Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,864
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,864 results for “live”
Figs 2–15. Live specimens. 2–4 in Evolution of genital asymmetry, exaggerated eye stalks, and extreme palpal elongation in Panjange spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae)
Figs 2–15. Live specimens. 2–4. Pa. lanthana, Mt. Isarog, Ƌ, ♀ with eggsac, and penultimate Ƌ. 5. Pa. malagos Huber sp. nov., Ƌ. 6–7. Pa. casaroro Huber sp. nov., ƋƋ. 8–10. Pa. camiguin Huber sp. nov. 8. ♀ with parasitized eggsac, from Camiguin Island. 9. Ƌ from Bohol Island. 10. Ƌ from Camiguin Island. 11–13. Pa. dinagat Huber sp. nov., Ƌ, ♀ with eggsac, and penultimate Ƌ. 14–15. Pa. marilog Huber sp. nov., ƋƋ showing color variation.
Peluang Prabowo di Jatim: Update Malam SBOTV Surabaya (Live)
<p>“Peluang Prabowo di Jatim”, <em>Update Malam SBOTV Surabaya (Live)</em>, 11-09-2018, pukul 17-30-18.30 WIB</p>
Dataset for article Direct Evidence of the Benzylium and Tropylium Cations as the Two Long-Lived Isomers of C7H7+
<p>Dataset for article Direct Evidence of the Benzylium and Tropylium Cations as the Two Long-Lived Isomers of C7H7+ (DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201800744)</p> <p>-1- Experimental data: raw data and python script to build the final data for Figs 1 and 2 of the main manuscript and Figs S1 and S2 of supporting information.</p> <p>-2- Computational results: Gaussian files for all the calculated species.</p>
Dataset (encounter histories of female bats) used in the analysis for the paper Culina et al.: Live fast, don't die young: survival reproduction trade-offs in long-lived income breeders
<p>Two data files (Md_capture_H, Mn_capture_H) represent the capture histories of females of two species (Myotis daubentonii = Md, and M. nattereri=Mn). These capture histories were used to run multi-event-capture-mark-recapture model, as described in the paper, and in the readme document in this data package.<br> </p>
ICSE 2018 and ICPC 2019 Research Dataset on Live Programming
<p>The release includes a dataset analyzed in the two following research works: </p> <p>"The Road to Live Programming: Insights From the Practice." (ICSE 2018)</p> <p>Abstract: Live Programming environments allow programmers to get feedback instantly while changing software. Liveness is gaining attention among industrial and open-source communities; several IDEs offer high degrees of liveness. While several studies looked at how programmers work during software evolution tasks, none of them consider live environments. We conduct such a study based on an analysis of 17 programming sessions of practitioners using Pharo, a mature Live Programming environment. The study is complemented by a survey and subsequent analysis of 16 programming sessions in additional languages, e.g., JavaScript. We document the approaches taken by developers during their work. We find that some liveness features are extensively used, and have an impact on the way developers navigate source code and objects in their work.</p> <p>"Live Programming and Software Evolution: Questions during a Programming Change Task" (ICPC 2019)</p> <p>Abstract: Several studies provide the questions developers ask during software evolution tasks, providing foundations for subsequent work. Nevertheless, none of them focus on Live Programming environments that gain in popularity as they are perceived to have a positive effect on programming tasks. Studying the impact of a Live Programming environment on software development activities is thus the goal of this study.</p> <p>In a partial replication of the study by Sillito et al., we conducted 17 software evolution sessions in a Live Programming environment and report 1,161 developer questions asked during these sessions. We contrast our results with the results by Sillito et al., focusing on the question occurrences, question complexity and what information participants used to gain a required knowledge. We report eight new questions and observe that the Live Programming facilities do have an impact on the way developers ask questions about source code and use tools to gain corresponding knowledge.</p>
Live Loom - demonstration
<p>Video demonstration of Live Loom, a prototype device for hand-weaving with the support of a programming language.</p>
(06)-He2019A-DS0003 – Tribolium castaneum AGOC #6 subline × foxQ2-5' line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy
<p>(06)-He2019A-DS0003 – <em>Tribolium castaneum</em> AGOC #6 subline × foxQ2-5' line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy</p>
(06)-He2019A-DS0002 – Tribolium castaneum foxQ2-5' line × AGOC #6 subline long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy
<p>(06)-He2019A-DS0002 – <em>Tribolium castaneum</em> foxQ2-5' line × AGOC #6 subline long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy</p>
