Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 13 in Revision of the genus Byrsopolis Burmeister, 1844 (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Rutelinae: Rutelini), with the description of six new species endemic to Brazil and Paraguay

Figure 13. Byrsopolis vazdemelloi sp. nov. Dorsal (a) and lateral habitus (b); caudal view of aedeagus (c); dorsal view of left mandible (d); ventral view of left maxilla (e); ventral view of mentum (f); and dorsal view of labrum (g). Scale bars: a, b = 5 mm; c–g = 1 mm.

Figure 9 in Revision of the genus Byrsopolis Burmeister, 1844 (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Rutelinae: Rutelini), with the description of six new species endemic to Brazil and Paraguay

Figure 9. Byrsopolis cribricollis Ohaus. Lectotype, São Paulo, Jacareí. Dorsal habitus (a), lateral habitus (b); dorsal view of right mandible (c); ventral view of right maxilla (d); dorsal view of mentum (e); labels attached (f). Scale bars: a, b = 5 mm; c–e = 1 mm.

Figure 8 in Revision of the genus Byrsopolis Burmeister, 1844 (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Rutelinae: Rutelini), with the description of six new species endemic to Brazil and Paraguay

Figure 8. Byrsopolis laticollis Burmeister, Minas Gerais, Ponto dos Volantes. Dorsal habitus (a); caudal view of aedeagus (b); dorsal view of left mandible (c); ventral view of left maxilla (d); ventral view of mentum (e); dorsal view of labrum (f). Scale bars: a = 5 mm; b–f = 1 mm.

Figure 14 in Revision of the genus Byrsopolis Burmeister, 1844 (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Rutelinae: Rutelini), with the description of six new species endemic to Brazil and Paraguay

Figure 14. Byrsopolis ohausi sp. nov. Dorsal habitus (a); caudal view of aedeagus (b); dorsal view of left mandible (c); ventral view of left maxilla (d); ventral view of mentum (e); and dorsal view of labrum (f). Scale bars: a = 5 mm; b–f = 1 mm.

Figure 2 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 2. Post-pachytene cells of Gint species after Giemsa staining (A, C, E, G, I, K, M, O) and FISH with 18S rDNA (red signals) (B, D, F, H, J, L, N, P). A, B, G. banfasae cytotype I (2 n = 18 – 7II + IV). C, D, G. banfasae cytotype II (2n= 18 – 6II + VI). E, F, G. banfasae cytotype III (2n = 19 – 5II + III + VI). G, H, G. dabakalo cytotype I (2n = 23 – 9II + V). I, J, G. dabakalo cytotype II (2n = 24 – 8II + III + V). K, L, G. dabakalo cytotype III (2n = 27 – 8II + 2III + V). M, N, G. gaitako (2n = 30 – 13II + IV). O, P, G. maidensis (2n = 34). Abbreviations: II, bivalent; III, trivalent; IV, quadrivalent; V, pentavalent; VI, hexavalent. Arrowheads indicate the position of 18S rDNA. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 7 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 7. Types of meiotic multivalent associations in Gint spp. with schemes of hypothesized intra- or interchromosomal rearrangements leading to observed multivalent formation.A,G. dabakalo – a trivalent arising from fission of the chromosome. B, G. dabakalo – a pentavalent originating from three independent fusion events. C, G. gaitako – a quadrivalent resulting from reciprocal translocation. D, G. banfasae – a quadrivalent as a result of reciprocal translocation. E, G. banfasae – a hexavalent arising through two independent events: (1) a fission of chromosome 1 involved in quadrivalent; (2) subsequent fusion of an emerging chromosome fragment with another chromosome. F, G. amoudensis – a quadrivalent arising from the reciprocal translocation. G, G. amoudensis – a hexavalent originated from the reciprocal translocation of the chromosome involved in the quadrivalent and another chromosome.

Figure 6 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 6. Ancestral state reconstruction analyses based on the Bayesian tree from this study, depicting: A, number of chromosomes; B, position of 18S rDNA. Results of maximum parsimony analysis reconstructing ancestral states for both cytogenetic characters are visualized by colours of the circles. Arrowheads indicate hypothetical inversion on 18S rDNAbearing chromosomes.

Figure 4 in Phylogeny, species delimitation and biogeography of the endemic Palaearctic tribe Tomarini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Figure 4. Historical biogeography of Tomares. The most supported ancestral area reconstruction model (DIVALIKE+j) was estimated within the R package BIOGEOBEARS. Pie charts on each node depict the relative probabilities of ancestral ranges. A, North Africa. B, western Mediterranean. C, south-west Asia. D, Pontic-Caspian region. E, Central Asia; *, other regions. Classification follows Weidenhoffer & Bozano (2007) and Nazari & Ten Hagen (2020).

Figure 3. A in Phylogeny, species delimitation and biogeography of the endemic Palaearctic tribe Tomarini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Figure 3. A, result of the statistical parsimony network analysis illustrating relationships of the 25 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I haplotypes of the Tomares nogelii species group. Colours of circles correspond to origins of samples. B, result of the statistical parsimony network analysis illustrating relationships of the 25 cytochrome c oxidase subunit I haplotypes of the T. nogelii species group. Colours of circles correspond to species previously considered within the group (Weidenhoffer & Bozano, 2007).

