Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,636
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,636 results for “marine species”
Figure 11 in New genera and species of sphaeromatid isopod crustaceans from Australian marine coastal waters
Figure 11. Cassidias australiensis sp. nov. A–E, pleopods 1–5; F, coupling hooks, pleopod 1.
Figure 30 in New genera and species of sphaeromatid isopod crustaceans from Australian marine coastal waters
Figure 30. Margueritta sandyi sp. nov. Female paratype. A, pleopod 1; B, pleopod 2; C, pleopod 3.
Figure 41 in New genera and species of sphaeromatid isopod crustaceans from Australian marine coastal waters
Figure 41. Pedinura mokari sp. nov. Male paratype NMV J39721. A–C, pereopods 1, 2 and 7.
Figure 3 in New genera and species of sphaeromatid isopod crustaceans from Australian marine coastal waters
Figure 3. Austrasphaera berentsae sp. nov. A–D, pereopods 2, 3, 6 and 7; E–I, pleopods 1–5.
Fig. 2 in Marine bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha) from Vietnam, with description of a new species of Hermatobates (Hermatobatidae)
Fig. 2. Habitus of Hermatobates sanho sp. nov., male.
Figure 1 in New records of Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) from three marine fish species from the coast of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Figure 1. Map of the area of new geographical records.
Figure 1 in Distribution and diversity of intertidal marine faunal species along with Maharashtra and Goa coast, India
Figure 1. Map showing sampling locations along the Maharashtra and Goa.
FIGURE 1. Penthetria species undetermined, photograph under isopropanol. Scale bar equals 2 in The first fossil insect from the deep-water marine Early Miocene of Zillerleite, Germany (Diptera: Bibionidae)
FIGURE 1. Penthetria species undetermined, photograph under isopropanol. Scale bar equals 2 mm.
World Register of Marine Species
The aim of a World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) is to provide an authoritative and comprehensive list of names of marine organisms, including information on synonymy. WoRMS data published to EOL include taxon names and classification, images and Notes, and attribute data including Environment and Distribution.<p></p>For permission to access this resource, please visit <p></p>http://www.marinespecies.org/usersrequest.php <p></p>Please contact the WoRMS Maintainer with any questions
Arctic Biodiversity: Arctic Register of Marine Species
Biogeography and other attributes for Arctic organisms, various sources.<p></p>Sirenko, B.I.; Clarke, C.; Hopcroft, R.R.; Huettmann, F.; Bluhm, B.A.; Gradinger, R. (eds) (2016). The Arctic Register of Marine Species (ARMS) compiled by the Arctic Ocean Diversity (ArcOD). Accessed at <p></p>http://www.marinespecies.org/arms on 2016-06-03
Arctic Biodiversity: Arctic Register of Marine Species
Biogeography and other attributes for Arctic organisms, various sources.<p></p>Sirenko, B.I.; Clarke, C.; Hopcroft, R.R.; Huettmann, F.; Bluhm, B.A.; Gradinger, R. (eds) (2016). The Arctic Register of Marine Species (ARMS) compiled by the Arctic Ocean Diversity (ArcOD). Accessed at <p></p>http://www.marinespecies.org/arms on 2016-06-03
Table 3 in New species and new records of camallanid nematodes (Nematoda, Camallanidae) from marine fishes and sea snakes in New Caledonia
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Comparison of measurements of <i>Camallanus carangis</i> four-stage larvae from fish and reptilian hosts in New Caledonia.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Host <i>Parupeneus</i></th><th><i>Chirocentrus</i></th><th><i>Laticauda</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td><i>indicus</i></td><td><i>dorab</i></td><td><i>saintgironsi *</i></td></tr><tr><th>No. of specimens</th><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th>Body length (in mm)</th><td>3.13</td><td>4.12</td><td>1.31</td></tr><tr><th>Body width</th><td>136</td><td>109</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – length</th><td>84</td><td>105</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – width</th><td>69</td><td>69</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><th>No. of ridges</th><td>17</td><td>?