RES Living Labs Operational Plan
<p>This document aims to provide a solid operating structure for the interaction between the PROSEU team members and the Living Lab. It establishes a set of common goals, clarifies roles and responsibilities between the PROSEU Focal Point and the Living Lab Focal Point and outlines a clear timeline for the activities to be carried out. </p>
ENERGISE Living Lab Country Report - Switzerland
<p>In Switzerland, the two ENERGISE Living Labs (ELLs) took place in the City and Canton of Geneva, in the French-speaking region of the country. The first Living Lab (ELL1) included 20 households with diverse profiles, from one- and two-person households to families with two or three children, and with participants of all age groups. A large majority of them lived in multi-family houses or larger apartment buildings, reflecting the housing situation in Switzerland. The second Living Lab (ELL2) was organised in a community of place, a housing cooperative located in the Geneva city center. The participants' profile was also varied in terms of age group and type of households.</p>
ENERGISE Living Lab Country Report - Hungary
<p>The ENERGISE Living Labs in Hungary were located in the town of Gödöllő in Central Hungary in order to provide a better opportunity to make comparisons between the individual (ELL1) and the community or group approach (ELL2). Thus, while an attempt was made to recruit a socio-economically diverse group of participants, the two ELLs had a similar make-up in terms of household types. The final number of households participating in the ENERGISE Living Labs in Hungary was 41. Out of this number 21 participated in ELL1 and 20 in ELL2. It is notable that all 41 households remained engaged in the ELLs up until the end. This report provides a summary of the qualitative and quantitative data as well as a country-level analysis of outcomes.</p>
ENERGISE Living Lab country report - United Kingdom
<p>This national country report describes the two living labs run in the United Kingdom for the pan-European ENERGISE (European Network for Research, Good Practice and Innovation for Sustainable Energy) project funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 framework programme for 36 months (December 2016 - November 2019). The report discusses the main findings arising from the living labs. It also considers some of the implications for policy-making and future research of the project.</p>
ENERGISE Living Lab country report - Finland
<p>ENERGISE Living Labs (ELLs) employ practice-based approaches to reduce energy use in households while co-creating knowledge on why energy-intensive practices are performed and how they depend on the context in which they are performed. Altogether 16 living labs were implemented in eight European countries in 2018.</p> <p>The Finnish ELLs were implemented in two different sites. ELL1 for individual households took place in a Porvoo region, about 50 kilometres from Helsinki and engaged 19 households living mainly in single-family homes. ELL2 (with collective elements) was implemented in Merihaka, urban district close to Helsinki city centre, and 18 households living in apartment buildings in Merihaka joined the ELL challenges and community activities.</p>
ENERGISE Living Lab country report - Ireland
<p>ENERGISE Living Labs (ELLs) employ practice-based approaches to reduce energy use in households while co-creating knowledge on why energy-intensive practices are performed and how they depend on the context in which they are performed. Altogether 16 living labs were implemented in eight European countries in 2018.</p> <p>The Irish ELLs were led by the ENERGISE team from the National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG). The ENERGISE Living Labs were implemented in one county (Tipperary) in the midlands of Ireland, approximately 150 kilometres from Galway City.</p>
A calibrated database of kinematics and EMG of the forearm and hand during activities of daily living
<p>KIN-MUS UJI Dataset contains 572 recordings with anatomical angles and forearm muscle activity of 22 subjects while performing 26 representative activities of daily living. This dataset is, to our knowledge, the biggest currently available hand kinematics and muscle activity dataset to focus on goal-oriented actions. Data were recorded using a CyberGlove instrumented glove and surface EMG electrodes, both properly synchronised. Eighteen hand anatomical angles were obtained from the glove sensors by a validated calibration procedure. Surface EMG activity was recorded from seven representative forearm areas. The statistics verified that data were not affected by the experimental procedures and were similar to the data acquired under real-life conditions.