tapir (Tapirus terrestris).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Susceptibility of targets to the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus are proportional to their abundance in Atlantic Forest fragments?

Fig. 1. Study area located in the municipalities of ItajÁ and Aporé, state of GoiÁs, BraZil. Black dots represent the sites where the camera traps were set up.

Fig. 1 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 1. Anoura caudifer (É. Geoffroy, 1818) with its snout partially inserted in floral tube performing the hovering strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 3 in Activity patterns of frugivorous phyllostomid bats in an urban fragment in southwest Amazonia, Brazil

Fig. 3. Number of captures of the four most abundant species, according to the rainfall in the ParQue Zoobotânico, Rio Branco, state of Acre, northern Brazil.

Fig. 2 in Activity patterns of frugivorous phyllostomid bats in an urban fragment in southwest Amazonia, Brazil

Fig. 2. Number of captures of the four most abundant species throughout the night period, according to hours after sunset, in the ParQue Zoobotânico, Rio Branco, state of Acre, northern Brazil.

Fig. 1 in Activity patterns of frugivorous phyllostomid bats in an urban fragment in southwest Amazonia, Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the forest fragment (ParQue Zoobotânico) in the urban area of Rio Branco, Acre, southwestern Amazonia, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in Consistency in fruit preferences across the geographical range of the frugivorous bats Artibeus, Carollia and Sturnira (Chiroptera)

Fig. 2. Distribution of three bat genera (Artibeus, Carollia and Sturnira – solid gray) and the four most frequent plant genera (Cecropia, Ficus, Piper and Solanum – dotted pattern) in their diet in the Neotropical region. Sources: bat distribution follows GARDNER (2008); plant distribution follows JARAMILLO & MANOS (2001) for Piper; KNAPP et al. (2004) for Solanum, LOBOVA et al. (2003) for Cecropia; SHANAHAN et al. (2001) for Ficus.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Consistency in fruit preferences across the geographical range of the frugivorous bats Artibeus, Carollia and Sturnira (Chiroptera)

Fig. 1. Number of records for the four fruit genera most frequently consumed by Artibeus, Carollia and Sturnira (total number of records for each bat species) based on literature review.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 3 in Association of bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) and bats: Richness and host specificity in Western Mexico

Fig. 3. Taxonomic trees with the STD value for the hosts that presented more than two species of parasites. *The value represents the number of steps to get from one host to another since there are only two host species.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Association of bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) and bats: Richness and host specificity in Western Mexico

Fig. 2. Interaction network between bats and ectoparasites captured in Western Mexico. The lines represent interactions between species, and the width of the line indicates the strength of the interactions.

Fig. 1 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 1. Map showing the distribution of bats sampled from site 1 (Santa Cruz, dark green) and site 2 (Talamanca, light green), related to ectoparasites a) and GI parasites b). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 5 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic relationships between the sequences of the Rickettsia sp. detected from the positive immature tick and those available in the GenBank database, using maximum likelihood analysis on the gltA gene. Rickettsia felis (JQ674484) was used as outgroup.

Fig. 4 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 4. Joblingia sp. tree based on 18S rRNA sequences here generated (in bold) with those available from GenBank database by using maximum likelihood analysis. Arachinida (KY554629) was used as outgroup.

Fig. 3 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on maximum likelihood analysis of the 18S rRNA sequences obtained from bat mites (consensus sequences of this study are bold) and other sequences available in the GenBank database. Poecilochirus sp. (FJ911802) and Pergamasus sp. (FJ911803) were used as outgroup.

Fig. 6 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 6. Phylogenetic tree based on maximum likelihood analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences obtained from bat ticks (consensus sequences of this study are bold) and other sequences available in the GenBank database. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (MF425982) was used as outgroup.

Fig. 2 in Parasitic fauna of bats from Costa Rica

Fig. 2. Ectoparasite genera found on bats from Cost Rica a) Cameronieta sp. female specimen b) Mitonyssoides sp. male specimen c) Joblingia sp. female specimen d) Ornithodoros sp.