</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – length</th><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – width</th><td>51</td><td>51</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><th>Length of prongs</th><td>78</td><td>123</td><td>117</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – length</th><td>18</td><td>24</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – width</th><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – length</th><td>435</td><td>571</td><td>517</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – width</th><td>63</td><td>60</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – length</th><td>394</td><td>490</td><td>435</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – width</th><td>72</td><td>60</td><td>45</td></tr><tr><th>Musc./gland. oesoph.</th><td>1:091</td><td>1:0.86</td><td>1:0.84</td></tr><tr><th>length ratio</th><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>% of buc. c. and</th><td>2</td><td>28</td><td>81</td></tr><tr><th>oesoph. of body</th><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Tail</th><td>72</td><td>147</td><td>54</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>*</sup> Sea-snake (Reptilia).</p>
Table 2 in New species and new records of camallanid nematodes (Nematoda, Camallanidae) from marine fishes and sea snakes in New Caledonia
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Comparison of measurements of <i>Camallanus carangis</i> females from marine fishes in New Caledonia.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Host</th><th><i>Atule</i></th><th><i>Carangoides</i></th><th><i>Selar</i></th><th><i>Parupeneus</i></th><th><i>Pristipomoides</i></th><th><i>Epinephelus</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td><i>mate</i></td><td><i>dinema</i></td><td><i>crumenophthalmus</i></td><td><i>cyclostomus</i></td><td><i>filamentosus</i></td><td><i>retouti</i></td></tr><tr><th>No. of specimens 1 (grav.)</th><td>2 (subgr.)</td><td>3 (gr., subgr.)</td><td>2 (subgr.)</td><td>1 (subgr.)</td><td>1 (subgr.)</td></tr><tr><th>Body length (in mm)</th><td>14.93</td><td>4.75 –7.00</td><td>14.63–17.00</td><td>10.23–11.13</td><td>14.89</td><td>10.95</td></tr><tr><th>Body width</th><td>340</td><td>163–245</td><td>381–517</td><td>340–408</td><td>313</td><td>354</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – length</th><td>195</td><td>159–180</td><td>186–225</td><td>159</td><td>150</td><td>183</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – width</th><td>198</td><td>144–180</td><td>204–233</td><td>144</td><td>159</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><th>No. of ridges</th><td>32</td><td>37–40</td><td>35–50</td><td>?</td><td>32</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – length</th><td>30</td><td>27</td><td>24–36</td><td>21–24</td><td>24</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – width</th><td>111</td><td>96</td><td>108–117</td><td>96–99</td><td>90</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><th>Length of tridents</th><td>141</td><td>135</td><td>195–240</td><td>105–195</td><td>141</td><td>153</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – length</th><td>27</td><td>24–30</td><td>30–39</td><td>33</td><td>15</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – width</th><td>36</td><td>30–36</td><td>39–45</td><td>36</td><td>33</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – length</th><td>1550</td><td>721–1047</td><td>1333–1850</td><td>816–979</td><td>911</td><td>1469</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – width</th><td>136</td><td>90</td><td>123–177</td><td>122–136</td><td>163</td><td>122</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – length</th><td>1333</td><td>653–911</td><td>1156–1659</td><td>775–925</td><td>993</td><td>1156</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – width</th><td>136</td><td>96–99</td><td>114–190</td><td>122–163</td><td>163</td><td>136</td></tr><tr><th>Musc./gland. oesoph.</th><td>1:0.86</td><td>1:0.87–0.91</td><td>1:0.87–0.98</td><td>1:0.94–0.95</td><td>1:1.09</td><td>1:0.79</td></tr><tr><th>length ratio</th></tr><tr><th>% of buc. c. and oesoph.</th><td>21</td><td>22–40</td><td>18–25</td><td>17–19</td><td>14</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><th>of body</th></tr><tr><th>Excretory pore</th><td>1401</td><td>707–911</td><td>1591</td><td>?</td><td>?</td><td>1224</td></tr><tr><th>Vulva from ant. end (in</th><td>7.51</td><td>2.56–3.93</td><td>7.13–8.80</td><td>4.92</td><td>7.00</td><td>5.74</td></tr><tr><th>mm)</th></tr><tr><th>% of vulva of body</th><td>50</td><td>54–56</td><td>49–55</td><td>48</td><td>47</td><td>52</td></tr><tr><th>Tail</th><td>272</td><td>90–136</td><td>225</td><td>144–147</td><td>177</td><td>190</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in New species and new records of camallanid nematodes (Nematoda, Camallanidae) from marine fishes and sea snakes in New Caledonia