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data Sets</strong>:</p> <p>Data are presented as a Matlab data structure (<em>.mat</em> file). This structure contains all the recorded kinematic and muscle activity data classified as: ADL, phase (reaching, manipulation or release) and subject. The fields contained in the structure are those detailed in the following scheme:</p> <ul> <li>Subject: subject ID;</li> <li>ADL: ADL ID;</li> <li>Phase: phase of movement. 1 corresponds to reaching; 2 corresponds to manipulation; 3 corresponds to releasing.</li> <li>Time: Time stamp</li> <li>Angles (18 columns): Calibrated anatomical angles</li> <li>Muscle activity (7 columns): Normalised signal for the seven representative spot areas, according to [1].</li> </ul> <p>RAW_EMG struct provides the raw sEMG data, without any filter and not resampled, so that researchers may choose to condition the signals as they please<strong>.</strong> The fields contained in this structure are those detailed in the following scheme:</p> <ul> <li>Subject: subject ID;</li> <li>ADL: ADL ID, according to Table 1;</li> <li>Time: Time stamp; this field corresponds with the time stamp of the previous structure.</li> <li>Raw EMG data (7 columns): Raw sEMG data without any filter and not resampled, for the seven representative spot areas according to [1].</li> </ul> <p>[1] Jarque-Bou, N. J., Vergara, M., Sancho-Bru, J. L., Alba, R.-S. & Gracia-Ibáñez, V. Identification of forearm skin zones with similar muscle activation patterns during activities of daily living. <em>J. NeuroEngineering Rehabil. </em>(2018).</p>
ENERGISE LIVING LAB COUNTRY REPORT – GERMANY
<p>The German ENERGISE living labs were rolled out by the LMU ENERGISE team to 40 participant households over the course of eight months from August 2018 to April 2019 in the Oberland region of Bavaria. During that time, over the course of a number of interviews and surveys households in and around the towns of Weilheim (ELL1) and Murnau (ELL2) were asked to do a thorough examination of their practices in the areas of heating and laundry with a specific focus on trying to encourage households to reduce the energy use associated with those practices by means of finding sufficiency focused strategies to enable them to heat less and launder less.</p>
Fig. 15. Live Pleioplectron Hutton, 1896 in Diversity and distribution of Pleioplectron Hutton cave wētā (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae: Macropathinae), with the synonymy of Weta Chopard and the description of seven new species
Fig. 15. Live Pleioplectron Hutton, 1896 in their natural environments. A. P. auratum sp. nov., adult ♂, Whites Beach, Rarangi. B. P. gubernator sp. nov., two adult ♂♂, Three Pointer, Gouland Downs, Heaphy Track. C. P. caudatum sp. nov., adult ♂, Blowfly Hut, Moeraki River, South Westland. D. P. flavicorne sp. nov., sub-adult ♀, Blowfly Hut, Moeraki River, South Westland. E–F. P. crystallae sp. nov. E. Adult ♂, Cave Brook, Gouland Downs, Kahurangi NP. F. Adult ♀ feeding on Racomitrium Brid. moss, Salisbury Lodge, Mt Arthur, Kahurangi NP.
Figure 3. X in Megachile (Megachile) montivaga (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) nesting in live thistle (Asteraceae: Cirsium)
Figure 3. X-ray of three/four nest stems. Nest entrances appeared as darker patches along the stem and larvae at various stages of development were revealed. The small ovals embedded in the pith are fly pupae, reared and identified as Scathophagidae sp.; they appear to be phytophagous and unassociated with the bees. The height of each number is 1 cm.
Figures 1–2 in Megachile (Megachile) montivaga (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) nesting in live thistle (Asteraceae: Cirsium)
Figures 1–2. Photographs of nesting by Megachile (Megachile) montivaga Cresson in thistle (photographs by Z.M. Portman). 1. Nest entrance, with apparent associated small shavings from nest construction. 2. Nest contents of field dissected thistle stem.
Fig. 2. a in Free-living Heterotrophic Flagellates from Intertidal Sediments of Saros Bay, Aegean Sea (Turkey)
Fig. 2. a – Actinomonas mirabilis/Pteridomonas danica; b – Amastigomonas mutabilis; c – Ancyromonas micra; d – Bicosoeca conica; e – Caecitellus parvulus, note the mouth on the left-hand side; f – Bordnamonas tropicana; g – Cafeteria roenbergensis; h – Cyranomonas australis; i – Developayella elegans; j – Discocelis saleuta; k – Goniomonas amphinema; l – Cafeteria minuta, feeding cell; m – Anisonema acinus, dorsal view, note the ingestion organelle; n – Dinema platysomum, ventral view showing surface striations; o – Goniomonas pacifica; p – Heteronema exaratum, ventral view, general appearance of cell; q – Kathablepharis remigera; r – Massisteria marina; s – Neobodo saliens; t – Neobodo designis; u–v – Heteronema ovale, same cell; u – general appearance; v – extended cell. All micrographs are DIC images. Scale bar: 5 μm for all figures.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.