Figure 2 in Phylogeny, species delimitation and biogeography of the endemic Palaearctic tribe Tomarini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Figure 2. Molecular phylogenetic tree and putative species boundaries, with selected male specimens of Tomares. The Bayesian inference phylogenetic hypothesis was obtained from the combined datasets of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), 28S rRNA (28S), histone 3 (H3) and elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1α). Numbers above branches indicate the posterior probabilities; numbers below branches indicate bootstrap values obtained from the maximum likelihood analysis. Methods of species delimitation are as follows: GMYC, generalized mixed Yule coalescent method; ABGD, authomatic barcode gap discovery and its models, JC69 (Jukes–Cantor), K80 (Kimura) and SD (uncorrected p-distance). Branch names of the tree follow Weidenhoffer & Bozano (2007) and Nazari & Ten Hagen (2020). An updated classification based on the results of our study is given near the tree. Specimens: 1,T. romanovi cachetinus, Azerbaijan, Alty-Agatch; 2,T. romanovi romanovi, Armenia, Noravank; 3, T. nogelii dobrogensis (phenotype monotona), Ukraine, Dnepropetrovsk (photograph by Vadim Tshikolovets); 4, T. nogelii nogelii, Lebanon, Ain Zhatta; 5, T. nogelii nogelii (phenotype nesimachus), Syria, north Damascus, voucher BPAL2357-14; 6, T. callimachus callimachus, Crimea, Ordzhonikidze, voucher TOM044; 7, T. callimachus dentata, Turkey, Van Province, Erek Mountain; 8, T. desinens desinens, Azerbaijan, Talysh, Zuvand (paratype); 9, T. fedtschenkoi fedtschenkoi, Tajikistan, Dushanbe, voucher TOM031; 10, T. ballus ballus, Morocco, Igherm; 11, T. mauritanicus mauritanicus, Morocco, Asni.

Figure 1 in Phylogeny, species delimitation and biogeography of the endemic Palaearctic tribe Tomarini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Figure 1. Map showing the origins of the Tomares samples used for phylogenetic analyses in this study.

Figure 5 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 5. Bayesian tree of the Gint species based on the concatenated data set (16S and COI), complemented with summarized cytogenetic data of the species studied. Numbers above branches correspond to values for highly supported nodes as follows: Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP)> 0.95/maximum likelihood bootstrap> 70%. Specimen IDs depicted in bold indicate individuals based on chromosome counts determined for the corresponding Gint species in previous studies (see: Kovařík et al., 2013; Kovařík & Mazuch, 2015; Kovařík et al., 2018). Abbreviations: cyt, cytotype; 2n, diploid number of chromosomes; II, bivalent; III, trivalent; IV, quadrivalent; V, pentavalent; VI, hexavalent.

Figure 3 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 3. Post-pachytene cells of Gint amoudensis and G. gubanensis after Giemsa staining (A, C, E, G, I) and FISH with 18S rDNA (red signals) (B, D, F, H, J). A, B, G. amoudensis cytotype I (2n = 36 – 16II + IV). C, D, G. amoudensis cytotype II (2n = 35 – 14II + III + IV). E, F, G. amoudensis cytotype III (2n = 36 – 15II + VI). G, H, G. amoudensis cytotype IV (2n = 35 – 13II + III + VI). I, J, G. gubanensis (2n = 45 – 21II + III). Abbreviations: II, bivalent; III, trivalent; IV, quadrivalent; VI, hexavalent. Arrowheads indicate the position of 18S rDNA. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 4 in Tracking the trends of karyotype differentiation in the phylogenetic context of Gint, a scorpion genus endemic to the Horn of Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 4. Post-pachytene cells of Gint species after FISH with (TTAGG)n telomeric probe (red signal). A, G. banfasae cytotype III (2n = 19 – 5II + III + VI). B, G. dabakalo cytotype II (2n = 24 – 8II + III + V). C, G. gaitako (2n = 30 – 13II + IV). D, G. maidensis (2n = 34 – 17II). E, G. amoudensis cytotype IV (2n = 35 – 13II + III + VI). F, G. gubanensis (2n = 45 – 21II + III). Abbreviations: II, bivalent; III, trivalent; IV, quadrivalent; V, pentavalent; VI, hexavalent. Scale bar = 10 µm.

FIGURE 31 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURE 31. The ML tree showing unique base changes per phylogroups of Bolua, obtained by maximum parsimony analysis (the base position indicates by the position number in the concatenated matrix)

FIGURES 28–30 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURES 28–30. Song in Bolua (28—B. balikesirensis from Balıkesir; 29—and 30—B. bursaensis from Bursa and Kütahya, respectively; A, B and C show song at three different time scale)

FIGURES 18–26. 18–20 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURES 18–26. 18–20. Female head+pronotum+tegmina in Bolua (18—B. turkiyae, 19—B. balıkesirensis, 20—B. bursaensis; D—dorsal view, L—lateral view). 21–23. Female subgenital plate in Bolua (21—B. turkiyae, 22—B. balıkesirensis, 23—B. bursaensis; V—ventral view, L-lateral view). 24–26. Ovipositor in Bolua (24—B. turkiyae, 25—B. balıkesirensis, 26— B. bursaensis)

FIGURE 2 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree, chronogram and taxonomic pattern obtained from the matrix constituted by concatenation of COI+NAD2+VAL+ITS sequences. The bootstrap (ML)/ posterior probability (BI) supports to the node are given above the node and the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) and the 95% HPD as million years below the node. The results from the species delimitation test are indicated by a bar line.

FIGURE 27 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURE 27. The PCA plots and trait contribution prepared from the metric data sets of male and female individuals belonging to Bolua

FIGURE 1 in Anatolian endemic genus Bolua (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Tettigoniinae): genetic and phenotypic data indicate inconsistent diversity and evolutionary patterns

FIGURE 1. Distribution of Bolua [for detail of the localities see material examined per species; Bolu(1), Kastamonu (2,3,4, 6), Karabük (5), Çankırı (7), Balıkesir (8), Bursa (9, 10), Kütahya (11) and Kocaeli (12, 13)]