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Comparison of measurements of <i>Camallanus carangis</i> males from marine fishes in New Caledonia.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Host</th><th><i>Atule mate</i></th><th><i>Carangoides fulvoguttatus</i></th><th><i>Cephalopholis sonnerati</i></th><th><i>Epinephelus retouti</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>No. of specimens</th><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th>Body length (in mm)</th><td>12.17–13.67</td><td>6.90</td><td>9.93–11.32</td><td>frag. 5.40</td></tr><tr><th>Body width</th><td>299–354</td><td>218</td><td>258–326</td><td>258</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – length</th><td>165–189</td><td>162</td><td>183–186</td><td>159</td></tr><tr><th>Buccal capsule – width</th><td>159–189</td><td>156</td><td>156–183</td><td>165</td></tr><tr><th>No. of ridges</th><td>33–35</td><td>38</td><td>34–35</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – length</th><td>21–24</td><td>27</td><td>27–33</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><th>Basal ring – width</th><td>90–105</td><td>90</td><td>96–102</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><th>Length of tridents</th><td>150</td><td>150</td><td>171–219</td><td>153</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – length</th><td>21–30</td><td>30</td><td>30–36</td><td>36</td></tr><tr><th>Oesoph. cup – width</th><td>24–33</td><td>39</td><td>36–39</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – length</th><td>1183–1414</td><td>1020</td><td>1333–1170</td><td>1102</td></tr><tr><th>Musc. oesoph. – width</th><td>122–136</td><td>81</td><td>122–136</td><td>84</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – length</th><td>1156–1333</td><td>857</td><td>1034–1238</td><td>1673</td></tr><tr><th>Gland. oesoph. – width</th><td>136</td><td>96</td><td>122–136</td><td>90</td></tr><tr><th>Musc./gland. oesoph. length ratio</th><td>1:0.94–0.98</td><td>1:084</td><td>1:0.88–0.93</td><td>1:0.79</td></tr><tr><th>% of buc. c. and oesoph. of body</th><td>21</td><td>30</td><td>23–24</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Excretory pore</th><td>1047–1387</td><td>?</td><td>1115–1251</td><td>?</td></tr><tr><th>Right spicule</th><td>306–309</td><td>300</td><td>294–312</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Tail</th><td>75–81</td><td>102</td><td>84–117</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Data from: Selection for life-history traits to maximize population growth in an invasive marine species
Species establishing outside their natural range, negatively impacting local ecosystems, are of increasing global concern. They often display life-history features characteristic for r-selected populations with fast growth and high reproduction rates to achieve positive population growth rates (r) in invaded habitats. Here, we demonstrate substantially earlier maturation at a 2 orders of magnitude lower body mass at first reproduction in invasive compared to native populations of the comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi. Empirical results are corroborated by a theoretical model for competing life-history traits that predicts maturation at the smallest possible size to optimize r, while individual lifetime reproductive success (R0), optimized in native populations, is near constant over a large range of intermediate maturation sizes. We suggest that high variability in reproductive tactics in native populations is an underappreciated determinant of invasiveness, acting as substrate upon which selection can act during the invasion process.
Fig. 2 in Diversity and distribution of intertidal marine species in Singapore
Fig. 2. Species richness of intertidal sites in Singapore.
Data from: Are Mediterranean marine threatened species at high risk by climate change?
<p><span>Rapid anthropogenic climate change is driving threatened biodiversity one step closer to extinction. Effects on native biodiversity are determined by an interplay between species' exposure to climate change and their specific ecological and life-history characteristics that render them even more susceptible. Impacts on biodiversity have already been reported; however, a systematic risk evaluation of threatened marine populations is lacking. Here, we employ a trait-based approach to assess the risk of 90 threatened marine Mediterranean species to climate change, combining species' exposure to increased sea temperature and intrinsic vulnerability. One-quarter of the threatened marine biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea is predicted to be under elevated levels of climate risk, with </span><span>various traits </span><span>identified as key vulnerability traits</span><span>. Climate risk, vulnerability and exposure hotspots are distributed along the Western Mediterranean, Alboran, Aegean, and Adriatic Seas. At each Mediterranean marine ecoregion, 21% to 31% of their threatened species have high climate risk. All Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas host threatened species with high risk to climate change, with 90% having a minimum of 4 up to 19 species of high climate risk, making the objective of a climate-smart conservation strategy a crucial task for immediate planning and action. Our findings aspire to offer new insights for systematic, spatially strategic planning and prioritization of vulnerable marine life in the face of accelerating climate change.</span></p>
Data for study on the permeability of biogeographic barriers to marine species on the east and west coasts of North America
<p><strong>Aim</strong>: We assess the role of contemporary oceanography and species traits in shaping observed patterns of biogeography over broad spatial scales.</p> <p><strong>Location</strong>: Our study domain covers the east and west coasts of North America, from 30° to 73° on the east coast and 33° to 73° on the west coast.</p> <p><strong>Time Period</strong>: Hydrodynamic models use climatological fields from 1990 to 2015 on the east coast, and 1993 to 2018 on the west coast.</p> <p><strong>Major Taxa Studied:</strong> Model simulations represent larval dispersal for generalized benthic invertebrate species distributed in the subtidal zone from 10 m to 100 m depth, with planktonic larval durations ranging from 21–60 days.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: We conducted a literature review to identify major biogeographic barriers along the east and west coasts of North America, and then assessed the permeability of these barriers to larval dispersal using Lagrangian Particle Tracking. We ran a series of simulations in which we varied the suitable habitat distribution, planktonic larval duration, and spawning seasonality of simulated larvae (i.e. particles) to assess the role of species traits on biogeography.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: Our results showed a strong alignment of observed biogeographic barriers with larval dispersal patterns, with high variation in barrier permeability depending on the traits of the species considered. The location of suitable habitat and the season during which particle release occurred were the biological traits that drove much of the variation in barrier permeability among simulations on both coasts.</p> <p><strong>Main Conclusions</strong>: Our results indicate an important role of contemporary oceanographic and geographic features in determining the biogeography of species whose primary dispersal is during larval stages, suggesting that climate change is likely to alter patterns of species biogeography. Our results also demonstrate that species traits play a strong role in determining the location and strength of biogeographic barriers.</p>
Fig. 3 in A new genus and species of marine fish leech (Annelida: Hirudinea: Piscicolidae) from South Africa
Fig. 3. Male gonopores, transverse section in clitellum region. Abbreviation: Mp – male gonopore.
Supplementary Files: "Improved baited remote underwater video (BRUV) for 24h re-al-time monitoring of surface and deep-sea marine species"
<p>In the supplementary material you will find: Figure S1: Photographs of the different parts of the innovative BRUV design; Video S1: Video footage of a bluntnose sixgill shark; Video S2: Types of markings in blue sharks bodies to identify individuals; Video S3: Other marine pelagic species.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.